Hideacover.com Review

Based on looking at the website Hideacover.com, it presents a very specific and radical proposal for reforming democracy, particularly in the United States.

The site outlines a new constitutional framework and a method for citizens to enact this framework through a grassroots, video-recorded election system.

While the stated goal of fighting corruption and increasing citizen participation is noble, the proposed methods raise significant concerns regarding privacy, logistical feasibility, and the potential for societal instability.

The lack of clear information on the organization behind the website and the speculative nature of its claims make it difficult to recommend as a credible solution for democratic reform.

Here’s an overall review summary:

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Hideacover.com Review Latest Discussions & Reviews:

• Website Focus: Proposes a new, “incorruptible” democratic system, primarily for the United States, involving video-recorded public voting and a new constitution.
• Key Claims: Aims to eliminate election corruption, campaign money influence, and bureaucratic overreach through a significantly broadened legislature and decentralized government.
• Methodology: Advocates for public “mustering” assembly where citizens video-record their votes on printed ballots attached to their chests.
• Ethical Concerns: While promoting transparency in voting, it explicitly mentions “some degree of voter privacy” while simultaneously making it a “felony to assemble these videos, or share them, or ask to see them,” which creates a confusing and potentially contradictory privacy stance. The concept of forcing open video voting directly contradicts the Islamic emphasis on protecting private affairs and avoiding unnecessary exposure, especially when linked to potentially sensitive political acts. Transparency should not come at the cost of individual dignity and security.
• Credibility: Lacks clear institutional backing, professional web design, or verifiable testimonials from established political science or legal experts. The claims are highly speculative and not supported by mainstream democratic theory or practice.
• Feasibility: The proposed system of nationwide street assemblies, video recording millions of individual votes, and the immediate replacement of government within “7-days” is logistically overwhelming and highly improbable in a large, diverse nation.
• Recommendations: Due to significant concerns regarding privacy, logistical viability, and the unconventional and largely unverified nature of the proposals, Hideacover.com is not recommended as a reliable or practical platform for democratic reform. Its approach is both ethically problematic and practically unsound.

Best Alternatives for Ethical Civic Engagement and Democracy Promotion:

When it comes to promoting ethical governance and civic participation, the focus should be on strengthening existing, proven democratic institutions, fostering transparency through established legal frameworks, and empowering citizens through education and organized, lawful advocacy.

These alternatives prioritize established principles of privacy, due process, and stable societal progress, aligning with ethical considerations.

• League of Women Voters: A non-partisan organization dedicated to empowering voters and defending democracy. They focus on voter education, protection, and advocacy for fair electoral practices, rather than radical systemic overhaul. Key features include voter registration, election information, and advocacy for policy changes. Average Price: Free to access information, donations support their work. Pros: Established, reputable, non-partisan, focuses on practical voter engagement. Cons: Works within existing systems, which may not appeal to those seeking radical change.
• Common Cause: A non-profit, non-partisan advocacy organization that works to uphold the core values of American democracy. They focus on issues like campaign finance reform, voting rights, and government accountability. Key features include public education, lobbying, and legal advocacy. Average Price: Free to access information, relies on donations. Pros: Active in policy reform, long track record, strong focus on ethics and accountability. Cons: Primarily a lobbying and advocacy group, not a direct tool for citizen voting.
• Brennan Center for Justice: A non-partisan law and policy institute that focuses on democracy, justice, and liberty. They conduct research and advocacy on issues like voting rights, money in politics, and judicial independence. Key features include in-depth reports, policy proposals, and litigation. Average Price: Free access to reports and resources. Pros: Respected legal and policy expertise, evidence-based recommendations, focuses on systemic improvements. Cons: Academic and policy-oriented, not a direct action platform for the general public.
• Vote.org: A non-profit technology organization that uses data to make voting easier. They provide tools for voter registration, checking registration status, and finding polling places. Key features include online voter registration, election reminders, and absentee ballot information. Average Price: Free. Pros: User-friendly, practical tools for increasing voter turnout within the current system, highly accessible. Cons: Focuses solely on individual voter access, not systemic reform.
• The National Conference on Citizenship NCoC: A non-partisan organization that fosters civic health and engagement. They conduct research, host events, and create partnerships to promote civic participation. Key features include community-based initiatives, data collection on civic health, and thought leadership. Average Price: Free access to resources. Pros: Broad focus on civic health, community-oriented, supports various forms of participation. Cons: Less focused on direct election reform, more on general civic well-being.
• Sunlight Foundation: Note: While the Sunlight Foundation concluded its operations as a standalone organization in 2022, its resources and archives remain valuable, and its mission of government transparency is continued by others. This organization focused on advocating for open government and using technology to make government more transparent and accountable. Their previous work included tracking money in politics and lobbying data. Key features historic: Data analysis, open data advocacy, policy recommendations. Average Price: N/A archival. Pros: Pioneering work in government transparency, data-driven approach. Cons: No longer an active independent entity.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Understanding Hideacover.com’s Vision for Democracy

Hideacover.com presents a vision for a radical overhaul of democratic systems, particularly targeting what it perceives as deep-seated corruption and inefficiency within the existing framework of the United States.

It champions a new constitution and a highly decentralized, public voting mechanism.

The core argument hinges on the idea that current democratic structures are fundamentally flawed, leading to an “oligarchy” rather than a true “democracy of the people.”

The website asserts that the current system’s reliance on “secret ballots” and machine-counted votes enables widespread fraud and vote manipulation.

Instead, it proposes a system of open, video-recorded voting, where citizens publicly display their choices. Thecatandkittenstore.com Review

This, according to the site, would eliminate the possibility of cheating and restore faith in election outcomes.

The Perceived Problems with Current Democracy:

Hideacover.com lays out a lengthy critique of contemporary democracy, highlighting several key areas it believes are broken.

• Corruption and Lack of Accountability: The site argues that the small number of lawmakers in power, particularly in the US, leads to immense sums of money controlled by too few individuals, making them susceptible to lobbying, blackmail, and bribery. It cites figures like “$12.9-Billion each year” controlled by “535 lawmakers” as evidence of a corrupt oligarchy.
• Ineffective Representation: The website claims the current “representation-ratio” is far too narrow, leading to an elitist and isolated government disconnected from the common person. It contrasts the historical US ratio of “one lawmaker per 1,200 people” with today’s “almost one lawmaker per million people.”
• Voter Fraud and Manipulation: A significant portion of the critique focuses on election irregularities, such as mail-in ballots, lack of voter ID laws, and the use of voting machines, which it claims facilitate fraud and vote selling. The site implies a pattern where “the liberals consistently comes from far behind to a razor-thin win over the conservatives in 1/6 of elections.”
• Media Influence and Campaign Money: The site asserts that campaign money and “corrupt media” dictate who gets elected, rather than personal acquaintance or merit. It proposes a system where “money isn’t needed talk with the other 249 neighbors in a Nome.”
• Unchangeable Constitution: The existing US Constitution is described as “famously hard and expensive to change,” enabling a “tyranny” by preventing rapid response to public will.
• Over-reliance on Appointees: The site argues that too many important governmental duties fall to “non-elected appointees” who “frame the issues our democracy votes on, but they also write the solutions, and manage their implementation.”

A New “Incorruptible” System:

The proposed solution by Hideacover.com centers around a “new 815,000 word/ 1,900 page constitution” and a multi-tiered legislative body. Hghforsale.org Review

• Public Video Voting: The core of the new system is “elections on video that is totally incorruptible, and totally believable.” Voters would “attach a home-printed paper-ballot to their chest” with their “name, ID info, and who or what they are voting for.” Groups of 250 voters would “walk in two side-by-side lines,” video recording each other’s ballots.
• Decentralized Legislature: The proposal includes a massive expansion of elected officials:
  • Sub-Senate: “One part-time ‘Sub-Senator’ per 250 voters,” totaling “around 1-million part-time Sub-Senators.” These individuals would listen to the people, determine truth independently of commercial media, and help administer government.
  • Main-Senate: 100,000 “full-time, 100,000-man Main-Senate” elected by groups of 200 Sub-Senators. This body would “make all the laws and also serves for 1-year full time.” It would also operate in “10 specialized ‘sluices’ of 10,000” for different areas like healthcare or military.
  • Over-Senate: 10,000 “thrice-elected people” who set the overall course of government and its budget, interpret the constitution, and act as the supreme judge.
• No Campaign Money: Elections would be based on “personal acquaintance,” eliminating the need for expensive campaigns.
• Rapid Government Transition: The system aims to “elect a new government in less than 8-days from when a majority has been mustered.”
• Elimination of Washington D.C.: The new constitution calls for “34 regional voting centers around the US, and the elimination of Washington DC as a seat of government.”

The proposed system attempts to be comprehensive, addressing what the site perceives as deep-seated issues in democratic governance.

However, the unconventional and untested nature of its methods warrants extreme caution and skepticism.

hideacover.com Review & First Look

Based on checking the website Hideacover.com, the first impression is one of dense, text-heavy content laying out a highly ambitious and somewhat radical political reform agenda.

The site doesn’t immediately strike you as a polished, professional platform from a well-funded organization.

It feels more like a passion project, a deeply thought-out proposal from a single or small group of dedicated individuals rather than a widely adopted movement. Militarygadgets.eu Review

The aesthetic is minimalist, focusing almost entirely on detailed written arguments.

There are no flashy graphics, interactive elements, or typical web design flourishes.

This design choice, while perhaps intended to convey seriousness and intellectual depth, might also make the site feel overwhelming and less accessible to a general audience accustomed to more visually engaging online experiences.

The core proposition—a complete overhaul of the US democratic system through a new constitution and video-recorded public voting—is immediately apparent and dominates the homepage.

Initial Observations: Grabweb.net Review

• Content-Heavy: The homepage is packed with extensive philosophical and historical arguments for a new democratic system, including long quotes from historical figures and detailed critiques of the current US Constitution.
• Lack of Mainstream Validation: There’s no immediate evidence of endorsements from established political scientists, legal scholars, or widely recognized public figures. This absence is a significant red flag for a proposal of this magnitude.
• Unconventional Approach to “Democracy”: The call for public, video-recorded voting, while touted as “incorruptible,” directly contrasts with the long-standing democratic principle of the secret ballot, which protects voters from intimidation and coercion. This is a fundamental departure that raises serious questions about voter privacy and safety.
• Absence of Standard Website Features: Missing are typical “About Us” sections with clear organizational structures, team bios, or contact information beyond an email. This makes it difficult to ascertain who is behind the initiative and their credentials.
• Focus on Problems, Not Solutions’ Practicality: While the site meticulously details perceived flaws in the current system, the practicality and real-world implications of its proposed solutions, especially the logistical challenges of nationwide video-recorded street voting, are largely glossed over.

First Look Summary:

The website’s first look suggests a serious, albeit unconventional, intellectual exercise in democratic theory.

It’s a into historical grievances and proposed solutions, but it lacks the institutional credibility, practical implementation details, and adherence to established democratic norms that one would expect from a viable plan for national reform.

It reads more like a manifesto than a ready-to-implement political framework.

The sheer volume of text without clear navigational aids can be daunting for a first-time visitor. Mycoastcomputers.com Review

hideacover.com Pros & Cons

When evaluating Hideacover.com, it’s crucial to look beyond the surface and weigh the potential benefits against the significant drawbacks.

While the site articulates some common frustrations with modern governance, its proposed remedies introduce new layers of complexity and ethical concerns.

The Stated “Pros” from the website’s perspective:

• Elimination of Campaign Money: The core idea of basing elections on “personal acquaintance” within small “Nomes” districts of 250 voters aims to cut out the influence of large campaign contributions, super PACs, and expensive media ads. This is a widely shared desire among many citizens who feel disempowered by money in politics.
  • Bold Highlight: The promise of “no role for campaign money” in elections is a powerful draw for those disillusioned with financial influence on politics.
• Increased Transparency and Reduced Voter Fraud: The proposal for open, video-recorded voting is designed to make elections “totally incorruptible, and totally believable.” The idea is that with every vote visibly cast and recorded, there would be “no possibility of election corruption.”
  • Bold Highlight: The system promises to “End voting machines,” “Scare non-citizens from voting due to the video,” “End mail voting,” “End all ballot count and ballot box stuffing corruption,” and “Make it impossible to vote more than once.”
• Greater Citizen Representation: The concept of a million-man Sub-Senate and a 100,000-man Main-Senate dramatically increases the number of elected officials, aiming to bring government closer to the people and make it “230x harder to lobby, blackmail and bribe.”
  • Bold Highlight: A shift from 535 lawmakers to “100,000 Main-Senators” intends to create a more responsive and less corruptible legislature.
• Rapid Government Change: The system claims to enable the election of a new government in “less than 8-days” in times of crisis, theoretically preventing “dangerous anarchy period.” This offers a seemingly quick fix to perceived governmental stagnation.
  • Bold Highlight: The idea of a “7-days to elect a new government” appeals to those who feel the current system is too slow or unresponsive to urgent public demands.
• Decentralization of Power: By eliminating Washington D.C. as the capital and proposing 34 regional voting centers, the plan aims to “make our government much more accessible to the people” and reduce the concentration of power in a single, distant location.
  • Bold Highlight: The vision of “No distant capital” seeks to “drain the swamp completely” by fostering local governance.

The Significant Cons & Ethical Problems:

While the stated goals might resonate with many, the practical implications and ethical ramifications of Hideacover.com’s proposed system are deeply troubling, especially when viewed through an ethical lens that prioritizes individual rights, privacy, and societal stability.

• Egregious Violation of Voter Privacy and Safety: The demand for public, video-recorded voting is a direct assault on the fundamental democratic principle of the secret ballot. The secret ballot exists to protect voters from coercion, intimidation, and retaliation, whether from employers, social groups, or even the state itself. While the site vaguely mentions “some degree of voter privacy” and making it a “felony to assemble these videos, or share them, or ask to see them,” this is a contradictory and frankly, unbelievable assurance when the act of voting itself is publicly recorded. In a society where political divisions can be intense, revealing one’s vote could lead to significant social, economic, or even physical harm. This is a severe ethical drawback, conflicting with the right to security and dignity.
  • Real-world Impact: Imagine a small town where everyone knows everyone. If your vote is recorded, your employer, neighbors, or even family members could pressure you or retaliate based on your political choices. This is precisely what the secret ballot was designed to prevent.
  • Data Vulnerability: Who would control these millions of videos? How would they be secured against hacking, malicious aggregation, or misuse by future governments or bad actors? The notion of making it a “felony” to share them, while simultaneously recording them, creates a massive, unmanageable data security and privacy nightmare.
• Logistical Impossibility and Chaos: Organizing millions of people into “Nomes” of 250, having them walk in specific loops while simultaneously video-recording each other, and then aggregating these individual videos for a nationwide count in “10-minutes for voting and 20-minutes for counting” is a fantasy. The scale of coordination, potential for accidents, disputes, and sheer physical impossibility makes this proposal unworkable in a large, diverse nation.
  • Practicality: Even in small, homogenous communities, managing this would be a monumental task. Scaling it to a country of 330 million people, with diverse geographies, weather conditions, and accessibility needs, is simply not feasible.
  • Dispute Resolution: What happens if a video is unclear? What if there are disputes over who voted or how a ballot was recorded? The system, despite its claims of “incorruptibility,” seems ripe for new forms of chaos and disagreement.
• Risk of Instability and Anarchy: The proposal to “elect a new government in less than 8-days” by having “a majority of the people assembles in the streets” is a recipe for instability, not democratic revolution. While it speaks of “no dangerous anarchy period,” history teaches us that rapid, mass changes of government without established transitional mechanisms often lead to power vacuums, internal strife, and authoritarian takeovers.
  • Historical Precedent: Genuine democratic transitions are complex processes that require careful planning, institutional stability, and broad societal consensus, not spontaneous street actions.
  • Security Concerns: Mass public assemblies, particularly with explicit political aims and the public display of individual choices, are inherently vulnerable to disruption, violence, and exploitation by extremist groups.
• Unverified Claims and Lack of Accountability: The website operates with no clear institutional backing, named experts, or verifiable organizational structure. The “new 815,000 word/ 1,900 page constitution” is presented as a complete solution without external review or input from constitutional scholars. This lack of transparency and accountability from the proponents themselves undermines the credibility of their call for greater governmental transparency.
  • Trust Factor: In the absence of a reputable organization or individuals with relevant credentials, trusting a proposal of this magnitude is a significant leap of faith that is ill-advised.
• Potential for Mass Intimidation: Even if a system were to be put in place, the very act of public, video-recorded voting, regardless of legal protections, creates an environment ripe for intimidation. Individuals could be pressured to vote a certain way, knowing their choices are visible. This fundamentally undermines the freedom of choice that is essential to any true democracy.
• Exclusion and Accessibility Issues: A system relying on physical assembly and personal video recording would disproportionately disadvantage large segments of the population, including the elderly, disabled, those in remote areas, or individuals with work/family commitments. This would effectively disenfranchise millions, contradicting the goal of broad democratic participation.
• The “One Constitution Fits All” Fallacy: The idea that a single 1,900-page constitution, designed by one individual, can “fix almost everything at once” for a diverse nation, let alone “for everyone worldwide,” is a simplistic and utopian overreach. Effective governance requires constant adaptation, compromise, and broad societal input, not a rigid, all-encompassing document.
• Vague Legal Frameworks: Making it a “felony to assemble these videos, or share them, or ask to see them” while simultaneously requiring their creation for transparency is a legal quagmire. Who enforces this? How can verification occur if access to the “evidence” is restricted? This legal ambiguity creates more problems than it solves.

In conclusion, while Hideacover.com identifies some valid concerns about modern democracy, its proposed solutions are highly problematic.

The fundamental assault on voter privacy, combined with the logistical impossibilities and risks of societal instability, makes it an unworkable and ethically dubious proposition. Chiccanvas.com Review

The cons far outweigh any perceived pros, making it an endeavor to be approached with extreme caution and skepticism.

How to Navigate and Evaluate Hideacover.com’s Content

You’ve landed on Hideacover.com and you’re staring down this wall of text about reforming democracy.

It’s a lot, right? Like trying to drink from a firehose.

The key here isn’t to just scroll through it and nod along.

It’s to put on your critical thinking cap, especially given the bold claims being made. This isn’t just a regular website. Homeenter.com Review

It’s presenting a complete philosophical and practical overhaul of how a nation operates.

Understanding the Site Structure and Navigation

First off, the website itself isn’t a paragon of modern web design.

It’s built for information density, not intuitive user experience.

• Minimalist Design: Don’t expect fancy menus, pop-ups, or interactive elements. It’s largely a single-page or very loosely linked document. The “Menu and widgets” link near the top is practically the only navigation.
• Scroll-Heavy: You’ll be doing a lot of scrolling. The homepage is one continuous, long exposition of the proposed system and its justifications.
• Internal Links Limited: You’ll notice some internal links, like “Scroll down — there is much more information than on the flyer” or “Download the new constitution here.” These are your primary ways to jump to related sections or external documents.
• External Links: The site does link to AndrewMelcher.com, which appears to be the primary source for the full constitution and commentary. This is important because the core documents are not hosted on Hideacover.com itself.

Tips for Navigating:

1. Start with the “Why”: Begin by understanding the site’s core critique of current democracy. Look for sections detailing “How to get all campaign money and out of our elections” or “We have a corrupt oligarchy, not a democracy.” This sets the stage.
2. Identify the “What”: Next, try to grasp the proposed new system. Look for explanations of “How to turn protests into elections,” “7-days to elect a new government,” and the structure of the “Sub-Senate,” “Main-Senate,” and “Over-Senate.”
3. Find the “How”: Search for descriptions of the voting mechanism, such as “All voters attach a home-printed paper-ballot to their chest” and the video recording process. This is where the rubber meets the road for their claims of “incorruptibility.”
4. Look for Sources Limited: While there are many historical quotes, formal citations to academic papers or peer-reviewed studies backing their specific model are notably absent. The links provided are mostly to the constitution document itself or general historical context.

Evaluating the Arguments and Claims

This is where you shift from reader to detective. Wildform.com Review

The website makes extraordinary claims, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

• Question the Premises: The site opens with, “Shouldn’t Democracy have a backup system, where a majority of the people assembles in the streets and replaces their entire leadership all at once, in one go?” This is a loaded question designed to set a specific tone. Ask yourself: Is this a universally accepted or even desirable premise for democratic stability? What are the historical precedents for such rapid, total overhauls?
• Analyze the “Incorruptible” Claim: The central promise is an “incorruptible” system through open video voting. But immediately, a red flag pops up: “for voter safety, it will be a felony to assemble these videos, or share them, or ask to see them.” How can a system be “totally incorruptible” and verifiable if the verification evidence the videos is illegal to assemble or share? This is a fundamental logical inconsistency.
  • Consider the Trade-off: The secret ballot is a cornerstone of modern democracy for a reason: it protects voters from intimidation. The site proposes sacrificing this privacy for transparency. Is this a fair trade-off? What are the societal implications of public voting, especially in highly polarized environments? Think about historical examples where public voting or lack of privacy led to oppression or violence.
• Assess Feasibility and Scale: The proposed system, particularly the “Nomes” of 250 people recording each other, and the rapid election process, needs a reality check.
  • Logistics: How would millions of people across a vast country coordinate this? What about weather, accessibility, or managing disputes in real-time?
  • Counting and Verification: Even with video, aggregating, verifying, and certifying millions of individual video-recorded votes for a nationwide election, let alone one conducted in minutes, is a technical and administrative nightmare.
• Identify the “Straw Man” Arguments: The site frequently contrasts its ideal system with a highly exaggerated or caricatured version of current democracy e.g., “corrupt oligarchy,” “fake senate/democracy”. While some critiques of existing systems are valid, be wary of arguments that simplify complex realities or present only extreme negative interpretations.
• Check for Bias: The language used is often strongly critical of existing structures and political figures “corrupt oligarchy,” “corrupt media,” “9 lifetime appointee super-lawyers”. While a critical perspective is healthy, consistently negative and emotionally charged language can indicate a strong bias rather than a balanced, objective analysis.
• Examine the Historical Interpretations: The site delves deeply into historical interpretations of the US Constitution, often portraying it as a document designed to “restrain freedoms” or facilitate “oligarchy.” While historical interpretations can vary, be mindful if these interpretations are selectively used to support a pre-determined conclusion without acknowledging alternative scholarly views. For instance, the discussion of the “Founding Fathers” being “foreign moles” or allowing slavery to secure ratification is a highly contentious and fringe interpretation.
• Evaluate the “Solution” for New Problems: While aiming to solve old problems corruption, lack of representation, does the proposed system inadvertently create new, equally serious problems? Public voting leading to intimidation, or an overly broad legislature leading to gridlock and inefficiency, are potential new pitfalls.

By applying this level of scrutiny, you can move beyond simply reading the text on Hideacover.com to critically assessing its claims, feasibility, and underlying assumptions, especially through an ethical and practical lens.

hideacover.com Features

Hideacover.com isn’t a platform with interactive features in the traditional sense, like an e-commerce site or a social media application.

Instead, its “features” are primarily the comprehensive articulation of its proposed new democratic system and the arguments supporting it.

Think of it less as a tool and more as a detailed manifesto. Glaglashoes.com Review

Here’s a breakdown of what Hideacover.com “features” as content and its theoretical functionalities:

1. The “New Constitution” Downloadable Document

• Comprehensive Legal Framework: The site prominently features links to a downloadable PDF document, described as an “815,000 word/ 1,900 page constitution.” This is arguably the central “product” or “feature” of the site. It’s intended to be a complete legal and governmental framework for a new democratic system.
  • Content: This constitution supposedly outlines everything from free speech and assembly rights 21,313 words to police and courts 100,232 words, immigration 29,978 words, and government finances 18,881 words.
  • Purpose: It’s presented as a ready-to-implement alternative to existing constitutions, designed to “fix almost everything at once.”
  • Data Point: The staggering length of “814,784 words in 431 chapters” is emphasized as a testament to its thoroughness.

2. “Rules Of Mustering And Propagating” ROMAP

• Grassroots Self-Organization Instructions: This “feature” outlines the proposed method for citizens to actually implement the new constitution and elect leaders without government involvement.
  • Mechanism: It details how “street protesters elect temporary leaders, each holding the signatures of 500 people that have assembled under a new democratic constitution.”
  • Staged Process: Describes a multi-step process for forming the “mustering” Senate, leading to the election of Sub-Senators and Main-Senators.
  • Goal: To enable a “peaceful democratic revolution” and rapidly elect a new government within “7-days”.

3. Argumentation and Commentary Over 1,000 Pages

• Detailed Critique of Existing Systems: The website is essentially a vast repository of arguments against current democratic structures, particularly the US system. This includes historical analysis, philosophical discussions, and critiques of current political practices.
  • Focus Areas: Corruption, narrow representation, unchangeable constitutions, media influence, and the power of non-elected officials are extensively discussed.
  • Historical Examples: It leverages quotes from historical figures like Cassius Dio, Thucydides, William Penn, and the Anti-Federalist Papers to support its claims about the historical flaws and manipulations of democratic systems.
  • Purpose: To convince readers that the existing system is “deeply flawed” and that the proposed new model is the superior alternative. The content acts as a persuasive tool.

4. Proposed Legislative Structure

• Multi-Tiered Senate System: A key feature is the detailed description of the proposed legislative bodies designed to replace existing governmental structures.
  • Sub-Senate 1 Million Members: Envisioned as a part-time body to “Listen to the people and elevate good ideas,” “Determine the truth independently of the openly-corrupt paid commercial media,” and “Help administer government in a granular way.”
  • Main-Senate 100,000 Members: A full-time body that “will both make and execute the nation’s laws,” operating in “10 specialized ‘sluices’ of 10,000 each” for different policy areas e.g., healthcare, military.
  • Over-Senate 10,000 Members: A full-time body that “sets the overall course of government and its budget,” interprets the constitution, and acts as the “supreme judge of constitutionality,” replacing the current Supreme Court.

5. Open Video Voting Mechanism

• Proposed Electoral Process: The site outlines a specific, public method for voting.
  • Visibility: Voters attach “home-printed paper-ballot to their chest” with “name, ID info, and who or what they are voting for.”
  • Mutual Recording: Voters in “Nomes” districts of 250 video record each other to ensure transparency.
  • Anti-Fraud Claims: This system is presented as the definitive solution to “End voting machines,” “End mail voting,” and “End all ballot count and ballot box stuffing corruption.”
  • Speed: Claims of “10-minutes for voting and 20-minutes for counting” for elections.

These “features” collectively represent the intellectual product of Hideacover.com: a comprehensive proposal for a radical political transformation. However, it’s important to reiterate that these are proposed features and functionalities, not active, implemented tools. The site itself is merely the vehicle for presenting these ideas.

hideacover.com Alternatives

Given the highly unconventional and problematic nature of Hideacover.com’s proposals—particularly its disregard for voter privacy and its logistically improbable “solutions”—it’s crucial to identify alternatives that promote ethical civic engagement and democratic strengthening within established, safe, and effective frameworks.

Instead of advocating for radical, destabilizing overhauls, these alternatives focus on improving existing systems, fostering participation, and upholding fundamental rights.

Here are seven ethical alternatives focused on legitimate civic engagement and democratic improvement, suitable for a US-based audience: Eddiemaintenance.com Review

• VoteSmart.org

  • Key Features: Provides comprehensive, unbiased information on candidates and elected officials, including voting records, issue positions, campaign finances, and public statements. It helps citizens make informed decisions based on facts.
  • Average Price: Free to access.
  • Pros: Non-partisan, data-driven, focuses on informed voter decision-making, protects voter privacy.
  • Cons: Doesn’t directly advocate for systemic reform, relies on individuals to seek out information.

• The American Civil Liberties Union ACLU

  • Key Features: A nationwide organization dedicated to defending and preserving individual rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States. They engage in litigation, lobbying, and public education on issues like voting rights, free speech, and privacy.
  • Average Price: Membership is donation-based. resources are free.
  • Pros: Long-standing, highly respected, focuses on fundamental rights, works within the legal framework, promotes privacy.
  • Cons: Primarily a legal and advocacy organization, not a direct voting platform.
• FairVote

  • Key Features: A non-profit that advocates for electoral reforms such as ranked-choice voting, proportional representation, and fair redistricting to ensure every vote counts and better reflect voter preferences.
  • Average Price: Free access to research and information.
  • Pros: Focuses on systemic, incremental improvements to electoral mechanics, evidence-based policy proposals, transparent.
  • Cons: Reforms require legislative action, which can be slow and challenging.

• National Democratic Institute NDI

  • Key Features: Works globally to support and strengthen democratic institutions, political practices, and open governments. While focused internationally, their methodologies and principles of fostering transparent, inclusive, and accountable democracies are directly applicable and relevant to improving domestic systems.
  • Average Price: N/A non-profit, receives grants.
  • Pros: Global expertise in democratic development, emphasizes institutional strengthening, promotes peaceful transitions.
  • Cons: Not a direct US-focused grassroots organization, more high-level policy work.

• ProPublica Smokefreeonline.com Review

  • Key Features: An independent, non-profit investigative journalism organization. They produce impactful investigative journalism that shines a light on abuses of power and betrayals of public trust by government, business, and other institutions, including issues related to elections and political influence.
  • Average Price: Free to access their journalism.
  • Pros: Promotes transparency through rigorous reporting, holds powerful entities accountable, non-partisan.
  • Cons: Not an advocacy group. its role is journalistic, not direct reform implementation.

• Center for Election Innovation & Research CEIR

  • Key Features: A non-profit that works with election officials and experts to improve election administration by supporting data-driven research and best practices. They focus on secure, accessible, and accurate elections.
  • Average Price: N/A non-profit.
  • Pros: Works directly with election professionals, focuses on practical, evidence-based improvements to election security and efficiency, non-partisan.
  • Cons: Less visible to the general public, focuses on administrative rather than broad political reform.

• Civic Alliance

  • Key Features: A non-partisan coalition of businesses dedicated to strengthening democracy by encouraging civic participation and protecting elections. They provide tools and resources for companies to support their employees’ civic engagement.
  • Average Price: N/A coalition.
  • Pros: Brings corporate influence to bear on civic issues, broad reach through employer networks, emphasizes non-partisan participation.
  • Cons: Primarily focused on encouraging existing forms of civic engagement, not fundamental systemic change.

These alternatives offer concrete, ethical pathways for citizens to engage with and improve their democratic systems.

They uphold the principles of privacy, due process, and established legal frameworks, contrasting sharply with the speculative and potentially dangerous propositions found on Hideacover.com.

How to Promote Transparency Ethically in a Democracy

Promoting transparency in a democracy is a vital goal, but it must be pursued through ethical and practical means that uphold fundamental rights like privacy and due process. Metric-hosting.com Review

The approach proposed by Hideacover.com, with its call for open, video-recorded voting, is a prime example of how an attempt at “total transparency” can become deeply problematic, inviting intimidation, suppressing free expression, and creating unmanageable logistical nightmares.

Instead, ethical transparency builds trust without sacrificing individual security.

1. Robust Freedom of Information Laws and Accessibility

• What it is: Laws like the Freedom of Information Act FOIA allow citizens and journalists to request access to government documents and data. Ethical transparency means making these laws strong, widely known, and easy to use.
  • Bold Highlight: Governments should proactively publish data and documents online in easily searchable and machine-readable formats.
• Why it works: It empowers citizens to investigate government actions, track spending, and understand decision-making processes. It holds officials accountable by shedding light on their operations.
  • Data Point: According to a 2021 study by the Knight Foundation, over 90% of Americans believe it is important for government to be transparent and accountable to its citizens.
• Contrast with Hideacover.com: This approach focuses on making government actions transparent, not forcing citizens’ private political choices into the public eye.

2. Independent Oversight Bodies and Whistleblower Protection

• What it is: Establishing and empowering independent bodies e.g., auditors, inspectors general, ethics commissions to scrutinize government operations, finances, and conduct. Critically, these bodies must be shielded from political interference. Strong whistleblower protection laws are also essential, encouraging insiders to report wrongdoing without fear of retaliation.
  • Bold Highlight: Independent audits and ethics commissions are crucial for uncovering hidden corruption.
• Why it works: These mechanisms provide checks and balances, ensuring that even secret or sensitive government activities are subject to review. Whistleblowers are often the first line of defense against malfeasance.
  • Real-world Impact: The Government Accountability Office GAO in the US, for instance, provides Congress with objective, non-partisan information, audits, and evaluations. In FY 2022, GAO’s work yielded over $75 billion in financial benefits to the federal government.
• Contrast with Hideacover.com: Rather than a chaotic public assembly for “accountability,” this relies on structured, expert oversight that respects due process and confidentiality.

3. Campaign Finance Transparency

• What it is: Implementing strict laws requiring full disclosure of all political donations, lobbying expenditures, and sources of campaign funding. This includes banning dark money untraceable donations and ensuring real-time reporting.
  • Bold Highlight: Real-time, online databases of campaign contributions and lobbying activities are critical.
• Why it works: This allows the public and media to track who is influencing politicians and policies. It doesn’t eliminate money from politics, but it makes its flow visible, enabling voters to factor it into their decisions.
  • Data Point: The Center for Responsive Politics OpenSecrets.org reports millions of dollars in lobbying spending annually, highlighting the need for continued transparency in this area. In 2023, federal lobbying spending reached over $4.2 billion.
• Contrast with Hideacover.com: While Hideacover.com wants to eliminate campaign money, an ethical approach focuses on making its influence transparent, allowing for informed public debate and policy.

4. Open Data Initiatives

• What it is: Governments making vast datasets available to the public in open, usable formats. This includes everything from spending records and legislative votes to public service performance metrics and environmental data.
  • Bold Highlight: Government data portals should be user-friendly and regularly updated.
• Why it works: It enables citizens, journalists, and researchers to analyze trends, identify inefficiencies, and build applications that serve public interest. This passive form of transparency provides information without forcing active public participation in potentially unsafe ways.
• Real-world Impact: Websites like Data.gov provide access to thousands of datasets, fostering innovation and public insight into government operations.

5. Media Pluralism and Support for Investigative Journalism

*   Bold Highlight: A free and independent press acts as a crucial watchdog.

• Why it works: A strong media informs the public, exposes corruption, and provides diverse perspectives essential for a healthy democracy. Journalists act as public surrogates, delving into issues most citizens don’t have the time or resources to investigate themselves.
• Contrast with Hideacover.com: Instead of a system where a million Sub-Senators determine “truth independently of the openly-corrupt paid commercial media,” ethical transparency relies on a robust, diverse, and professional media sector.

6. Election Integrity through Auditable and Secure Systems

• What it is: Ensuring elections are secure, verifiable, and accessible, without resorting to public voting. This includes robust paper trails for every vote, comprehensive post-election audits, secure voter registration databases, and accessible polling places.
  • Bold Highlight: Emphasis on paper ballots and risk-limiting audits is key for verifiable elections.
• Why it works: These measures build public trust in election outcomes by providing concrete, auditable evidence that votes are counted accurately, without compromising voter privacy. Technologies can be leveraged for security and convenience e.g., digital voter registration, online ballot tracking for absentee votes but always with security and privacy as paramount.
  • Data Point: Post-election audits, particularly risk-limiting audits, have shown to be highly effective in verifying election results. A 2020 study by the University of Michigan found that such audits significantly increase confidence in election outcomes.
• Contrast with Hideacover.com: This maintains the secret ballot while providing robust, professional mechanisms for verification, rather than relying on a public spectacle that could lead to intimidation and chaos.

Ethical transparency is about empowering citizens with information and robust oversight, not exposing their private choices.

It requires a commitment to rule of law, respect for individual rights, and continuous improvement of existing institutions, rather than their wholesale, risky dismantling.

How to Cancel hideacover.com Subscription

It appears that Hideacover.com does not offer any services that would require a subscription, such as an online platform, a membership, or digital content access behind a paywall. Simplypowersupply.com Review

The website’s primary function is to serve as a repository for information, a manifesto if you will, outlining its unique proposal for democratic reform.

There’s no indication of any recurring payments, user accounts, or features that would necessitate a “subscription” in the typical sense.

Therefore, the question of “How to Cancel Hideacover.com Subscription” is largely moot because:

• No Service Offered: The website doesn’t sell products, provide software as a service SaaS, or host any members-only content that would require a recurring payment or account.
• Content is Free: All the information, including the downloadable constitution and commentary, is freely accessible to any visitor without registration or payment.
• No User Accounts: There is no login or registration functionality on the site, meaning there are no “accounts” to manage or close.

In essence, you cannot “cancel” a Hideacover.com subscription because no such subscription exists.

If you somehow found yourself in a situation where you believed you subscribed to something related to Hideacover.com, or if you were directed to an external service that purported to be associated with it and involved payment, you would need to: Bestdressprice.com Review

1. Check your bank statements or credit card bills: Identify the exact name of the charge and the merchant.
2. Contact your bank or credit card company: They can help you identify the actual merchant and initiate a dispute if the charge is unauthorized or for a service you did not intend to subscribe to.
3. Investigate the external service: If you were redirected to another website or service, you would need to find their terms of service, contact information, and cancellation policy. Hideacover.com itself does not facilitate these kinds of transactions.

It’s highly unlikely that any legitimate subscription service would be directly tied to Hideacover.com, given its current presentation and stated purpose.

Any charge you might encounter would likely be from a third party misrepresenting themselves or an entirely unrelated service.

Hideacover.com Pricing

Just like with the “subscription” aspect, Hideacover.com does not have any direct pricing associated with its content or proposals.

The website is purely informational, functioning as a free online publication of a new constitutional framework and extensive commentary on democratic reform.

Here’s why you won’t find any pricing details on Hideacover.com: Perfectweddingforever.com Review

• No Products or Services for Sale: The site is not an e-commerce platform. It does not sell goods, digital products, software, or services.
• All Content is Free: The entire 1,900-page constitution, the 1,050-page commentary, and all the arguments presented on the homepage are available for free download and viewing. There is no paywall, no premium content, and no membership tiers.
• No Donations Requested: While the site advocates for a significant societal change, it does not overtly solicit donations or contributions to fund its operations or advocacy. This is somewhat unusual for a project of such scope, which often relies on public support.
• Focus on Idea Dissemination: The clear objective of the website is to disseminate a particular set of ideas and a proposed new governmental framework, rather than to generate revenue.

Therefore, the simple answer is: Hideacover.com has no pricing. All its content is available free of charge.

If you encountered any requests for payment or pricing information in relation to Hideacover.com, it would be highly suspicious and likely a scam or an unrelated third party.

The legitimate website provides all its information openly and without cost.

Hideacover.com vs. Traditional Democratic Reform Movements

When you stack up Hideacover.com against traditional democratic reform movements, it’s like comparing a homemade rocket to a national space program.

Both might aim for the moon, but their methods, safety protocols, and likelihood of success are wildly different.

Traditional movements, rooted in decades or even centuries of democratic theory and practice, prioritize stability, incremental progress, and fundamental rights, whereas Hideacover.com advocates for a sudden, sweeping, and largely untested overhaul.

1. Approach to Change: Radical Overhaul vs. Incremental Improvement

• Hideacover.com: Advocates for a complete, immediate, and revolutionary replacement of the existing governmental system. Its “7-days to elect a new government” and “new 815,000 word/ 1,900 page constitution” are calls for a clean break and a complete societal reset. The philosophy is “We can fix everything at once.”
  • Data Point: The site explicitly says, “It would be impossible to make changes like these within the existing system, no matter how logical and reasonable they are.”
• Traditional Reform Movements: These typically work within the existing constitutional framework to achieve improvements. They focus on specific policy changes, constitutional amendments, or legal reforms that address identified problems.
  • Examples: Campaigns for voting rights e.g., extending suffrage, combating disenfranchisement, campaign finance reform e.g., stricter disclosure, limits on contributions, gerrymandering reform, or judicial appointments.
  • Process: This often involves sustained advocacy, lobbying, legislative battles, and sometimes litigation, aiming for gradual, verifiable change rather than sudden revolution.

2. Method of Implementation: Grassroots Muster vs. Organized Advocacy

• Hideacover.com: Proposes a “grassroots system for holding elections on video that is totally incorruptible” through mass public assembly “muster in the streets nationwide” to declare a new constitution in effect. It’s about spontaneous, citizen-led direct action on a massive scale.
• Traditional Reform Movements: Rely on established methods of political organization:
  • Lobbying: Engaging with elected officials to advocate for specific legislation.
  • Public Education: Informing citizens about issues and their rights through campaigns, workshops, and accessible materials.
  • Voter Registration and Turnout: Encouraging participation in existing elections.
  • Legal Challenges: Using the courts to overturn unconstitutional laws or practices e.g., challenges to voter ID laws, gerrymandering.
  • Coalition Building: Forming alliances with diverse groups to amplify their message and influence.

3. Core Principles: Public Transparency vs. Voter Privacy

• Hideacover.com: Prioritizes “total incorruptibility” through open, video-recorded voting, explicitly suggesting that “secret ballots” are obsolete and enable fraud. While it mentions “some degree of voter privacy,” the core mechanism is public voting.
• Traditional Reform Movements: Universally uphold the principle of the secret ballot as fundamental to democratic freedom and the protection of individual voters from intimidation, coercion, and social pressure. Transparency is sought in governmental operations e.g., campaign finance, legislative votes, not in individual citizen votes.
  • Ethical Standpoint: The protection of privacy in voting is a cornerstone of ethical governance, ensuring that citizens can cast their ballots based on conscience, not fear.

4. Legislative Structure: Mass Representation vs. Representative Republic

• Hideacover.com: Proposes an unprecedented scale of representation with a “million-man Sub-Senate” and a “100,000-man Main-Senate.” This is intended to eliminate elite control and bring government closer to the people.
• Traditional Reform Movements: Work within the framework of a representative republic, acknowledging that a practical number of elected representatives is necessary for efficient governance in large nations. Reforms focus on making existing representation more fair and responsive e.g., combating gerrymandering, improving electoral systems like ranked-choice voting.
  • Feasibility: While increasing representation is often a goal, the scale proposed by Hideacover.com is logistically and administratively unworkable for a modern nation.

5. Credibility and Backing: Unverified vs. Established Institutions

• Hideacover.com: Appears to be a singular, self-published initiative with no clear institutional backing, academic review, or endorsements from established political or legal experts. The claims are sweeping and lack external validation.
• Traditional Reform Movements: Often led by well-established non-profits e.g., ACLU, League of Women Voters, Common Cause, academic institutions, or bipartisan commissions. They rely on scholarly research, legal expertise, and a track record of advocacy and successful reform. Their proposals undergo rigorous review and public debate.

In summary, traditional democratic reform movements aim to strengthen and refine existing democratic systems through pragmatic, legally sound, and rights-respecting means.

Hideacover.com, in stark contrast, offers a radical, unproven, and potentially dangerous blueprint for revolution that disregards fundamental principles of privacy and practicality for the sake of perceived “total incorruptibility.” The former seeks evolution. the latter, a chaotic, unguided revolution.

The Islamic Perspective on Civic Engagement and Governance

While Hideacover.com’s specific proposals, particularly the video-recorded public voting, conflict with core Islamic principles of privacy and avoiding unnecessary exposure, the broader themes of seeking justice, accountability, and good governance are deeply resonant within Islamic tradition. Islam places a strong emphasis on leadership based on merit, consultation shura, justice adl, and accountability. It encourages active, ethical civic engagement to uphold these values within a society, but always within frameworks that ensure stability, protect rights, and prioritize the common good.

1. Justice Adl and Accountability

• Core Principle: Islam mandates justice in all affairs, including governance. Leaders are entrusted with power and are accountable to God and the people. This includes economic justice, fair application of laws, and transparent dealings.
  • Bold Highlight: The Quran and Sunnah repeatedly emphasize the importance of justice and fairness in leadership and society.
• Civic Engagement: Citizens have a right and a duty to hold leaders accountable, to speak truth to power amr bil ma’ruf wa nahy anil munkar – enjoining good and forbidding evil, and to demand justice. This can involve peaceful protest, petitioning, and electoral participation where applicable.
  • Historical Context: The early Islamic caliphates saw instances where ordinary citizens could directly question and hold leaders accountable, even in public forums.

2. Consultation Shura

• Core Principle: Islamic governance encourages consultation in decision-making, deriving from Quranic verses that instruct believers to conduct their affairs through mutual consultation e.g., Quran 3:159, 42:38. While not a prescriptive political system, it underlines the importance of broad participation and seeking diverse perspectives.
  • Bold Highlight: Consultation and consensus-building are key to legitimate decision-making.
• Application: This translates to mechanisms for public input, expert advice, and representative bodies that genuinely reflect the concerns of the populace. It encourages leaders to listen and integrate public opinion, rather than ruling unilaterally.

3. Leadership by Merit and Trust Amanah

• Core Principle: Leadership in Islam is seen as a trust amanah. Leaders should be chosen based on their piety, knowledge, capability, and trustworthiness.
  • Bold Highlight: Emphasizes the selection of competent and upright leaders.
• Civic Engagement: This principle encourages citizens to vote for or support candidates who demonstrate these qualities, rather than those who are wealthy, influential, or charismatic without moral grounding. It means resisting corruption and cronyism in political selection.

4. Protection of Privacy and Honor

• Core Principle: Islam strongly safeguards individual privacy and dignity. Spying, backbiting, and exposing people’s hidden faults are explicitly forbidden e.g., Quran 49:12.
  • Bold Highlight: The sanctity of individual privacy sitr is paramount.
• Relevance to Hideacover.com: This principle directly clashes with the idea of video-recorded public voting. While the intention might be “transparency,” forcing citizens to publicly display their private political choices violates their dignity and opens them up to potential intimidation, social pressure, and retaliation. True transparency in governance should focus on the actions of those in power, not the private choices of the populace. The secret ballot, which protects voter privacy, is consistent with this Islamic principle.

5. Stability and Order

• Core Principle: Islam emphasizes the importance of maintaining peace, order, and stability within society. While justice is paramount, revolutionary chaos that leads to greater harm is generally discouraged. Gradual, structured, and lawful change is preferred.
  • Bold Highlight: Societal stability amn and the avoidance of discord are crucial.
• Relevance to Hideacover.com: The proposal for rapid, mass street assemblies to overthrow and replace government, while perhaps appealing to those frustrated with slow change, carries an inherent risk of instability and anarchy, which is generally discouraged in Islamic jurisprudence unless there is severe oppression and no other means of redress.

6. Rejecting Corruption and Extravagance

• Core Principle: Islam condemns corruption, bribery, and the misuse of public funds. Leaders are expected to manage resources responsibly and for the public good.
  • Bold Highlight: Frugality and accountability in public spending are enjoined.
• Relevance to Hideacover.com: The site’s critique of “corrupt oligarchy” and excessive government spending aligns with Islamic values that promote responsible resource management and discourage extravagance and illicit gain. However, the proposed solutions must themselves be free from potential for new forms of corruption or logistical waste.

In conclusion, while Hideacover.com touches on valid grievances concerning corruption and accountability, its proposed methods especially public voting fundamentally contradict Islamic principles of privacy and dignity.

An ethical approach to civic engagement, informed by Islamic values, would advocate for strengthening transparent, accountable institutions through lawful means, protecting individual rights, and fostering a society built on justice, consultation, and moral leadership, always prioritizing societal stability and the well-being of its members.

FAQ

Is Hideacover.com a legitimate website for political reform?

Based on evaluating the website, Hideacover.com presents a highly ambitious and radical proposal for political reform, but its legitimacy as a practical or widely endorsed solution is questionable due to significant logistical challenges, privacy concerns, and the lack of traditional institutional backing.

It appears to be a conceptual framework rather than a movement with tangible, verifiable support.

What is the main purpose of Hideacover.com?

The main purpose of Hideacover.com is to propose and advocate for a completely new democratic system, primarily for the United States, which includes a new constitution and a radical public, video-recorded voting mechanism, aimed at eliminating perceived corruption and increasing direct citizen participation.

Does Hideacover.com promote secret ballots?

No, Hideacover.com explicitly argues against secret ballots, claiming they are “obsolete” and enable corruption.

Instead, it proposes a system where votes are cast openly and video-recorded.

What are the main criticisms of Hideacover.com’s proposed voting system?

The main criticisms include a severe violation of voter privacy, significant logistical impossibilities for nationwide implementation, a high risk of voter intimidation and coercion, and the potential for societal instability due to rapid, unstructured governmental overhauls.

Is there a subscription required to access content on Hideacover.com?

No, there is no subscription required.

All content, including the proposed constitution and commentary, is freely accessible and downloadable from the website.

Does Hideacover.com charge for its services or information?

No, Hideacover.com does not charge for any services or information.

The website is purely informational, making all its content available for free.

Who is behind Hideacover.com?

The website does not clearly state who is behind the initiative or the organization responsible.

It primarily presents the ideas and arguments of an unnamed author or group, with links to AndrewMelcher.com as the source of the constitution document.

Can Hideacover.com’s proposed system be realistically implemented?

Based on an objective assessment, Hideacover.com’s proposed system, especially the nationwide video-recorded public voting and rapid governmental transition, faces immense logistical and practical hurdles that make its realistic implementation highly improbable for a large, diverse nation.

How does Hideacover.com claim to eliminate campaign money?

Hideacover.com claims to eliminate campaign money by proposing a system where elections are based on “personal acquaintance” within small voting districts Nomes of 250 people, thus making expensive campaigns and media ads unnecessary.

What is the “Sub-Senate” proposed by Hideacover.com?

The “Sub-Senate” proposed by Hideacover.com is a part-time legislative body consisting of approximately one million members, with one Sub-Senator per 250 voters, intended to listen to the people and help administer government at a granular level.

What is the “Main-Senate” proposed by Hideacover.com?

The “Main-Senate” proposed by Hideacover.com is a full-time legislative body of 100,000 members, elected by Sub-Senators, which would be responsible for making and executing national laws, operating in specialized “sluices” for different policy areas.

What is the “Over-Senate” proposed by Hideacover.com?

The “Over-Senate” proposed by Hideacover.com is a full-time body of 10,000 thrice-elected people who would set the overall course of government, interpret the constitution, and act as the supreme judicial authority, replacing the current Supreme Court.

How does Hideacover.com address voter privacy with video-recorded voting?

Hideacover.com vaguely states that “for voter safety, it will be a felony to assemble these videos, or share them, or ask to see them.” However, this contradicts the very act of public video recording and raises serious questions about how privacy would be genuinely maintained in practice.

Does Hideacover.com advocate for the elimination of Washington D.C.?

Yes, Hideacover.com’s proposed new constitution calls for the elimination of Washington D.C.

As the seat of government and its replacement with 34 regional voting centers around the US.

What are the ethical concerns regarding Hideacover.com’s proposals?

Ethical concerns primarily revolve around the severe erosion of voter privacy, the potential for widespread voter intimidation, the lack of transparency from the website’s creators, and the high risk of societal instability if its radical overhaul methods were attempted.

How does Hideacover.com propose to fix government corruption?

Hideacover.com proposes to fix government corruption by dramatically increasing the number of lawmakers making them harder to bribe, eliminating campaign money, and implementing open, video-recorded voting to prevent election fraud.

Is the proposed constitution on Hideacover.com a widely accepted document?

No, the proposed constitution on Hideacover.com is not a widely accepted or endorsed document.

It is a unique proposal presented by the website’s creators, lacking mainstream political or academic consensus.

How does Hideacover.com compare to the traditional concept of democracy?

Hideacover.com’s proposals significantly deviate from traditional democratic concepts by advocating for open voting abandoning the secret ballot, an extremely broad and decentralized legislature, and a revolutionary means of government change rather than incremental reform.

Does Hideacover.com provide real-world data or case studies to support its claims?

Hideacover.com provides historical quotes and general critiques of existing systems, but it lacks real-world data or empirical case studies to demonstrate the practical success or feasibility of its specific proposed system. Its arguments are largely theoretical and based on its own interpretation of history.

What is “ROMAP” according to Hideacover.com?

“ROMAP” stands for “Rules Of Mustering And Propagating,” which, according to Hideacover.com, are the instructions for how people can self-assemble in the streets, declare a new constitution, and elect new leaders outside of government involvement.