E-vpn.net Review

Based on looking at the website e-vpn.net, it’s immediately clear that this isn’t a live VPN service you can sign up for today. The site explicitly states: “Verdict: NO LONGER ACTIVE” and “Unfortunately, in mid-2020, the VPN provider closed its doors, leaving many users unprotected.” This means that e-vpn.net is not a functional VPN service, and therefore, it cannot be recommended for anyone seeking online privacy or security. The website appears to be an archived review page, likely maintained by an affiliate, rather than the official e-VPN provider itself.

Here’s an overall review summary of e-vpn.net as presented on its defunct review page:

Status: No Longer Active Closed in mid-2020
Overall Score Historical: 5.8 / 10
Security Features Historical: Boasted 256-bit AES encryption defaulted to 128-bit, Stealth Mode, AdStop, private DNS, Kill Switch, Public WiFi Protection, OpenVPN protocol, IPv6 support.
Privacy Practices Historical: Claimed no identifying logs, but did store raw bandwidth usage. Never audited. Based in the UK Five Eyes jurisdiction.
Server Network Historical: Small, with servers in 12 countries.
Speed Historical: Decent speeds, implied bandwidth limits.
Torrenting Historical: but limited P2P support on few servers.
Streaming Historical: Poor, unblocked Netflix UK and BBC iPlayer inconsistently, failed to unblock US streaming services.
Device Compatibility Historical: Supported Windows, iOS, Android, macOS, Linux, Amazon Firestick. Offered 15 simultaneous connections.
Customer Support Historical: Ticket system, extensive Knowledgebase. No live chat.
Pricing Historical: Very affordable £0.80/month for 1, 2, or 3-year plans.

Given that e-vpn.net is a defunct service, focusing on its past performance isn’t as critical as understanding that it’s not an option for current needs. The site itself pivots quickly to recommending alternatives like NordVPN, ExpressVPN, Surfshark, and Private Internet Access, which are active and well-regarded VPN providers. When considering online tools, especially those related to privacy and security, it’s paramount to choose services that are actively maintained, transparent about their operations, and have a proven track record. Relying on defunct services or those with questionable transparency can lead to significant vulnerabilities.

0.0

0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)

Excellent0%

Very good0%

Average0%

Poor0%

Terrible0%

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for E-vpn.net Review
Latest Discussions & Reviews:

For those seeking robust and ethical online security tools, especially given the various concerns around data privacy and digital integrity, it’s vital to select alternatives that are known for their commitment to user protection and operate with transparency.

Here are some of the best alternatives for ethical online security:

NordVPN
- Key Features: Strong encryption AES-256, Double VPN, Onion Over VPN, CyberSec ad and malware blocker, Kill Switch, strict no-logs policy audited, large server network 5,100+ servers in 60 countries, P2P support, unblocks major streaming platforms.
- Average Price: Varies based on subscription length, generally more affordable on longer plans e.g., 2-year plan offers significant savings.
- Pros: Excellent security features, fast speeds, user-friendly apps, widespread server coverage, audited no-logs policy, good for streaming and torrenting.
- Cons: Slightly higher price for monthly plans, some users report occasional minor connection drops.
ExpressVPN
- Key Features: AES-256 encryption, Lightway protocol fast and secure, Kill Switch, Split Tunneling, TrustedServer technology RAM-only servers, strict no-logs policy audited, over 3,000 servers in 94 countries, Smart DNS MediaStreamer for streaming.
- Average Price: Generally considered a premium-priced VPN, but offers discounts on longer subscriptions.
- Pros: Industry-leading speeds, robust security and privacy features, easy to use, excellent customer support, reliable for streaming and torrenting.
- Cons: Higher price point compared to some competitors, fewer simultaneous connections up to 8 devices.
Surfshark
- Key Features: AES-256 encryption, WireGuard, IKEv2, OpenVPN protocols, CleanWeb ad, tracker, malware blocker, Kill Switch, Bypasser split tunneling, MultiHop double VPN, NoBorders mode bypasses restrictions, unlimited simultaneous connections, no-logs policy audited, 3,200+ servers in 100 countries.
- Average Price: Very affordable, especially for long-term plans.
- Pros: Unlimited simultaneous connections, excellent value, strong security, good for bypassing geo-restrictions, user-friendly interface.
- Cons: Slightly slower speeds than NordVPN or ExpressVPN on some servers, some advanced features can be complex for beginners.
ProtonVPN
- Key Features: Strong encryption AES-256, ChaCha20, Secure Core architecture multi-hop servers in secure data centers, Kill Switch, NetShield ad-blocker, strict no-logs policy audited, P2P support, integrates with ProtonMail.
- Average Price: Offers a free tier with limited features. paid plans vary, generally mid-to-high range.
- Pros: Exceptional focus on privacy and security, strong encryption, free tier available, based in Switzerland strong privacy laws, transparency reports.
- Cons: Smaller server network than some top-tier providers, free tier has speed limitations, may be slower on distant servers.
Mullvad VPN
- Key Features: Open-source software, strong encryption AES-256, WireGuard and OpenVPN protocols, no-logs policy verified, accepts anonymous cash payments, no account required just a randomly generated number, Kill Switch, IPv6 support.
- Price: Flat monthly fee, regardless of subscription length.
- Pros: Unparalleled commitment to privacy and anonymity, strong security, no personal information required for sign-up, highly transparent.
- Cons: Smaller server network, not optimized for streaming or unblocking geo-restricted content, no live chat support.
CyberGhost VPN
- Key Features: AES-256 encryption, automatic Kill Switch, dedicated servers for streaming, gaming, and torrenting, NoSpy servers owned and operated by CyberGhost, strict no-logs policy, large server network 9,000+ servers in 90+ countries, up to 7 simultaneous connections.
- Average Price: Very affordable on long-term plans.
- Pros: Massive server network, user-friendly apps, specialized servers for various activities, strong privacy features.
- Cons: Based in Romania privacy-friendly but part of 14 Eyes alliance, transparency reports could be more detailed.
Private Internet Access PIA
- Key Features: Configurable encryption AES-128 or AES-256, Kill Switch, Split Tunneling, MACE ad, tracker, malware blocker, SOCKS5 proxy and port forwarding, extensive server network 30,000+ servers in 84 countries, strict no-logs policy proven in court.
- Average Price: Very affordable, especially on longer plans.
- Pros: Largest server network, highly customizable, strong privacy features, great for torrenting, excellent value for money.
- Cons: Interface can be overwhelming for beginners due to many customization options, some users report inconsistent speeds.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Table of Contents

E-vpn.net Review: What Was Offered and Why It’s No Longer an Option

The website e-vpn.net presents itself as a historical review of a VPN service that is no longer active. Understanding this distinction is crucial for anyone seeking a VPN today. The page details the past features and performance of “e-VPN,” a service that ceased operations in mid-2020. While it provides a retrospective look, the primary takeaway is that this service is defunct and cannot be used. The website serves more as an affiliate platform, redirecting users to active VPN alternatives like NordVPN, ExpressVPN, Surfshark, and Private Internet Access. This approach, while providing historical context, is essentially a marketing funnel for current VPN providers.

The Defunct Status of E-vpn.net

The most critical piece of information on e-vpn.net is its explicit “NO LONGER ACTIVE” status. This isn’t a minor hiccup or temporary outage.

The service permanently closed its doors in mid-2020. For users, this means: September.immo Review

No new subscriptions: You cannot sign up for e-VPN.
No active servers: The infrastructure is offline.
No support: There’s no customer service for a defunct product.
No security: Using a non-existent VPN provides zero protection.

This highlights a fundamental principle in online security: always use active, well-maintained services. A VPN’s effectiveness relies on its ongoing development, server maintenance, and prompt security updates. A defunct service offers none of these, leaving users vulnerable if they were to somehow still rely on it.

Historical Security Features of E-vpn.net

According to the review, e-VPN, when active, offered what were considered decent security features. These included:

256-bit AES encryption: While touted, the site mentions its default was 128-bit AES, which, while still strong, isn’t the gold standard of 256-bit without manual configuration.
Stealth Mode Obfuscation: This feature was designed to bypass firewalls, including the Great Firewall of China. Obfuscation is a valuable tool for users in restrictive regions.
AdStop Adblocker: A built-in adblocker enhances user experience and can reduce exposure to malicious ads.
Private DNS servers: Aimed at preventing DNS leaks, which can expose a user’s browsing activity.
Kill Switch: A critical security feature that automatically disconnects your internet if the VPN connection drops, preventing accidental data exposure.
Public WiFi Protection: Designed to secure connections on insecure public networks.
OpenVPN protocol TCP and UDP: A widely respected and secure VPN protocol.
IPv6 support: E-VPN was noted for its IPv6 addresses and IPv6 leak protection, a less common but important feature for comprehensive privacy.

While these features sound robust on paper, the fact that the service is no longer active renders them moot for current users.

Furthermore, the mention of defaulting to 128-bit AES encryption rather than 256-bit could have been a point of concern for highly security-conscious users.

Historical Privacy Practices of E-vpn.net

Privacy is a cornerstone of any good VPN service. Navypanda.com Review

The e-vpn.net review touches upon the historical privacy stance of e-VPN:

Logging Policy: E-VPN “probably didn’t store identifying logs,” which is a soft claim. However, it explicitly “did keep raw bandwidth usage” for server optimization. While this might seem benign, any form of logging can potentially be linked back to a user, especially if other data points are compromised.
Jurisdiction: The service was based in the UK, a member of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. Countries within this alliance actively share intelligence, which can be a significant concern for privacy-focused users. A VPN operating in such a jurisdiction faces inherent pressure to comply with data requests.
Auditing: Crucially, e-VPN was “never audited.” Independent security audits are vital for verifying a VPN’s no-logs claims and overall security infrastructure. Without an audit, claims of privacy and security are merely promises.

The combination of being based in a Five Eyes country, collecting raw bandwidth usage, and lacking independent audits made e-VPN’s privacy posture, even historically, less than ideal compared to top-tier providers today.

Server Network and Performance Historical

The review states that e-VPN had a “small” server network, with servers in 12 countries. This is significantly fewer than what leading VPNs offer today, with many boasting thousands of servers across a hundred or more countries. A smaller network can lead to:

Slower speeds: Fewer server options mean more congestion.
Limited geo-unblocking: Fewer locations mean less ability to access content restricted to specific regions.
Less resilience: A smaller network is more susceptible to outages or targeted attacks.

Historically, e-VPN had “decent speeds,” with tests showing a speed loss of 23.45 Mbps, which is considered higher than the 10 Mbps speed loss expected from “best VPNs.” The site also implied bandwidth limits, a practice generally avoided by premium VPN services.

Historical Suitability for Torrenting and Streaming

Torrenting P2P: E-VPN was “okay for torrenting but not great.” This is due to its limited P2P support on only a “handful of servers” and “mediocre speeds.” For avid torrenters, this would have been a significant drawback. Leading VPNs often allow P2P on all servers or offer dedicated P2P-optimized servers.

These limitations would have greatly diminished e-VPN’s appeal for common VPN use cases, further solidifying the need for alternatives. Cantquitcartel.com Review

Device Compatibility and Customer Support Historical

E-VPN supported major platforms, including Windows, iOS, Android, macOS, Linux, and Amazon Firestick. It also offered OpenVPN configuration guides for other devices and notably allowed 15 simultaneous connections, which was generous compared to the industry standard of 5-7 at the time.

For customer support, e-VPN relied on a ticket system instead of live chat. While it had an “extensive Knowledgebase,” the lack of real-time support is a common drawback for users seeking immediate assistance.

Historical Subscription Fees

One of e-VPN’s most attractive historical features was its affordability, priced at a flat £0.80/month for 1-Year, 2-Year, and 3-Year plans. While this price point was exceptionally low, the trade-offs in terms of performance, privacy, and the ultimate shutdown underscore the adage that you often get what you pay for. A rock-bottom price for a security service should always be a red flag, prompting a deeper investigation into its capabilities and sustainability.

E-vpn.net Review & First Look

Upon visiting e-vpn.net, the immediate impression is that of an archived review page rather than a live service provider. The prominent “Verdict: NO LONGER ACTIVE” and the explicit statement about the VPN closing its doors in mid-2020 are undeniable. This directly answers any query about its current operational status: e-vpn.net is not a functioning VPN service. The website, in its current form, serves as a historical account of a defunct VPN and primarily functions as an affiliate platform, directing users to other popular VPNs such as NordVPN, ExpressVPN, and Surfshark. This structure means users looking for a new VPN cannot subscribe to or use e-VPN.

Cesmebook.com Review

The page is well-structured, offering a detailed breakdown of e-VPN’s past features and performance categories.

It includes a table of contents, allowing visitors to navigate directly to sections like “Was e-VPN Secure?”, “Was e-VPN Good for Privacy?”, and “e-VPN Subscription Fees.” While the content is thorough for a historical review, its primary objective appears to be channeling traffic towards its recommended alternatives.

The inclusion of current discount offers for active VPNs further reinforces this. Accessari.us Review

E-vpn.net Features Historical

Historically, e-VPN offered a suite of features that aimed to provide online security and privacy.

Encryption and Protocols

E-VPN touted military-grade 256-bit AES encryption, which is the industry standard for strong data protection. However, the review notes a critical detail: its default setting was 128-bit AES. This meant users had to manually configure settings to achieve the stronger 256-bit encryption. It supported the widely recognized and secure OpenVPN protocol both TCP and UDP modes, which is a positive indicator for security.

Advanced Security Measures

Beyond basic encryption, e-VPN included several advanced security features:

Stealth Mode: This obfuscation feature was designed to mask VPN traffic as regular internet traffic, enabling users to bypass strict firewalls and censorship, notably in regions like China.
AdStop: A built-in adblocker that also served to block malware, enhancing browsing safety and improving user experience by reducing intrusive advertisements.
Private DNS Servers: These were implemented to prevent DNS leaks, ensuring that DNS requests, which can reveal browsing activity, were securely handled by the VPN and not exposed to third parties.
Kill Switch: This essential feature automatically cuts off internet access if the VPN connection drops unexpectedly, preventing real IP address exposure.
Public WiFi Protection: Designed to safeguard users’ data when connected to potentially insecure public Wi-Fi networks.
IPv6 Support: E-VPN was one of the few VPNs at the time to support IPv6 addresses and offer IPv6 leak protection, addressing a potential vulnerability that many VPNs overlooked.

Simultaneous Connections and Device Compatibility

E-VPN offered a generous allowance of 15 simultaneous connections, significantly higher than the industry average of 5-7 devices during its operational period. This would have been a major advantage for users with multiple devices or for families. It provided applications for major operating systems:

Windows
macOS
Android
iOS
It also supported Linux and Amazon Firestick, and provided OpenVPN configuration guides for other devices, indicating a decent range of compatibility.

Limitations in Functionality

Despite these features, the review pointed out several functional limitations that would have impacted its overall utility:

Advocate.family Review

Limited P2P Support: Torrenting P2P was only supported on a “handful of servers,” restricting its utility for file-sharing.
Poor Streaming Performance: It struggled to unblock popular US streaming services and offered inconsistent access to UK platforms like Netflix UK and BBC iPlayer.
Small Server Network: With servers in only 12 countries, its geographical reach was limited, which could affect speeds and content access.

These limitations, combined with its defunct status, highlight that even a feature-rich VPN needs consistent maintenance, a robust server network, and reliable performance across various use cases to be truly effective.

E-vpn.net Cons Historical

While e-vpn.net’s review page attempts to provide a balanced historical perspective, several significant drawbacks are highlighted, all of which culminated in its ultimate shutdown.

These “cons” are not merely minor inconveniences but fundamental issues that would have hindered its appeal and reliability even if it were still active.

Defunct Status and Lack of Current Service

The most glaring con is that e-vpn.net is no longer an active VPN service. This means: Sportecentral.com Review

Zero Utility: It cannot be used for any current VPN needs. There are no active servers, no support, and no new subscriptions. Any historical feature discussion becomes irrelevant for present-day users.
Security Risk: Attempting to use or find remnants of a defunct VPN could expose users to unpatched vulnerabilities or scam attempts, as malicious actors sometimes capitalize on discontinued services.

Questionable Privacy Posture

Despite claims of not storing “identifying logs,” the historical review points to crucial privacy shortcomings:

Raw Bandwidth Logging: E-VPN explicitly stated it logged “raw bandwidth usage of the servers WAN Interface total data up/down per day.” While framed as optimization, any form of persistent logging, even non-identifying, is a red flag for privacy purists. Top-tier VPNs strive for a strict no-logs policy, often verified by third-party audits.
UK Jurisdiction Five Eyes: Being based in the United Kingdom, a core member of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, raised significant privacy concerns. This alliance facilitates intelligence sharing among member nations Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK, USA, potentially compromising user data if requested by authorities.
Lack of Independent Audits: The review explicitly states that e-VPN was “never audited.” Independent security and privacy audits are crucial for building trust in a VPN’s no-logs claims and overall security infrastructure. Without such verification, a VPN’s promises are merely that—promises.

Subpar Performance and Utility

Even in its operational days, e-VPN faced performance issues that limited its practical use cases:

Mediocre Speeds: While described as “decent,” historical speed tests showed a speed loss of 23.45 Mbps, which is considerably higher than the 10 Mbps benchmark for leading VPNs. This would have impacted activities like streaming, gaming, and large downloads.
Implied Bandwidth Limits: The review hints at potential bandwidth limits, stating that an individual user would “likely never reach the limit unless they shared their account.” Any form of bandwidth throttling is a significant negative for a VPN, as it restricts a user’s internet freedom.
Limited Server Network: With servers in only 12 countries, e-VPN’s global reach was severely constrained compared to major players boasting thousands of servers worldwide. A small network can lead to server congestion, slower speeds, and limited access to geo-restricted content.
Poor Streaming Unblocking: The service struggled to reliably unblock major US streaming platforms like Netflix US and Hulu, and even had inconsistent performance with UK services. This is a common expectation for many VPN users today.
Limited Torrenting Support: P2P file sharing was only supported on a “handful of servers,” making it an inconvenient choice for torrenters.

Customer Support Limitations

E-VPN utilized a ticket system for customer support instead of a live chat option. While it had a “Knowledgebase,” the absence of real-time assistance can be frustrating for users facing urgent issues. Most top-tier VPNs now offer 24/7 live chat support as a standard.

Obsolete Technology and Lack of Updates

Since the service is defunct, it implies a complete lack of:

Software Updates: No patches for newly discovered vulnerabilities, no performance enhancements, and no new features.
Server Maintenance: No upkeep of server infrastructure, leading to potential security risks if any part of the old system were to be accessed or misused.

In summary, while e-VPN was historically very affordable, its significant drawbacks in privacy, performance, and ultimate cessation of operations make it an entirely unsuitable option for anyone seeking a VPN today. Swing2app.com Review

The content on e-vpn.net serves as a cautionary tale of why vigilance and choosing active, reputable services are paramount in the VPN market.

E-vpn.net Alternatives

Given that e-vpn.net is defunct, the primary purpose of its review page is to direct users to active and reliable VPN alternatives.

For individuals prioritizing online security, privacy, and performance, investing in a reputable, actively maintained VPN service is crucial.

Here are some of the leading alternatives, offering robust features and a commitment to user privacy, which are considered ethical and widely accepted:

NordVPN

NordVPN stands out as one of the most recognized and feature-rich VPNs.

Technovert.com Review

Key Strengths: Offers Double VPN for enhanced encryption, Onion Over VPN for Tor integration, CyberSec for ad and malware blocking, and a strict, independently audited no-logs policy. It boasts a vast server network of over 5,100 servers in 60 countries, ensuring fast speeds and broad geographical coverage. It’s excellent for both streaming and torrenting, with dedicated P2P servers.
Why it’s a Top Alternative: Its comprehensive security suite, audited no-logs policy, and high performance make it a reliable choice for general users and those with advanced security needs.

ExpressVPN

ExpressVPN is consistently praised for its lightning-fast speeds and strong security.

Key Strengths: Utilizes its proprietary Lightway protocol for optimal speed and security, alongside AES-256 encryption. It features TrustedServer technology, ensuring all servers run on RAM and wipe data with every reboot, enhancing privacy. With over 3,000 servers in 94 countries, it offers extensive global coverage and reliable access to geo-restricted content. It also has an audited no-logs policy.
Why it’s a Top Alternative: Ideal for users who prioritize speed for activities like gaming, streaming, and large downloads, without compromising on security or privacy.

Surfshark

Surfshark offers exceptional value, particularly for its unlimited simultaneous connections feature.

Rivieras.com Review

Key Strengths: Provides AES-256 encryption, a robust Kill Switch, MultiHop double VPN, and CleanWeb for ad/malware blocking. Its most distinctive feature is allowing an unlimited number of simultaneous connections under a single subscription, making it perfect for families or users with many devices. It has 3,200+ servers in 100 countries and an audited no-logs policy.
Why it’s a Top Alternative: An excellent choice for budget-conscious users who need to secure numerous devices simultaneously, offering strong performance and features at a competitive price.

Private Internet Access PIA

Private Internet Access PIA is known for its extensive server network and high level of customizability.

Key Strengths: Boasts an astonishing 30,000+ servers across 84 countries, providing unparalleled coverage and load balancing. It offers flexible encryption settings AES-128 and AES-256, a MACE feature for blocking ads, trackers, and malware, and supports advanced features like SOCKS5 proxy and port forwarding, making it highly P2P-friendly. Its no-logs policy has been proven in court multiple times.
Why it’s a Top Alternative: Ideal for advanced users who want fine-grained control over their VPN settings, as well as those who prioritize torrenting and a massive server footprint.

ProtonVPN

ProtonVPN stands out for its strong emphasis on privacy and security, stemming from its Swiss base and the Proton Technologies group also behind ProtonMail.

Key Strengths: Features Secure Core servers, which route traffic through multiple hardened data centers, and NetShield, a robust ad-blocker. It adheres to a strict no-logs policy, verified by independent audits, and offers a free tier with limited features.
Why it’s a Top Alternative: For users whose absolute top priority is privacy and who are willing to pay a premium for a service with an impeccable track record and strong legal protections.

Mullvad VPN

Mullvad VPN offers an almost unmatched level of anonymity and a steadfast commitment to privacy.

Key Strengths: Operates on a unique model where accounts are identified by a random number instead of personal information, and it accepts anonymous cash payments. It boasts strong encryption AES-256, WireGuard, a verified no-logs policy, and an open-source client.
Why it’s a Top Alternative: The go-to choice for users seeking maximum anonymity and privacy, who are less concerned with streaming capabilities or a vast array of extra features.

CyberGhost VPN

CyberGhost VPN is known for its user-friendly interface and specialized servers for various activities.

Key Strengths: Offers a massive network of over 9,000 servers in 90+ countries. It features dedicated servers optimized for streaming, gaming, and torrenting, ensuring consistent performance for specific tasks. It also uses NoSpy servers, which are owned and operated by CyberGhost, reducing third-party risk.
Why it’s a Top Alternative: Excellent for beginners due to its intuitive apps and for users who frequently engage in specific online activities like streaming or torrenting and appreciate optimized connections.

Choosing from these alternatives provides a robust and ethical solution for online privacy and security, moving far beyond the capabilities of a defunct service like e-vpn.net. Flatrateairductcleaning.com Review

How to Cancel E-vpn.net Subscription

The question of how to cancel an e-vpn.net subscription is straightforward yet critical: you cannot cancel an e-vpn.net subscription because the service is no longer active. E-VPN officially shut down its operations in mid-2020. This means that:

No Active Subscriptions: There are no ongoing subscriptions to manage. If you were a past subscriber, your service would have ceased, and any recurring payments would have been discontinued when the company closed.
No Billing Portal: The company’s billing portal or user account management system would no longer be operational.
No Customer Support: There is no customer support to contact for cancellation requests.

If, by some remote chance, you believe you are still being charged or had a payment method linked to e-VPN from before its shutdown, you would need to:

Check Your Bank Statements: Carefully review your credit card or bank statements for any recurring charges under the name “e-VPN” or a similar variant.
Contact Your Bank/Credit Card Provider: If you identify any such charges, immediately contact your bank or credit card provider to dispute the charge and block any future payments from that merchant. Provide them with proof that the service is defunct e.g., a screenshot of the e-vpn.net website stating it’s no longer active.

It is highly unlikely that any charges would persist from a service that ceased operations almost four years ago, but exercising vigilance with financial statements is always a prudent practice.

The e-vpn.net website itself serves as evidence of its non-operational status, making any cancellation procedure entirely unnecessary for the defunct service.

How to Cancel E-vpn.net Free Trial

The concept of canceling an e-vpn.net free trial is irrelevant, as the service has been defunct since mid-2020. Since e-VPN is no longer operational and does not offer any services, including free trials, there is nothing to cancel. Paintcraftology.com Review

No active trials: If e-VPN previously offered a free trial, it would have ceased to function along with the rest of the service in 2020.
No trial sign-ups: It’s impossible to sign up for a free trial or any service from e-vpn.net today.

Therefore, users do not need to take any action to cancel an e-vpn.net free trial, as none exist in the present.

Any inquiry about canceling a free trial for this specific service would stem from a misunderstanding of its current non-operational status.

E-vpn.net Pricing Historical

The historical pricing structure of e-vpn.net, as detailed on its review page, was remarkably simple and exceptionally affordable for its time.

This made it one of its most attractive features, even if its overall performance had limitations.

Historically, e-VPN offered three distinct subscription plans, all priced to equate to the same monthly cost: Cinemasterpieces.com Review

1-Year Plan: £10 approximately $12.50 USD at current exchange rates, but likely varied at the time
- Monthly equivalent: £0.80/month
2-Year Plan: £20
3-Year Plan: £30

Key observations from this pricing model:

Flat Monthly Rate: Unlike most VPN providers that offer tiered pricing with significant discounts for longer commitments, e-VPN maintained a consistent, low monthly equivalent across all its long-term plans. This meant there were no additional savings for committing to a 2-year or 3-year plan over a 1-year plan, as the per-month cost remained the same.
Exceptional Affordability: At £0.80 per month, e-VPN was among the cheapest VPN services available on the market during its operational period. This low price point would have appealed greatly to budget-conscious users.
Feature-to-Price Ratio Historical: The review page notes that “considering all the features e-VPN included for that price, it was probably the VPN’s most attractive part.” This suggests that for the cost, the array of security features, even with their noted limitations like default 128-bit encryption, offered considerable value.

However, the affordability must be viewed in retrospect against the backdrop of its cons:

Trade-offs for Low Price: The extremely low price likely contributed to the service’s eventual closure, as sustaining server infrastructure, development, and customer support for such a low revenue stream is challenging. It also perhaps reflected the compromises in its privacy policy logging raw bandwidth and performance mediocre speeds, limited streaming/torrenting.
No Longer Relevant: Most importantly, the discussion of e-vpn.net’s pricing is purely historical. The service is defunct, and these prices are no longer applicable, as there are no active subscriptions to purchase.

Today, while affordability remains a factor for many users, the market has matured, and users often prioritize a balance of strong security, verified privacy, reliable performance, and responsive customer support over just the lowest price.

The current market average for a quality VPN often ranges from $2 to $5 per month on long-term plans, offering a far more robust and dependable service than what e-VPN could ultimately deliver.

E-vpn.net vs. NordVPN

Comparing e-vpn.net to NordVPN isn’t a fair fight, primarily because e-vpn.net is a defunct service, while NordVPN is a leading, active VPN provider. However, a historical comparison based on the e-vpn.net review page highlights the evolution and current standards of VPN services.

Fasttrack.services Review

Feature	E-vpn.net Historical/Defunct	NordVPN Current & Active
Status	Defunct Closed mid-2020	Active, Industry Leader
Overall Verdict	“NO LONGER ACTIVE”	Highly Recommended
Encryption	256-bit AES defaulted to 128-bit	256-bit AES Standard, ChaCha20 NordLynx
Advanced Security	Stealth Mode, AdStop, Private DNS, Kill Switch, Public WiFi Protection, IPv6 support	Double VPN, Onion Over VPN, CyberSec ad/malware blocker, Threat Protection advanced, Kill Switch, Dark Web Monitor, Meshnet
Privacy Policy	Claimed no identifying logs, but logged “raw bandwidth usage.”	Strict No-Logs Policy independently audited multiple times
Jurisdiction	UK Five Eyes alliance	Panama privacy-friendly, outside intelligence alliances
Audits	Never audited	Independently audited Deloitte, PwC for no-logs and security
Server Network	Small 12 countries, unclear server count	Extensive 5,100+ servers in 60 countries
Speed	“Decent speeds” 23.45 Mbps speed loss in tests, implied bandwidth limits	Among the fastest VPNs proprietary NordLynx protocol
Streaming	Poor inconsistent unblocking, failed US services	Excellent reliably unblocks all major streaming platforms
Torrenting P2P	but limited supported on few servers	Excellent dedicated P2P servers, full support
Device Support	Windows, macOS, Android, iOS, Linux, Firestick 15 connections	Wide range Windows, macOS, Android, iOS, Linux, Smart TVs, Routers, Browser Extensions, etc. – up to 10 connections
Customer Support	Ticket system, extensive Knowledgebase No live chat	24/7 Live Chat, email support, extensive knowledge base
Pricing	Very affordable £0.80/month for long-term	Competitively priced for premium features discounts on long-term

Key Differences Summarized:

Security & Privacy Verification: NordVPN’s commitment to privacy is backed by multiple independent audits of its no-logs policy and infrastructure. E-VPN lacked such verification and admitted to logging raw bandwidth.
Performance: NordVPN consistently ranks among the fastest VPNs, making it suitable for demanding tasks like 4K streaming and online gaming. E-VPN’s speeds were “decent” but not top-tier.
Features: NordVPN offers a more extensive and advanced feature set Double VPN, Onion Over VPN, Threat Protection, Meshnet tailored for modern security challenges.
Server Network: NordVPN’s vast global network dwarfs e-VPN’s limited presence, offering better speeds, reliability, and geo-unblocking capabilities.
Customer Support: NordVPN provides 24/7 live chat, offering immediate assistance, a stark contrast to e-VPN’s ticket system.

In essence, e-vpn.net represents a past, limited, and ultimately failed attempt at a VPN service. NordVPN, on the other hand, embodies the current gold standard for VPNs, offering robust security, verified privacy, high performance, and widespread utility. For any practical purpose, NordVPN is the unequivocally superior choice over the defunct e-vpn.net.

E-vpn.net vs. ExpressVPN

Comparing e-vpn.net with ExpressVPN is another stark contrast between a defunct service and a leading premium VPN.

The e-vpn.net review page itself, while historically detailing e-VPN’s features, quickly pivots to promoting ExpressVPN as a superior alternative, particularly for speed-intensive tasks. Defundbbc.uk Review

Here’s a detailed comparison:

Key Distinctions:

Operational Status & Reliability: ExpressVPN is a fully operational, highly reliable service with a global presence and constant updates. E-vpn.net is completely defunct.
Speed Superiority: ExpressVPN is renowned for its industry-leading speeds, largely thanks to its custom-built Lightway protocol and optimized server network. E-vpn.net, while having “decent” speeds, couldn’t compete with this level of performance.
Privacy Verification & Jurisdiction: ExpressVPN’s commitment to a strict no-logs policy is consistently verified by third-party audits, and its BVI jurisdiction is highly privacy-friendly. E-vpn.net’s UK base Five Eyes and admitted bandwidth logging were privacy weaknesses.
Server Technology: ExpressVPN’s use of RAM-only servers TrustedServer Technology is a significant privacy and security advantage, ensuring no data is ever stored on hard drives. E-vpn.net had no such advanced server architecture mentioned.
Streaming & P2P: ExpressVPN excels at unblocking geo-restricted content and supports P2P across its entire network. E-vpn.net was noted for its poor streaming performance and limited torrenting support.
Customer Support: ExpressVPN’s 24/7 live chat provides immediate, expert assistance, a standard feature for premium VPNs that e-vpn.net lacked.

In summary, ExpressVPN is a premium, high-performance, and privacy-focused VPN that sets industry benchmarks. E-vpn.net, a former budget option, fell short in many critical areas even when it was active, and is now entirely obsolete. For any serious online privacy and security needs, ExpressVPN is a vastly superior and currently viable alternative.

E-vpn.net vs. Surfshark

The comparison between e-vpn.net and Surfshark highlights the shift from a budget-oriented, ultimately defunct service to a modern, feature-rich VPN known for its affordability and unlimited simultaneous connections.

The e-vpn.net review page itself recommends Surfshark, particularly for its ability to offer unlimited connections.

Key Differences:

Operational Status: Surfshark is a vibrant, active VPN, constantly innovating and updating. E-vpn.net is completely defunct.
Simultaneous Connections: Surfshark’s standout feature is its unlimited simultaneous connections, far surpassing e-vpn.net’s 15 connections, making it ideal for large households or many devices.
Advanced Features: Surfshark offers a broader array of modern security features like CleanWeb, MultiHop, and NoBorders Mode, designed for comprehensive protection and bypassing tough restrictions. E-vpn.net had its own suite but was less comprehensive.
Privacy & Audits: Surfshark’s no-logs policy is regularly audited, providing verifiable trust. E-vpn.net’s policy was unverified and admitted to logging bandwidth.
Performance: Surfshark delivers consistently fast speeds, particularly with the WireGuard protocol, and excels at unblocking streaming services and supporting torrenting, areas where e-vpn.net fell short.
Global Reach: Surfshark’s server network spans 100 countries, offering vastly superior geographical coverage and access compared to e-vpn.net’s 12 countries.
Customer Support: Surfshark provides round-the-clock live chat support, which is a significant advantage for immediate assistance.

In essence, while e-vpn.net was historically a very cheap option, it was ultimately unsustainable and limited in its capabilities. Surfshark offers an incredibly strong value proposition by combining robust security, excellent performance, and the unique benefit of unlimited device connections, making it a far superior and viable choice for today’s VPN users.

E-vpn.net Pricing

The pricing of e-vpn.net is a historical footnote, as the service ceased operations in mid-2020. Therefore, there are no current pricing plans, and the information available reflects its cost structure during its operational period.

Historically, e-VPN stood out for its remarkably simple and exceptionally low pricing, making it one of the most budget-friendly options on the market at the time.

It offered three long-term subscription plans, all effectively priced at the same per-month rate:

1-Year Plan: £10 total equating to approximately £0.80 per month
2-Year Plan: £20 total equating to approximately £0.80 per month
3-Year Plan: £30 total equating to approximately £0.80 per month

This flat rate across different long-term commitments was unusual for the VPN industry, where larger discounts are typically reserved for the longest subscription periods.

While its affordability was a major draw, it also highlighted a potential unsustainability given the costs associated with maintaining a robust VPN infrastructure, security, and customer support.

The ultimate shutdown of the service suggests that these low prices were not viable for long-term operation.

For current VPN users, discussions about e-vpn.net’s pricing are purely academic.

The contemporary VPN market offers a wide range of pricing models, with reputable services typically costing between $2 to $12 per month, depending on the subscription length and features.

Investing in a currently active and reliable VPN is paramount for ensuring legitimate online security and privacy.

FAQ

What was e-vpn.net’s overall review score?

E-vpn.net’s historical overall review score, as presented on its defunct review page, was 5.8 out of 10.

Is e-vpn.net still active?

No, e-vpn.net is no longer active. the VPN provider closed its doors in mid-2020.

Can I subscribe to e-vpn.net today?

No, you cannot subscribe to e-vpn.net today as the service is defunct.

Did e-vpn.net offer 256-bit AES encryption?

Yes, e-vpn.net historically boasted military-grade 256-bit AES encryption, though its default was 128-bit AES.

Was e-vpn.net good for privacy?

Historically, e-vpn.net probably didn’t store identifying logs, but it did keep raw bandwidth usage and was never audited.

Where was e-vpn.net based?

E-vpn.net was historically based in the UK, making it susceptible to the Five Eyes intelligence alliance.

Did e-vpn.net have a no-logs policy?

E-vpn.net claimed not to store identifying logs, but it did log raw bandwidth usage, which is a form of data collection.

Was e-vpn.net’s no-logs policy audited?

No, e-vpn.net’s no-logs policy was historically never independently audited.

How many servers did e-vpn.net have?

It’s unclear how many specific servers e-vpn.net had historically, but its archived website confirmed servers in 12 countries.

Were e-vpn.net speeds good?

E-vpn.net historically had decent speeds, with past tests showing a speed loss of 23.45 Mbps, which was not as fast as leading VPNs.

Did e-vpn.net limit bandwidth?

Yes, it was implied that e-vpn.net historically limited bandwidth, though the specific limit was never specified.

Was e-vpn.net good for torrenting?

E-vpn.net was historically only okay for torrenting, with limited P2P support on a handful of servers and mediocre speeds.

Could e-vpn.net unblock Netflix US?

No, e-vpn.net historically could not unblock Netflix US and other US streaming platforms.

What devices did e-vpn.net support?

E-vpn.net historically supported Windows, iOS, Android, macOS, Linux, and Amazon Firestick, and offered OpenVPN guides for other devices.

How many simultaneous connections did e-vpn.net allow?

E-vpn.net historically allowed 15 simultaneous connections, which was higher than the industry standard at the time.

What kind of customer support did e-vpn.net offer?

E-vpn.net historically had a ticket system for customer support instead of live chat, though it had an extensive Knowledgebase.

How much did e-vpn.net cost per month historically?

E-vpn.net historically cost £0.80 per month for all its 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year subscription plans.

What are some good alternatives to e-vpn.net?

Good alternatives to the defunct e-vpn.net include NordVPN, ExpressVPN, Surfshark, Private Internet Access PIA, ProtonVPN, Mullvad VPN, and CyberGhost VPN.

Why is NordVPN recommended over e-vpn.net?

NordVPN is recommended over e-vpn.net because it is an active, industry-leading VPN with audited no-logs policy, advanced security features, faster speeds, and a vast server network, unlike the defunct e-vpn.net.

What should I do if I think I’m still being charged by e-vpn.net?

If you believe you’re still being charged by the defunct e-vpn.net, immediately check your bank or credit card statements and contact your financial institution to dispute the charge and block future payments.