How to write a bug report

Updated on

To write a clear and effective bug report, here are the detailed steps: Start by providing a concise summary of the bug.

👉 Skip the hassle and get the ready to use 100% working script (Link in the comments section of the YouTube Video) (Latest test 31/05/2025)

Check more on: How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile & Cloudflare WAF – Reddit, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – Medium, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – LinkedIn Article

0.0
0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)
Excellent0%
Very good0%
Average0%
Poor0%
Terrible0%

There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for How to write
Latest Discussions & Reviews:

Next, outline the exact steps to reproduce the issue, ensuring someone else can follow them precisely.

Describe the expected behavior versus the actual behavior you observed.

Include environmental details like your operating system, browser, and software version.

Finally, attach any relevant screenshots, videos, or logs.

For a deeper dive, check out resources like Atlassian’s guide on bug reporting best practices: https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/guides/write-bug-report.

Table of Contents

The Anatomy of a Stellar Bug Report: Why It Matters More Than You Think

Ever tried explaining a glitch to someone who just couldn’t “get it”? That’s precisely why mastering the art of bug reporting is a superpower in the tech world. It’s not just about pointing out something broken. it’s about providing a roadmap for resolution. A well-written bug report is like a precise surgical instruction manual, allowing developers to swiftly diagnose and fix issues without wasting precious cycles trying to reproduce them. Think of it as investing upfront in clarity to save exponential time and frustration later. In fact, studies show that clear, actionable bug reports can reduce resolution times by up to 30%, directly impacting project timelines and software quality.

Why Quality Bug Reports Are Non-Negotiable

You might wonder, “Is it really that big a deal?” Absolutely. A shoddy bug report can lead to a frustrating back-and-forth, developers unable to reproduce the issue, and ultimately, bugs lingering in the system. This directly translates to wasted resources, delayed releases, and a less-than-stellar user experience. It’s about efficiency and impact. When you provide a crystal-clear report, you’re not just flagging a problem. you’re actively contributing to the solution. This collaborative approach fosters a stronger team dynamic and builds a better product, one robust fix at a time. The average cost of fixing a bug after software release can be 100 times higher than fixing it during the design or development phase, emphasizing the critical role of early, detailed reporting.

The True Cost of Ambiguous Bug Reports

Consider the ripple effect: a vague report lands on a developer’s desk.

They spend an hour trying to reproduce it, fail, and then ping you for more details. You spend time gathering those details. They try again. This cycle can repeat several times. This isn’t just inefficient. it’s expensive.

Each hour spent on clarification is an hour not spent on actual development or new features. Jest framework tutorial

Multiply this by dozens of bugs and multiple team members, and you quickly see how poor reporting can derail an entire project.

It’s like trying to find your way through a maze blindfolded – you might get there eventually, but it’ll take a lot longer and involve more bumps and bruises.

Mastering the Art of the Subject Line: Your First Impression

The subject line is the headline of your bug report.

It’s the very first thing a developer sees, and often, it’s the basis for their initial prioritization.

A weak, generic subject line like “Bug in app” tells them nothing. Html5 browser compatible

A strong one, however, immediately conveys the essence of the problem, allowing them to quickly grasp the severity and potential impact.

Think of it as the elevator pitch for your bug – you need to grab attention and convey the core message instantly.

Research from software development firms indicates that well-structured subject lines lead to 15-20% faster initial triaging of bugs.

Crafting Concise and Descriptive Titles

Your goal here is clarity and conciseness. Avoid jargon where plain language suffices, but don’t shy away from technical terms if they accurately describe the issue. A good formula often includes: – – . For example, instead of “Login problem,” try “Login Page – Unable to log in with valid credentials.” Or, “Shopping Cart – Item quantity not updating when adding multiple units.” This immediately tells the developer where to look, what action caused it, and what the problem is. It’s a quick win for efficiency.

Prioritizing for Impact

Sometimes, you’ll want to include a severity indicator right in the subject line. This is particularly useful for critical bugs that need immediate attention. For instance, ” – Payment Gateway – Transaction failed after submitting credit card details.” This flags it as an urgent issue that could be losing revenue. Common severity levels might include: Critical, High, Medium, Low. However, be judicious. everything can’t be critical. Overusing “critical” diminishes its impact. Data suggests that only about 5-10% of reported bugs are genuinely critical, requiring immediate attention. Role of qa in devops

The Reproducible Steps: The Holy Grail of Bug Reporting

If a developer can’t reproduce your bug, they can’t fix it. It’s that simple. This section is arguably the most critical part of your report. You need to provide a step-by-step guide so precise that a complete stranger, who has never used the software before, could follow your instructions and witness the exact same bug. Think of it as writing a recipe: every ingredient and every action must be clearly laid out. A study by the IEEE found that over 60% of time wasted in debugging is due to poor or incomplete reproduction steps.

Step-by-Step Precision: No Detail Too Small

Start with a clean slate whenever possible.

For example, “1. Open browser and navigate to .” Don’t assume the developer knows your starting point. Then, list each action chronologically.

“2. Click on the ‘Sign Up’ button.” “3. Enter ‘[email protected]‘ in the email field.” “4. Enter ‘password123’ in the password field.” “5. Click ‘Submit’.” Be incredibly specific about what you click, what you type, and what sequence of events occurs. If you clicked an icon, describe the icon.

If you filled out a form, specify what you entered. Continuous monitoring in devops

The “Expected vs. Actual” Showdown

This is where you clearly define the discrepancy. What should have happened, and what actually happened?

  • Expected Result: “Upon clicking ‘Submit’, the user should be redirected to the dashboard, and a ‘Welcome!’ message should appear.”
  • Actual Result: “After clicking ‘Submit’, the page reloads, and an error message ‘User already exists’ is displayed, even though this is a new user.”

This juxtaposition immediately highlights the problem for the developer.

It’s the difference between saying “something’s wrong” and “this specific thing is wrong because it didn’t do what it was supposed to do.” This direct comparison reduces ambiguity and ensures the developer understands the core issue.

Environmental Details: Setting the Scene for the Bug

Imagine trying to fix a car without knowing its make, model, or year. It’s impossible. The same goes for software bugs. The environment in which a bug occurs can profoundly impact its behavior. A bug might appear on Chrome but not Firefox, or on iOS but not Android. Providing these details helps developers narrow down the potential causes and avoid wasting time investigating unrelated areas. Approximately 25% of all software bugs are environment-specific, making this information crucial for efficient debugging.

Browser, OS, and Device Specifics

Always include: What is shift left testing

  • Browser and Version: “Chrome 120.0.6099.199,” “Firefox 122.0.1 64-bit,” “Safari 17.2.1.” This is crucial as rendering engines and JavaScript interpretations can vary wildly between browsers.
  • Operating System and Version: “Windows 11 22H2 Build 22621.3007,” “macOS Sonoma 14.2.1,” “Android 14 Pixel 8 Pro.” Different OS versions can have different system libraries or security policies that affect software.
  • Device Type for mobile/responsive issues: “iPhone 15 Pro Max,” “Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra,” “iPad Pro M2.” Screen sizes, resolutions, and hardware capabilities can trigger specific UI/UX bugs.

Application Version and Relevant Configurations

If you’re reporting a bug in a specific application:

  • Application Version: “MyApp v2.3.1,” “Jira Server 8.20.10.” This is paramount for internal teams to pinpoint the exact codebase.
  • Any Specific Configurations: Were you logged in as an admin? Was a specific feature flag enabled? Were you using a VPN? “User logged in as ‘Admin’ with Two-Factor Authentication enabled.” These details can change how the application behaves and help developers replicate the exact conditions that triggered the bug. For instance, a bug might only manifest when a particular backend service is unavailable or under heavy load, so noting any unusual network conditions or server status is also helpful.

Visual Evidence: A Picture is Worth a Thousand Lines of Code

Text descriptions are great, but sometimes, seeing is believing. Screenshots and screen recordings are invaluable tools for conveying the exact visual manifestation of a bug. They eliminate ambiguity and can quickly highlight issues that are difficult to describe in words. They act as undeniable proof and provide immediate context that mere words often fail to deliver. According to a survey of software testers, 92% agree that screenshots and videos significantly improve the clarity and speed of bug resolution.

Screenshots and Annotations

When providing screenshots:

  • Capture the entire relevant area: Don’t just crop to the error message. show the surrounding UI elements for context.
  • Highlight the problem: Use annotation tools arrows, circles, text boxes to draw attention directly to the bug. For example, circle an element that’s misaligned or draw an arrow to an unclickable button.
  • Keep file sizes reasonable: Don’t upload massive uncompressed images. Most bug tracking tools handle compression well, but be mindful.
  • Multiple screenshots for sequential issues: If a bug manifests over several steps, consider taking multiple screenshots showing each stage of the problem.

Short Video Recordings for Complex Issues

For bugs that involve animation, timing, or a complex series of interactions, a short screen recording is far more effective than a dozen screenshots.

  • Keep it brief: Aim for 15-30 seconds, capturing only the reproduction steps and the bug occurring.
  • Clearly show inputs: If possible, let the mouse cursor or keyboard inputs be visible to demonstrate the exact actions taken.
  • Consider audio if relevant: If the bug involves sound issues, recording audio can be helpful.
  • Tools: Use built-in screen recorders macOS QuickTime, Windows Game Bar or dedicated tools like Loom, ShareX, or OBS Studio. These tools often allow for easy sharing and annotation. Videos can reduce clarification cycles by as much as 40% compared to text-only reports for visual bugs.

Beyond the Basics: Advanced Tips for Pro-Level Reports

While the core components are essential, there are additional elements that can elevate your bug reports from “good” to “great.” These are often the details that seasoned testers and developers appreciate, as they offer deeper insights and potential avenues for investigation. Selenium web browser automation

This level of detail demonstrates thoroughness and a proactive approach to problem-solving.

Console Logs and Network Traffic

For web applications, the browser’s developer console F12 is a treasure trove of information.

  • Console Logs: Check for error messages red text, warnings yellow text, or any relevant output. Copy and paste these into your report. These often point directly to JavaScript errors or unhandled exceptions.
  • Network Tab: If the bug involves data loading, API calls, or performance, inspect the Network tab. Look for failed requests red, slow responses, or incorrect data. You can often right-click and “Save as HAR with content” to provide a full network log. This can reveal server-side issues or frontend-backend communication problems. Data from monitoring tools indicates that over 70% of web application bugs have clear indicators in the browser console or network logs.

Database or Backend Logs if applicable

If you have access to backend logs or database information, and the bug seems server-side, include relevant snippets.

  • Error messages: Any stack traces, SQL errors, or specific error codes from the server logs are extremely valuable.
  • Relevant data points: If a bug is related to a specific user account or data record, mentioning its ID or relevant attributes can help developers pinpoint the exact issue in their database. However, be mindful of privacy and security. only include non-sensitive data or anonymize where necessary.

Suggestions for Resolution Use with Caution

While primarily the developer’s job, if you have a strong hypothesis about the cause or a potential fix, you can include it.

  • “Possible Cause:” “It appears the user_id might not be correctly passed to the API endpoint on line X.”
  • “Suggested Fix:” “Adding a null check for this variable might prevent the crash.”
  • Caveat: Frame these as suggestions or hypotheses, not demands. Your primary role is to report, not necessarily to fix. This can sometimes be helpful, but developers might also find it distracting if the suggestion is off-base. Use this sparingly and only when you genuinely have an informed insight.

Prioritization and Severity: Guiding the Fixer’s Hand

Not all bugs are created equal. Some are minor cosmetic glitches, while others can halt critical business operations. Assigning the correct priority and severity helps developers understand the urgency and impact of the bug, allowing them to allocate resources effectively. Mislabeling a low-impact bug as critical can lead to wasted effort on less important issues, while under-prioritizing a critical bug can cause significant damage. Industry benchmarks suggest that accurate prioritization can reduce bug backlog by 10-15% within the first month of implementation. Checklist for remote qa testing team

Defining Severity Levels

Severity refers to the impact of the bug on the system or user.

  • Critical S1: System crash, data loss, major security vulnerability, core functionality completely blocked, production environment unusable. e.g., users cannot log in or make payments.
  • High S2: Significant feature broken, major usability issue, workaround exists but is cumbersome, affects a large number of users. e.g., specific reports are incorrect, but the system is still functional.
  • Medium S3: Minor feature broken, non-critical functionality impaired, UI/UX issues, affects a limited number of users. e.g., a button is misaligned, a search filter doesn’t work perfectly.
  • Low S4: Cosmetic issues, minor text errors, trivial usability problems, very rare occurrence. e.g., a typo in a help message, a very slight color inconsistency.

Understanding Priority Levels

Priority refers to the order in which the bug should be fixed, based on business impact and urgency.

  • P1 Immediate: Fix immediately, hotfix required, halts development or major business process.
  • P2 High: Fix in current sprint/release, impacts important functionality.
  • P3 Medium: Fix in next sprint/release, not urgent but needs attention.
  • P4 Low: Fix when time permits, backlog item, minor enhancement.

Important Note: While severity and priority are often related, they are not always the same. A severe bug e.g., a very rare crash might have a low priority if its business impact is minimal, while a less severe but frequently occurring UI glitch affecting a key conversion funnel might be high priority. Effective teams often use both metrics to make informed decisions.

Follow-Up and Communication: Closing the Loop

Reporting a bug isn’t a one-and-done deal. It’s the start of a conversation. Once you’ve submitted your report, be prepared for follow-up questions from the development team. Timely and clear communication on your part ensures the bug progresses through the resolution pipeline efficiently. This collaborative approach fosters trust and ensures that the effort you put into reporting the bug doesn’t go to waste. A study by the Project Management Institute revealed that effective communication can reduce project failure rates by over 20%.

Responding to Clarification Questions

Developers might need more information to reproduce or understand the bug. Webdriverio tutorial for selenium automation

  • Be prompt: Respond to questions as quickly as possible. Delays here mean delays in fixing the bug.
  • Be specific: If they ask for more details, provide them with the same level of precision as your initial report.
  • Avoid defensiveness: The goal is to fix the bug, not to prove who’s right or wrong.

Verifying the Fix

Once a bug is marked as “resolved” or “fixed,” it’s your responsibility to verify the fix.

  • Reproduce the steps: Follow the exact same steps you used to report the bug.
  • Confirm the fix: Verify that the “Expected Result” now occurs and the “Actual Result” the bug no longer happens.
  • Communicate status:
    • If fixed: Mark the bug as “Verified” or “Closed.”
    • If not fixed: Reopen the bug, explain why it’s not fixed e.g., “The original issue is resolved, but now a new issue X appears after following the steps.”, and ideally, provide new reproducible steps if the behavior has changed.
      This verification step is crucial. Without it, a bug might be marked as fixed but still persist in the wild, leading to user frustration and a loss of confidence in the development process. Effective bug re-testing and verification can lead to an additional 10-15% improvement in software stability post-release.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a bug report?

A bug report is a detailed document that describes a software defect, allowing developers to understand, reproduce, and ultimately fix the issue.

It acts as a communication bridge between those who discover bugs and those who fix them.

Why is writing a good bug report important?

Writing a good bug report is crucial because it saves significant time and resources for development teams, accelerates the bug-fixing process, improves software quality, and reduces miscommunication, leading to a more efficient development cycle.

What are the essential components of a bug report?

The essential components typically include a clear summary/title, detailed steps to reproduce, observed actual behavior, expected behavior, environmental details browser, OS, app version, and visual evidence like screenshots or videos. How device browser fragmentation can affect business

How do I write an effective bug report title?

An effective bug report title should be concise, descriptive, and immediately convey the core issue.

Use a format like ” – – ” and consider including severity for critical bugs.

What are “steps to reproduce”?

“Steps to reproduce” are a chronological, numbered list of actions that, when followed precisely, consistently lead to the bug appearing.

They must be clear enough for anyone to follow, even without prior knowledge of the system.

What is the difference between “expected behavior” and “actual behavior”?

“Expected behavior” describes what the software should do if it were functioning correctly. “Actual behavior” describes what the software did do when the bug occurred, highlighting the deviation from the expected outcome. Debug iphone safari on windows

What environmental details should I include?

You should include the operating system and its version, the browser and its version for web apps, the device type for mobile apps, and the specific version of the application or software being tested.

Why are screenshots and videos important for bug reports?

Screenshots and videos are important because they provide undeniable visual evidence of the bug, eliminate ambiguity, and can convey complex visual issues much more effectively than text descriptions alone, speeding up understanding and resolution.

Should I include console logs or network traffic in my bug report?

Yes, for web applications, including relevant snippets from browser console logs error messages, warnings and network traffic failed requests, slow responses can provide developers with crucial technical insights into the bug’s root cause.

What is the difference between bug severity and priority?

Severity refers to the impact of the bug on the system or user e.g., critical, high, medium, low. Priority refers to the urgency of fixing the bug, based on business impact and strategic importance e.g., P1, P2, P3, P4.

How do I determine the severity of a bug?

Determine severity based on the bug’s impact: Does it crash the system? Does it cause data loss? Does it block core functionality? Does it affect a large number of users? A critical bug would typically have severe consequences. Elements of modern web design

How do I determine the priority of a bug?

Determine priority based on business urgency and strategic importance.

A high-priority bug might be one that prevents users from completing a key transaction, even if its technical severity isn’t a system crash.

Can I suggest a solution in my bug report?

While your primary role is to report, you can cautiously suggest a possible cause or solution if you have a strong, informed hypothesis.

Frame it as a suggestion or hypothesis, not a demand, and always prioritize clear bug description first.

What should I do after submitting a bug report?

After submitting, be prepared to respond promptly to any clarification questions from the development team. Testng annotations in selenium

Once the bug is marked as fixed, it is crucial to verify the fix yourself and confirm whether the bug is resolved.

What if the bug is intermittent and hard to reproduce?

For intermittent bugs, describe the conditions under which it sometimes occurs, even if not consistently. Note the frequency “occurs about 1 in 5 times” and include any unusual environmental factors or prior actions that might be related. More occurrences logged, the better.

Should I create a new bug report for every distinct issue?

Yes, generally, each distinct issue should have its own bug report.

This keeps reports focused and allows each bug to be tracked, prioritized, and fixed independently.

If two issues are clearly related, you can link them within the bug tracking system. How to increase website speed

What details should I avoid in a bug report?

Avoid vague language “it’s broken”, emotional statements, blame, or excessively long narratives that don’t contribute to understanding the bug. Stick to facts and objective observations.

What tools are commonly used for bug reporting?

Common bug reporting and tracking tools include Jira, Asana, Trello, Azure DevOps, Bugzilla, and Monday.com.

Many teams also use integrated project management suites.

How often should I check for updates on my reported bugs?

It depends on your team’s workflow, but regularly checking for status updates and responding to comments is good practice.

For high-priority bugs, more frequent checks are warranted. Findelement in appium

What if a developer cannot reproduce my bug?

If a developer cannot reproduce your bug, they will likely ask for more details.

Be ready to provide additional context, try to reproduce it again on your end, or even offer to walk them through the reproduction steps live. The goal is collaborative problem-solving.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *