Pushbuttontrading.co Pricing and Subscription Structure

Understanding the financial commitment required by Pushbuttontrading.co is crucial for any potential user.

Read more about pushbuttontrading.co:
Pushbuttontrading.co Review & First Look
Understanding the Landscape of Automated Trading Platforms
Addressing Pushbuttontrading.co’s Ethical Standing and Legitimacy
Pushbuttontrading.co Alternatives: Ethical Paths to Financial Growth

The platform employs a multi-tiered pricing model, combining an upfront payment with recurring monthly fees, along with additional costs for third-party services.

This structure means the initial investment is significant, and ongoing expenses can accumulate, impacting the overall profitability for the user, especially considering the inherent risks of the underlying activity.

It’s a common strategy for software-as-a-service (SaaS) and education platforms, but when tied to high-risk financial activities, it demands careful scrutiny.

Decoding the Initial and Recurring Costs

The website clearly states its primary pricing structure, but also points to necessary external costs that users must consider.

• Initial Technology Lease: The primary upfront cost is “$1,800 down and $150/month technology lease.”
  • Breakdown: This means an initial outlay of $1,800 to gain access to their bots and initial education. The $150 monthly fee covers continued access to the technology and potentially ongoing support/updates.
  • Implication: This is a substantial investment for a digital product with a “no refunds” policy, placing significant financial risk on the user from the outset.
• Third-Party Prop Firm Accounts: The website explicitly states, “3rd party funded accounts, like Apex Trader Funding, are an additional cost. They start around $28/month with our discount coupon code for the $25k account.”
  • Nature: These are typically evaluation fees or monthly subscriptions paid directly to the prop firm to gain access to their trading capital.
  • Variability: The cost can increase significantly for larger “funded accounts” (e.g., $50k, $100k, $150k accounts will have higher monthly fees).
• NinjaTrader 8 Multi-Broker License: For users wanting to trade their “own brokerage account by connecting a compatible broker to NinjaTrader 8,” the website mentions, “NinjaTrader requires you have a multi-broker license which costs around $99/month, payable to NinjaTrader directly.”
  • Requirement: This is an essential piece of software for the bots to operate on, particularly for self-funded accounts.
  • Impact: This adds another substantial monthly expense to the overall cost of using the Pushbuttontrading.co system.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculation

To get a clearer picture, let’s consider a simplified scenario for the first month and subsequent months.

• First Month (Using a Prop Firm):
  • Pushbuttontrading.co down payment: $1,800
  • Pushbuttontrading.co monthly lease: $150
  • Prop firm fee (e.g., Apex Trader Funding $25k account): $28
  • Total First Month Cost: $1,800 + $150 + $28 = $1,978
• Subsequent Months (Using a Prop Firm):
  • Prop firm fee: $28
  • Total Subsequent Monthly Cost: $150 + $28 = $178
• First Month (Using Own Brokerage via NinjaTrader 8):
  • NinjaTrader 8 license: $99
  • Total First Month Cost: $1,800 + $150 + $99 = $2,049
• Subsequent Months (Using Own Brokerage via NinjaTrader 8):
  • Total Subsequent Monthly Cost: $150 + $99 = $249

These calculations highlight that even before a single trade is made, or any profit is realized, users are facing significant recurring expenses.

This increases the break-even point for any trading activity, meaning users need to generate substantial profits just to cover their operational costs, let alone make a net gain.

Implications of the Pricing Model

The pricing structure has several implications, especially when viewed through an ethical lens and considering the inherent risks. Pushbuttontrading.co Alternatives: Ethical Paths to Financial Growth

• High Barrier to Entry: The upfront $1,800 fee, plus other initial costs, makes this inaccessible for many individuals, particularly those who might be drawn to the “limited capital” solution.
  • Demographic Targeting: This pricing implicitly targets individuals who have disposable income but may lack trading experience or sufficient capital for traditional trading, making them potentially vulnerable.
• Revenue Certainty for Pushbuttontrading.co: The subscription model ensures a steady revenue stream for Pushbuttontrading.co, regardless of whether their users actually profit from trading. The company gets paid for access to its technology and education, not for the success of its users.
  • Ethical Conflict: This creates a potential conflict of interest, where the company’s financial success is not directly tied to the financial success of its customers in the trading markets.
• Non-Refundable Policy: The strict “no refunds” policy for the initial $1,800, combined with the “digital downloads” rationale, is a significant disadvantage for the customer. If a user realizes early on that the service is not for them, or that the underlying activity is not ethically permissible, they lose their initial investment.
  • Contrast: Many ethical education platforms offer at least a short refund window for dissatisfaction.
• Pressure to Perform: The ongoing monthly fees create pressure on users to start trading quickly and generate profits to justify the costs. This can lead to rushed decisions and increased risk-taking.
  • Real-World Data: Studies on retail trading consistently show that a very high percentage of individual traders lose money over the long term. Adding significant monthly overhead only exacerbates this challenge. For example, a 2014 study by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK found that 82% of retail clients lost money trading Contracts for Difference (CFDs), which share similarities with futures and forex in terms of leverage and speculation.
• Opacity of “Value”: While the website lists inclusions like “4+ hours of pre-recorded videos” and “Licensing of all 8 trading bots,” quantifying the true value of these components, especially given the “no refunds” policy, is challenging for the consumer. The primary “value” is tied to speculative trading, which itself is highly uncertain.

In conclusion, Pushbuttontrading.co’s pricing model, while clear, demands a significant financial commitment upfront and ongoing.

This structure, combined with the non-refundable initial payment and the inherent high risks of the speculative activities it facilitates, places a substantial burden on the user.

For those seeking ethical and sustainable financial growth, these costs represent funds that could be much more productively and permissibly invested in tangible skills, ethical entrepreneurship, or real, value-generating assets.

Addressing Pushbuttontrading.co’s Ethical Standing and Legitimacy