Based on looking at the website, Code-like.org presents itself as an international online programming school for children, offering courses in various areas like game development, web design, and 3D modeling.
The site emphasizes practical, engaging learning with a focus on developing essential skills for the future.
However, a strict review of its homepage reveals several crucial omissions that raise questions about its transparency and overall reliability for potential users, especially given ethical considerations.
Here’s an overall review summary:
- Website Transparency: Lacking. Key information like company details, physical address, and team profiles are absent.
- Pricing Clarity: Poor. Pricing is not openly displayed and requires a form submission.
- Customer Support Information: Limited. Primarily relies on form submissions with no direct contact details phone number, email.
- Testimonials/Social Proof: Absent. No user reviews or success stories are featured.
- Security & Trust Signals: Minimal. No clear trust badges or verifiable certifications.
- Ethical Considerations: Generally permissible. The core offering of programming education for children is sound. However, the lack of transparency is a significant concern from an ethical standpoint regarding business practices.
- Overall Recommendation: Not Recommended. The lack of basic transparency and comprehensive information on the homepage makes it difficult to fully trust and assess the service.
The site is in Russian, which immediately presents a barrier for English-speaking users, despite claiming to be “international.” While the concept of teaching children programming is beneficial, the absence of standard trust-building elements on the homepage, such as clear pricing, detailed “About Us” sections, or visible contact information beyond a submission form, is a red flag.
|
0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. |
Amazon.com:
Check Amazon for Code-like.org Review Latest Discussions & Reviews: |
Reputable online services typically provide this information upfront to build user confidence.
From an ethical perspective, while the service itself education is not problematic, the lack of transparency in business operations could be concerning for parents seeking a trustworthy platform for their children’s learning.
Here are some better alternatives for online educational platforms focusing on ethical learning and transparent operations:
-
- Key Features: Interactive coding lessons, career paths, practical projects, quizzes, active community forums. Offers courses in numerous programming languages and web development.
- Average Price: Free basic access. Pro membership typically $19.99 – $39.99/month.
- Pros: Highly interactive, self-paced, strong community support, clear learning paths, excellent for beginners, transparent pricing.
- Cons: Some advanced topics might require external resources.
-
- Key Features: Courses, specializations, and degrees from top universities and companies. Covers a vast array of subjects, including computer science, data science, and business.
- Average Price: Many courses are free to audit. paid courses/specializations range from $39-$79/month or one-time fees from $200-$2000.
- Pros: High-quality content, reputable institutions, verifiable certificates, flexible learning schedules.
- Cons: Can be expensive for full certifications, some courses require prerequisites.
-
- Key Features: Online courses from universities worldwide, covering subjects like computer science, engineering, and humanities. Offers verified certificates and MicroMasters programs.
- Average Price: Many courses are free to audit. verified certificates typically $50-$300.
- Pros: Academic rigor, wide range of subjects, flexible learning, reputable partners.
- Cons: Less interactive than dedicated coding platforms for hands-on practice.
-
- Key Features: Free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. Covers subjects from math and science to computer programming and humanities. Offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard.
- Price: Free.
- Pros: Completely free, high-quality content, wide range of subjects, excellent for foundational learning, great for children and adults.
- Cons: Less focused on advanced, specialized programming career paths compared to paid platforms.
-
- Key Features: Massive online course marketplace. Thousands of courses on programming, web development, data science, and more, taught by independent instructors.
- Average Price: Varies widely, courses often on sale for $9.99 – $199.99.
- Pros: Huge selection, often affordable, lifetime access to purchased courses, practical, project-based learning.
- Cons: Quality can vary significantly between instructors.
-
- Key Features: Skill assessments, guided learning paths, and hands-on labs for IT professionals. Strong focus on software development, data, and cybersecurity.
- Average Price: Personal plans start around $29/month or $299/year.
- Pros: High-quality, in-depth content for professionals, skill-level assessments, hands-on labs.
- Cons: More geared towards adults and professionals, may be too advanced for young beginners.
-
- Key Features: Interactive courses and projects focused on data science, programming Python, R, SQL, and machine learning. Offers coding challenges and skill tracks.
- Average Price: Free basic access. Premium plans start around $25/month or $300/year.
- Pros: Highly interactive, project-based learning, strong focus on data skills, good for practical application.
- Cons: More niche, primarily focused on data science and analytics, less broad than general programming platforms.
Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.
IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.
Code-like.org Review & First Look
Based on an initial examination of the Code-like.org homepage, the site positions itself as an “International online programming school for children,” aiming to teach them to create games, websites, chatbots, and applications from scratch.
The primary language of the website is Russian, which immediately limits its “international” appeal and accessibility to a global, English-speaking audience.
This language barrier is a significant hurdle for any user not fluent in Russian.
The site features prominent calls to action for a “free trial lesson” and emphasizes the benefits of programming for children, such as developing communication skills, problem-solving abilities, logic, memory, and attention.
It also claims to “distract the child from computer games and mobile phones,” which is a common and appealing promise for parents. Pay.sendwyre.com Review
Initial Impressions and Accessibility
The design appears clean and relatively modern, though it’s built on Tilda, a common website builder, as indicated by the “Made on Tilda” footer.
This isn’t inherently a negative, but it suggests a more standardized, less custom development.
The user experience is straightforward for those who can navigate the Russian text.
However, the lack of an English language option or clear translation tool integrated into the site makes it largely inaccessible to a vast potential international market.
For a website claiming international reach, this is a critical oversight. Coralgraph.com Review
The site primarily uses pop-up forms for any user interaction, whether it’s signing up for a trial or asking questions, which can sometimes be cumbersome for users seeking quick information.
What’s Missing at First Glance
A critical component missing from the homepage is clear and upfront pricing information.
Instead of a pricing page or even a price range, the site states, “We will gladly tell you about the cost of our courses, but since the exact cost depends on the direction, format and duration of the course, we do not want to burden you with unnecessary calculations.
Just leave an application on our website, we will contact you and tell you everything.” This approach, while perhaps intended to personalize the experience, often creates a barrier for users who prefer transparency and direct access to cost details before committing to providing personal information.
Furthermore, there is no easily identifiable “About Us” section detailing the school’s history, its founders, or the qualifications of its instructors. Mauriceward.com Review
This lack of transparency regarding the people behind the platform can undermine trust.
Code-like.org Pros & Cons
When evaluating Code-like.org based on its homepage, it’s essential to weigh its potential advantages against its clear drawbacks.
From an ethical standpoint, a transparent and honest presentation of services is paramount.
While the underlying educational service is permissible, the website’s execution lacks certain ethical best practices in transparency.
Potential Advantages Pros
The core concept of Code-like.org—teaching children programming—is a valuable and ethical endeavor. Lighinthebox.com Review
- Focus on Children’s Education: The school is specifically tailored for children aged 6 to 17, which means the curriculum and teaching methods are likely designed to be age-appropriate and engaging. This specialization can be beneficial for parents looking for a dedicated platform for their kids.
- Variety of Programming Directions: The site lists several promising courses, including Graphic Design, 3D Modeling, Backend Web Programming Django/Python, Frontend Web Programming HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Python Programming via Godot, and even a “City of Programmers” for advanced students and “Programming + Math” for foundational learning. This breadth of options allows children to explore different facets of technology.
- Emphasis on Practical Application: The descriptions highlight “lots of practice” and the creation of “real working projects” by students. This hands-on approach is crucial for effective programming education, as it allows children to apply theoretical knowledge immediately.
- Trial Lesson Availability: The prominent offer of a “free trial lesson” is a positive feature, allowing parents and children to experience the teaching style and platform before making a financial commitment.
- Individual and Group Formats: The availability of both individual one-on-one and group up to 6 people sessions offers flexibility for different learning styles and preferences. Individual lessons can provide personalized attention, while group lessons can foster collaboration.
Significant Disadvantages Cons
The drawbacks identified on the Code-like.org homepage are primarily related to transparency, accessibility, and standard business practices.
These issues raise concerns about the overall trustworthiness and reliability of the platform.
- Lack of Pricing Transparency: This is perhaps the most significant red flag. Not displaying pricing directly on the website and requiring users to submit a form to inquire about costs is a common tactic that can deter potential customers. Transparent pricing builds trust and allows consumers to make informed decisions without feeling pressured.
- Language Barrier: The entire website is in Russian, despite its claim of being an “international” school. This immediately alienates a massive global audience and contradicts its stated international scope. A truly international platform would offer multiple language options, particularly English.
- Absence of “About Us” and Team Information: There is no dedicated section providing details about the school’s background, its mission, the qualifications of its instructors, or the experience of its leadership team. This lack of transparency about who is running the school and who will be teaching the children is a major trust deficit. Reputable educational institutions are usually proud to showcase their team and credentials.
- Limited Contact Information: The primary method for contact is through a web form. There’s no visible phone number, direct email address, or physical address. This makes it difficult for potential customers to quickly reach out with questions or concerns, or to verify the legitimacy of the operation.
- No Customer Testimonials or Social Proof: The homepage lacks any form of customer reviews, testimonials, or success stories. Without this social proof, it’s hard for new users to gauge the quality of the teaching or the satisfaction of previous students.
- Unclear Cancellation Policy: Information regarding how to cancel a subscription or a free trial is not readily available on the homepage. This is crucial for consumer protection and clarity, as users need to know their options if the service doesn’t meet their expectations.
- Generic Website Builder: While not a deal-breaker, the “Made on Tilda” footer indicates the use of a generic website builder. While Tilda is capable, a dedicated educational platform might invest in a more robust, custom-built site that offers more advanced features and a unique brand identity.
Code-like.org Alternatives
Given the significant transparency issues with Code-like.org, it’s crucial for parents seeking online programming education for their children to consider reputable, well-established alternatives.
These platforms offer clear pricing, strong reputations, and comprehensive support, making them far more trustworthy choices.
Reputable Online Learning Platforms
When choosing an online education provider, look for platforms that prioritize transparency, user experience, and verifiable credentials. Owlnwolf.ie Review
-
- Focus: Live online classes for K-12 learners, including a vast array of programming and tech courses.
- Key Features: Wide variety of subjects, small class sizes, live interaction with instructors, flexible scheduling, and parent reviews for each class and teacher.
- Pros: Highly interactive, diverse course offerings, strong community, transparent instructor profiles and ratings, easy to find classes based on interest and schedule.
- Cons: Pricing varies per class and instructor, requires good internet connection for live sessions.
-
- Focus: Coding for kids using visual block coding and transitioning to real-world languages like Python and JavaScript.
- Key Features: Game-based learning, self-paced courses, STEM integration, creation of games, apps, and mods. Used in over 100,000 schools.
- Pros: Very engaging for young learners, excellent progression from visual to text-based coding, strong curriculum, widely adopted in education.
- Cons: Subscription model, some content might be too game-focused for those seeking pure theoretical depth.
-
- Focus: Free visual programming language and online community for children to create interactive stories, games, and animations.
- Key Features: Drag-and-drop block coding, vibrant online community, extensive tutorials, free to use.
- Pros: Completely free, highly intuitive for beginners, fosters creativity and computational thinking, large supportive community, excellent for introducing fundamental concepts.
- Cons: Primarily visual block coding, not for learning advanced text-based languages directly.
-
- Focus: Non-profit dedicated to expanding access to computer science in schools and increasing participation by women and underrepresented minorities. Offers free online courses.
- Key Features: Hour of Code tutorials, full computer science curricula for various age groups, engaging activities, widely used in schools globally.
- Pros: Free, high-quality, research-backed curriculum, widely recognized, excellent for introducing foundational CS concepts.
- Cons: Primarily designed for integration into school curricula, less focused on individual advanced skill acquisition outside of a classroom setting.
-
- Focus: Online learning environment for STEM and robotics, teaching coding through virtual robot simulations.
- Key Features: Game-like environment, challenges, competitions, alignment with CSTA and ISTE standards.
- Pros: Highly engaging, teaches problem-solving and computational thinking through robotics, fun and interactive, good for hands-on learners.
- Cons: More niche focus on robotics, may not cover broader programming topics in depth.
-
- Focus: Hands-on projects delivered monthly that inspire creativity and problem-solving in STEM, including coding and electronics.
- Key Features: Monthly subscription boxes with materials and instructions for building cool projects.
- Pros: Physical, tangible projects, combines learning with hands-on building, engaging for visual and kinesthetic learners, high-quality materials.
- Cons: Not a purely online coding platform, focuses on project-based learning rather than structured coding courses, subscription required.
-
- Focus: While not a coding platform itself, the Logitech Crayon is an excellent tool for digital creativity and often used in conjunction with creative coding apps on iPads. It enhances engagement in visual programming environments or digital design aspects of coding.
- Key Features: Precise, responsive digital pencil for iPads, comfortable grip, durable design, long battery life.
- Pros: Enhances creativity and interaction with digital learning tools, particularly useful for graphic design or visual coding interfaces, more accessible than a traditional stylus for children.
- Cons: Requires an iPad, not a standalone learning solution, but an excellent accessory for digital learning.
How to Cancel Code-like.org Subscription
Given that Code-like.org does not display clear pricing or subscription terms on its homepage, information on how to cancel a subscription is also entirely absent.
This lack of transparency is a significant concern for any consumer. Charlestonphotoart.com Review
In the absence of direct instructions, typical methods for managing or canceling subscriptions apply, but they would rely heavily on the initial agreement made during the registration process.
Navigating the Unknowns of Cancellation
Without direct access to their terms of service apart from a link to a privacy policy and an “Offer” document, both in Russian, potential users are left in the dark.
A reputable online service provides clear, easily accessible information on how to manage accounts, including cancellation procedures, refunds, and renewal terms.
- Reviewing Initial Communication: If you were to subscribe to Code-like.org, the first step to cancellation would typically involve reviewing all communication received during the sign-up process. This includes any welcome emails, invoices, or service agreements, as these often contain details about subscription management.
- Checking Account Settings: For most online services, cancellation options are found within the user’s account dashboard or profile settings. Users would need to log in and look for sections like “Subscription,” “Billing,” “Manage Plan,” or “Account Settings.” Given the website’s current presentation, it’s uncertain if such a user-friendly dashboard exists.
- Contacting Support Directly via Form: Since no direct email or phone number is provided on the homepage, the only explicit method of contact is through their inquiry forms. You would likely need to fill out one of the “Ask us a question” or “Sign up for a trial lesson” forms, explicitly stating your intent to cancel and providing your account details. This is a less efficient and less reliable method than direct contact.
- Checking Payment Provider: If you paid via a third-party payment processor e.g., credit card, PayPal, you might be able to manage or cancel recurring payments directly through that provider’s portal. This is often a last resort if the service itself is unresponsive or unhelpful. However, this method only stops future payments and doesn’t guarantee a refund for services already paid for.
- Reviewing “Offer” Document: The website does link to an “Оферта” Offer document. This document, likely their terms of service, would contain the legal specifics regarding subscriptions, payments, and cancellations. It is crucial to have this translated and thoroughly reviewed before committing to any service from Code-like.org, as it will outline your rights and obligations.
Why Transparency Matters
From an ethical perspective, hiding cancellation policies or making them difficult to find is a deceptive practice.
It creates friction for consumers and can lead to frustration and financial disputes. Circumference.com Review
Reputable businesses prioritize clear, accessible terms to foster trust and ensure customer satisfaction.
The absence of this information on Code-like.org’s readily visible pages is a significant concern and makes it difficult to recommend the service.
Code-like.org Pricing
The pricing structure for Code-like.org is conspicuously absent from its public-facing homepage.
Instead of transparently displaying costs, the website opts for a strategy of requiring potential customers to submit their personal information name, email, phone number to receive a quote.
This approach, while sometimes used for highly customized services, is generally considered a barrier to entry and a red flag for many online consumers, especially in the education sector where competitive pricing is often a key decision factor. Usdtisv.com Review
The Opaque Pricing Model
The website explicitly states: “We will gladly tell you about the cost of our courses, but since the exact cost depends on the direction, format and duration of the course, we do not want to burden you with unnecessary calculations.
Just leave an application on our website, we will contact you and tell you everything.”
- Lack of Upfront Costs: This statement confirms that no pricing information is available without direct inquiry. This means users cannot quickly compare Code-like.org’s prices with competitors or budget accordingly without first engaging with their sales process.
- Personalized Quotes: The rationale provided is that pricing varies by “direction course, format individual/group, and duration 36 or 72 weeks.” While these factors genuinely influence educational costs, reputable platforms often provide a base price, starting rates, or a clear pricing calculator to give users an immediate estimate.
- Data Collection Strategy: This pricing model also serves as a lead generation tool, ensuring that Code-like.org captures contact information from interested parties. While common in sales, it can feel intrusive to users who are simply browsing and comparing options.
What to Expect Based on Industry Norms
Given the information provided about course duration and formats, we can infer some general aspects of what their pricing might entail, based on industry averages for online programming schools for children:
- Duration-Based Tiers: The site mentions “Basic course lasts 36 weeks” and “Full course lasts 72 weeks.” This suggests a tiered pricing model, where longer commitments likely result in a higher overall cost but potentially a lower weekly or monthly rate.
- Format-Based Pricing: “Individual” versus “Group” formats would almost certainly have different price points. Individual lessons one-on-one with a teacher are typically significantly more expensive due to the personalized attention. Group sessions, with up to 6 students, would be more budget-friendly per student.
- Course-Specific Costs: Some specialized courses, like 3D modeling or advanced web development, might command higher prices due to the complexity of the material or specialized software/resources required.
Ethical Implications of Opaque Pricing
From an ethical standpoint, transparent pricing is a cornerstone of fair business practice. When prices are hidden, it can:
- Create Distrust: Consumers may feel like the company has something to hide or is attempting to inflate prices based on individual inquiries.
- Waste User Time: Users must invest time providing information and waiting for a response, only to potentially find the price is outside their budget, leading to frustration.
- Limit Comparison: It becomes impossible for users to make an informed decision by comparing Code-like.org with its competitors without going through a tedious inquiry process for each.
Recommendation: Potential users should be extremely cautious when dealing with services that do not display their pricing upfront. Always ensure you understand the full cost, any recurring charges, and the cancellation policy before committing to any service. Etadit.com Review
Code-like.org vs. Competitors
Code-like.org’s current presentation places it at a significant disadvantage compared to platforms like Codecademy, Coursera, Tynker, or even free resources like Scratch and Code.org.
Transparency and Trust
This is where Code-like.org falls short most dramatically.
- Code-like.org: Lacks transparent pricing, no “About Us” section with team details, and minimal direct contact information. The entire site is in Russian, limiting its “international” claim. This opacity makes it difficult for potential users to trust the platform.
- Competitors e.g., Codecademy, Coursera, Tynker, Code.org: These platforms prioritize transparency.
- Clear Pricing: Most offer free tiers, trial periods, and clearly outlined subscription or course fees. For instance, Codecademy lists its Pro membership costs directly, and Coursera displays course prices upfront.
- “About Us” and Team: Reputable platforms prominently feature their mission, history, and the qualifications of their founders and instructors. This builds credibility and allows users to verify expertise.
- Contact Information: Typically provide dedicated support channels, including email, chat, and sometimes phone numbers.
- Multi-Language Support: Many “international” platforms offer content and site navigation in multiple languages, particularly English.
User Experience and Accessibility
The design and usability of a website significantly impact a user’s decision to engage with a service.
- Code-like.org: The site is visually appealing but uses a generic template Tilda. The constant reliance on pop-up forms for any interaction can be disruptive. The single language Russian is its biggest accessibility barrier.
- Competitors:
- Intuitive Design: Platforms like Tynker and Code.org are specifically designed with engaging, child-friendly interfaces. Codecademy and Coursera have highly intuitive dashboards for tracking progress.
- Interactive Learning: Many competitors offer highly interactive coding environments, quizzes, and project-based learning directly within their platforms, reducing the need for external tools in initial stages.
- Community and Support: Established platforms often boast large, active user communities and dedicated support teams, allowing learners to get help and share progress.
Curriculum and Learning Methodology
While Code-like.org lists various programming areas, the depth and methodology are less clear than those of competitors.
- Code-like.org: Emphasizes “live communication with the teacher and classmates” and mentions “36-72 weeks of fascinating, continuous classes.” It highlights practical tasks and homework. The “City of Programmers” concept suggests an advanced, immersive experience.
- Structured Learning Paths: Platforms like Codecademy and DataCamp excel at structured learning paths that guide students from beginner to advanced levels, often with clear learning objectives and skill outcomes.
- Pedagogical Expertise: Many established platforms collaborate with educational experts or universities to ensure their curricula are pedagogically sound and aligned with industry standards.
- Variety of Formats: While Code-like.org offers individual and group, platforms like Outschool offer a marketplace of diverse teaching styles and class formats from various instructors.
- Gamification and Engagement: Tynker, Scratch, and Code.org heavily utilize gamified elements to make learning fun and engaging for children, often more so than traditional classroom models.
Trust Signals and Social Proof
Credibility is built through verifiable external validation. Labelsonline.com Review
- Code-like.org: Lacks customer testimonials, reviews, or any external certifications or partnerships mentioned on the homepage. There’s no visible success stories or portfolio of student projects to showcase outcomes.
- User Reviews and Ratings: Platforms like Outschool, Udemy, and Coursera feature extensive user reviews and ratings for courses and instructors, providing valuable social proof.
- Partnerships and Accreditations: Many platforms highlight partnerships with reputable universities, tech companies, or educational bodies e.g., Code.org’s widespread school adoption.
- Awards and Media Mentions: Established platforms often showcase awards or mentions in major media outlets, further cementing their credibility.
In summary, while Code-like.org proposes a valuable service, its lack of transparency and accessibility puts it far behind its competitors.
For parents seeking a reliable and trustworthy online programming education for their children, established alternatives offer a much safer and more informative choice.
Ethical Considerations for Online Learning Platforms
For parents and guardians, especially those adhering to Islamic principles, choosing an online learning platform involves more than just curriculum and cost.
Ethical considerations surrounding privacy, content, business practices, and the overall environment are paramount.
Code-like.org’s current presentation raises several points that warrant attention from an ethical standpoint. Trapica.com Review
Data Privacy and Information Collection
The website explicitly asks for name, email, and phone number to provide pricing and trial lessons.
This is standard practice, but the context of privacy policies and data handling is critical.
- Code-like.org: Links to a “Политика конфиденциальности” Privacy Policy and an “Оферта” Offer document, both in Russian. Without a clear English translation or summary, understanding how personal data is collected, stored, used, and shared is impossible for a non-Russian speaker. This lack of transparency regarding privacy is a significant ethical concern.
- Ethical Standard: Reputable platforms clearly outline their data privacy practices in easily understandable language. They specify data retention periods, security measures, and whether data is shared with third parties. For children’s education, adherence to regulations like COPPA Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act in the U.S. is crucial. The absence of clear compliance information is a drawback.
Content Suitability and Supervision
While programming itself is neutral, the applications children are taught to create, and the environment they learn in, must be free from harmful or inappropriate content. The site mentions creating “games, websites, chatbots, and applications.”
- Code-like.org: The homepage does not elaborate on the specific content or themes of the games/applications children will be taught to create. For example, it doesn’t state if there are guidelines against violence, inappropriate themes, or podcast/entertainment elements that might be ethically problematic.
- Ethical Standard: Parents seek assurance that the learning environment is safe, free from distractions that lead to idle pastimes, and that the projects align with wholesome values. Platforms should have clear content policies. For example, ensuring that games are constructive, not violent, or that website content is educational or beneficial. The focus on “distracting the child from computer games and mobile phones” is a positive statement, but the actual implementation needs to be verified.
Transparency in Business Operations
Ethical business practices demand clarity in operations, particularly for services targeting children.
- Code-like.org: As noted, there’s a significant lack of transparency regarding pricing, company background, and cancellation policies. This creates an information asymmetry where the provider holds all the cards.
- Ethical Standard: Businesses should be upfront about costs, terms of service, and who is behind the operation. This builds trust and empowers consumers to make informed decisions. Hiding information can be perceived as an attempt to leverage a sales advantage rather than genuinely serve the customer’s best interest. A professional service would include:
- Physical Address and Legal Entity: Essential for accountability.
- Clear Refund/Cancellation Policies: Details on how to terminate service and receive refunds.
- Instructor Credentials: Information about who is teaching the children.
Learning Environment and Distractions
The aim to “distract the child from computer games and mobile phones” is noble, but the online environment itself can be distracting. Bhupindersandhu.com Review
- Code-like.org: Promises “fascinating, continuous classes” and “live communication with the teacher and classmates,” along with homework. This suggests a structured environment. However, without parental oversight or clear guidelines, excessive screen time can still be an issue.
- Ethical Standard: Platforms should promote balanced learning and encourage healthy digital habits. While teaching programming is valuable, it should ideally complement, not replace, physical activity, family time, and other beneficial pursuits. Parents should monitor the overall screen time and ensure the learning is productive.
In conclusion, while the subject of programming education for children is inherently permissible and beneficial, Code-like.org’s lack of transparency in its business practices and data handling is a significant ethical concern.
Parents should exercise extreme caution and seek out platforms that are open, honest, and provide comprehensive information about their operations and content.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Code-like.org?
Code-like.org presents itself as an international online programming school specifically designed for children, offering courses in areas like game development, website creation, and 3D modeling.
Is Code-like.org legitimate?
Based on the website’s homepage, it’s difficult to ascertain full legitimacy due to a significant lack of transparency.
Key information such as transparent pricing, detailed company background, and direct contact methods are missing, which are standard for trustworthy online services. Vortexrefrigeration.com Review
How much does Code-like.org cost?
Code-like.org does not display its pricing on the website.
To get a cost estimate, users are required to fill out a form with their name, email, and phone number, after which the company states they will contact you with the details.
What age range does Code-like.org cater to?
Code-like.org states it educates children from 6 to 17 years old, with the only prerequisite being that the child must be able to read.
What programming languages or topics are taught at Code-like.org?
The website mentions courses in Graphic Design Figma, PowerPoint, 3D Modeling Blender, Backend Web Programming Django for Python, Frontend Web Programming HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and Python Programming via Godot.
Does Code-like.org offer a free trial?
Yes, Code-like.org prominently offers a “free trial lesson” for prospective students, which requires submitting a contact form. Brokerdynamics.co Review
Is Code-like.org available in English?
No, based on the homepage, the entire website content is in Russian, which poses a significant language barrier for English-speaking users, despite the claim of being an “international” school.
How are classes conducted at Code-like.org?
The website states that classes involve students connecting online at a scheduled time, working collaboratively with a teacher on practical tasks, and receiving homework after each lesson.
What are the class formats available at Code-like.org?
Code-like.org offers both individual one-on-one with a teacher and group up to 6 people class formats.
What equipment is needed for Code-like.org classes?
All that is needed for classes is a laptop or computer with internet access.
What results can a child expect after completing a Code-like.org course?
Upon course completion, a child is expected to receive a certificate of training, a real working project developed independently, and a foundational understanding of programming.
What is the duration of Code-like.org courses?
Code-like.org offers a “Basic course” lasting 36 weeks and a “Full course” lasting 72 weeks.
They emphasize that learning continues with homework even after the live sessions.
Where can I find reviews for Code-like.org?
The Code-like.org homepage does not feature any customer testimonials or reviews.
Potential users would need to search for independent reviews on external platforms, which may be challenging due to the language barrier.
Is there an “About Us” section on Code-like.org?
No, the Code-like.org homepage does not contain a dedicated “About Us” section or information about the school’s founders, team, or history.
How can I contact Code-like.org customer support?
The primary method for contact provided on the Code-like.org homepage is through inquiry forms.
No direct email address or phone number is publicly listed.
Does Code-like.org offer a certificate of completion?
Yes, the website states that upon successful completion of a course, the child receives a certificate of training.
What is the “City of Programmers” course at Code-like.org?
The “City of Programmers” is described as a course for students who have completed the “Programming + Mathematics” course, where they undergo an internship in companies within a virtual programmers’ city.
Does Code-like.org integrate math with programming?
Yes, Code-like.org offers a “Programming + Mathematics” course, which aims to teach mathematics in a simple and engaging format through programming games and tasks.
What is the privacy policy of Code-like.org?
Code-like.org has a privacy policy linked on its website, but it is in Russian, making it inaccessible to non-Russian speakers.
Details on data handling and user privacy are not transparently summarized.
Is Code-like.org suitable for a child new to programming?
The website claims to teach children to create things “from scratch” and offers a free trial, suggesting it’s suitable for beginners.
However, the lack of transparent information makes it difficult to fully assess its pedagogical approach for novices.
Leave a Reply