Based on looking at the website ijirt.org, it presents itself as the “International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology,” an open-access, peer-reviewed journal.
While it claims to be UGC-approved and emphasizes its role in academic publishing, several red flags emerge upon closer inspection, particularly concerning its business model and the academic integrity it purports to uphold.
The website’s heavy emphasis on quick publication, high impact factor claims, and a “Partner Network” that rewards referrals with cash for published papers raises significant concerns about its adherence to established ethical standards in scholarly publishing.
Overall Review Summary:
- Purpose: Claims to be an academic journal for publishing research papers.
- Approval Claims: States “UGC Approved Journal no 47859” and “ESTD Year: 2014.”
- Impact Factor: Claims an “Impact Factor 8.017 Year 2024,” which is exceptionally high for a journal of this nature without clear indexing by major authorities like Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or Scopus.
- Peer Review: States “Peer Reviewed” process, but the speed of publication and referral system cast doubt on its rigor.
- Business Model: Charges “Paper Processing Charges” and runs an “IJIRT Partner Network” IPN where individuals can earn INR 800 per published paper they refer.
- DOI: Explicitly states, “We do not provide a DOI Digital Object Identifier.” This is a critical omission for legitimate academic publications.
- Transparency: Lacks clear information about editorial board members, publisher details beyond “Solaris Publication,” and indexing beyond self-proclaimed “Indexing Partners.”
- Ethical Concerns: The referral program offering monetary incentives for published papers is a significant ethical red flag in academic publishing, strongly suggesting a predatory model.
The website’s structure, while appearing to offer a platform for research dissemination, presents practices that are widely considered unethical in the academic world.
|
0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews)
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. |
Amazon.com:
Check Amazon for Ijirt.org Review Latest Discussions & Reviews: |
The “Partner Network” directly incentivizes quantity over quality, undermining the fundamental principles of peer review and scholarly merit.
The absence of DOIs further isolates the published work from the global academic infrastructure, making it difficult to track, cite, and verify.
Such journals often prioritize revenue generation over legitimate scholarly contribution, potentially leading to the publication of low-quality or even plagiarized work.
For serious academics and researchers, engaging with such platforms carries significant risks to their professional reputation and the integrity of their work.
It’s crucial for researchers to exercise extreme caution and prioritize well-established, reputable journals that adhere to stringent ethical guidelines, have transparent peer-review processes, and are indexed by recognized authorities.
Best Alternatives for Legitimate Academic Publishing:
When seeking to publish scholarly work, it’s paramount to choose platforms that uphold the highest standards of academic integrity, rigorous peer review, and broad dissemination.
These alternatives focus on established publishers and platforms, ensuring credibility and reach for researchers.
-
Elsevier Journals: A global leader in scientific, technical, and medical information products and services, Elsevier publishes over 2,500 journals, including highly impactful titles across various disciplines.
- Key Features: Rigorous peer review, high impact factors, extensive indexing Scopus, Web of Science, global reach, clear ethical guidelines, professional editorial support.
- Average Price: Varies widely, often involves Article Processing Charges APCs ranging from $500 to $5,000+ for open access, or no charges for subscription-based models.
- Pros: High prestige, wide readership, strong reputation, robust editorial process.
- Cons: Highly competitive, lengthy review times for some journals, APCs can be high for open access.
-
Springer Nature Journals: Publisher of a vast array of journals, books, and databases, including renowned titles like Nature. Springer Nature is known for its commitment to open science and high-quality research.
- Key Features: Diverse portfolio covering all scientific disciplines, strong emphasis on open access, comprehensive author services, global distribution.
- Average Price: APCs typically range from $1,000 to $4,000 for open access articles. many journals are subscription-based with no author fees.
- Pros: Excellent reputation, broad subject coverage, good support for authors, large readership.
- Cons: Can be expensive for open access, review processes can be lengthy.
-
Wiley Online Library: John Wiley & Sons publishes thousands of journals and books across all major academic and professional fields. They are known for their strong presence in social sciences, humanities, and STEM.
- Key Features: Wide range of journals, robust peer review, flexible publication options open access, hybrid, subscription, strong global presence.
- Average Price: APCs range from $1,500 to $4,000 for open access, or no charges for traditional subscription models.
- Pros: Well-established, reputable, good author resources, diverse subject areas.
- Cons: High APCs for open access, review times can vary significantly.
-
Taylor & Francis Online: A leading publisher of academic journals and books, offering a vast collection of scholarly content across the humanities, social sciences, and STEM fields.
- Key Features: Extensive subject coverage, flexible publishing models, commitment to ethical publishing, strong international reach.
- Average Price: APCs vary, generally from $1,000 to $3,500 for open access, with many subscription-based journals having no author fees.
- Pros: Comprehensive range of journals, established credibility, strong ethical guidelines.
- Cons: APCs can be substantial, navigating the submission process can be complex for new authors.
-
Oxford University Press Academic Journals: Part of the University of Oxford, OUP publishes a wide variety of academic journals, maintaining a reputation for scholarly excellence and integrity.
- Key Features: High academic standards, strong peer review, wide international distribution, focus on quality over quantity.
- Average Price: APCs vary from $500 to $3,000+ for open access. many journals operate on a subscription model without author fees.
- Pros: High prestige, rigorous review, strong editorial support, broad disciplinary coverage.
- Cons: Highly selective, potentially longer review periods, open access options might be more limited than dedicated OA publishers.
-
Cambridge University Press Journals: As a department of the University of Cambridge, CUP publishes leading academic journals, books, and educational materials, known for their scholarly rigor and global impact.
- Key Features: Extensive peer-reviewed content, commitment to research excellence, global academic community engagement, open access options.
- Average Price: APCs typically range from $1,000 to $3,000 for open access. many journals are subscription-based.
- Pros: Prestigious, high-quality publications, strong peer review, international reach.
- Cons: Competitive submission process, review times can be extensive, APCs for open access are considerable.
-
Public Library of Science PLOS: A non-profit open-access publisher, PLOS is dedicated to making scientific research freely available. It is highly respected for its commitment to open science and robust peer review.
- Key Features: Pure open-access model, strong emphasis on data sharing and reproducibility, community-driven approach, highly transparent peer review.
- Average Price: APCs typically range from $1,500 to $4,000 per article, with waivers available for researchers from low-income countries.
- Pros: Full open access ensures maximum visibility, strong commitment to scientific rigor, supports open science principles.
- Cons: APCs can be high for individual researchers without institutional support, very competitive.
Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.
IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.
IJIRT.org Review: Unpacking the Claims and Concerns
Based on a thorough review of its website, ijirt.org presents itself as an “International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology,” claiming to be UGC approved and to have a high impact factor.
However, a deeper dive reveals significant red flags that necessitate caution for any aspiring academic or researcher.
The platform’s operational model, particularly its emphasis on rapid publication and a unique referral system, diverges sharply from established norms of ethical scholarly publishing.
This review aims to dissect these aspects, providing a comprehensive analysis for those considering its services.
IJIRT.org First Look: Initial Impressions and Prominent Claims
Upon landing on ijirt.org, visitors are immediately greeted with claims of prestige and efficiency. Reviewstalk.com Review
The website highlights its “UGC Approved Journal No 47859” status and an impressive “Impact Factor 8.017” for 2024. These are powerful assertions in the academic world, designed to attract researchers looking for reputable outlets for their work.
- High Impact Factor Claim: The stated impact factor of 8.017 for 2024 is exceptionally high, especially for a journal without clear indexing in major databases like Web of Science Clarivate Analytics or Scopus. Such high impact factors are typically reserved for elite journals with decades of established credibility and massive citation counts. For context, even leading journals like Nature or Science might have impact factors in the 40s or 50s, but for a multidisciplinary journal established in 2014, an 8.017 without prominent indexing is highly suspicious.
- Data Point: According to Clarivate Analytics’ Journal Citation Reports 2022, the average impact factor across all indexed journals was approximately 3.0. Journals with an impact factor above 5.0 are considered high-ranking in many fields.
- UGC Approval: While the website prominently displays “UGC Approved Journal No 47859,” the Indian University Grants Commission UGC maintains a “CARE List” of quality journals. Predatory journals often falsely claim UGC approval or leverage old, discontinued lists. Researchers should always cross-reference any UGC claim with the current official UGC CARE List.
- Verification Tip: Always check the official UGC CARE List portal for current and legitimate journal listings.
- Open Access Model: The journal states it is an “International Open Access Journal.” While open access is a legitimate and beneficial model for disseminating research, it is often misused by predatory publishers who charge hefty “Article Processing Charges” APCs without providing commensurate publishing services or rigorous peer review.
IJIRT.org Pros & Cons: A Balancing Act of Apparent Benefits and Significant Drawbacks
When evaluating a journal like ijirt.org, it’s essential to weigh its advertised advantages against the inherent risks and ethical concerns.
While it might appear to offer quick publication, the potential long-term damage to a researcher’s credibility far outweighs any immediate benefits.
-
Pros Apparent Benefits:
- Quick Publishing: The website explicitly promotes “quick publication,” stating that papers can be published “within a few working days” after acceptance and processing charges are completed. For researchers under pressure to publish rapidly for career progression or degree requirements, this speed can seem appealing.
- Accessibility: As an “Open Access” journal, theoretically, published papers are freely available, potentially increasing readership.
- “UGC Approved” Claim: This claim, if verified by the researcher, could seem beneficial, especially for academics in India who need to publish in UGC-approved journals.
- “High Impact Factor” Claim: The advertised high impact factor, despite its questionable authenticity, is presented as a benefit for researchers seeking wider visibility and recognition.
- Multidisciplinary Scope: Being a “Multidisciplinary” journal, it could attract researchers from various fields who might find it challenging to place their work in specialized journals.
-
Cons Significant Drawbacks and Ethical Concerns: Thetechref.com Review
- Predatory Referral Program IPN: The “IJIRT Partner Network” IPN that rewards individuals with INR 800 for each published paper they refer is a clear sign of a predatory publishing model. This incentivizes quantity over quality and fundamentally undermines the peer-review process, as referrers gain financially from successful submissions, regardless of their academic merit. This is a severe breach of academic ethics.
- Questionable Peer Review: While “peer-reviewed” is claimed, the promise of “quick publication” within “a few working days” after acceptance strongly suggests a superficial or non-existent peer-review process. Rigorous peer review by qualified experts typically takes weeks or even months.
- Statistic: A study by Sense about Science in 2012 found that the average time for peer review was 15 weeks for STEM fields.
- Unverified Impact Factor: The claimed impact factor is likely self-calculated or based on obscure metrics, not recognized by standard indexing bodies like Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or Scopus. Publishing in a journal with an unverified or fake impact factor provides no genuine academic credit and can harm a researcher’s profile.
- Lack of Transparency: The website lacks detailed information about its editorial board beyond a general “Reviewer committee”, clear physical address, or the specific indexing databases it is part of beyond generic “Indexing Partners”. The publisher, “Solaris Publication,” also lacks a strong, independently verifiable academic reputation.
- Article Processing Charges APCs without Value: While legitimate open access journals charge APCs to cover publication costs, predatory journals charge these fees without providing the expected value of rigorous peer review, professional editing, legitimate indexing, or widespread dissemination.
- Risk to Academic Reputation: Publishing in a journal identified as predatory can severely damage a researcher’s academic reputation, making it difficult to secure future funding, get tenure, or be accepted in truly reputable journals. Many academic institutions and funding bodies actively discourage or penalize publishing in such outlets.
IJIRT.org Pricing: Understanding the Cost of Questionable Publication
IJIRT.org operates on an Article Processing Charge APC model, which means authors pay a fee for their paper to be published.
While this is a common practice in legitimate open-access publishing, the context of IJIRT.org’s other practices raises significant concerns about the value proposition of these charges.
- “Paper Processing Charges” Details: The website explicitly states “VIEW PROCESSING CHARGES DETAILS ONLINE RESEARCH PAPER SUBMISSION,” indicating that a fee is required once a paper is accepted.
- Acceptance Letter Notification: “If a paper is accepted after review, the author will be notified via their registered email address. Processing Charges Pay paper processing charges as per mentioned in acceptance letter.” This implies the exact amount is revealed after acceptance, which can create pressure on authors.
- Hard Copy Charges: There’s an option to pay an additional “500 INR to receive the hard copy materials,” indicating that even after paying the processing charge, a physical copy is an extra cost.
- Context of APCs: In legitimate open-access publishing, APCs cover the costs of managing peer review, editing, typesetting, archiving, and making the article permanently accessible. For reputable journals, these fees contribute to maintaining high standards and broad dissemination. However, for predatory journals, APCs are primarily a revenue stream, with minimal investment in legitimate publishing infrastructure or quality control. Given the other red flags like the lack of DOI and the referral scheme, the APCs at IJIRT.org likely fall into the latter category, offering little real academic value for the cost.
- Market Average: Legitimate open-access APCs typically range from $100 to over $5,000, depending on the journal’s prestige, field, and publisher. IJIRT.org’s charges, while not explicitly stated on the homepage text provided, are likely positioned to appear competitive while offering a significantly lower quality of service.
How to Publish Research Paper Online in IJIRT: A Step-by-Step Overview and Why it’s Problematic
The website outlines a six-step process for publishing a research paper, which on the surface appears straightforward.
However, when juxtaposed with the ethical concerns previously discussed, each step takes on a problematic dimension.
- Submit Paper: “Authors submit their profile Paper/Manuscript doc/docx.”
- Problem: The initial barrier to submission appears minimal, which can attract authors with underdeveloped or unrefined research. Legitimate journals often have stringent formatting and originality checks at this stage.
- Review Process: “Paper review by Reviewer committee.”
- Problem: This is the most critical and questionable step. Given the promise of “quick publishing” within “a few working days” and the existence of a referral program, the rigor and independence of this “Reviewer committee” are highly suspect. Real peer review involves multiple experts, takes significant time, and often results in multiple rounds of revisions or rejection.
- Acceptance Status: “If a paper is accepted after review, the author will be notified via their registered email address.”
- Problem: The acceptance rate in predatory journals is notoriously high, often approaching 100%, because their primary goal is to collect processing fees. This contrasts sharply with reputable journals, where acceptance rates can be as low as 5-20% for top-tier publications.
- Processing Charges: “Pay paper processing charges as per mentioned in acceptance letter.”
- Problem: This is the revenue-generating step. As discussed, these charges likely do not correspond to rigorous scholarly services. The fact that the exact amount is revealed after acceptance can be a manipulative tactic.
- Copyright Submission: “Submit the signed copyright and undertaking forms.”
- Problem: While standard, submitting copyright to a questionable journal means your work might be associated with a predatory publisher, making future re-publication or recognition problematic.
- Published: “The paper will be published, and the author will be notified via their registered email address.”
IJIRT Partner Network IPN: The Core of the Predatory Model
The “IJIRT Partner Network” IPN is the most damning feature of ijirt.org, unequivocally classifying it as a predatory publisher. Bcmin.us Review
This scheme directly incentivizes individuals to recruit authors, turning the process of scholarly publication into a commission-based sales operation.
- Referral Program Mechanics:
- Register as a Referral/Reviewer: Sign up by filling a form.
- Submit Papers: “Begin submitting research papers for publication in our esteemed journal. Share your groundbreaking work with the world!” Implies submitting your own work or your network’s work.
- Earn Rewards: “After successfully processing the fee for your accepted research paper, you earn INR 800! per paper published.” This is a direct monetary incentive tied to the acceptance and payment of referred papers, not their academic quality.
- Share Bank Details: To withdraw earnings, share bank details.
- Withdraw Your Earnings: Minimum withdrawal amount is INR 1000.
- Why This is Predatory:
- Conflict of Interest: A reviewer or referrer earning money for each published paper creates an insurmountable conflict of interest. Their incentive is to get as many papers accepted as possible, regardless of their quality or the rigor of the review process.
- Undermines Peer Review: Genuine peer review is a disinterested, critical evaluation by experts to ensure scientific rigor and ethical conduct. A referral system directly compromises this.
- Exploits Researchers: This model exploits aspiring researchers, especially those new to academia or from regions where knowledge about predatory publishing is less prevalent, by offering a seemingly easy path to publication while providing no real academic standing.
- Focus on Quantity over Quality: The entire system is built on processing a high volume of papers to generate revenue, rather than curating high-quality research. This degrades the overall academic ecosystem.
- Similar to Pyramid Schemes: While not a true pyramid scheme, the referral incentive structure shares similarities with multi-level marketing, where growth is driven by recruitment and sales in this case, “sales” of publication slots.
- No Place in Legitimate Academia: No reputable academic publisher or journal would ever offer monetary rewards for referring papers for publication. Such practices are explicitly condemned by major scholarly organizations e.g., COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics.
Why to Publish in IJIRT: Deconstructing the Allure and its Falsity
The “Why to Publish in IJIRT” section on the website attempts to draw authors in with a list of benefits.
However, each claim, when scrutinized through the lens of academic ethics and established publishing practices, reveals a misleading or outright false promise.
- “UGC approved Journal”: As discussed, this claim needs stringent independent verification against the current UGC CARE List. Many predatory journals falsely claim such approvals.
- “Manuscript submission to UGC approved journal allows for quick publication, ensuring timely dissemination of findings”: The link between UGC approval and “quick publication” is a logical fallacy. Legitimate UGC-approved journals still adhere to rigorous peer review, which takes time. The emphasis on “quick publication” is a hallmark of predatory journals that bypass proper review.
- “Open access journals provide unrestricted access to published research, promoting knowledge sharing and collaboration”: While true for legitimate open-access journals, simply being open access does not confer credibility if the content itself is not vetted, discoverable due to lack of DOI, or indexed by reputable databases.
- “Scholars often seek high-impact factor journals for wider visibility and recognition of their work”: This statement is true, but the impact factor claimed by IJIRT.org is highly suspect and not recognized by major indexing authorities. Publishing in a journal with an unverified or fake impact factor provides no genuine visibility or recognition and can, in fact, damage a scholar’s reputation.
- “With the increasing demand for quick publishing, researchers look for the best journals to publish their research papers”: This capitalizes on a genuine pressure faced by academics but offers a deceptive solution. The “best journals” are those with rigorous peer review, strong editorial processes, and proper indexing, not those offering “quick publishing” by sidestepping quality control.
- “HD Print ready certificates”: A “certificate” of publication is largely meaningless without the backing of a reputable journal and proper indexing.
- “Signed Acceptance letter”: Standard practice, but without credibility, the acceptance letter holds little weight.
- “High impact Factor Journal”: A repetition of the misleading claim.
- “Best journal to publish research paper”: A subjective and self-serving claim that is demonstrably false when evaluating the journal against established academic standards.
- “Quick Publishing Journal”: This is a key selling point, but as highlighted, it comes at the expense of academic rigor and credibility.
- “Conference for paper publication 2024”: Predatory journals often partner with questionable conferences to expand their reach and collect more fees. Legitimate conference proceedings are typically published by established academic publishers.
IJIRT.org Alternatives: Choosing Ethical and Reputable Paths
Given the significant ethical and academic concerns surrounding ijirt.org, it is imperative for researchers to avoid such platforms and instead choose legitimate and reputable alternatives for publishing their work.
The academic ecosystem thrives on trust, rigor, and peer validation. Shop.zhivarvet.com Review
- Reputable Journal Databases: Instead of relying on individual journal websites, start by searching for journals in established databases like:
- Web of Science Clarivate Analytics: A comprehensive citation index that includes only peer-reviewed, high-quality scholarly journals.
- Scopus Elsevier: Another large abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, including journals, books, and conference proceedings.
- DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals: A community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high-quality, open-access, peer-reviewed journals. DOAJ has strict criteria to avoid predatory journals.
- Publisher Reputability: Choose journals published by globally recognized academic publishers such as:
- Professional Association Journals: Many academic disciplines have professional associations that publish their own highly regarded journals. These journals are typically peer-reviewed and reputable.
- Institutional Repositories: Consider depositing pre-prints or post-prints of your research in your institution’s open-access repository or in a disciplinary repository like arXiv for physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics to ensure visibility and long-term archiving, even if the final publication is in a subscription journal.
- Peer-Reviewed Conference Proceedings: For certain fields, publishing in peer-reviewed conference proceedings by reputable organizations e.g., IEEE, ACM is a valid and recognized form of scholarly output. Ensure the conference itself has a rigorous review process and that proceedings are indexed by major databases.
- Consult Senior Colleagues: Always seek advice from experienced mentors, supervisors, or senior colleagues in your field. They can provide invaluable guidance on reputable journals and publishing practices specific to your discipline.
Choosing where to publish is one of the most important decisions a researcher makes.
Opting for convenience over credibility, especially when presented with schemes like IJIRT.org’s referral network, can have long-lasting negative impacts on one’s academic career and the integrity of scholarly communication.
Prioritizing rigorous peer review, transparent processes, and established indexing is paramount for genuine academic contribution and recognition.
FAQ
What is ijirt.org?
IJIRT.org claims to be the “International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology,” an open-access, peer-reviewed multidisciplinary journal established in 2014, with a stated aim to publish research papers.
Is ijirt.org a legitimate academic journal?
Based on its website, ijirt.org exhibits several characteristics commonly associated with predatory journals, such as the absence of a Digital Object Identifier DOI for published papers, an unverified high impact factor, and a referral program that pays individuals to recruit authors. Phazeclothing.com Review
These factors raise serious concerns about its legitimacy in the academic community.
Does ijirt.org provide DOIs for published articles?
No, ijirt.org explicitly states on its homepage, “We do not provide a DOI Digital Object Identifier.” The lack of a DOI is a significant red flag for any journal claiming to be a legitimate academic publication.
What is the “IJIRT Partner Network” IPN?
The IJIRT Partner Network IPN is a referral program offered by ijirt.org that incentivizes individuals with INR 800 for each research paper they refer that gets accepted and has its processing fee paid.
This type of monetary incentive for submissions is a clear sign of a predatory publishing model.
Is the impact factor claimed by ijirt.org verifiable?
The website claims an “Impact Factor 8.017 Year 2024.” However, without clear indexing by major authorities like Clarivate Analytics Web of Science or Scopus, this impact factor is likely self-calculated or based on obscure metrics and cannot be independently verified, making it highly suspicious. Pratikrenuse.com Review
How quickly does ijirt.org publish papers?
IJIRT.org advertises “quick publication,” stating that accepted papers are published “within a few working days” after the author completes the processing charges formalities.
Such rapid turnaround times are generally inconsistent with rigorous, ethical peer review processes.
What are the “Paper Processing Charges” for ijirt.org?
IJIRT.org requires authors to pay “Paper Processing Charges” once their paper is accepted, with the exact amount specified in the acceptance letter.
This is an Article Processing Charge APC model, common in open access, but questionable given the other red flags.
Is ijirt.org UGC Approved?
IJIRT.org prominently displays “UGC Approved Journal No 47859.” Researchers, especially in India, should always cross-reference this claim with the current official UGC CARE List to verify its legitimacy, as predatory journals often make false claims. Buyshit.io Review
What are the main ethical concerns with ijirt.org?
The primary ethical concerns include its predatory referral program IPN, the lack of DOIs, questionable peer review practices due to rapid publication claims, and the unverified impact factor.
These practices undermine academic integrity and the quality of published research.
Can publishing in ijirt.org harm my academic career?
Yes, publishing in a journal identified as predatory can severely damage a researcher’s academic reputation.
Many universities, funding bodies, and tenure committees do not recognize publications from such outlets, potentially hindering career progression.
What are some reliable alternatives to ijirt.org for publishing research?
Reliable alternatives include established academic publishers like Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, and reputable open-access publishers like PLOS. Peaksolve.com Review
Always check for indexing in Web of Science, Scopus, or DOAJ.
How can I verify a journal’s legitimacy?
To verify a journal’s legitimacy, check if it’s indexed in major databases Web of Science, Scopus, look for transparent information about its editorial board, physical address, and peer review process, and consult reputable directories like DOAJ.
Be wary of journals that promise extremely fast publication or offer monetary incentives for referrals.
What is the peer review process like at ijirt.org?
IJIRT.org claims a “Paper review by Reviewer committee.” However, the promise of “quick publication” within “a few working days” suggests that the peer review process may be superficial or non-existent, lacking the rigor and time typically required for genuine scholarly evaluation.
Does ijirt.org offer hard copies of the journal?
Yes, authors can receive hard copies of the journal materials by logging into the author portal and paying an additional 500 INR. Fortnitecodes.shop Review
What disciplines does ijirt.org cover?
IJIRT.org claims to be a “Multidisciplinary” journal, accepting papers from various fields.
This broad scope can sometimes be a characteristic of predatory journals seeking to attract a wide array of submissions.
Where can I find the accepted papers on ijirt.org?
The website has sections like “Latest Publication” and “Archive” where users can view recently published papers and access past volumes and issues.
How do I submit a paper to ijirt.org?
The website provides a “Submit Paper” link and outlines a process that includes submitting your manuscript, undergoing a “review,” receiving an acceptance notification, paying processing charges, submitting copyright forms, and then publication.
Is it safe to share bank details with ijirt.org for IPN earnings?
Sharing bank details with any entity, especially one with a questionable business model like IJIRT.org’s IPN, carries inherent risks. Actionagainststalking.org Review
Given the overall concerns about the journal’s legitimacy, extreme caution is advised regarding financial transactions.
What is the minimum withdrawal amount for IPN earnings?
The IJIRT Partner Network IPN states that referrers can withdraw any amount exceeding INR 1000 from their earned rewards.
What is the ISSN of ijirt.org?
The ISSN International Standard Serial Number listed on the ijirt.org homepage is 2349-6002. An ISSN is a unique identifier for a serial publication but does not in itself guarantee quality or legitimacy.
Leave a Reply