Visual test lazy loading in puppeteer

•

bulkarticlewriting

Updated on

To effectively visually test lazy loading in Puppeteer, here are the detailed steps:

👉 Skip the hassle and get the ready to use 100% working script (Link in the comments section of the YouTube Video) (Latest test 31/05/2025)

Check more on: How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile & Cloudflare WAF – Reddit, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – Medium, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – LinkedIn Article

0.0
0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)
Excellent0%
Very good0%
Average0%
Poor0%
Terrible0%

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.

​
Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Visual test lazy
Latest Discussions & Reviews:
  1. Set Up Your Environment: Ensure Node.js is installed. Initialize a new project with npm init -y and install Puppeteer: npm install puppeteer.
  2. Identify Lazy-Loaded Elements: Before testing, pinpoint the specific images, videos, or components on your webpage that are loaded lazily. This often involves inspecting the HTML for attributes like data-src, srcSet, or loading="lazy".
  3. Simulate Initial Page Load Above the Fold:
    • Launch Puppeteer and navigate to your target URL.
    • Take an initial screenshot before scrolling to capture the “above the fold” content. This serves as your baseline for content that should not be lazy-loaded, or lazy-loaded elements that haven’t appeared yet.
    • Code Snippet: 
      const puppeteer = require'puppeteer'.

async function captureAboveFold {


   const browser = await puppeteer.launch.
    const page = await browser.newPage.


   await page.goto'YOUR_URL_HERE', { waitUntil: 'networkidle2' }.


   await page.screenshot{ path: 'above_fold.png' }.
    await browser.close.
}
captureAboveFold.
  4. Scroll and Trigger Lazy Loading:
    • Programmatically scroll down the page to reveal the lazy-loaded content. You can scroll by a fixed pixel amount, or scroll into view specific selectors.
    • Recommendation: Use page.evaluate => window.scrollBy0, document.body.scrollHeight. for a full scroll, or target specific elements with elementHandle.scrollIntoView.
    • Important: Introduce a wait period page.waitForTimeoutmilliseconds after scrolling to allow lazy-loaded assets to fetch and render. The duration depends on your network speed and asset sizes.
  5. Take Post-Scroll Screenshots:

    • After scrolling and waiting, take another screenshot of the entire page or specific sections where lazy-loaded content is expected to appear.

    • Compare this screenshot with the initial one. You should see the previously missing content rendered.

    • Code Snippet continued:

      // … inside your async function after above_fold.png

      Await page.evaluate => window.scrollBy0, document.body.scrollHeight.

      Await page.waitForTimeout3000. // Wait for 3 seconds for assets to load

      Await page.screenshot{ path: ‘after_lazy_load.png’, fullPage: true }.
      // … browser.close

  6. Implement Visual Regression Testing:
    • Integrate a visual regression testing library like jest-image-snapshot or pixelmatch.
    • jest-image-snapshot simplifies the process within a Jest testing framework. You’ll take a screenshot, and the library compares it against a “golden” reference image. If there’s a difference beyond a set threshold, the test fails.
    • Workflow:
      • First Run: Generate reference images.
      • Subsequent Runs: Compare current screenshots to reference images.
    • Key Idea: Any visual discrepancies between your current test run and the established “correct” visual state the golden image will be flagged. This is crucial for catching regressions introduced by code changes.
    • Consider Tools: Beyond basic screenshot comparison, tools like Loki or Storybook with image snapshotting add more robust features for component-level visual testing. While this example focuses on Puppeteer, integrating it with such tools can provide a comprehensive visual testing suite.
  7. Analyze and Refine:
    • Manually inspect the difference images generated by your visual regression tool.
    • Determine if a difference is a legitimate bug e.g., lazy-loaded image failed to appear or an intentional design change requiring reference image updates.
    • Adjust wait times, scroll behavior, or screenshot areas as needed to make your tests reliable and efficient. For instance, if you notice your tests are flaky, it might be due to insufficient wait times for network requests to complete, especially on slower connections.

Table of Contents

The Strategic Importance of Visual Testing for Lazy Loading

Visual regression testing for lazy loading is not just a “nice-to-have” but a critical component of robust web development, especially as web pages become more dynamic and reliant on asynchronous content loading.

It ensures that the user experience remains consistent and that performance optimizations like lazy loading don’t inadvertently introduce visual defects.

The objective is to catch discrepancies that functional tests might miss, such as misaligned images, blank spaces where content should be, or unexpected layout shifts, all of which directly impact user perception and engagement.

According to a study by Google, pages that load within 3 seconds see a 32% increase in conversion rates, highlighting the direct link between perceived performance which lazy loading aims to improve and business outcomes.

Understanding Lazy Loading’s Impact on User Experience

Lazy loading defers the loading of non-critical resources at page load time. How to debug in appium

Instead, these resources are loaded only when they are needed, typically when the user scrolls them into the viewport.

This technique significantly improves initial page load times, reduces data consumption, and conserves system resources by avoiding unnecessary downloads.

  • Faster Initial Load: By loading only what’s “above the fold” immediately, users perceive a faster page load, leading to reduced bounce rates. For instance, a typical e-commerce product page might have dozens of images, but only the first few are visible without scrolling. Lazy loading ensures only those are downloaded initially.
  • Reduced Server Load: Fewer simultaneous requests at page load time mean less strain on the server, especially during peak traffic. This can lead to significant cost savings for hosting providers.
  • Lower Data Consumption: Mobile users with limited data plans benefit greatly, as unnecessary images and videos are not downloaded until they are actively viewed. A study by Statista in 2023 showed that mobile devices account for over 50% of global website traffic, underscoring the importance of mobile optimization.
  • Improved Core Web Vitals: Lazy loading directly contributes to better scores for Largest Contentful Paint LCP and Cumulative Layout Shift CLS, two crucial metrics in Google’s Core Web Vitals, which influence search engine rankings.

Why Visual Testing is Indispensable for Lazy-Loaded Content

While functional tests might confirm that an image eventually loads, they often fail to capture how it loads or if its placement is correct. Visual testing bridges this gap by comparing screenshots pixel by pixel.

  • Catching “Blank Spots”: A common lazy-loading bug is an element failing to load entirely, leaving a blank space. Visual tests immediately highlight these.
  • Detecting Layout Shifts CLS issues: If an image loads and then causes the surrounding content to jump a common Cumulative Layout Shift problem, visual tests will expose this as a difference in layout, which is particularly detrimental to user experience. Google’s own data indicates that for every 100ms improvement in CLS, there’s a measurable positive impact on user engagement.
  • Ensuring Consistent Appearance: Small styling changes or unintended interactions with CSS can break the appearance of lazy-loaded elements. Visual tests provide an objective “photographic memory” of your UI.
  • Regression Prevention: As codebases evolve, it’s easy for new features or bug fixes to inadvertently break existing functionality. Visual tests act as a safety net, automatically flagging any unintended visual regressions.

Setting Up Your Puppeteer Environment for Visual Testing

A well-configured Puppeteer environment is the bedrock for effective visual testing.

This involves not only installing the necessary libraries but also establishing a structured project setup that can scale as your test suite grows. Xpath in appium

Installing Puppeteer and Dependencies

The first step is to get Puppeteer and a visual comparison library integrated into your project.

  • Node.js: Ensure you have Node.js installed LTS version recommended. You can download it from nodejs.org.

  • Project Initialization: 

    mkdir visual-test-lazy-load
cd visual-test-lazy-load
npm init -y

  • Install Puppeteer:
    npm install puppeteer

    This command installs Puppeteer and downloads a Chromium browser instance that Puppeteer can control. Difference between functional testing and unit testing

  • Install Visual Regression Library: For robust visual testing, integrate a library like jest-image-snapshot. While pixelmatch is also an option, jest-image-snapshot provides a more integrated testing framework experience.

    Npm install –save-dev jest jest-image-snapshot

    jest is a popular testing framework, and jest-image-snapshot extends it with image comparison capabilities.

Project Structure and Configuration

A clear project structure makes tests easier to manage and maintain.

  • Test File Location: Create a tests directory.
    visual-test-lazy-load/
    ├── tests/
    │ └── lazyload.test.js
    ├── screenshots/
    │ ├── reference/
    │ └── diff/
    └── package.json
  • Jest Configuration package.json: Add a script to run your tests and configure Jest to use jest-image-snapshot. 
    {
  "name": "visual-test-lazy-load",
  "version": "1.0.0",


 "description": "Visual testing for lazy loading with Puppeteer",
  "main": "index.js",
  "scripts": {
    "test": "jest",
    "test:update": "jest --updateSnapshot"
  },
  "keywords": ,
  "author": "",
  "license": "ISC",
  "dependencies": {


   "puppeteer": "^22.0.0" // Check for latest version
  "devDependencies": {


   "jest": "^29.0.0", // Check for latest version


   "jest-image-snapshot": "^6.0.0" // Check for latest version
  "jest": {
    "setupFilesAfterEnv": 
  }
}
  • Jest Setup File jest.setup.js: This file configures jest-image-snapshot to output differences in a specific directory. 
    

const { toMatchImageSnapshot } = require'jest-image-snapshot'.

expect.extend{ toMatchImageSnapshot }.



// Optional: Configure jest-image-snapshot output directories


// This makes sure diffs and reference images are saved in predictable places.
const path = require'path'.


const customSnapshotsDir = path.joinprocess.cwd, 'screenshots', 'reference'.


const customDiffDir = path.joinprocess.cwd, 'screenshots', 'diff'.



// Override the default snapshot path for Jest Image Snapshot


// This ensures your reference images are stored in a dedicated folder.
const customConfig = {
  customSnapshotsDir,
  customDiffDir,


 failureThreshold: 0.01, // 1% pixel difference allowed
  failureThresholdType: 'percent',


 // If true, the diff image is saved even if the test passes. Useful for debugging.
  // debug: true,


 // If true, the diff image is saved even if the test passes.
  // saveFailedSnapshot: true,
}.



// Apply the custom configuration to the toMatchImageSnapshot matcher


// This global setup ensures all image snapshot tests use these paths.


global.toMatchImageSnapshot = received, config => {


 return toMatchImageSnapshot.bind{ customSnapshotIdentifier: received.description }received.image, { ...customConfig, ...config }.

This setup ensures that:
*   Reference images are stored in `screenshots/reference`.
*   Difference images when a test fails are stored in `screenshots/diff`.
*   A `failureThreshold` of `0.01` 1% means if more than 1% of pixels differ between the current and reference image, the test will fail. This threshold might need adjustment based on your specific UI and tolerance for minor visual variations.

Crafting Puppeteer Scripts for Lazy Load Simulation

The core of visual testing lazy loading lies in scripting Puppeteer to mimic user behavior: navigating to a page, scrolling to trigger lazy assets, and capturing the visual state. Visual regression testing with protractor

Navigating and Waiting Strategically

Proper navigation and waiting are crucial to ensure all necessary resources have loaded before capturing a screenshot. Flaky tests often stem from insufficient waiting.

  • page.gotourl, options:
    • waitUntil: 'networkidle2': This is a good starting point. It waits until there are no more than 2 network connections for at least 500ms. It’s often effective for initial page loads.
    • waitUntil: 'domcontentloaded': Fires when the initial HTML document has been completely loaded and parsed, without waiting for stylesheets, images, and subframes to finish loading. Useful if you want to screenshot before external resources load.
    • waitUntil: 'load': Waits for the load event to fire, indicating that all resources on the page have been downloaded. Can be slow.
    • Recommendation: For lazy loading, networkidle2 or a combination of load followed by explicit waits is generally best to ensure the initial “above the fold” content is fully ready.
  • page.waitForSelectorselector: Waits for a specific DOM element to appear. Useful if a key element is loaded dynamically after initial page load.
  • page.waitForFunctionpageFunction, ...args: Executes a function in the browser context and waits for it to return a truthy value. Incredibly powerful for custom wait conditions.

    • Example for lazy loading: Waiting for a specific number of images to have loaded or for an IntersectionObserver callback to fire.
      await page.waitForFunction => { 

      const images = Array.fromdocument.querySelectorAll'img'.


return images.everyimg => img.naturalWidth > 0 && img.naturalHeight > 0.

      }, { timeout: 10000 }. // Wait up to 10 seconds

  • page.waitForTimeoutmilliseconds: A blunt instrument, but sometimes necessary as a fallback or for simple scenarios where explicit conditions are hard to define. Use sparingly and with awareness of potential flakiness. A common practice is to use this after a scroll to allow time for assets to fetch and render.

Implementing Programmatic Scrolling to Trigger Lazy Loading

To simulate user scrolling and trigger lazy loading, you can use page.evaluate.

  • Scrolling by a Fixed Amount: Website ui ux checklist

    Await page.evaluate => window.scrollBy0, 500. // Scroll down 500 pixels

  • Scrolling to the Bottom of the Page: This is often the most effective way to ensure all lazy-loaded content is triggered.

    Await page.evaluate => window.scrollTo0, document.body.scrollHeight.

    • Consideration: For very long pages with infinite scrolling, you might need to scroll incrementally and check for newly loaded content in a loop.

  • Scrolling a Specific Element into View: If you know the selector of an element that is lazy-loaded, you can scroll it into view directly.

    Const element = await page.$’.lazy-loaded-section’.
    if element {
    await element.scrollIntoView. Migrate to cypress 10

    • Note: scrollIntoView might not always trigger IntersectionObserver events if the element is already partially in the viewport, depending on the implementation. You might need to scroll it out of view first, then into view.

Capturing Screenshots with Puppeteer

Puppeteer offers flexible options for taking screenshots.

  • page.screenshotoptions:

    • path: The file path to save the screenshot.
    • fullPage: true: Essential for capturing the entire page, including content below the fold. This is critical for lazy-loading tests to ensure all elements are rendered.
    • omitBackground: true: Transparent background, useful for component-level screenshots.
    • type: 'png' default or 'jpeg'. PNG is lossless and preferred for visual regression.
    • encoding: 'binary' default or 'base64'. Binary is suitable for direct saving.

  • Example Screenshot Flow:
    // In your test file e.g., lazyload.test.js

    const puppeteer = require’puppeteer’.

    describe’Lazy Loading Visual Test’, => {
    let browser.
    let page. Proof of concept for test automation

    beforeAllasync => {

    browser = await puppeteer.launch. // headless: false for visual debugging
    page = await browser.newPage.

    // Set a larger viewport for better full-page screenshots

    await page.setViewport{ width: 1920, height: 1080 }.

    // Disable caching and set network conditions if simulating slower connections Angular vs angularjs

    await page.emulateNetworkConditions’Fast 3G’. // Simulate slower network
    }.

    afterAllasync => {

    test’should load all lazy-loaded content visually’, async => {

    const url = ‘http://localhost:3000/your-lazy-load-page‘. // Replace with your actual URL

    await page.gotourl, { waitUntil: ‘networkidle2’ }. Data virtualization

    // 1. Capture initial above-the-fold state optional, for comparison

    // const initialScreenshot = await page.screenshot.

    // expectinitialScreenshot.toMatchImageSnapshot{

    // customSnapshotIdentifier: ‘lazy-load-initial-state’
    // }.

    // 2. Scroll to the bottom to trigger all lazy loading Challenges in appium automation

    await page.evaluate => window.scrollTo0, document.body.scrollHeight.

    // 3. Wait for lazy-loaded content to appear
    // This is the critical waiting period. Adjust based on your content.

    // You might need to wait for network requests, specific selectors, or a timeout.

    await page.waitForTimeout3000. // Wait 3 seconds for images/scripts to fetch and render

    // Alternative: Wait for a specific lazy-loaded element to be visible Fault injection in software testing

    // await page.waitForSelector’.last-lazy-image’, { visible: true, timeout: 5000 }.

    // 4. Capture the full page screenshot after lazy loading

    const fullPageScreenshot = await page.screenshot{ fullPage: true }.

    // 5. Compare with reference snapshot

    expectfullPageScreenshot.toMatchImageSnapshot{ Cypress visual test lazy loading

    customSnapshotIdentifier: ‘lazy-load-full-page-state’
    }.

    }, 30000. // Increase Jest timeout for potentially long test runs 30 seconds
    }.
    This example demonstrates a basic flow.

Remember to replace 'http://localhost:3000/your-lazy-load-page' with the actual URL you are testing.

The customSnapshotIdentifier is important because jest-image-snapshot uses the test name by default, but for multiple snapshots within one test, you need unique identifiers.

Implementing Visual Regression Testing with Jest Image Snapshot

Integrating jest-image-snapshot elevates your Puppeteer screenshots from simple captures to powerful visual regression checks. Migrate visual testing project to percy cli

It automates the comparison process, flagging any unintended visual changes.

Setting Up jest-image-snapshot

As covered in the “Setting Up Your Puppeteer Environment” section, the key steps are:

  1. Install: npm install --save-dev jest jest-image-snapshot
  2. Configure Jest: Add jest.setup.js and point setupFilesAfterEnv in package.json to it.
  3. Extend Expect: In jest.setup.js, include expect.extend{ toMatchImageSnapshot }. and configure the customSnapshotsDir and customDiffDir for organized output.

Writing Visual Regression Tests

Once configured, using toMatchImageSnapshot is straightforward.

  • Test Syntax:
    // Inside your test e.g., lazyload.test.js

    Test’should visually confirm all lazy-loaded images are rendered’, async => { Popular sap testing tools 

    // ... Puppeteer setup, navigate, scroll, wait ...



const screenshot = await page.screenshot{ fullPage: true }.
 expectscreenshot.toMatchImageSnapshot{


    // Optional: Provide a unique identifier if taking multiple snapshots in one test


    customSnapshotIdentifier: 'lazy-load-complete-render',


    // Optional: Adjust threshold for this specific test


    failureThreshold: 0.02, // Allow 2% difference for this test
     failureThresholdType: 'percent'

Managing Reference Images Snapshots

This is a crucial part of the visual regression workflow.

  • Generating Initial Snapshots:
    The first time you run your tests:
    npm test

    jest-image-snapshot will see that no reference image exists for a given snapshot identifier and will create one in your screenshots/reference directory. These are your “golden” images.

  • Updating Snapshots Intended Changes:

    When you make intentional UI changes or design updates, your existing snapshots will likely fail. This is expected. Shift left vs shift right

To update your reference images to reflect the new, correct visual state:
npm run test:update # Or jest –updateSnapshot 

This command will re-run the tests and, for any `toMatchImageSnapshot` assertions, it will replace the old reference image with the new one captured during the test run.
*   Caution: Always review changes when running `--updateSnapshot`. Ensure the visual changes are indeed intended and not accidental regressions.

  • Analyzing Test Failures:

    If a test fails i.e., the captured screenshot differs from the reference beyond the threshold, jest-image-snapshot will:

    1. Mark the test as failed.

    2. Output the percentage difference in the console.

    3. Save three images in your screenshots/diff directory:

      • The actual failed screenshot.
      • The expected reference screenshot.
      • A “diff” image, highlighting the pixels that are different often in magenta or red.
    • Reviewing Diff Images: This is the most important step for debugging. Open the diff image to visually inspect where the changes occurred. This quickly tells you if it’s a layout shift, missing image, color change, or something else.
    • Example Diff Image concept: Imagine a screenshot of a page. If a lazy-loaded image failed to appear, the diff image would show a large red rectangle in the area where the image should be, highlighting the missing content.

Best Practices for Reliable Visual Tests

  • Isolate Components/Pages: If possible, test specific components or smaller pages in isolation to make failures easier to diagnose.
  • Consistent Environment: Run tests in a consistent environment e.g., Docker containers to minimize variations due to OS, display drivers, or browser versions. Chrome’s rendering engine might vary slightly across different OS versions.
  • Controlled Data: Use consistent test data. Dynamic content e.g., random user avatars, real-time stock prices can cause flaky visual tests. Mock or control such data.
  • Minimize Flakiness:
    • Sufficient Waits: The most common source of flakiness. Use waitForSelector, waitForNetworkIdle, waitForFunction, or realistic waitForTimeout values.
    • Network Throttling: Puppeteer can emulate slower network conditions page.emulateNetworkConditions'Slow 3G'. This is excellent for ensuring lazy loading behaves correctly under less-than-ideal network speeds.
    • Resource Blocking: Sometimes, external scripts or analytics can interfere. Use page.setRequestInterception to block non-essential requests if they introduce noise.
    • Consistent Viewport: Always set a fixed page.setViewport size. Different viewport sizes will produce different screenshots.
    • Disable Animations/Transitions: CSS animations or JavaScript transitions can cause slight pixel differences. Use page.addStyleTag to override and disable them during tests.
      await page.addStyleTag{
      content: * { transition: none !important. animation: none !important. }

By diligently applying these practices, you can build a robust visual regression testing suite that reliably catches issues related to lazy loading, ensuring a smooth and consistent user experience.

Advanced Strategies for Comprehensive Lazy Load Testing

While basic scrolling and screenshot comparisons are a great start, truly comprehensive lazy loading tests require more nuanced approaches to catch subtle issues and ensure robustness across various conditions.

Simulating Different Network Conditions

Lazy loading behavior is heavily dependent on network speed.

Testing under various network conditions ensures your implementation performs as expected for all users.

  • Puppeteer’s emulateNetworkConditions:

    Puppeteer provides built-in network emulation capabilities.

    Const { KnownNetworkConditions } = require’puppeteer’.

    // Inside your test setup

    Await page.emulateNetworkConditionsKnownNetworkConditions.

    // Other options: ‘Fast 3G’, ‘Offline’, ‘Fast 4G’ etc.
    // Or define custom conditions:
    /*
    await page.emulateNetworkConditions{
    offline: false,
    latency: 200, // ms
    downloadThroughput: 750 * 1024, // 750 kb/s
    uploadThroughput: 250 * 1024, // 250 kb/s
    */

    • Benefit: By slowing down the network, you increase the likelihood of catching race conditions where content might appear briefly, then disappear, or load slowly causing a poor experience. It also helps verify that placeholders are shown correctly during the loading phase.

Testing Lazy Load Placeholders and Loading States

Many lazy-loading implementations use placeholders e.g., low-resolution images, blurred effects, or skeleton loaders before the full content loads. Visual tests should verify these too.

  • Strategy:

    1. Capture initial state: Load the page, but don’t scroll yet. Capture a screenshot of the above-the-fold area to ensure placeholders if any are correctly rendered for elements just below the fold.
    2. Scroll and wait briefly: Scroll the lazy-loaded element into view. Take a screenshot immediately or after a very short wait e.g., 500ms to capture the placeholder state.
    3. Wait for full load: Wait for the actual asset to load using waitForFunction for naturalWidth > 0 on images, or waitForSelector for the final loaded state.
    4. Capture final state: Take a screenshot to confirm the full content has replaced the placeholder.

  • Example Conceptual:

    Test’should show placeholder then final image for lazy-loaded element’, async => { 

    await page.gotourl, { waitUntil: 'networkidle2' }.


await page.setViewport{ width: 800, height: 600 }. // Smaller viewport to bring more elements below fold



const lazyImageSelector = '.lazy-image-example'.


const lazyImage = await page.$lazyImageSelector.



// Scroll just enough to bring the placeholder into view
 await page.evaluateselector => {


    document.querySelectorselector.scrollIntoView{ block: 'start' }.


    window.scrollBy0, -100. // Scroll up a bit so it's just appearing
 }, lazyImageSelector.



await page.waitForTimeout500. // Give time for placeholder to render


const placeholderScreenshot = await page.screenshot.


expectplaceholderScreenshot.toMatchImageSnapshot{ customSnapshotIdentifier: 'lazy-image-placeholder' }.



// Wait for the actual image to load e.g., by checking naturalWidth
 await page.waitForFunctionselector => {


    const img = document.querySelectorselector.
     return img && img.naturalWidth > 0.
 }, { timeout: 10000 }, lazyImageSelector.



const finalImageScreenshot = await page.screenshot.


expectfinalImageScreenshot.toMatchImageSnapshot{ customSnapshotIdentifier: 'lazy-image-final' }.

    This test creates two distinct snapshots for the same lazy-loaded element, verifying the visual transition.

Testing Lazy Loading within Dynamic Components e.g., Carousels, Modals

Lazy loading isn’t just for page scrolls.

It’s often applied to content inside carousels, tabs, or modals that appear conditionally. 

1.  Trigger the container: If the content is in a modal, open the modal. If it's a carousel, click the "next" arrow.
2.  Wait for content to be "visible": Wait for the carousel slide or modal content area to be present in the DOM.
3.  Scroll/trigger lazy load within container: If the container itself has scrollable lazy content, perform targeted scrolls within that specific element.
4.  Capture screenshot of container: Focus the screenshot on the specific dynamic component rather than the entire page.

  • Example Carousel:

    Test’should lazy load images in carousel slides’, async => { 

    const carouselNextButton = '#carousel-next-button'.


const carouselImageSelector = '.carousel-image'.

 // Initial carousel state


const initialCarouselScreenshot = await page.screenshot{ clip: { x: 0, y: 0, width: 800, height: 400 } }.


expectinitialCarouselScreenshot.toMatchImageSnapshot{ customSnapshotIdentifier: 'carousel-slide-1' }.

 // Click next to load the second slide
 await page.clickcarouselNextButton.


await page.waitForSelector`${carouselImageSelector}`, { visible: true }. // Wait for second slide image




}, { timeout: 5000 }, `${carouselImageSelector}`. // Wait for image in second slide



const secondSlideScreenshot = await page.screenshot{ clip: { x: 0, y: 0, width: 800, height: 400 } }.


expectsecondSlideScreenshot.toMatchImageSnapshot{ customSnapshotIdentifier: 'carousel-slide-2' }.

    The clip option in page.screenshot is extremely useful here to focus the screenshot on just the carousel area, reducing noise and making comparisons more precise.

Preventing Flakiness: Robust Waiting and Retries

Flakiness is the bane of automated tests.

For lazy loading, it often boils down to improper waiting.

  • Smart Waiting: Prioritize explicit waits over arbitrary waitForTimeout.

    • page.waitForFunction combined with a condition that checks the naturalWidth for images, video.readyState for videos, or specific class names for components is often the most reliable.
    • page.waitForRequest and page.waitForResponse can be used to wait for specific asset requests to complete.

  • Test Retries Jest-circus: For genuinely intermittent issues, some test runners allow retries. Jest with jest-circus as a runner supports this.
    // In package.json, under “jest”:
    // “testRunner”: “jest-circus/runner”

    // In your test file:
    test’flaky test example’, async => { /* … */ }, 3, { retries: 2 }. // Retry this test 2 times if it fails

    While retries can mask underlying issues, they can be useful for minor network blips in CI/CD environments.

Always investigate the root cause of flakiness first.

By employing these advanced strategies, your visual tests for lazy loading will become far more robust, catching a wider range of issues and providing greater confidence in your application’s visual integrity and performance.

Integrating with CI/CD for Automated Visual Feedback

Automating your visual tests within a Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment CI/CD pipeline is crucial for continuous feedback and preventing visual regressions from reaching production.

It transforms a manual debugging task into an automated gatekeeper.

Why Automate Visual Tests in CI/CD?

  • Early Detection: Catch visual bugs introduced by new code commits before they are merged or deployed.
  • Consistency: Tests run in a consistent, controlled environment, reducing “it works on my machine” scenarios.
  • Regression Prevention: Every code change is visually validated, significantly reducing the risk of unintended UI regressions.
  • Faster Feedback Loop: Developers get immediate feedback on visual impacts, allowing quicker fixes.
  • Reduced Manual Effort: Eliminates the tedious and error-prone process of manually checking UI changes.

Essential CI/CD Considerations for Puppeteer

Running Puppeteer in a CI/CD environment requires specific configurations, as CI environments typically lack a graphical interface.

  • Headless Mode: Always run Puppeteer in headless mode headless: true or just puppeteer.launch within CI. There’s no screen to render to.
  • Install Dependencies: Ensure your CI environment has Node.js and all npm install dependencies including puppeteer, jest, jest-image-snapshot installed.
  • Chromium Dependencies Linux/Docker: For Linux-based CI environments common for Docker, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Puppeteer’s Chromium often requires additional system libraries. These are usually font-related or graphics dependencies.

    • Common Dependencies Debian/Ubuntu:

      sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -yq gconf-service libasound2 libatk1.0-0 libc6 libcairo2 libcups2 libdbus-1-3 libexpat1 libfontconfig1 libgcc1 libgconf-2-4 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 libglib2.0-0 libgtk-3-0 libnspr4 libpango-1.0-0 libpangocairo-1.0-0 libstdc++6 libx11-6 libx11-xcb1 libxcb1 libxcomposite1 libxcursor1 libxdamage1 libxext6 libxfixes3 libxi6 libxrandr2 libxrender1 libxss1 libxtst6 ca-certificates fonts-liberation libappindicator1 libnss3 lsb-release xdg-utils wget

    • Docker: Use a Docker image that pre-installs these dependencies or add them to your Dockerfile. A common base image is buildpack-deps:stable-chrome.

  • Snapshot Storage: How will you store and manage your reference images?
    • Version Control Git: The simplest approach is to commit your screenshots/reference directory to your Git repository. This keeps them alongside your code.
      • Pros: Easy setup, direct linkage to code versions.
      • Cons: Can bloat repository size, especially with many or large screenshots. Binary diffs in Git are not efficient.
    • External Storage: For larger projects, consider storing snapshots in cloud storage S3, Google Cloud Storage or a dedicated visual testing platform. Your CI job would download references before tests and upload new/failed snapshots afterward.
  • Artifacts for Failed Tests: When tests fail, ensure your CI pipeline collects and stores the generated diff images screenshots/diff as build artifacts. This allows developers to easily inspect failures directly from the CI dashboard.

Example CI/CD Configuration GitHub Actions

This example demonstrates a basic GitHub Actions workflow for running your Puppeteer visual tests. 

# .github/workflows/visual-tests.yml
name: Visual Regression Tests

on:
  push:
    branches:
      - main
      - develop
  pull_request:

jobs:
  visual_test:
   runs-on: ubuntu-latest # Use a Linux environment

   # Use a custom Docker image if the default ubuntu-latest doesn't have all Chromium deps
   # container:
   #   image: buildpack-deps:stable-chrome # This image has common Puppeteer deps pre-installed

    steps:
    - name: Checkout code
      uses: actions/checkout@v4

    - name: Set up Node.js
      uses: actions/setup-node@v4
      with:
       node-version: '20' # Or your desired Node.js version

   # If not using a custom Docker image, install Chromium dependencies
    - name: Install Chromium dependencies
     run: |
        sudo apt-get update


       sudo apt-get install -yq gconf-service libasound2 libatk1.0-0 libc6 libcairo2 libcups2 libdbus-1-3 libexpat1 libfontconfig1 libgcc1 libgconf-2-4 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 libglib2.0-0 libgtk-3-0 libnspr4 libpango-1.0-0 libpangocairo-1.0-0 libstdc++6 libx11-6 libx11-xcb1 libxcb1 libxcomposite1 libxcursor1 libxdamage1 libxext6 libxfixes3 libxi6 libxrandr2 libxrender1 libxss1 libxtst6 ca-certificates fonts-liberation libappindicator1 libnss3 lsb-release xdg-utils wget

    - name: Install dependencies
      run: npm install



   - name: Start your web server if testing locally
     # If your application is a static site, you might use 'npx serve .'
     # If it's a dynamic app, start its server here.
     # Example: For a create-react-app or similar:
     # run: npm start &
     # If running a local server:
     # run: npm install -g serve && serve -p 3000 . &
     # Wait for the server to be ready
     # run: sleep 10 # Adjust as needed

    - name: Run visual tests
      run: npm test

    - name: Upload failed screenshots artifacts
     if: failure # Only upload if the previous step failed
      uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        name: failed-screenshots
       path: screenshots/diff/ # Path to your diff images
       retention-days: 5 # Keep artifacts for 5 days

Addressing Common CI/CD Challenges

  • Memory/CPU Usage: Puppeteer can be resource-intensive. Ensure your CI runners have sufficient memory and CPU. For very large suites, consider splitting tests or optimizing test execution.
  • Network Stability: CI environments can sometimes have fluctuating network. Use network throttling and robust waiting strategies as discussed earlier.
  • Timeouts: Increase CI job timeouts if your tests are lengthy.
  • Environment Differences:
    • Fonts: Different OS/environments might have different default fonts or font rendering. This can cause subtle pixel differences. If this is an issue, consider embedding fonts or using a Docker image with consistent font configurations.
    • Antialiasing: Graphics drivers and browser versions can affect antialiasing, leading to minor pixel variations. Setting a higher failureThreshold or ignoring antialiased regions if your visual regression tool supports it can help.
    • Browser Version: Pin the Chromium version used by Puppeteer or ensure your CI environment uses a consistent one to avoid rendering differences between versions.

By meticulously setting up your CI/CD pipeline, you create an automated guardian for your UI, catching visual regressions related to lazy loading and beyond, significantly enhancing the quality and stability of your web application.

Analyzing and Maintaining Visual Test Snapshots

Visual regression testing is not a “set it and forget it” task.

Effective analysis and ongoing maintenance of your snapshots are crucial for the long-term success and reliability of your testing suite.

Understanding Snapshot Failures

When a visual test fails, it’s not always a bug. It’s a signal that something has changed visually. Your job is to determine if that change is:

  1. A Legitimate Bug/Regression: An unintended visual defect e.g., a lazy-loaded image failed to appear, a layout shift, a broken style. This requires a fix in the application code.
  2. An Intended Change: A design update, a new feature, or a refactoring that legitimately alters the UI. This requires updating the reference snapshot.
  3. Flakiness/Environmental Variation: A non-deterministic failure due to factors like network latency, slightly different font rendering across environments, or race conditions. This requires investigation and refinement of the test itself e.g., better waits, network throttling, more robust selectors.

The “Diff” Image: Your Best Friend

The diff image generated by jest-image-snapshot and similar tools is your primary tool for analysis.

It visually highlights the exact pixels that differ between the current failed screenshot and the reference image, often in a bright, contrasting color like magenta or red.

  • How to Analyze:

    1. Locate the failed test output in your terminal or CI logs.

    2. Find the paths to the “actual,” “expected,” and “diff” images.

    3. Open the diff image first. This immediately shows you where the change occurred.

    4. Compare the “actual” new image with the “expected” reference image side-by-side to understand the nature of the change.

Is content missing? Has spacing changed? Is a font different?
* Example Scenario: If you’re testing lazy loading and the diff image shows a large red rectangle where an image should be, it’s a clear indication that the image failed to load or render. If it shows a small red line at the bottom of an element, it might indicate a minor layout shift or padding change.

Updating Snapshots

When an intended visual change occurs, you need to update your reference snapshots.

  • Command: Use npm run test:update or jest --updateSnapshot.
  • Process:

    1. Ensure the new visual state of your application is the correct state. Do not update snapshots if the change is an actual bug.

    2. Run the update command.

    3. Review the updated snapshots: While jest-image-snapshot doesn’t automatically show you the “before” and “after” during an update, you should still mentally or manually confirm that the new snapshot reflects the intended change.

    4. Commit the updated snapshots to your version control system.

Treat snapshot updates like any other code change – they reflect the current UI truth.

Maintaining Snapshot Quality

  • Granularity:
    • Page-level snapshots: Good for overall layout and major regressions.
    • Component-level snapshots: More precise, less prone to unrelated changes, easier to debug. For lazy loading, if you have distinct lazy-loaded components, try to test them individually or within their containing sections using Puppeteer’s elementHandle.screenshot with a clip option.
  • Avoid Over-updating: Don’t blindly update snapshots. Each update should be a conscious decision that the new visual state is the desired one.
  • Clear Naming: Use descriptive customSnapshotIdentifier values e.g., 'product-card-loaded-state', 'hero-banner-after-scroll'.
  • Version Control: Store your reference images in Git. This allows you to track changes to your UI over time, revert if necessary, and see who updated what.
  • Periodical Review: Even with automation, periodically review your most critical page or component snapshots manually. This helps catch subtle issues that might fall below the failureThreshold or unexpected cumulative changes.
  • Educate Your Team: Ensure all developers understand the visual testing workflow: how to run tests, interpret failures, and update snapshots. This fosters a culture of UI quality.

Addressing Flakiness and Noise

Flaky tests undermine trust in your test suite. Prioritize fixing them.

  • Root Cause Analysis: When a test is flaky, resist the urge to immediately increase the failureThreshold. Instead, investigate:
    • Is it a timing issue? Add more specific waitFor conditions.
    • Is it network-related? Use page.emulateNetworkConditions.
    • Is it font rendering? Try running in a consistent Docker environment.
    • Is it dynamic content? Mock or control it.
  • Increase Threshold Last Resort: Only increase failureThreshold if you’ve exhausted all other options and are confident that the minor pixel differences are truly irrelevant e.g., slight anti-aliasing variations that are imperceptible to humans. A common strategy is to have a lower default threshold and higher thresholds for specific tests known to have minor, acceptable variations.
  • CSS Resets/Standardization: Ensure your test environment applies consistent CSS, potentially using a CSS reset or normalize.css to reduce browser default inconsistencies.

By diligently analyzing failures and maintaining your snapshot suite, your visual tests for lazy loading will become a reliable, high-value asset in your development process, consistently ensuring a pixel-perfect user experience.

Alternatives and Complementary Tools for Visual Testing

Understanding alternative tools and how they complement a Puppeteer-based setup can help you build an even more robust testing strategy.

Dedicated Visual Testing Platforms

These platforms offer advanced features beyond basic pixel comparison, often with sophisticated UIs for managing baselines, reviewing diffs, and integrating into workflows.

  • Applitools Eyes:
    • How it works: Uses AI-powered “Visual AI” to understand the meaning of UI changes, not just pixel differences. It’s more robust against minor, irrelevant changes e.g., anti-aliasing, font rendering across OS and better at detecting layout shifts or content changes.
    • Pros: Highly intelligent comparisons, excellent dashboard for review, cross-browser/device testing, automatic baseline management.
    • Cons: Commercial product subscription based, can be more complex to set up initially than basic snapshotting.
    • Integration with Puppeteer: You can use Puppeteer to navigate and interact, then pass the page content or a screenshot to Applitools’ SDK for visual analysis.
  • Percy.io BrowserStack acquisition:
    • How it works: Similar to Applitools, Percy captures screenshots and compares them against baselines in their cloud. It excels at showing visual changes across different browsers and responsive breakpoints.
    • Pros: Easy integration, good collaboration features for reviewing changes, strong responsive testing capabilities, scalable cloud infrastructure.
    • Cons: Commercial product, primarily focused on full-page or component snapshots rather than granular “AI-driven” analysis like Applitools.
    • Integration with Puppeteer: You integrate Percy’s SDK into your Puppeteer scripts, sending screenshots to their cloud for comparison.
  • Chromatic for Storybook:
    • How it works: Specifically designed for Storybook, it captures snapshots of your UI components in isolation and provides a cloud platform for visual regression testing and collaboration.
    • Pros: Ideal for component libraries, built for Storybook, fast and scalable, great review workflow.
    • Cons: Focused on Storybook components, less suited for full-page end-to-end visual tests though can be used for them.
    • Complementary: You’d use Puppeteer for end-to-end page-level lazy loading tests, while Chromatic handles component-level visual integrity.

Open-Source Alternatives and Complementary Tools

  • pixelmatch and resemble.js:
    • How they work: These are pure JavaScript libraries for pixel-level image comparison. You capture screenshots with Puppeteer, then use these libraries programmatically to compare them.
    • Pros: Lightweight, fine-grained control over comparison logic, free.
    • Cons: Requires more manual setup for reporting, diff image generation, and baseline management compared to jest-image-snapshot or commercial tools. jest-image-snapshot actually uses pixelmatch internally.
  • Cypress with Visual Regression Plugins:
    • How it works: Cypress is a popular end-to-end testing framework. It has plugins like cypress-image-snapshot that offer similar functionality to jest-image-snapshot but within the Cypress ecosystem.
    • Pros: All-in-one testing solution e2e, component, visual, excellent developer experience, auto-waiting.
    • Cons: Limited to Chromium-based browsers similar to Puppeteer, but Cypress runs in the browser, not designed for full page load performance profiling.
    • Complementary: If your team is already using Cypress, it might be a more natural fit for visual regression testing than introducing a separate Puppeteer setup.
  • Loki for Storybook:
    • How it works: Another open-source visual regression testing tool for Storybook. It works locally and generates diffs for component changes.
    • Pros: Free, integrates with Storybook, great for component-level visual testing.
    • Cons: Primarily component-focused, requires local setup for diff review.
    • Complementary: Similar to Chromatic, Loki can be used for component-level visual tests, while Puppeteer handles end-to-end lazy loading scenarios.
  • Playwright:
    • How it works: Developed by Microsoft, Playwright is a direct competitor to Puppeteer, offering similar browser automation capabilities but supporting Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit Safari’s engine. It also has built-in screenshot comparison capabilities similar to jest-image-snapshot.
    • Pros: Cross-browser support out-of-the-box, excellent auto-waiting, robust API, built-in visual regression.
    • Cons: Newer than Puppeteer, community might be slightly smaller though growing rapidly.
    • Recommendation: If starting a new project, consider Playwright as a strong alternative to Puppeteer, especially for its cross-browser capabilities and integrated visual testing features. Its built-in toHaveScreenshot matcher is very similar to toMatchImageSnapshot.

When to Choose Which Tool

  • Simple Projects/Tight Budget: Puppeteer + jest-image-snapshot is an excellent, free, and powerful combination.
  • Large-Scale Applications/Enterprise: Consider Applitools or Percy for their advanced AI, reporting, and collaboration features, which justify the cost through efficiency.
  • Component Libraries: Chromatic or Loki are ideal if you heavily use Storybook.
  • Cross-Browser Visual Testing: Playwright or commercial platforms like Applitools/Percy are superior for ensuring visual consistency across different browser engines.
  • Existing Cypress User: Leverage cypress-image-snapshot for consistency within your existing test suite.

No single tool is a silver bullet.

Often, the best approach is a combination: Puppeteer for end-to-end lazy loading scenarios and a Storybook-based tool for component-level visual integrity, complemented by a robust CI/CD setup to automate the entire process.

The key is to choose tools that align with your team’s existing tech stack, budget, and specific testing needs.

Troubleshooting Common Puppeteer Visual Testing Issues

Even with careful setup, you’ll encounter issues when doing visual testing with Puppeteer, especially when dealing with dynamic content like lazy loading.

Here’s a guide to common problems and their solutions.

1. Flaky Tests Inconsistent Failures

This is the most common and frustrating issue.

A test passes sometimes and fails others without any code changes.

  • Problem: Insufficient waiting for elements, network requests, or animations to complete.
  • Symptoms: Screenshots show content missing, partial loading, or elements jumping into place.
  • Solutions:
    • Use Specific Waits: Replace page.waitForTimeout with more intelligent waits.
      • await page.waitForSelector'.lazy-loaded-image', { visible: true }.
      • await page.waitForFunction => document.querySelectorAll'img'.length === TOTAL_EXPECTED_IMAGES.
      • await page.waitForNetworkIdle. after a scroll, or after a click that triggers new content
      • For Images: await page.waitForFunctionselector => { const img = document.querySelectorselector. return img && img.naturalWidth > 0. }, {}, '.your-lazy-image'. This waits for the image to have actual dimensions, meaning it has loaded.
    • Increase waitForTimeout: As a last resort, slightly increase the timeout, but always try to find a more explicit wait condition first.
    • Network Throttling: Introduce page.emulateNetworkConditions'Slow 3G' to force the browser to load assets slower. This can make race conditions more apparent and help you adjust wait times more accurately.
    • Disable Animations/Transitions: CSS animations and transitions can cause subtle pixel differences. Add a CSS rule to disable them during tests:
      scroll-behavior: auto !important. /* Prevents smooth scrolling interfering */
    • Retry Mechanism: If using Jest, consider jest-circus and setting retries for very rare, environment-specific flakiness.

2. Screenshots Differ Due to Font Rendering/Anti-aliasing

Even if everything else is the same, subtle pixel differences might appear due to rendering variations.

  • Problem: Fonts render slightly differently across operating systems, CI environments, or even between minor browser versions. Anti-aliasing can also cause slight variations.
  • Symptoms: Diff image shows tiny red/magenta spots around text or curved shapes.
    • Increase failureThreshold: Incrementally increase the failureThreshold in toMatchImageSnapshot e.g., from 0.01 to 0.02 or 0.05. This tells the matcher to ignore minor differences. Be careful not to set it too high, or you’ll miss real bugs.
    • Use a Consistent Environment: Run tests in a Docker container with a fixed Linux distribution and font configuration. This provides a highly reproducible environment.
    • Embed Fonts: If using custom fonts, ensure they are properly embedded and loaded, rather than relying on system defaults.
    • Test on Specific OS: If your primary user base is on a specific OS, you might consider running tests on that OS, though this limits cross-platform coverage.
    • Ignore specific regions: Some advanced visual testing tools like Applitools allow you to ignore specific regions e.g., areas with dynamic text or ads from the comparison. For jest-image-snapshot, this is harder.

3. Screenshots Are Not Capturing All Content Missing Lazy-Loaded Elements

You expect to see content, but the screenshot shows a blank space.

  • Problem: The lazy-loaded content hasn’t fully loaded or rendered before the screenshot is taken.
  • Symptoms: Diff image highlights large blank areas or shows placeholders instead of final content.

    • Verify Scrolling: Ensure your page.evaluate => window.scrollTo0, document.body.scrollHeight. or equivalent is correctly scrolling the entire page.

    • Adequate Waiting After Scroll: Lazy loading involves network requests. A waitForTimeout after scrolling is almost always necessary to allow time for assets to download.

    • Wait for Specific Elements: If you know the selectors of the lazy-loaded elements, await page.waitForSelector'.lazy-loaded-element', { visible: true }. is very effective.

    • Network Request Monitoring: Intercept network requests to ensure all expected lazy-loaded assets have completed their downloads:
      await page.setRequestInterceptiontrue.
      page.on’request’, request => { 

      if request.resourceType === 'image' && request.url.includes'lazy-image-path' {
     // Log or track requests
 }
 request.continue.

      // Then await a function that checks if all expected requests are done

    • Check for JavaScript Errors: Open Puppeteer in headless: false mode and watch the browser console for JavaScript errors that might prevent lazy loading from initializing or completing.

4. Large Snapshot Files / Repository Bloat

Committing many full-page screenshots can quickly inflate your Git repository size.

  • Problem: Screenshots are large, making clones slow and Git history bulky.
  • Symptoms: git clone takes a long time. git status shows many changes.
    • Optimize Screenshot Size:
      • PNG vs. JPEG: Use PNG for visual regression lossless, but consider if JPEG is acceptable for non-critical elements or if file size is a major concern though JPEG introduces compression artifacts which are bad for pixel comparison.
      • Clip Screenshots: Use page.screenshot{ clip: { x, y, width, height } } to only screenshot specific regions or components, not the whole page. This is highly effective.
    • External Storage for Snapshots: Store snapshots in cloud storage e.g., AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage instead of Git. Your CI/CD pipeline would then download/upload them.
      • Pros: Keeps Git clean, scalable storage.
      • Cons: Adds complexity to CI setup, requires managing cloud credentials.
    • Git LFS Large File Storage: If you must keep them in Git, use Git LFS for binary files. It stores large files outside the main Git repository, replacing them with pointers.
      • Pros: Integrates with Git workflow.
      • Cons: Requires LFS client for users, can still be slow for many files.
    • Regular Cleanup: Remove old or unused snapshots.

5. Timeouts During Test Execution

Tests fail because they exceed the allowed time limit.

  • Problem: Tests are taking too long to run.
  • Symptoms: Jest timeout error or CI job timeout error.
    • Increase Test Timeout: In Jest, you can increase the default timeout: jest.setTimeout30000. 30 seconds or per-test test'...', async => { ... }, 30000..
    • Optimize Wait Conditions: Reduce unnecessary waitForTimeout calls.
    • Parallelize Tests: If your tests are independent, run them in parallel Jest does this by default if using multiple files.
    • Faster CI Runners: Use more powerful CI/CD machines.
    • Reduce Test Scope: Break down very large tests into smaller, more focused ones.

By systematically approaching these common issues, you can build a more resilient and reliable visual testing suite for your lazy-loaded content, ensuring a consistently high-quality user experience.

Ensuring Ethical and Responsible Testing Practices

As Muslim professionals, our approach to any endeavor, including software testing, should be guided by Islamic principles.

This means ensuring our methods are not only effective but also ethical, responsible, and aligned with our values of honesty, efficiency, and avoidance of waste.

When engaging in visual testing, particularly for lazy loading, we must consider the broader implications of our work.

Avoiding Waste and Over-Testing Israf

Islam encourages moderation and discourages extravagance and waste israf. In the context of testing:

  • Targeted Tests: While comprehensive testing is good, avoid creating tests that provide little value or redundant coverage. For lazy loading, focus on critical user paths and elements that are frequently updated. Don’t create hundreds of identical snapshots for every single image if a few representative ones suffice.
  • Meaningful Snapshots: Each snapshot should serve a purpose. If a lazy-loaded component is visually identical across 10 pages, test it thoroughly on one, and perhaps a lighter smoke test on others, rather than 10 identical full-page snapshots.
  • Optimizing Resource Usage: Running tests in CI/CD consumes computing resources. Optimize your tests to run efficiently. This includes:
    • Clipping Screenshots: Instead of fullPage: true, use clip to capture only the relevant sections. This reduces file size and processing.
    • Parallelization: Utilize parallel execution where appropriate to finish tests faster, consuming resources for a shorter duration.
    • Cleaning Up Artifacts: Ensure your CI/CD pipeline cleans up old test artifacts screenshots, diffs to prevent unnecessary storage consumption.
    • Efficient Waiting: As discussed, rely on precise waitFor conditions instead of arbitrary waitForTimeout to prevent tests from idling unnecessarily.

Ensuring Data Privacy and Security

Our work should always uphold privacy and security, as these are fundamental rights.

  • Non-Production Data: Crucially, never run visual tests against live production data or environments if they contain sensitive user information. Always use sanitized, anonymized, or mock data for testing. If your lazy-loaded content pulls from a database, ensure your test environment’s database only contains dummy or irrelevant information.
  • Secure Environments: If your tests interact with any backend or API endpoints, ensure your test environments are secured just as diligently as production environments. Access controls and network segmentation are vital.
  • Avoid Over-Logging: Be mindful of what is logged during test execution. Avoid logging sensitive data in plaintext in CI/CD logs.
  • No Financial Fraud/Scams: This goes without saying, but ensure the applications being tested are built for ethical purposes and do not facilitate any form of financial fraud, scams, or riba-based transactions. If you encounter features related to interest-based loans, gambling, or deceptive financial products, it is important to discourage their development and use, advocating for Halal financing alternatives and transparent, ethical business practices.

Building Reliable and Honest Systems

Reliability and honesty are core Islamic values that extend to the systems we build.

  • Accuracy in Testing: Strive for accurate and reliable tests. Flaky tests, while sometimes unavoidable, should be seen as a call to improve the robustness of the test itself. Unreliable tests lead to false confidence or unnecessary time spent debugging, both of which are forms of inefficiency.
  • Transparency in Issues: If a visual test fails, it should genuinely indicate a problem or an intended change. Masking issues by setting excessively high failureThreshold values or ignoring failures is akin to dishonesty in reporting, which is contrary to our principles.
  • Focus on User Value: Lazy loading is a performance optimization designed to improve user experience. Our visual tests ensure this optimization doesn’t come at the cost of visual integrity. This focus on delivering a high-quality, efficient experience to the user aligns with the concept of ihsan excellence.
  • Discouraging Harmful Content: If the application being tested features or lazy-loads content that is impermissible e.g., imagery related to riba, gambling, explicit content, or content promoting shirk, as Muslim professionals, we should actively advocate against its inclusion. While testing its functionality might be part of a job, our stance should be clear against the content itself. We should encourage the development of applications that provide wholesome, beneficial content aligned with Islamic teachings. For example, instead of testing a lazy-loaded stream of entertainment content, focus on ensuring a lazy-loaded list of educational articles or permissible e-commerce products functions flawlessly.

By adhering to these ethical considerations, our work in visual testing with Puppeteer not only contributes to the technical quality of software but also reflects our commitment to broader Islamic principles of responsibility, integrity, and benefiting humanity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is visual testing in Puppeteer?

Visual testing in Puppeteer involves automating a browser Chromium to navigate a webpage, take screenshots, and then programmatically compare these screenshots against pre-approved “reference” images snapshots to detect any unintended visual changes or regressions in the user interface.

It ensures that the UI looks as expected, catching issues that functional tests might miss.

Why is visual testing important for lazy loading?

Visual testing is crucial for lazy loading because it confirms that content which is supposed to load lazily actually appears correctly when scrolled into view. It catches issues like blank spaces where images should be, layout shifts when content loads, incorrect positioning, or failure of assets to load at all, which are often missed by traditional functional tests that only check for element presence in the DOM.

How does Puppeteer simulate lazy loading?

Puppeteer simulates lazy loading by programmatically scrolling the webpage.

Since most lazy loading implementations rely on the user scrolling content into the viewport often using IntersectionObserver, Puppeteer’s page.evaluate => window.scrollTo0, document.body.scrollHeight. or elementHandle.scrollIntoView mimics this user interaction, triggering the lazy load mechanism.

What are the basic steps to visually test lazy loading with Puppeteer?

The basic steps involve: 1. Launching Puppeteer and navigating to your page. 2. Setting the viewport. 3. Scrolling the page to trigger lazy loading.

  1. Adding a sufficient wait time for assets to load. 5. Taking a full-page screenshot.

  2. Using a visual regression library like jest-image-snapshot to compare the captured screenshot against a baseline reference image.

Can Puppeteer test lazy-loaded images specifically?

Yes, Puppeteer can specifically test lazy-loaded images.

You can scroll the page, wait for images to appear, and then use page.waitForFunction to check if an image’s naturalWidth and naturalHeight properties are greater than zero, indicating it has loaded and rendered.

What is jest-image-snapshot?

jest-image-snapshot is a Jest matcher that extends Jest’s testing framework to allow for image comparison.

It works by taking a screenshot which Puppeteer provides as a buffer and comparing it pixel-by-pixel against a stored baseline “snapshot” image.

If the difference exceeds a predefined threshold, the test fails.

How do I install jest-image-snapshot?

You install jest-image-snapshot as a development dependency using npm: npm install --save-dev jest jest-image-snapshot. You then need to configure Jest to use it by adding expect.extend{ toMatchImageSnapshot }. in a setup file e.g., jest.setup.js and referencing it in your package.json‘s Jest configuration.

Where are the reference images stored for jest-image-snapshot?

By default, jest-image-snapshot stores reference images in a __image_snapshots__ directory alongside your test files.

However, it’s recommended to configure customSnapshotsDir in your Jest setup file e.g., to screenshots/reference for better organization.

What is a “diff” image in visual testing?

A “diff” image is a visual representation generated by a visual regression tool like jest-image-snapshot when a test fails.

It highlights the pixel differences between the current screenshot the “actual” state and the reference image the “expected” state, often in a bright, contrasting color like magenta or red, making it easy to spot where changes occurred.

How do I update reference snapshots when a visual change is intended?

When an intended visual change occurs, your visual tests will fail.

To update the reference snapshots to reflect the new, correct visual state, you typically run your test command with an update flag, such as jest --updateSnapshot or npm run test:update if configured in package.json.

Why are my visual tests flaky?

Flaky visual tests are usually due to insufficient waiting for dynamic content, network requests, animations, or subtle environmental differences like font rendering. Solutions include using explicit wait conditions waitForSelector, waitForFunction, adding network throttling, disabling animations, or ensuring a consistent test environment e.g., Docker.

Can Puppeteer run in a CI/CD pipeline for visual testing?

Yes, Puppeteer is excellent for CI/CD integration. You must run Puppeteer in headless: true mode.

For Linux-based CI environments like GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, you’ll often need to install additional Chromium dependencies e.g., libgconf-2-4, libnss3 to ensure it runs correctly.

What are common Chromium dependencies for Puppeteer in Linux CI?

Common Chromium dependencies on Linux include gconf-service, libasound2, libatk1.0-0, libc6, libcairo2, libcups2, libdbus-1-3, libexpat1, libfontconfig1, libgcc1, libgconf-2-4, libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0, libglib2.0-0, libgtk-3-0, libnspr4, libpango-1.0-0, libpangocairo-1.0-0, libstdc++6, libx11-6, libx11-xcb1, libxcb1, libxcomposite1, libxcursor1, libxdamage1, libxext6, libxfixes3, libxi6, libxrandr2, libxrender1, libxss1, libxtst6, ca-certificates, fonts-liberation, libappindicator1, libnss3, lsb-release, xdg-utils, and wget.

Should I commit my reference screenshots to Git?

For smaller projects, committing reference screenshots to Git is common and simple. For larger projects, it can bloat the repository.

Alternatives include using Git LFS, or storing snapshots in cloud storage e.g., AWS S3 and downloading them in your CI pipeline.

How can I simulate slow network conditions in Puppeteer?

You can simulate slow network conditions using page.emulateNetworkConditions. Puppeteer provides predefined conditions like KnownNetworkConditions or you can define custom settings for latency, download/upload throughput.

What is the failureThreshold in jest-image-snapshot?

The failureThreshold determines how much pixel difference is allowed between the current screenshot and the reference image before the test fails.

It can be a percentage failureThresholdType: 'percent' or a number of pixels.

Adjusting it can help account for minor, acceptable rendering variations.

Can I test lazy loading within a specific component, not the whole page?

Yes, you can.

After selecting an element handle e.g., const element = await page.$'.my-lazy-component'., you can take a screenshot of just that element using await element.screenshot. This creates more focused tests and smaller image files.

What is the difference between Puppeteer and Playwright for visual testing?

Both Puppeteer and Playwright are powerful browser automation libraries.

Puppeteer focuses on Chromium and by extension, Chrome, Edge, and other Chromium-based browsers. Playwright, developed by Microsoft, supports Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit Safari’s engine out-of-the-box and has built-in screenshot comparison, making it a strong multi-browser alternative.

How does visual testing help with Cumulative Layout Shift CLS?

Visual testing directly helps with CLS by comparing before and after screenshots.

If lazy-loaded content loads and causes other elements on the page to jump or shift, the visual diff will highlight these layout changes, signaling a CLS issue that needs to be addressed.

What are some advanced visual testing tools beyond Puppeteer and jest-image-snapshot?

Advanced tools include Applitools Eyes AI-powered visual testing, Percy.io cloud-based visual regression for various browsers/devices, and Chromatic specifically for Storybook components. These often offer more sophisticated diffing, collaboration features, and scalable infrastructure compared to local, open-source solutions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *