The core promise of TypingDNA revolves around leveraging AI-based technology to recognize individuals by the unique rhythm and characteristics of their typing.

This behavioral biometric approach promises to reduce friction in authentication processes while bolstering security against unauthorized access, account sharing, and even remote workforce vulnerabilities.

For businesses grappling with the complexities of modern cybersecurity and the demands of a remote workforce, TypingDNA’s offerings present a potentially transformative solution, moving beyond static passwords and one-time codes to a dynamic, continuous verification method that operates seamlessly in the background.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Table of Contents

The Science Behind Typing Biometrics: How It Works

TypingDNA’s foundation lies in the fascinating field of typing biometrics, a behavioral authentication method that analyzes the unique patterns of a user’s keyboard interaction. It’s not about what you type, but how you type. This nuanced approach offers a robust layer of security that traditional methods often miss, essentially turning your keyboard into a sophisticated identity sensor.

Key Aspects of Typing Pattern Analysis

The system delves into micro-patterns that are incredibly difficult for an imposter to replicate.

Think of it like a digital fingerprint, but for your fingers’ dance across the keys.

Keystroke Dynamics: This is the bedrock. It measures the time a key is pressed down dwell time and the time it takes to move from one key to the next flight time or latency. These seemingly insignificant milliseconds reveal a unique rhythm for every individual.
Typing Speed and Accuracy: While not the sole determinants, consistency in typing speed and the frequency of errors or corrections can also contribute to a user’s biometric profile.
Force and Pressure Indirectly: Though not directly measured by a standard keyboard, the way a user interacts with keys—for example, a heavy-handed typist versus a light touch—can manifest in subtle variations in dwell and flight times.
Pattern Consistency: The system builds a profile over time, learning the typical variations in a user’s typing. This allows it to distinguish between an authentic user having an “off day” and a completely different individual attempting to mimic the pattern.

Machine Learning and AI in Action

TypingDNA employs proprietary AI-based technology to process this vast amount of biometric data.

Profile Creation: When a user first enrolls, the system captures multiple typing samples. This initial data trains the AI to create a baseline biometric profile. It’s not about memorizing specific words, but the underlying motor skills and habits.
Continuous Learning and Adaptation: The AI isn’t static. It continuously learns and refines the user’s profile with every subsequent interaction. This adaptive learning is crucial for maintaining accuracy, as a user’s typing style might subtly evolve over time due to factors like fatigue, hand injury, or even a new keyboard.
Anomaly Detection: The AI’s primary role is to detect deviations from the established biometric profile. If a typing pattern significantly deviates from the norm, it can flag it as a potential security incident, prompting further verification or blocking access. This allows for real-time risk assessment.

Why It’s More Than Just a Password

A password is a static piece of information that can be stolen, phished, or guessed.

Typing biometrics, however, is a dynamic, behavioral trait.

Hard to Steal: You can’t “steal” someone’s typing rhythm in the same way you can steal a password. Even if an attacker knows your password, they are highly unlikely to be able to replicate your unique typing dynamics.
Continuous Verification: Unlike a password that’s only checked at login, typing biometrics can be continuously monitored throughout a session, providing ongoing authentication. This is especially vital for “zero trust” environments, where trust is never assumed and continuously verified.
User Experience: For the legitimate user, it’s largely frictionless. There’s no extra step beyond typing normally. This contrasts sharply with the inconvenience of constantly re-entering codes or fumbling with authenticator apps.

In essence, TypingDNA transforms an everyday interaction—typing—into a sophisticated security mechanism, moving beyond “what you know” passwords and “what you have” devices to “who you are” your unique behavioral patterns. This represents a significant leap forward in passive, yet powerful, authentication.

TypingDNA Products and Solutions: A Deep Dive into Their Offerings

They’ve strategically positioned their solutions to address critical needs in workforce and customer authentication, aiming for both enhanced security and improved user experience.

Cloud Authentication: Verify 2FA

This is TypingDNA’s flagship offering for two-factor authentication 2FA, emphasizing a frictionless user experience by eliminating the need for external devices or codes.

“2FA Without a Phone”: The central selling point. Instead of receiving an SMS code or generating a TOTP Time-based One-Time Password from an app, users simply type a short phrase e.g., 4 words or continue typing naturally. The system verifies their identity based on their unique typing rhythm.
Integration Flexibility:
- Direct API Integration: Businesses can integrate Verify 2FA directly into their websites, web applications, or internal systems using TypingDNA’s Authentication API. This allows for custom implementation tailored to specific needs.
- OIDC OpenID Connect Integration: For organizations already utilizing Identity and Access Management IAM platforms, Verify 2FA offers seamless integration with popular providers like Okta, Ping Identity, and Microsoft Entra ID formerly Azure AD. This allows companies to augment their existing IAM infrastructure with a powerful, device-agnostic 2FA method.
Use Cases:
- Seamless Customer Experience: For customer-facing applications, Verify 2FA can reduce login friction, leading to higher conversion rates and reduced abandonment, while still providing strong authentication. This is crucial for e-commerce, banking, and SaaS platforms.
- Workforce Authentication: It offers a more convenient and less intrusive 2FA for employees accessing corporate applications, especially beneficial for remote workers who might not always have their phone or a hardware token readily available.
Benefits:
- Reduced Friction: Eliminates common pain points associated with traditional 2FA, like lost phones, weak Wi-Fi signals for SMS, or expired TOTP codes.
- Enhanced Security: Typing biometrics adds a layer that’s incredibly difficult to spoof, even if credentials are compromised.
- Cost Savings: Potentially reduces the need for hardware tokens or the operational overhead of managing SMS gateways.

Continuous Endpoint Authentication: ActiveLock

ActiveLock is TypingDNA’s solution for real-time, ongoing identity verification on company computers, particularly designed for the modern remote and hybrid workforce. It’s a key component of a “Zero Trust” security strategy. Safari.com Reviews

What it Does: ActiveLock continuously monitors the typing patterns of users on company devices after initial login. If it detects a significant deviation from the authorized user’s typical typing rhythm, it can trigger an alert, prompt re-authentication, or even lock the device.
Problem Solved:
- Device Sharing: Prevents unauthorized users from accessing a logged-in company computer if the legitimate user steps away or shares their device. This is a common vulnerability, especially in remote work settings where physical oversight is absent.
- Unattended Devices: Mitigates the risk of someone gaining access to an unattended, logged-in workstation.
- Session Hijacking: Adds a layer of defense against scenarios where an attacker might take over an active session.
- Insider Threats: Helps detect if a legitimate employee’s account has been compromised and is being used by someone else.
Key Features:
- Real-time Monitoring: Provides continuous assessment of the user’s identity.
- Configurable Actions: Organizations can set policies for what happens when suspicious activity is detected e.g., re-authenticate, lock screen, notify IT.
- Compliance Support: Helps meet regulatory requirements like HIPAA and SOC2 by ensuring only authorized individuals access sensitive data in remote environments.
- AI-Powered Detection: Leverages TypingDNA’s advanced AI to distinguish between legitimate user variations and actual impostor attempts.
- Enhanced Security Posture: Moves beyond static login checks to continuous vigilance.
- Zero Trust Enforcement: A crucial enabler for a true Zero Trust security framework, where trust is never implicit.
- Reduced Fraud and Data Breaches: By identifying unauthorized access in real-time, it significantly reduces the window of opportunity for attackers.
- Peace of Mind for IT/Security Teams: Provides granular visibility and control over endpoint access in distributed workforces.

Integration Capabilities: Fitting TypingDNA into Your Existing Stack

One of the critical factors for any enterprise-grade security solution is its ability to seamlessly integrate with existing infrastructure. TypingDNA understands this, and their platform is designed with a strong emphasis on interoperability, allowing organizations to leverage their typing biometric technology without a complete overhaul of their IT environment.

OIDC OpenID Connect Integration

For organizations already invested in Identity and Access Management IAM solutions, OIDC integration is a must. OpenID Connect is an authentication layer built on top of OAuth 2.0, providing a standardized way for clients to verify the identity of an end-user based on authentication performed by an authorization server.

Seamless IAM Augmentation: TypingDNA Verify 2FA can act as an External IdP/EAM Identity Provider/External Authentication Method through OIDC. This means it can plug directly into your existing IAM platform as an additional authentication factor.
Supported IAM Providers: TypingDNA specifically highlights compatibility with industry leaders such as:
- Okta: A widely used identity management platform for workforce and customer identities.
- Ping Identity PingOne DaVinci: Another robust enterprise identity solution. Their integration with PingOne DaVinci signifies a deep technical partnership.
- Microsoft Entra ID formerly Azure AD: Microsoft’s cloud-based identity and access management service, prevalent in many enterprise environments.
How it Works: When a user attempts to log in via your IAM platform, the IAM can be configured to call TypingDNA as a second factor. The user performs the typing biometric verification e.g., typing 4 words, and TypingDNA returns an assertion to the IAM, confirming the user’s identity based on their typing pattern. The IAM then proceeds with the login flow.
Benefits of OIDC:
- Standardization: OIDC is a widely adopted standard, ensuring predictable and secure integration.
- Reduced Development Effort: Leveraging OIDC simplifies the integration process compared to building custom connectors.
- Flexibility: Allows organizations to maintain their existing IAM workflows while adding TypingDNA’s advanced biometrics.
- Centralized Management: Authentication policies and user directories remain managed within the IAM, with TypingDNA providing a powerful biometric layer.

Authentication API

For more granular control or for direct integration into custom applications and websites, TypingDNA provides a comprehensive Authentication API. This allows developers to embed typing biometric verification directly into their applications.

Direct Control: The API gives developers direct control over the biometric enrollment, verification, and authentication flows within their own applications.
- Custom Web Applications: Integrate 2FA into a bespoke customer portal, an internal employee application, or a unique online service.
- Mobile Applications Indirectly: While TypingDNA is primarily keyboard-based, the API could theoretically be used to integrate with mobile apps where a virtual keyboard is used, though the accuracy might vary compared to physical keyboards.
- Fraud Detection Systems: Integrate typing biometrics into existing fraud detection engines to add another data point for risk assessment.
Developer-Friendly Resources: TypingDNA provides:
- Extensive Documentation: Detailed API references, guides, and best practices.
- Tutorials: Step-by-step instructions for implementing the technology.
- Dev Account: A sandbox environment for developers to experiment and build integrations.
- SDKs Software Development Kits: While not explicitly stated for every language, typically, an API of this nature would come with SDKs for popular programming languages to further simplify development.
Benefits of API Integration:
- Maximum Customization: Tailor the user experience and integration logic precisely to your application’s needs.
- Deep Embedding: Embed the biometric checks directly into critical workflows.
- Agility: Rapidly prototype and deploy new authentication methods.

ActiveLock’s Endpoint Integration

ActiveLock, their continuous endpoint authentication product, integrates differently, typically as a software agent or application installed on the endpoints company computers.

Endpoint Agent: ActiveLock runs in the background on the user’s computer, continuously monitoring typing patterns without interrupting their workflow.
Centralized Management: While running on individual endpoints, ActiveLock is managed from a central console, allowing IT administrators to:
- Set Policies: Define thresholds for suspicious activity and dictate actions e.g., prompt re-authentication, lock device, notify admin.
- View Reports: Access real-time monitoring reports and incident logs to track security events.
- User Management: Enroll and manage user biometric profiles.
- Passive Monitoring: Operates silently in the background, providing continuous security without user intervention.
- Scalability: Designed to be deployed across large fleets of company devices.
- Real-time Alerts: Provides immediate notification of potential unauthorized access.

In summary, TypingDNA has clearly prioritized ease of integration, offering both standardized OIDC options for enterprise IAM ecosystems and a flexible API for custom development.

This dual approach ensures that their advanced typing biometric technology can be adopted by a wide range of organizations, from those with complex existing infrastructure to those building new, custom solutions.

Security and Accuracy Claims: Unpacking the Reliability

When it comes to biometric authentication, security and accuracy are paramount.

TypingDNA makes strong claims in these areas, backed by their AI engine and industry recognition. Matter.com Reviews

Understanding what these claims mean and how they’re achieved is crucial for evaluating the technology.

AI Engine and Accuracy Breakthroughs

TypingDNA highlights significant advancements in its AI engine, stating that it has achieved “breakthrough accuracy… comparable with fingerprint and face recognition.” This is a bold claim, as fingerprint and facial recognition are considered highly accurate biometric modalities.

What Drives Accuracy:
- Sophisticated Algorithms: The AI goes beyond simple key-press timing. It likely analyzes a multitude of micro-patterns, including the consistency of key presses, release times, flight times between specific key pairs digraphs, trigraphs, and even the pressure and force applied inferred from timing variations.
- Large Datasets: Training a robust AI model requires vast amounts of diverse typing data from real users. The more data the AI is trained on, the better it can learn to distinguish between legitimate users and imposters, and to account for natural variations in a user’s typing.
- Continuous Improvement: AI models are constantly being refined. TypingDNA’s announcements e.g., December 19, 2024: “TypingDNA achieves breakthrough accuracy with new AI engine” suggest ongoing research and development to enhance their core algorithms.
“Comparable with Fingerprint and Face Recognition”: This claim implies a very low False Acceptance Rate FAR and False Rejection Rate FRR.
- FAR False Acceptance Rate: The probability that an unauthorized user is incorrectly authenticated as a legitimate user. A low FAR is critical for security.
- FRR False Rejection Rate: The probability that a legitimate user is incorrectly denied access. A low FRR is crucial for user experience and avoiding frustration.
- For typing biometrics, the challenge is balancing these. A system too strict will reject legitimate users high FRR, while one too lenient will let imposters in high FAR. Advanced AI aims to find the optimal balance.

Gartner and Frost & Sullivan Recognition

Third-party validation from reputable research and consulting firms adds significant credibility to TypingDNA’s claims.

Gartner® Hype Cycle™ Recognition 2024: TypingDNA has been recognized as a “Sample Vendor” in:
- Digital Identity: This Hype Cycle tracks emerging technologies for identity verification and access management. Inclusion here signifies that Gartner sees typing biometrics as a relevant and developing technology in this space.
- Financial Crime: This Hype Cycle focuses on technologies used to combat financial fraud. Their inclusion here indicates that typing biometrics is seen as a viable tool for fraud detection and prevention, particularly in areas like account takeover.
- Significance: Being a “Sample Vendor” means Gartner has identified TypingDNA as a representative vendor offering solutions in these emerging technology categories. It signals to enterprises that this technology is gaining traction and worth considering for future adoption.
Frost & Sullivan Identification as a Leader in Global Biometric Verification Solutions: This is another strong endorsement. Frost & Sullivan conducts in-depth market research and competitive analysis. Being identified as a “leader” suggests TypingDNA holds a significant position in the market, likely due to its technology, customer base, and market strategy.

Zero Trust Security and Compliance

TypingDNA explicitly positions its solutions within the framework of Zero Trust Security and highlights its relevance for compliance.

Zero Trust Alignment: The core principle of Zero Trust is “never trust, always verify.” ActiveLock, with its continuous authentication, perfectly aligns with this. Instead of authenticating once at login, it continuously verifies the user’s identity throughout their session, assuming no implicit trust, even within the network perimeter.
Compliance HIPAA/SOC2:
- HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act: Relevant for healthcare organizations, HIPAA mandates strict controls over access to Protected Health Information PHI. ActiveLock helps demonstrate that only authorized individuals are accessing patient data, crucial for remote healthcare workers.
- SOC2 Service Organization Control 2: A compliance framework for service organizations that specifies how they should manage customer data. Continuous authentication with ActiveLock can contribute to meeting the security and privacy criteria of SOC2.
- New York State DMV and European Banking Authority Approval: This is a particularly strong real-world validation. Regulatory bodies are notoriously cautious about new technologies, especially in sensitive sectors like government and finance. Their approval indicates that typing biometrics has met stringent security and reliability standards. This suggests that the technology has undergone rigorous testing and validation to be considered compliant for identity authentication.

Security Beyond Accuracy: Resilience to Attacks

While accuracy is key, a truly secure biometric system also needs to be resilient to various attack vectors.

Spoofing Resistance: Unlike passwords that can be stolen, or physical biometrics that could theoretically be spoofed e.g., a high-quality fingerprint replica, replicating someone’s precise typing rhythm is incredibly difficult. It requires replicating muscle memory, speed, and subtle timing variations.
Liveness Detection Implicit: Typing requires active user interaction. This inherently provides a form of “liveness detection” – the system is verifying an active, real-time typing process, not a static image or recording.
Data Protection: TypingDNA emphasizes privacy-friendly student authentication. This suggests they handle biometric data with care, likely anonymizing or encrypting the raw biometric templates to prevent re-identification.

In essence, TypingDNA’s security and accuracy claims are not just marketing fluff.

They are supported by a strong AI foundation, positive recognition from leading industry analysts, and crucial real-world regulatory approvals, positioning it as a credible and robust authentication solution.

Use Cases and Target Industries: Where TypingDNA Shines

TypingDNA’s typing biometric technology is versatile, finding strong applications across a range of industries and specific use cases where traditional authentication methods fall short or create friction.

Their focus is clearly on enhancing security while optimizing the user experience.

Workforce Authentication: Securing the Enterprise Perimeter

This is perhaps the most prominent and immediately impactful application for TypingDNA, especially with the rise of remote and hybrid work models. Cinamaker.com Reviews

Zero Trust for Remote Workforce:
- Challenge: In a remote setup, the traditional network perimeter dissolves. Employees access corporate resources from various locations, often on personal or less secure networks. Initial login authentication is no longer sufficient to ensure continuous identity.
- TypingDNA Solution: ActiveLock provides continuous endpoint authentication. It ensures that even after a successful login, the person using the company device is indeed the authorized employee. If the typing pattern deviates, it flags potential unauthorized access, device sharing, or an unattended device.
- Benefit: Moves organizations towards a true Zero Trust security model, where every access request is verified, regardless of location or initial authentication.
Prevent Device Sharing:
- Challenge: A common issue in remote work, and even in shared office environments, is employees or contractors sharing devices or leaving a logged-in computer unattended. This creates significant security vulnerabilities.
- TypingDNA Solution: ActiveLock actively monitors typing patterns. If a different typing rhythm is detected, it can alert the IT department or even lock the device, preventing an unauthorized individual from accessing company resources.
- Benefit: Enhances compliance e.g., HIPAA, SOC2 for remote access to sensitive data and reduces the risk of data breaches due to improper device usage.
Frictionless Workforce 2FA:
- Challenge: Traditional 2FA methods SMS codes, authenticator apps, hardware tokens can be cumbersome, leading to employee frustration, productivity loss, and sometimes even workaround behaviors that compromise security.
- TypingDNA Solution: Verify 2FA offers “2FA without a phone.” Employees simply type a short phrase or continue typing as usual. Their identity is verified based on their typing pattern.
- Benefit: Improves employee satisfaction, reduces login times, and eliminates the operational overhead associated with managing traditional 2FA methods.

Customer Authentication: Enhancing User Experience and Reducing Fraud

Beyond the enterprise, TypingDNA’s technology has significant implications for customer-facing applications, balancing security with a seamless user journey.

Seamless 2FA Customer Experience:
- Challenge: Customers often abandon transactions or accounts if the authentication process is too cumbersome. Strong security is necessary, but it shouldn’t come at the cost of user frustration.
- TypingDNA Solution: Verify 2FA allows customers to authenticate using their typing pattern, eliminating the need to reach for a phone or remember additional codes. This is particularly valuable for e-commerce, online banking, and subscription services.
- Benefit: Reduces friction, improves customer retention, and enhances the overall user experience while maintaining strong security.
Prevent Account Sharing:
- Challenge: Account sharing can lead to revenue loss for subscription services e.g., streaming platforms, SaaS tools and can also pose security risks if compromised accounts are widely distributed.
- TypingDNA Solution: By continuously monitoring typing patterns, the system can detect if multiple distinct individuals are accessing an account, even if they know the correct credentials.
- Benefit: Helps enforce licensing agreements, maximize revenue, and mitigate the security risks associated with shared credentials.
Reduce Fraud:
- Challenge: Account takeover fraud, new account fraud, and transaction fraud remain pervasive threats. Traditional authentication often fails to detect imposters who have stolen credentials.
- TypingDNA Solution: Typing biometrics provides a powerful, behavioral layer of defense. Even if an attacker has a stolen username and password, their typing pattern will likely not match the legitimate user’s, flagging the fraudulent attempt in real-time.
- Benefit: Proactive fraud detection, reduced financial losses, and enhanced trust in online services.

Student Authentication: Integrity in Online Education

The proliferation of online learning has brought new challenges to academic integrity, particularly around verifying student identity during exams.

E-learning Student Authentication:
- Challenge: Ensuring the person taking an online exam is indeed the registered student, and that they are not being aided by another individual. Many proctoring solutions are invasive e.g., requiring constant webcam monitoring or easily circumvented.
- TypingDNA Solution: By continuously authenticating the student’s typing pattern throughout an online exam, TypingDNA can detect if the student has been swapped out or if someone else is typing for them.
- Benefit: A privacy-friendly alternative to intrusive proctoring methods. It helps maintain academic integrity, provides confidence in online certifications, and is less stressful for students compared to constant video surveillance. It also makes it significantly harder to “ghost-write” an exam.

Other Niche Applications

While the primary focus is on security, the underlying technology has broader potential:

Focus Mood and Productivity Tracking: As mentioned, this experimental tool shows how typing patterns can reveal behavioral insights beyond just identity, potentially impacting personal productivity and wellness.
Accessibility Enhancements: While not a primary focus, biometric typing could potentially assist in verifying users with certain disabilities or unique typing styles, provided the AI is robust enough to learn these variations.

In conclusion, TypingDNA is not just a niche security gadget.

It offers practical, scalable solutions that address some of the most pressing authentication and fraud challenges across diverse sectors, proving particularly valuable in the age of digital transformation and remote operations.

The Pricing Model: Understanding Cost and Value

While TypingDNA does not publicly list specific pricing tiers on their main product pages likely due to the enterprise-grade nature of their solutions requiring custom quotes, they do provide clear pathways for obtaining pricing information and suggest factors that would influence cost.

This approach is common for B2B SaaS companies offering tailored security solutions.

How to Get Pricing Information

“Contact us for a demo” / “Pricing” links: Prominently featured on product pages for Verify 2FA and ActiveLock, these buttons lead to inquiry forms. This indicates that pricing is typically provided after an initial consultation to understand a client’s specific needs.
Dev Account: While not directly for pricing, the availability of a developer account suggests a freemium or trial access model for developers to test and build integrations, which can precede a commercial agreement.

Factors Influencing Pricing Inferred

Based on industry standards for enterprise-grade security software and the nature of TypingDNA’s offerings, the pricing model is likely influenced by several key variables:

Number of Users/Endpoints: This is almost always a primary driver.
- For Verify 2FA Cloud Authentication: The number of unique users requiring 2FA. Pricing could be per active user per month/year.
- For ActiveLock Continuous Endpoint Authentication: The number of endpoints company computers where the software will be installed and monitored.
Volume of Transactions/Authentications: For high-volume customer authentication scenarios, pricing might be tiered based on the number of biometric verification attempts or successful authentications per period.
Features and Modules:
- Basic 2FA vs. Continuous Authentication.
- Specific integrations e.g., advanced IAM integrations might be bundled differently.
- Reporting and analytics capabilities.
- Advanced fraud detection features.
Support and SLAs: Enterprise clients often require dedicated support, faster response times, and guaranteed service level agreements SLAs, which would factor into the cost.
Deployment Model:
- Cloud-based SaaS: Most likely the standard offering for Verify 2FA. This would be a subscription model.
- On-Premise for ActiveLock: While less common for modern solutions, large enterprises with strict data residency requirements might inquire about on-premise deployment for ActiveLock components. This would involve higher upfront costs for licensing and infrastructure.
Customization and Professional Services: Any bespoke development, unique integrations, or professional services for implementation and training would add to the overall cost.
Industry and Compliance Requirements: Solutions tailored for highly regulated industries e.g., finance, healthcare might have specific features or certification requirements that influence pricing.

Value Proposition and ROI

While specific pricing isn’t disclosed, the value proposition TypingDNA offers can help justify the investment:

Reduced Fraud Costs: By preventing account takeovers and other forms of fraud, businesses can save significant amounts in chargebacks, customer support, and brand reputational damage.
Increased Productivity: For workforce authentication, frictionless 2FA reduces login times and minimizes employee frustration, directly impacting productivity. Elimination of hardware tokens also reduces procurement and management costs.
Enhanced Security Posture: Moving to continuous authentication and strong biometrics significantly reduces the risk of breaches and unauthorized access, which can have massive financial and reputational costs.
Compliance Adherence: For regulated industries, the ability to demonstrate continuous identity verification can help avoid hefty fines and ensure regulatory compliance e.g., HIPAA, SOC2.
Improved User Experience: For customer-facing applications, a seamless authentication experience can lead to higher conversion rates, increased engagement, and reduced customer churn.

In summary, TypingDNA’s pricing model is likely custom-quoted to align with the specific scale, complexity, and integration needs of each enterprise client. Flipboard.com Reviews

The focus is on demonstrating a strong Return on Investment ROI through enhanced security, reduced operational overhead, and improved user satisfaction.

Latest Developments and Industry Recognition

TypingDNA actively highlights its advancements and external validation, indicating a commitment to innovation and market relevance.

Recent Product and AI Engine Updates

February 16, 2025: Introducing ActiveLock 3.5 Fortress
- Key Feature: “Redefining Continuous Endpoint Authentication with Dual-Layer Security and Revolutionary AI.”
- Significance: This suggests a significant upgrade to their continuous authentication product, ActiveLock. “Dual-Layer Security” implies additional authentication mechanisms or enhanced detection capabilities beyond just typing biometrics, potentially integrating other behavioral signals or contextual data. “Revolutionary AI” points to ongoing improvements in their core machine learning algorithms, likely leading to even higher accuracy and faster detection of anomalies. This demonstrates a clear focus on strengthening their flagship continuous authentication offering for enterprise environments.
December 19, 2024: TypingDNA achieves breakthrough accuracy with new AI engine
- Key Feature: “comparable with fingerprint and face recognition.”
- Significance: This is a crucial claim. Fingerprint and facial recognition are highly mature and widely accepted biometric modalities known for their high accuracy. Achieving comparable accuracy with typing biometrics would be a major technical breakthrough, significantly bolstering its credibility and utility as a primary authentication factor. It suggests their AI has reached a level where False Acceptance Rates FAR and False Rejection Rates FRR are competitive with these established methods. This advancement directly impacts the reliability and trustworthiness of all their products.

Strategic Integrations

December 4, 2024: TypingDNA now integrates with Ping Identity’s PingOne DaVinci
- Significance: This is a key strategic partnership. Ping Identity is a major player in the Identity and Access Management IAM space, serving large enterprises. PingOne DaVinci is their no-code/low-code identity orchestration platform. This integration means that organizations using Ping Identity can easily incorporate TypingDNA’s “2FA without a phone” capability into their existing identity workflows without extensive coding. It expands TypingDNA’s reach into the enterprise IAM market and validates their ability to seamlessly integrate with complex identity ecosystems.

Industry Recognition and Validation

August 21, 2024: TypingDNA recognized as a Sample Vendor in Gartner® Hype Cycle™ for Digital Identity and Financial Crime, 2024
- Significance: This reiterates their inclusion in Gartner’s influential Hype Cycles. Being a “Sample Vendor” means Gartner identifies TypingDNA as a representative provider of solutions in these emerging technology categories. It signals to enterprise decision-makers that typing biometrics is a technology worth monitoring and considering for future adoption in both digital identity management and fraud prevention strategies. It lends significant credibility to their solutions.
Frost & Sullivan identifies TypingDNA as a leader in global Biometric Verification Solutions
- Significance: This is a powerful endorsement from another respected market research firm. Being labeled a “leader” by Frost & Sullivan implies that TypingDNA has a strong market position, robust technology, and potentially a competitive edge in the biometric verification space. This kind of recognition often stems from a comprehensive analysis of market share, growth strategies, technological innovation, and customer impact.
Spring 2022: TypingDNA is ranked in the Top 10 of Zero Trust Security solutions in the world.
- Significance: This highlights their strong alignment with the critical and growing “Zero Trust” security paradigm. Being in the top 10 signifies that independent evaluators or market analysts view TypingDNA as a significant enabler of Zero Trust architectures, particularly for continuous authentication at the endpoint.
New York State DMV and European Banking Authority approve typing biometrics as a compliant method of identity authentication.
- Significance: This is perhaps the most compelling form of real-world validation. Government agencies like the DMV and financial regulatory bodies like the European Banking Authority operate under extremely strict security and compliance mandates. Their approval of typing biometrics as a compliant method means the technology has undergone rigorous scrutiny and met high standards for reliability, security, and data privacy. This is a massive vote of confidence and opens doors for broader adoption in highly regulated sectors.

These latest developments and recognitions paint a picture of TypingDNA as an innovative company that is continuously improving its core technology, expanding its market reach through strategic partnerships, and gaining significant validation from industry analysts and regulatory bodies.

This trajectory suggests a growing maturity and acceptance of typing biometrics as a legitimate and powerful authentication method.

Comparative Advantages: Why Choose TypingDNA?

In a crowded cybersecurity market, understanding TypingDNA’s distinct advantages is key. While many companies offer 2FA or continuous authentication, TypingDNA carves out a unique niche with its emphasis on behavioral biometrics, leading to several compelling benefits over traditional and even other biometric solutions.

Frictionless User Experience

This is arguably TypingDNA’s most significant differentiator.

“2FA without a Phone”: The ability to authenticate simply by typing a few words, or by continuously typing during a session, eliminates the common pain points associated with other 2FA methods.
- No Hardware Tokens: Reduces procurement, distribution, and management costs, as well as the risk of loss or damage.
- No SMS Codes: Solves issues with poor cell reception, international roaming charges, and the vulnerability of SMS-based authentication to SIM swap attacks.
- No Authenticator Apps: Users don’t need to download a separate app, open it, find the code, and then manually enter it, saving time and reducing friction.
Passive Continuous Authentication: ActiveLock operates silently in the background, continuously verifying identity without requiring explicit user actions after the initial login. This is far less intrusive than periodic re-authentication prompts or invasive monitoring.
Reduced User Frustration: Fewer steps, fewer external devices, and a more natural authentication flow lead to happier employees and customers, translating into higher productivity and better conversion rates.

Enhanced Security Posture

Typing biometrics offers unique security benefits that complement or surpass other methods.

Strong Anti-Spoofing: Unlike static credentials passwords that can be stolen, or even some physical biometrics that might be spoofed with sophisticated techniques, accurately replicating someone’s precise keystroke dynamics dwell time, flight time, rhythm is incredibly difficult, bordering on impossible for an imposter. It requires mirroring muscle memory, not just data.
Real-time Fraud Detection: The continuous monitoring offered by ActiveLock allows for immediate detection of anomalies. If an account is hijacked or a device is being used by an unauthorized person, TypingDNA can flag it in real-time, significantly reducing the window of opportunity for attackers. This is a critical advantage over single-point-of-failure login authentication.
Beyond Stolen Credentials: Even if a user’s password is leaked or phished, an attacker would still face the hurdle of mimicking the legitimate user’s unique typing pattern, providing an additional, robust layer of defense.
Zero Trust Enabler: TypingDNA’s continuous authentication capabilities directly align with the “never trust, always verify” principle of Zero Trust. It allows organizations to continuously assess user identity even after initial access is granted, mitigating threats within the network.

Privacy-Friendly Nature

Compared to some other biometric modalities, typing biometrics can be perceived as less intrusive.

No Facial Scans or Fingerprints: Avoids the privacy concerns sometimes associated with facial recognition or fingerprint scanning, which capture more visually identifiable biometric data.
Behavioral, Not Physiological: Typing patterns are behavioral traits rather than fixed physiological ones. While unique, they might be seen as less sensitive than data directly derived from one’s body.
Focus on Pattern, Not Content: The system analyzes how you type, not what you type though it does need input to analyze the pattern. This helps alleviate concerns about data content.

Scalability and Integration

Cloud-Based Architecture: Their cloud authentication solutions are designed for scalability, capable of handling large volumes of users and authentications for enterprises.
OIDC and API Flexibility: The provision of both standard OIDC integration with major IAMs Okta, Ping Identity, Microsoft Entra ID and a flexible API means TypingDNA can be easily embedded into a wide array of existing IT infrastructures, reducing implementation complexity and time.

Diverse Applicability

Workforce, Customer, and Education: Unlike niche solutions, TypingDNA’s technology addresses critical needs across multiple domains, from securing corporate networks and preventing employee device sharing to enhancing customer login experiences and ensuring academic integrity in online exams. This broad applicability increases its overall value proposition.

While other solutions might excel in specific areas e.g., hardware tokens for ultra-high security in specific environments, or facial recognition for quick, hands-free login, TypingDNA’s blend of unparalleled user experience, robust behavioral security, privacy considerations, and broad applicability sets it apart as a strong contender for modern authentication needs, especially in the context of remote work and continuous identity verification.

Limitations and Considerations: The Other Side of the Coin

While TypingDNA presents a compelling vision for authentication, no technology is without its limitations. Streaky.com Reviews

Understanding these nuances is crucial for a balanced review and for organizations considering adoption.

Learning Curve and Initial Enrollment

Baseline Data Requirement: For TypingDNA to accurately identify a user, it first needs to learn their unique typing rhythm. This involves an initial enrollment period where the user types a sufficient amount of text to build a reliable biometric profile.
Potential for Initial False Rejections FRR: During the initial learning phase, or if a user’s typing behavior deviates significantly from their established norm e.g., using a new keyboard, typing with an injury, extreme fatigue, there’s a higher chance of a False Rejection FRR. The system might mistakenly identify the legitimate user as an imposter. While the AI aims to adapt, significant, sudden changes can be challenging.
User Training: Users might need to be briefly educated on how the system works and that their typing is being used for authentication, to ensure they don’t consciously try to alter their typing style, which could negatively impact accuracy.

Environmental and Device Factors

Keyboard Consistency: The accuracy of typing biometrics can be influenced by the type of keyboard used. A mechanical keyboard feels and sounds different from a laptop’s chiclet keyboard or a virtual on-screen keyboard. While the AI is robust, significant changes in keyboard type could potentially lead to reduced accuracy or require the user to re-enroll or adapt their profile.
Typing Style Variations: Factors like:
- Ergonomic Keyboards vs. Standard: Different layouts can alter typing patterns.
- Physical Conditions: Hand injuries, medical conditions affecting motor skills e.g., tremors, or even temporary factors like cold hands can subtly alter typing patterns.
- Emotional State: Extreme stress or excitement might slightly affect typing rhythm, though a well-trained AI should account for typical human variability.
Background Noise Indirectly: While not directly impacting typing biometrics, if the system were to incorporate auditory cues which TypingDNA’s description doesn’t explicitly state, background noise could be a factor. Currently, it’s primarily focused on timing and dynamics.

Applicability Limitations

Not for All Users: Typing biometrics is fantastic for users who type regularly. However, it wouldn’t be suitable as a sole authentication method for users who rarely type, or those who use non-keyboard input methods predominantly e.g., voice, touchscreens for casual browsing. In such cases, it would need to be combined with other factors.
Single Device Dependency for ActiveLock: While ActiveLock provides continuous authentication on a specific endpoint, it’s tied to that device. If a user switches to a completely new, unmonitored device, the continuous authentication benefit for that specific session is lost until ActiveLock is installed and active on the new device.
Boot-Up Security: Typing biometrics typically begins after the operating system loads and a keyboard is active. It doesn’t secure the initial boot process itself or protect against hardware-level attacks.

Privacy Perception

Monitoring “How” You Type: While TypingDNA emphasizes its privacy-friendly nature and focuses on patterns rather than content, the concept of monitoring typing behavior might raise initial privacy concerns for some users or organizations, especially those in highly privacy-sensitive regions. Clear communication about data handling and what is not being monitored is essential.
Biometric Data Storage: Although biometric templates are generally stored rather than raw biometric data, the security of these templates is paramount. A breach of biometric templates, while not as devastating as a password breach, still represents a security incident. TypingDNA’s regulatory approvals NY DMV, European Banking Authority suggest they meet high standards for data security and privacy.

Complementary, Not Always Standalone

While TypingDNA positions itself as a strong 2FA, for the highest security requirements e.g., government, highly classified data, it will likely be used as part of a multi-factor authentication MFA strategy, combining it with another factor like a trusted device, a PIN, or a password. This is a common best practice for robust security architectures.

In conclusion, while TypingDNA offers significant advantages in user experience and behavioral security, organizations should consider the initial enrollment requirements, the impact of varying typing environments, and the need to potentially integrate it as part of a broader MFA strategy for comprehensive security.

These are not necessarily weaknesses, but rather important considerations for optimal deployment and user acceptance.

Conclusion

The company’s strong emphasis on AI-driven accuracy, as evidenced by their claims of comparability with fingerprint and face recognition, combined with significant third-party validation from Gartner, Frost & Sullivan, and notably, regulatory approvals from the NY State DMV and the European Banking Authority, lends substantial credibility to their technology. These endorsements are not mere marketing. they signal that typing biometrics has passed stringent tests and is considered a viable, compliant method of identity verification in highly sensitive sectors.

TypingDNA’s strategic integration capabilities through OIDC with major IAM providers like Okta and Ping Identity, alongside a flexible API, demonstrate their commitment to enterprise adoption and seamless embedding into existing IT infrastructures. This ease of integration is crucial for organizations looking to modernize their security without disruptive overhauls.

While limitations such as the initial learning curve for biometric profiles, potential variations due to different keyboards, and the perception of behavioral monitoring exist, these are common considerations for any advanced biometric technology.

TypingDNA appears to be proactively addressing these through continuous AI refinement and clear communication.

In essence, TypingDNA is not just offering a new authentication method. they are providing a solution that aims to redefine the balance between security and user experience. For businesses grappling with fraud, device sharing, compliance, and employee/customer friction, TypingDNA presents a robust, privacy-friendly, and forward-thinking alternative. Their trajectory suggests that typing biometrics is poised to become an increasingly integral component of modern, Zero Trust-aligned security architectures, making TypingDNA a company well worth exploring for organizations looking to future-proof their identity and access management strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TypingDNA a legitimate company?

Yes, TypingDNA is a legitimate company.

They are recognized by industry analysts like Gartner and Frost & Sullivan, and their technology has received approval from regulatory bodies such as the New York State DMV and the European Banking Authority. Adaface.com Reviews

How does TypingDNA’s typing biometrics work?

TypingDNA analyzes the unique micro-patterns of how a user types, focusing on factors like the time a key is pressed dwell time and the time between key presses flight time. This data is processed by proprietary AI to create a unique biometric profile for authentication.

What is “2FA without a phone” with TypingDNA?

“2FA without a phone” is a feature of TypingDNA Verify 2FA.

Instead of using a phone for SMS codes or authenticator apps, users authenticate by typing a short phrase or naturally continuing to type.

Their typing pattern is used to verify their identity as the second factor.

What is ActiveLock by TypingDNA?

ActiveLock is TypingDNA’s continuous endpoint authentication solution.

It runs in the background on company computers, continuously monitoring the user’s typing pattern to ensure the legitimate user remains at the device, helping prevent device sharing and unauthorized access.

Can TypingDNA prevent account sharing?

Yes, TypingDNA’s continuous authentication capabilities can detect if multiple distinct individuals are using the same account based on their differing typing patterns, thereby helping to prevent account sharing.

Is TypingDNA compatible with Okta or Ping Identity?

Yes, TypingDNA’s Verify 2FA integrates seamlessly with major Identity and Access Management IAM platforms like Okta, Ping Identity including PingOne DaVinci, and Microsoft Entra ID formerly Azure AD via OIDC OpenID Connect.

How accurate is TypingDNA’s technology?

TypingDNA claims its new AI engine achieves “breakthrough accuracy, comparable with fingerprint and face recognition,” suggesting very low False Acceptance Rates FAR and False Rejection Rates FRR.

Is typing biometrics privacy-friendly?

Yes, TypingDNA emphasizes that its typing biometrics focuses on behavioral patterns rather than physiological identifiers like fingerprints or facial scans, which can be perceived as less intrusive. It analyzes how you type, not what you type. Zoho.com Reviews

Can TypingDNA help with HIPAA or SOC2 compliance?

Yes, for remote workforces, ActiveLock’s continuous authentication can help organizations meet regulatory requirements like HIPAA and SOC2 by ensuring only authorized users access sensitive data on company devices.

What industries can benefit from TypingDNA?

TypingDNA can benefit various industries including enterprise IT for workforce authentication, financial services for fraud detection, e-commerce for seamless customer 2FA, and education for student authentication in online exams.

Can TypingDNA prevent cheating in online exams?

Yes, TypingDNA’s student authentication solution can continuously monitor a student’s typing pattern during an online exam to ensure the registered student is the one taking the test, acting as a privacy-friendly proctoring method.

Is there a free trial or developer account for TypingDNA?

TypingDNA offers a developer account which likely provides free or trial access to their APIs and tools for developers to test and build integrations before committing to a commercial agreement.

How does TypingDNA compare to traditional 2FA methods like SMS or authenticator apps?

TypingDNA offers a more frictionless experience by eliminating the need for external devices or manual code entry, reducing user frustration, and enhancing security by making it harder to spoof a typing pattern compared to intercepting an SMS or brute-forcing a TOTP.

What kind of data does TypingDNA collect about typing?

TypingDNA collects data points related to keystroke dynamics, such as dwell time how long a key is pressed and flight time time between key presses. It does not analyze the content of what is typed for authentication purposes, but rather the underlying rhythm and patterns.

How long does it take for TypingDNA to learn a user’s typing pattern?

An initial enrollment period is required where the user types a sufficient amount of text for the AI to build a reliable baseline biometric profile.

The system then continuously learns and refines the profile over time.

Can I use TypingDNA on different keyboards or devices?

While TypingDNA’s AI is designed to adapt, significant changes in keyboard type e.g., mechanical vs. laptop could potentially influence initial accuracy or require the system to adapt to the new typing context. ActiveLock is installed per endpoint.

What happens if TypingDNA detects an unauthorized user?

If TypingDNA e.g., ActiveLock detects a significant deviation from the authorized user’s typing pattern, it can trigger configurable actions such as prompting re-authentication, locking the device, or notifying IT administrators. Uni.com Reviews

Does TypingDNA offer an on-premise solution?

While their Cloud Authentication Verify 2FA is cloud-based, large enterprises might inquire about on-premise deployment options for components of ActiveLock, though this is typically a custom arrangement.

Is TypingDNA a replacement for passwords?

TypingDNA is primarily a strong second factor 2FA or a continuous authentication method.

While it significantly enhances security and can reduce reliance on complex passwords, it often works in conjunction with passwords as part of a multi-factor authentication MFA strategy for maximum security.

How can I get pricing information for TypingDNA?

TypingDNA’s pricing is typically customized for enterprise clients.

You can obtain specific pricing information by contacting them directly through the “Contact us for a demo” or “Pricing” links on their website to discuss your organization’s specific needs.

Typingdna.com Reviews