Lusciouslush.com Review

Based on looking at the website Lusciouslush.com, it presents itself as a platform advocating for a new form of democracy, focusing on a revised constitutional framework for the United States.

The site’s primary content revolves around political reform, voter systems, and critiques of the current U.S. government structure.

Here’s an overall review summary of Lusciouslush.com:

• Content Focus: Political reform, a proposed new U.S. constitution, and critiques of existing democratic systems.
• Key Proposals: Video-based elections, decentralized government, elimination of campaign money, and a significantly expanded legislative body.
• Ethical Stance Islamic Perspective: The website’s content, while unconventional, does not appear to directly promote any practices explicitly forbidden in Islam. Its focus on justice, accountability, and curbing corruption in governance aligns with general Islamic principles of good governance. However, the specific implementation details, such as “mustering in the streets” for revolutionary change, might be interpreted differently based on scholarly views regarding civil disobedience and maintaining societal order. The proposals are political and constitutional, not religious or moral in a theological sense.
• Credibility: The website lacks standard trust signals found on legitimate platforms, such as clear “About Us” information, a physical address, contact details beyond a simple content link, or a privacy policy. The sole linked external domain, AndrewMelcher.com, is the source of the proposed constitution and commentary, suggesting it’s primarily a personal project rather than an established organization. This absence of transparency and professional presentation raises questions about its broader legitimacy and accountability as a reliable source of political discourse or a platform for widespread adoption.
• User Experience: The website is text-heavy with minimal visual elements, making it somewhat challenging to navigate and digest the extensive information. It functions more like a digital manifesto than an interactive political platform.

Lusciouslush.com embarks on an ambitious endeavor, aiming to overhaul the American democratic system through a meticulously detailed — and remarkably lengthy — proposed constitution.

The site is essentially a digital white paper, laying out a vision for a “less corrupt” democracy.

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Lusciouslush.com Review Latest Discussions & Reviews:

It dissects what it perceives as deep-seated flaws in the current system, ranging from campaign finance and voter fraud to the concentration of power in a small number of elected officials and unelected bureaucrats.

The proposed solutions are radical, suggesting a complete re-imagining of how governance functions, emphasizing transparency through video voting and widespread participation through a million-strong “Sub-Senate”.

From an Islamic ethical standpoint, the core objectives of combating corruption, promoting fairness, and ensuring accountability are highly commendable. Islam places a strong emphasis on justice adl, consultation shura, and governance that serves the welfare of the people maslaha. The website’s critique of financial influence in politics and its call for greater public participation resonate with these principles. However, the practical methodology for achieving these changes, particularly the idea of mass street assembly to unilaterally adopt a new constitution, might raise concerns among Islamic scholars who prioritize stability and avoidance of chaos fitna unless absolutely necessary and conducted through legitimate means. The website doesn’t explicitly discuss religious or moral topics, focusing purely on political science and constitutional law. Therefore, its ethical review from an Islamic perspective centers on the implications of its proposed actions rather than inherent theological conflict.

The most significant red flag for Lusciouslush.com is its profound lack of conventional online credibility markers.

It would also feature transparent contact information, a privacy policy explaining data handling, and potentially a sitemap or a more intuitive navigation system.

The absence of these standard elements makes it difficult for a visitor to ascertain the background, expertise, or accountability of the individuals behind this project.

While the content is extensive, its presentation strongly suggests a personal initiative rather than a broadly endorsed or institutionally backed movement.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Best Ethical Alternatives for Political and Civic Engagement

Given the nature of Lusciouslush.com’s content, here are some ethical alternatives for those seeking to engage with political thought, civic action, and constitutional studies, prioritizing transparency, established credibility, and a focus on positive, structured engagement:

• Khan Academy

  • Key Features: Free online courses covering U.S. government and civics, including constitutional principles, democratic processes, and historical context. Features videos, exercises, and articles.
  • Average Price: Free
  • Pros: Highly credible, widely recognized educational platform. content is well-structured and easy to understand. promotes foundational civic knowledge. non-partisan.
  • Cons: Not directly focused on political reform advocacy.

• Council on Foreign Relations CFR

  • Key Features: Independent, non-partisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher focusing on U.S. foreign policy and international affairs. Offers extensive research, analysis, and reports on global governance, democracy, and political systems.
  • Average Price: Many resources are free. membership has a cost.
  • Pros: High journalistic and academic standards. provides in-depth, expert analysis. covers global political systems and challenges. influential in policy discussions.
  • Cons: Focus is broader than just U.S. domestic politics. some premium content requires membership.

• National Constitution Center

  • Key Features: Non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to increasing understanding of the U.S. Constitution. Offers educational resources, interactive exhibits, and public programs.
  • Average Price: Many resources are free. some programs or exhibits may have a fee.
  • Pros: Directly addresses U.S. constitutional law and history. promotes civic dialogue. educational and accessible for all ages.
  • Cons: Focused on the existing Constitution, not proposing a new one.

• Brookings Institution

  • Key Features: Non-profit public policy organization conducting in-depth research and providing innovative recommendations on a full range of issues facing the U.S. and the world. Features extensive reports on governance, economy, and social policy.
  • Average Price: Free access to most research and publications.
  • Pros: Highly respected, independent think tank. offers data-driven analysis and policy recommendations. covers a wide array of governance topics.
  • Cons: Can be very academic and dense for a general audience.

• The American Enterprise Institute AEI

  • Key Features: Conservative think tank dedicated to research and education on issues of government, politics, economics, and social welfare. Offers a variety of publications and events.
  • Pros: Provides a specific viewpoint on governance and public policy, offering diverse perspectives. focuses on economic freedom and limited government.
  • Cons: Has a clear ideological stance, which may not appeal to all users. less focused on fundamental constitutional overhaul.

• Pew Research Center

  • Key Features: Non-partisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research.
  • Average Price: Free access to all reports and data.
  • Pros: Provides unbiased, data-driven insights into public opinion on governance and political systems. excellent for understanding public sentiment.
  • Cons: Primarily a data provider, not a platform for political reform advocacy.

• Project Gutenberg

  • Key Features: A library of over 70,000 free eBooks. Includes historical political texts like the U.S. Constitution, Federalist Papers, and other foundational documents that inform political thought.
  • Pros: Excellent for direct access to primary source political documents. supports self-education and in-depth study of historical governance theories.
  • Cons: Requires the user to find and interpret the relevant texts. not a guided learning experience.

Lusciouslush.com Review & First Look

Based on checking the website Lusciouslush.com, it immediately becomes apparent that this platform is not a typical e-commerce site or a standard blog.

Instead, it positions itself as a deeply philosophical and technical proposal for an entirely new form of American democracy.

The homepage is an exhaustive manifesto, outlining what the author perceives as the inherent flaws in the current U.S.

Constitutional framework and presenting a radical, intricate alternative.

It’s less a “review” in the consumer sense and more an evaluation of a political treatise published online. Transchemtraining.com Review

The site champions a direct, video-recorded voting system in small local groups Nome, a massive “Sub-Senate” of one million part-time lawmakers, a “Main-Senate” of 100,000 full-time legislators, and an “Over-Senate” of 10,000. It asserts that this structure would fundamentally eliminate corruption, campaign money, and the undue influence of media and powerful entities. The core argument rests on the idea that the existing U.S. Constitution, particularly its 1789 iteration, was subtly designed to restrain freedoms rather than ensure them, leading to what the author terms an “oligarchy” rather than a true democracy.

Key observations on the website’s initial presentation:

• Purpose: The website’s singular purpose is to introduce and advocate for a new, extensive 1,900-page constitution. It’s a call to action for citizens to “muster in the streets” and adopt this new framework, circumventing existing government structures.
• Content Density: The homepage is exceptionally text-heavy, resembling a continuous scroll of arguments, historical critiques, and constitutional proposals. There’s a deliberate lack of typical website formatting e.g., clear section breaks, interactive elements, diverse media that one might expect from a modern online platform.
• Tone and Style: The writing style is direct, assertive, and highly critical of the status quo. It uses rhetorical questions and strong declarative statements, aiming to provoke thought and agreement from the reader. It delves deep into historical interpretations, citing figures like Patrick Henry, James Madison, and ancient thinkers like Thucydides and Cassius Dio, but often with a specific interpretative lens.
• Absence of Commercial Elements: There are no products, services, or commercial transactions. It’s purely an informational and advocacy platform.
• Lack of Standard Website Trust Signals: This is a significant point of concern. There is no “About Us” page detailing the organization or individuals behind “Lusciouslush.com,” no clear contact information beyond a link to AndrewMelcher.com which appears to be the author’s primary hub, no privacy policy, and no terms of service. This omission of standard transparency measures makes it challenging to assess the credibility or accountability of the project from a conventional standpoint.

From an ethical perspective, especially considering principles of transparency and responsibility, the lack of clear organizational information is a notable drawback.

While the content itself is intellectually engaging for those interested in political theory and constitutional law, the absence of basic trust signals means users are engaging with a powerful, revolutionary idea without clear knowledge of its source or backing beyond a single individual’s apparent efforts.

Lusciouslush.com Pros & Cons Focusing on the Website’s Design and Information

When evaluating Lusciouslush.com, it’s crucial to separate the ambitious, revolutionary ideas it espouses from the technical and user experience aspects of the website itself. Wscapnow.com Review

For a platform making such profound claims and proposing sweeping societal changes, the presentation and underlying structure are critical.

Cons of Lusciouslush.com’s Website Presentation

• Lack of Transparency and Trust Signals: This is arguably the biggest drawback. A website advocating for a new constitutional order should be a paragon of transparency. Lusciouslush.com offers no clear “About Us” section detailing its founders, mission, or organizational structure. There’s no physical address, phone number, general contact email beyond the implication of AndrewMelcher.com, or even a basic privacy policy. In the age of online scams and misinformation, this absence of standard trust markers is a significant red flag for any serious visitor. It makes it nearly impossible to verify the entity behind the content or hold them accountable.
• Poor User Experience UX and Navigation: The website is a dense, almost overwhelming wall of text. It lacks clear hierarchical headings, digestible paragraphs, or visual breaks that would make the extensive content more accessible. Scrolling endlessly through thousands of words without strong visual cues or internal navigation within the page is a frustrating experience for most modern web users. The menu simply links to the same page or external documents.
• Minimalist Design to a Fault: While a clean, minimalist design can be effective, Lusciouslush.com takes it to an extreme that hinders readability. There are almost no images, infographics, or other multimedia elements to break up the text or illustrate complex ideas. This makes the content feel dry and academic, potentially alienating a broader audience that might otherwise be interested in its core message.
• Absence of Community or Interaction Features: For a movement advocating for widespread civic action and a new form of democracy, the website offers no discernible way for users to engage with each other, discuss ideas, or contribute to the discourse directly on the platform. There are no comment sections, forums, or social media integrations, limiting its potential as a collaborative hub for political change.
• Single-Point-of-View Presentation: The entire website presents a singular, unwavering perspective. While this is common for manifestos, a platform seeking to redefine democracy might benefit from acknowledging diverse viewpoints or at least having a section for critical analysis even if self-critique. The absence of even a hypothetical FAQ addressing common objections to such radical proposals can make the content feel dogmatic.
• Questionable Domain Name Choice: The domain “Lusciouslush.com” does not intuitively relate to political reform or constitutional law. This seemingly random domain name could lead to confusion or make the website appear less serious and professional to potential visitors seeking information on civic matters. It undermines the gravity of the subject matter.

Deep Dive into the Proposed Democratic Model

The core of Lusciouslush.com’s proposal is a radical restructuring of governmental power, moving away from what it calls a “narrow democracy” and toward a “broad, incorruptible democracy.” This new model is predicated on principles that directly address the perceived failures of the current U.S. system.

Critiques of the Existing U.S. System

The website offers a scathing critique of the current American democratic structure, arguing that it’s fundamentally flawed and operates more as an “oligarchy” than a true democracy.

These criticisms are central to understanding the rationale behind the proposed alternative.

• Concentration of Power: The site contends that the U.S. government, with its relatively small number of elected lawmakers 535 in Congress plus the President, places an “immense” amount of power and financial control trillions of dollars annually into too few hands. This narrow representation ratio, it argues, makes the system inherently susceptible to corruption.
• Campaign Finance and Media Influence: A major point of contention is the role of money in elections. Lusciouslush.com asserts that expensive campaign ads and contributions allow “fictional entities” corporations, charities to “drown out the organic voice of the people.” It proposes a system where money is entirely removed from the electoral process, making elections based on “personal acquaintance” rather than financial leverage or “corrupt media” coverage.
• Voter Secrecy and Fraud: The website strongly criticizes secret ballots and mail voting, arguing that these methods facilitate corruption. It proposes open, video-recorded voting in small neighborhood groups as a means to “end all ballot count and ballot box stuffing corruption” and to “scare non-citizens from voting.” This is a bold claim, contrasting sharply with conventional arguments for secret ballots protecting voters from intimidation.
• Bureaucracy and Appointee Power: A significant portion of the critique is directed at the “unelected bureaucracy” and the power of appointed officials. The site claims that because elected officials are too few to manage a vast nation, most government work, including law-writing, falls to non-elected appointees, effectively making the U.S. a “public king situation” run by a “Deep State” behind the scenes. It asserts that the new system would replace these appointees with “Senator juries.”
• Constitutional Intent and Amendments: Lusciouslush.com argues that the 1789 U.S. Constitution was “cleverly written to restrain freedoms” rather than ensure them. It points to aspects like the allowance for minimal representation per state, the omission of a Bill of Rights initially, and the difficulty of amendment as evidence of a design aimed at controlling the populace. It highlights historical debates from the Anti-Federalist Papers to support this view, suggesting a deliberate move from a broader “meta-democracy” under the Articles of Confederation to a narrower, more controllable system.

Proposed Solutions for Governance

The core of Lusciouslush.com’s alternative governance model revolves around a multi-tiered, highly decentralized legislative structure designed to enhance accountability, reduce corruption, and increase citizen participation. Flyeliteclass.com Review

• Video-Recorded Elections: A cornerstone of the new system is the abolition of secret ballots and the adoption of open, video-recorded elections. Each “Nome” voting district of 250 voters would walk in looping lines, video-recording each other’s faces and paper ballots attached to their chests. This is presented as an “incorruptible” and “totally believable” method to eliminate vote fraud, scare non-citizens from voting, and end mail voting, as “people must show their face to vote.” The site acknowledges privacy concerns but states it would be a felony to assemble or share these videos, aiming for “some degree of voter privacy.”
• The Three-Tiered Senate Structure:
  • Sub-Senate 1:250 ratio, 1 Million members: This part-time body would consist of one elected “Sub-Senator” per 250 voters. Their roles would include listening to the people, elevating good ideas, determining truth independently of commercial media, producing their own media channels, helping administer government granularly, and serving as a staffing pool for higher Senates and judicial duties. The election process is designed to be swift 3 days and based on personal acquaintance within neighborhoods.
  • Main-Senate 1:2,500 ratio, 100,000 members: These full-time lawmakers would be elected by groups of 200 Sub-Senators called “Centi-Nomes”. They would be responsible for making and executing the nation’s laws. The Main-Senate would operate as a whole for important decisions and also through “10 specialized ‘sluices’” of 10,000 members each, similar to modern cabinet departments e.g., healthcare, military, justice. Each sluice would manage its area of specialty, aiming for a “10 times faster” and “more granular” democracy.
  • Over-Senate 1:25,000 ratio, 10,000 members: Elected by the Main-Senate, this full-time body would set the overall course of government and its budget, adjust powers among other Senates and sluices, and act as the “supreme judge of constitutionality,” replacing the current Supreme Court. Crucially, the Over-Senate would make no laws and spend almost no money itself, serving as a “check and balance” on the powers of the Main-Senate and its sluices. The Sub-Senate would retain “ultimate authority to vote and declare any law of the Main-Senate as unconstitutional.”
• Elimination of Campaign Money and Media Influence: By using small election groups and relying on personal acquaintance, the system aims to make campaign money irrelevant. Candidates would not need funds for expensive ads or media coverage, as their election would be based on community knowledge and direct interaction. This also diminishes the power of media organizations in shaping public opinion during elections.
• Rapid Government Assembly and Citizen Oversight: The proposed system claims the ability to elect a new government in less than 8 days. The concept of “mustering” involves citizens assembling nationwide under the new constitution. Once a majority of the electorate has mustered, the new constitution automatically takes effect, and nationwide elections for the new Senate structure are immediately called. This mechanism is presented as a “backup system” for “free people everywhere” to replace their entire leadership at once, without government involvement, thus turning “protests into elections.”
• Decentralization and Regional Governance: The new constitution advocates for “mandatory decentralization,” pushing government functions to county levels where they can be “nearly as effectively” managed. This would also eliminate Washington D.C. as a single national capital, replacing it with 34 regional voting centers across the U.S., making government more accessible and harder to lobby or attack.

Historical Context and Arguments

Lusciouslush.com extensively uses historical accounts and quotes, particularly from the Anti-Federalist Papers and classical thinkers, to bolster its arguments for a new constitutional framework.

The website’s narrative suggests a deliberate, historical “sabotage” of true democratic principles in the U.S.

• Critique of the 1789 U.S. Constitution: The site argues that the current U.S. Constitution, drafted by “39 men without any authority” referring to the Constitutional Convention delegates who exceeded their initial mandate to merely amend the Articles of Confederation, was designed to create an “oligarchy” rather than a broad democracy. It highlights several points:
  • Initial Lack of a Bill of Rights: The authors of the 1789 Constitution intentionally campaigned against including a Bill of Rights, which states later insisted upon. The site quotes James Wilson to illustrate how “lawyer-type” language was used to obscure this “indefensible position.”
  • Tolerance of Slavery: The Constitution allowed slavery in the “land of the free” and even counted slaves for representation, further demonstrating its perceived flaws.
  • Narrowing of Representation: Compared to the 1st U.S. Constitution Articles of Confederation which had over 2,000 state lawmakers for 2.4 million people a 1:1,200 ratio, the 1789 Constitution reduced the number of federal lawmakers drastically 65 representatives, 26 senators, creating a “measly 67 lawmakers” and eventually leading to today’s 1-in-1.54 million representation ratio. This, the site argues, is a “thousand times narrower” and easier to corrupt.
  • Recording of Lawmaker Votes: The site notes that the U.S. Constitution mentions three times that lawmaker votes must be recorded, which it interprets as a mechanism for external powers to know if their “blackmail and bribes worked.” It argues that lawmakers should vote secretly to prevent corruption, while the people should vote openly.
• The “Illusion of Democracy”: The website maintains that the U.S. style of government presents an “illusion of democracy” while functioning as an “oligarchic monarchy.” It compares the U.S. President to a “4-year elected monarch” and the judiciary to a “9-man court of appointees.” It quotes classical figures like Thucydides and Cassius Dio, who described ancient Athens and Rome as monarchies “in name” despite their democratic facades, to draw parallels with the modern U.S. system.
• Anti-Federalist Perspectives: Lusciouslush.com heavily draws from the Anti-Federalist Papers, portraying figures like Patrick Henry and Melancton Smith as “true leaders of the American Revolution” who correctly identified the inherent dangers of the proposed 1789 Constitution. It highlights their arguments against the concentration of power, the lack of representation, and the potential for corruption, suggesting that their warnings were prophetic.
• The “Truth has a Ring to It”: The site implies that historical truths about the U.S. Constitution’s problematic origins and design have been deliberately obscured or downplayed. It suggests that a “foreign interest” shaped the prototype democracy to be “easy to corrupt” and that a “ministry of truth” alluding to George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four has indoctrinated Americans with misleading narratives.

Lusciouslush.com Alternatives for Civic Engagement & Constitutional Study

Since Lusciouslush.com is a platform for political ideas and a proposed new constitution, direct “competitors” in a commercial sense don’t exist.

However, for individuals interested in civic engagement, understanding constitutional law, and exploring different models of governance, numerous established and credible alternatives offer a more transparent and academically rigorous approach.

These platforms provide educational resources, foster informed debate, and engage with political science in a structured and accountable manner. Couponzshop.com Review

Here are some alternatives, focusing on different facets of political and civic engagement, that prioritize established methodologies and transparency:

• Academic Institutions and University Programs:

  • Key Features: University departments of political science, public policy, and constitutional law offer rigorous academic courses, research, and publications. Many provide free online lectures, course materials, or open-access journals.
  • Pros: Highest level of academic rigor and peer review. diverse range of expert opinions and research methodologies. foundational understanding of political theory and constitutional history.
  • Cons: Can be highly academic and require prior knowledge. direct engagement might require enrollment in programs.
  • Example: Harvard Kennedy School, Stanford University Political Science

• Non-Partisan Think Tanks:

  • Key Features: Organizations like the Brookings Institution, Council on Foreign Relations, and American Enterprise Institute AEI conduct independent research on public policy, governance, and international relations. They publish reports, analyses, and host events.
  • Pros: Provide in-depth, data-driven analysis from diverse perspectives. focus on evidence-based policy recommendations. contribute to informed public discourse.
  • Cons: Can be very academic and complex. some may have perceived ideological leanings despite their non-partisan claims.
  • Example: Brookings Institution, Council on Foreign Relations, American Enterprise Institute AEI

• Civic Education Organizations:

  • Key Features: Organizations dedicated to educating citizens about their rights, responsibilities, and the functioning of government. They often provide accessible materials for various age groups.
  • Pros: Focus on civic literacy and participation. present foundational knowledge in an understandable format. often non-partisan and widely respected.
  • Cons: May not delve into radical critiques or proposals for fundamental governmental change.
  • Example: National Constitution Center, Center for Civic Education

• Public Policy Research Centers: Allcam.biz Review

  • Key Features: Similar to think tanks, but often with a narrower focus or affiliation with specific academic centers. They analyze current events, policy proposals, and their implications.
  • Pros: Offer specialized expertise. provide timely analysis of contemporary issues. often publish accessible policy briefs.
  • Cons: May be more focused on current policy rather than long-term constitutional reform.
  • Example: RAND Corporation, Urban Institute

• Online Learning Platforms MOOCs:

  • Key Features: Platforms like Coursera, edX, and Khan Academy offer free or low-cost courses from top universities on subjects like U.S. government, political science, and constitutional law.
  • Pros: Flexible learning. access to university-level content without traditional enrollment. often includes video lectures, readings, and quizzes.
  • Cons: Requires self-discipline. interaction with instructors or peers might be limited in free versions.
  • Example: Coursera Political Science, edX Government & Politics, Khan Academy US Government and Civics

• Government Archives and Congressional Resources:

  • Key Features: Official government websites provide direct access to historical documents, congressional records, legislative processes, and government data.
  • Pros: Unbiased primary source material. direct insight into the legislative process. highly authoritative.
  • Cons: Can be overwhelming to navigate. requires the user to interpret raw data and documents.
  • Example: National Archives, Congress.gov

• Reputable News and Investigative Journalism:

  • Key Features: Major news organizations with strong investigative journalism departments often delve deep into political corruption, campaign finance, and governmental accountability.
  • Pros: Provides real-world examples and current events related to governance challenges. often presents complex issues in an accessible format.
  • Cons: Can sometimes be subject to editorial bias. requires critical evaluation of sources.
  • Example: ProPublica, The New York Times Politics, The Washington Post Politics

How to Engage with Lusciouslush.com’s Ideas Ethical Considerations

Given that Lusciouslush.com presents a radical re-imagining of governance, the “how-to” isn’t about practical product usage, but rather about how one might ethically engage with such revolutionary proposals.

From an Islamic perspective, the principles of deliberation, upholding covenants, and avoiding societal strife are paramount when considering political change. Sopro.org.uk Review

Deliberation and Scholarly Inquiry

Engaging with the extensive proposals on Lusciouslush.com necessitates a deep level of intellectual rigor and critical analysis.

Hasty conclusions or emotional responses, whether positive or negative, are counterproductive.

• Study the Proposed Constitution Thoroughly: The website emphasizes the existence of a 1,900-page constitution. To truly understand the author’s vision, one must delve into this document. This involves carefully reading each section, understanding its implications, and mapping out the interdependencies of the proposed system. A superficial scan will not suffice.
• Compare with Established Political Theories: How do the proposed ideas align with or deviate from classical and modern political philosophies e.g., Lockean liberalism, Rousseau’s social contract, Montesquieu’s separation of powers, Machiavellian realism, Islamic political thought? Understanding these intellectual lineages provides context and allows for a more nuanced evaluation.
• Analyze Historical Precedents: The website itself heavily relies on historical critiques of the U.S. Constitution and references ancient democracies/oligarchies. Critically examine these historical claims. Are the interpretations accurate? Are the historical parallels truly applicable to contemporary society? Consult diverse historical scholarship, not just the selected quotes presented on the site.
• Consult Experts in Constitutional Law and Political Science: For serious intellectual engagement, it would be beneficial to discuss the proposals with constitutional law scholars, political scientists, and historians. Their expertise can help unpack the legal ramifications, practical challenges, and theoretical underpinnings of such a system.
• Identify Underlying Assumptions: Every political theory operates on certain assumptions about human nature, societal structure, and the purpose of government. What are the core assumptions behind Lusciouslush.com’s proposals? Are they realistic? For instance, the assumption that video voting will eliminate all fraud or that a million-member legislature can operate efficiently requires scrutiny.

Considerations for Societal Change Islamic Perspective

From an Islamic standpoint, the pursuit of justice and good governance is a religious imperative. However, the means by which change is pursued are equally important. Islam generally prioritizes stability and avoiding widespread chaos fitna while advocating for gradual, reasoned reform where possible. Revolutionary change, especially when it bypasses established legitimate mechanisms, is viewed with caution and often discouraged if it leads to greater harm.

• The Principle of Shura Consultation: Islamic governance emphasizes mutual consultation. While Lusciouslush.com proposes a system designed for broader participation, the method of its adoption e.g., “mustering in the streets” to unilaterally enact a new constitution raises questions about whether it embodies genuine societal consensus or risks imposing a system without widespread, informed agreement. True shura involves careful deliberation among diverse stakeholders, not just a numerical majority in a protest.
• Upholding Covenants and Agreements: Islamic teachings strongly emphasize fulfilling contracts and agreements 'ahd. A constitution, in essence, is a societal covenant. To unilaterally discard an existing constitutional framework, even if perceived as flawed, without a legitimate and broadly accepted process for amendment or replacement, could be seen as violating a societal trust. Gradual reform through established legal channels, even if slow, is generally preferred.
• Avoiding Fitna Chaos and Strife: The potential for societal disruption, conflict, and loss of life inherent in revolutionary movements is a major concern in Islamic jurisprudence. The idea of “mustering in the streets” to overthrow an entire government, even a “corrupt” one, carries significant risks. Islamic scholars often advise against actions that could lead to widespread civil unrest, damage to property, or loss of innocent lives, even in pursuit of a better system, unless extreme oppression leaves no other recourse and success is highly probable with minimal harm. The website doesn’t explicitly detail how this “mustering” would remain peaceful and ordered, or how the transition would prevent anarchy.
• Justice and Accountability within the System: While Lusciouslush.com aims for an “incorruptible” system, it’s essential to consider how justice and accountability would be maintained within the proposed structure. What mechanisms would exist to prevent abuses of power within the vast new legislative bodies? How would the “Senator juries” ensure impartial justice? Islamic principles demand robust systems of oversight and accountability for all rulers.
• Feasibility and Practicality: Beyond the ethical and theoretical aspects, one must consider the practical feasibility of such a radical overhaul in a large, diverse nation. Could a million-member Sub-Senate effectively legislate? How would 10,000 Over-Senators interpret a 1,900-page constitution? The operational challenges of such a system are immense and deserve careful consideration.

In conclusion, engaging with Lusciouslush.com’s ideas requires a critical, analytical, and ethically grounded approach.

While the aspirations for justice and accountability are commendable from an Islamic perspective, the proposed methods for achieving them warrant serious scrutiny, particularly concerning the potential for societal disruption and the means of establishing a new governance framework. Xakbox.com Review

How to Cancel Lusciouslush.com Subscription / Free Trial

This section is not applicable to Lusciouslush.com. The website does not offer any subscriptions, free trials, or commercial services. It is a purely informational and advocacy platform that provides its content freely to all visitors. There is no account to create, no payment information to enter, and therefore, nothing to “cancel.”

The website’s entire focus is on presenting a detailed proposal for a new form of government and critiquing the existing U.S. political system.

Visitors can access all of its content, including the downloadable constitution and commentary, without any registration or financial commitment.

Therefore, if you have engaged with Lusciouslush.com, there is no action required to “cancel” anything, as you have not entered into any commercial relationship with the site.

Your interaction is limited to consuming the free content provided. Moneysavinganswers.com Review

Lusciouslush.com Pricing

This section is not applicable to Lusciouslush.com. The website does not offer any products, services, or subscriptions that have a price. It is a completely free resource dedicated to presenting a detailed proposal for a new governmental system for the United States.

All the content available on Lusciouslush.com, including the proposed 1,900-page constitution and its accompanying commentary, can be accessed and downloaded without any cost.

There are no premium tiers, paywalls, or hidden fees.

The website operates purely as a platform for political discourse and advocacy.

Therefore, for those interested in the political theories and constitutional proposals presented on the site, there is no “pricing” information to consider, as all content is provided at no charge. Foxgown.com Review

Lusciouslush.com vs. Mainstream Political Discourse

Lusciouslush.com stands in stark contrast to mainstream political discourse and established political science.

While mainstream discourse operates within the existing constitutional framework and focuses on incremental policy changes, elections, and established institutions, Lusciouslush.com advocates for a complete, revolutionary overhaul.

This fundamental difference makes a direct “versus” comparison complex, as they operate on entirely different premises.

Here’s how Lusciouslush.com differentiates itself from, and critiques, mainstream political discourse:

• Scope of Change: Sharptvusa.com Review

  • Mainstream: Debates typically revolve around legislation e.g., healthcare reform, climate policy, tax laws, electoral strategies e.g., primary races, general elections, and the interpretation of existing constitutional powers e.g., Supreme Court rulings, executive orders. The goal is usually to improve or adjust the current system within its established boundaries.
  • Lusciouslush.com: Calls for a total replacement of the U.S. Constitution and governmental structure. It views incremental change within the current system as futile, believing the system itself is designed to be corrupt and oligarchic. Its proposals are not about policy tweaks but about fundamental institutional and constitutional re-engineering.

• Approach to Elections and Campaign Finance:

  • Mainstream: Accepts the current electoral process, including secret ballots, party-based campaigning, and the significant role of campaign finance though with ongoing debates about regulation. Discussions focus on voter registration drives, combating specific instances of fraud, and campaign finance reform within the existing system.
  • Lusciouslush.com: Rejects the current electoral system outright. It proposes radical changes like video-recorded open voting, elimination of campaign money, and decentralization of electoral power to small neighborhood groups. It views the current system as inherently susceptible to fraud and undue influence, particularly from corporate money and media.

• View of the Constitution and Governance:

  • Mainstream: Generally respects the U.S. Constitution as a foundational, albeit amendable, document. Debates center on its interpretation e.g., originalism vs. living constitution and application. The focus is on the “checks and balances” among existing branches of government.
  • Lusciouslush.com: Considers the 1789 U.S. Constitution to be a flawed, even deceptive, document designed by “oligarchs” to restrain freedom. It argues that the system is not a true democracy but a “monarchy” disguised by an “elected monarch” the President and controlled by an “unelected bureaucracy” the “Deep State”. It advocates for a new constitution that fundamentally redefines the relationship between citizens and government.

• Role of Experts and Institutions:

  • Mainstream: Relies heavily on the expertise of constitutional lawyers, political scientists, economists, and established institutions e.g., universities, think tanks, government agencies for analysis, policy recommendations, and implementation.
  • Lusciouslush.com: Appears to present a singular, highly detailed vision from an individual perspective, often challenging the interpretations of mainstream historians and legal scholars. While it cites historical figures, its overall argument is distinctly anti-establishment in its intellectual lineage.

• Method of Change:

  • Mainstream: Advocates for change through established democratic processes: elections, legislation, judicial review, and constitutional amendments which are notoriously difficult to pass.
  • Lusciouslush.com: Proposes a revolutionary “backup system” where citizens “muster in the streets” to unilaterally adopt a new constitution, effectively bypassing the existing legal and governmental structures. This is a call for a non-violent but fundamentally extra-constitutional revolution.

In essence, Lusciouslush.com operates as a radical critique and alternative blueprint to mainstream political thought. Glutimax.com Review

It aims to ignite a grassroots movement for fundamental systemic change, whereas mainstream discourse is largely confined to working within and incrementally modifying the established system.

Its proposals are audacious, comprehensive, and challenge the very foundation of American governance as currently understood.

FAQ

What is Lusciouslush.com’s primary purpose?

Lusciouslush.com’s primary purpose is to advocate for and present a detailed blueprint for a new, “incorruptible” form of democracy for the United States, including a proposed 1,900-page constitution, and to critique the current U.S. government as an “oligarchy.”

Does Lusciouslush.com sell any products or services?

No, Lusciouslush.com does not sell any products or services.

It is a purely informational and advocacy website that provides its content, including the proposed constitution and commentary, for free. Buy-fifa-ultimateteam-coins.com Review

Is Lusciouslush.com a legitimate organization or business?

Based on the website’s presentation, it does not appear to be a conventional organization or business.

It lacks standard “About Us” information, contact details, or a clear organizational structure, suggesting it is primarily a personal project or manifesto by an individual author.

Who is behind Lusciouslush.com?

The website links to AndrewMelcher.com for the downloadable constitution and commentary, indicating that Andrew Melcher is the author and driving force behind the proposed democratic system and the content on Lusciouslush.com.

Can I trust the information presented on Lusciouslush.com?

The information presented on Lusciouslush.com reflects a specific, highly critical perspective on U.S. history and governance.

While it cites historical figures and documents, its interpretations are unique and revolutionary. Maboutiquepharma.com Review

Visitors should independently verify claims and consult diverse, established sources for a balanced understanding.

What are the main problems Lusciouslush.com identifies with current democracy?

Lusciouslush.com identifies several problems, including excessive concentration of power, pervasive corruption due to campaign money, susceptibility to voter fraud with secret and mail ballots, and the overwhelming influence of unelected bureaucracy and media.

What is the “new constitution” proposed on Lusciouslush.com?

The “new constitution” is a comprehensive, 1,900-page document available for download, proposing a radical overhaul of the U.S.

Government, including a three-tiered Senate structure, video-recorded elections, and mandatory decentralization of power.

How does the proposed system eliminate campaign money?

The proposed system aims to eliminate campaign money by making elections based on “personal acquaintance” within small voting districts Nomes of 250 voters, eliminating the need for expensive campaign ads or media coverage. Softech-intl.com Review

What is the “Sub-Senate” in the new proposed system?

The “Sub-Senate” is the lowest tier of the proposed legislative body, consisting of one million part-time lawmakers 1 per 250 voters responsible for listening to the people, elevating ideas, and helping administer government at a granular level.

What is the role of the “Main-Senate” and “Over-Senate”?

The “Main-Senate” 100,000 full-time members makes and executes laws, operating in specialized “sluices.” The “Over-Senate” 10,000 full-time members sets overall government course, budgets, and acts as the supreme judge of constitutionality, replacing the Supreme Court.

How are elections conducted in the proposed new democracy?

Elections would be open and video-recorded.

Voters would attach home-printed ballots to their chests, and groups of 250 voters “Nomes” would video-record each other as they walk past, making vote counts transparent and “impossible to cheat.”

How does Lusciouslush.com propose to institute this new government?

The website proposes a “mustering” process where a majority of the people assemble in the streets nationwide under the new constitution. Mohrdar.com Review

Once the required percentage is met, the new constitution takes effect, and immediate nationwide elections for the new Senate structure are called.

What is the website’s stance on voter privacy with video elections?

The website states that for voter safety, it would be a felony to assemble or share the video recordings of votes or ask to see them, aiming to maintain “some degree of voter privacy” despite the open voting method.

Does Lusciouslush.com offer a way to contact the author or team?

The website itself does not provide a direct contact form or email address.

However, the links to AndrewMelcher.com suggest that inquiries or discussions might be directed through that associated site, which appears to be the author’s primary platform.

Are there any user interaction features like forums or comments on Lusciouslush.com?

No, Lusciouslush.com does not feature any user interaction elements such as comment sections, forums, or social media integration.

It is primarily a static platform for presenting the author’s ideas.

What historical evidence does Lusciouslush.com use to support its claims?

Lusciouslush.com heavily cites the Anti-Federalist Papers, quotes from historical figures like Patrick Henry and James Madison, and references ancient Greek and Roman political systems to argue that the U.S.

Constitution was designed to limit democracy and promote oligarchy.

Does the website discuss any financial or economic aspects of the new system?

Yes, the website discusses financial aspects, arguing that the new system with more lawmakers would be “much less corruptible” as each lawmaker would control significantly less money.

It also proposes mechanisms like line-item vetoes by the Sub-Senate to manage government spending.

Is Lusciouslush.com available in languages other than English?

Based on the website’s content, it appears to be exclusively in English United States. There are no indications of multilingual support.

What is the “representation ratio” and why is it important to Lusciouslush.com?

The “representation ratio” refers to the number of citizens per elected leader.

Lusciouslush.com argues that a narrow ratio like the current U.S.

System’s 1-in-1.54 million leads to oligarchy and corruption, advocating for a much broader ratio e.g., 1-in-250 for the Sub-Senate to ensure more genuine representation.

How does the website claim its proposed system is “incorruptible”?

Lusciouslush.com claims the system is “incorruptible” due to several factors: open video voting eliminating ballot fraud, abolition of campaign money, significantly increased numbers of lawmakers making bribery harder, and decentralized governance reducing the impact of single points of corruption.