Phabricator.com Reviews

Based on checking the website, Phabricator.com primarily serves as a historical archive and informational hub for Phabricator, a discontinued open-source software development platform. While it once provided a comprehensive suite of tools for code review, task management, and repository browsing, potential users looking for an active, supported solution for their development workflows will find that the platform ceased active maintenance on June 1, 2021. This means Phabricator is no longer receiving updates, bug fixes, or new features, which is a critical consideration for any team seeking robust and secure development tools. This review will delve into what Phabricator was, why its end-of-life status is so important, and what alternatives now exist for teams that require ongoing support and modern features.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Understanding What Phabricator Was: A Comprehensive Development Suite

Phabricator, developed by Phacility, was once a powerhouse integrated software development platform.

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Phabricator.com Reviews Latest Discussions & Reviews:

Think of it as a Swiss Army knife for engineering teams, bundling a significant number of tools under one roof.

Its core appeal lay in its ability to streamline the entire software development lifecycle, from initial concept to deployment and beyond.

It was particularly popular among open-source projects and companies that valued a self-hosted, highly customizable environment.

Differential: The Code Review Engine

At the heart of Phabricator’s offering was Differential, its robust code review application. This wasn’t just a simple diff viewer. it was a sophisticated system designed to facilitate thorough, asynchronous code reviews. Redactor.com Reviews

• Key Features:
  • Inline Comments: Developers and reviewers could leave comments directly on specific lines of code, making feedback highly contextual.
  • Review Workflows: It supported various review policies, ensuring that code changes met specific quality standards before being merged.
  • Pre-Commit Review: One of its standout features was the ability to review code before it was committed to the repository, catching issues earlier in the development cycle.
  • Rich Diff Views: It provided clear, color-coded comparisons of code changes, even for complex merges.
• Impact: Differential significantly improved code quality and fostered collaboration by making code reviews an integral, rather than an optional, part of the development process. Teams that used it often cited a noticeable reduction in bugs making it to production due to early detection during the review stage.

Maniphest: Project and Task Management

Maniphest was Phabricator’s answer to project and task management, offering a flexible and powerful system for tracking work, bugs, and features.

• Customizable Workflows: Users could define their own task types, statuses, and priorities, adapting Maniphest to their unique project methodologies e.g., Agile, Scrum, Waterfall.
• Query Language Phabricator Query: A powerful query language allowed users to create highly specific filters and dashboards for task tracking, providing granular insights into project progress.
• Integration with Code: Tasks could be directly linked to code commits and reviews, providing a clear audit trail from concept to implementation.
• Dashboarding: Teams could build custom dashboards to visualize task status, assignee workloads, and overall project health, aiding in resource allocation and bottleneck identification.

Diffusion: Repository Browsing and Source Control

Diffusion served as Phabricator’s integrated repository browser, offering a centralized hub for managing and navigating source code. It supported popular version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion.

• Code Browsing: Users could easily browse repositories, view file histories, and explore branches.
• Syntax Highlighting: Enhanced readability of code across various programming languages.
• Blame and History Views: Essential tools for understanding who made what changes and when, aiding in debugging and code ownership tracking.
• Integration with Differential and Audit: Seamlessly linked code changes to their respective reviews and audits, providing a complete picture of code evolution.

Audit: Post-Commit Code Review and Compliance

While Differential focused on pre-commit reviews, Audit was designed for post-commit code review, often used for compliance, security, or ongoing quality assurance.

• Mandatory Reviews: Allowed teams to enforce mandatory reviews for specific branches or types of commits.
• Audit Rules: Configurable rules could automatically flag commits for review based on author, file path, or keywords.
• Compliance Tracking: Provided a formal mechanism for ensuring that code changes met regulatory or internal compliance requirements.

Phriction: Integrated Wiki

Phriction was Phabricator’s integrated wiki application, designed for documentation, knowledge sharing, and team collaboration.

• Markdown Support: Allowed for easy creation and formatting of documents.
• Version History: Tracked changes to documents, making it easy to revert to previous versions.
• Linking: Seamlessly linked to other Phabricator objects like tasks, code reviews, and commits, creating a highly interconnected knowledge base.
• Permissions: Granular control over who could view and edit wiki pages, ensuring sensitive information was protected.

The Critical Impact of End-of-Maintenance: Why June 1, 2021, Matters

Security Vulnerabilities

Perhaps the most significant risk of using unmaintained software is exposure to security vulnerabilities. Point-3.com Reviews

• No Patching: When new vulnerabilities are discovered and they always are, there will be no official patches or fixes released for Phabricator.
• Exploitation Risk: This leaves any instance of Phabricator open to exploitation, potentially leading to data breaches, unauthorized access, or system compromise. For companies handling sensitive intellectual property or customer data, this is an unacceptable risk.
• Third-Party Dependencies: Phabricator relies on various third-party libraries and components. If these dependencies have their own security issues, Phabricator instances will inherit those vulnerabilities without any official path to remediation.

Compatibility Issues and Technical Debt

Software doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

It interacts with operating systems, databases, programming languages, and other tools.

• Operating System Updates: As operating systems Linux distributions, Windows Server, etc. evolve, they often introduce changes that can break compatibility with older software. Phabricator may cease to function correctly, or at all, on newer OS versions.
• Database Updates: Similar issues arise with database systems like MySQL or PostgreSQL. Newer versions might introduce breaking changes that an unmaintained Phabricator instance cannot adapt to.
• Programming Language Evolution: Phabricator was primarily written in PHP. As PHP evolves, older versions become deprecated and eventually unsupported, potentially leaving Phabricator instances running on insecure or obsolete PHP environments.
• Increased Technical Debt: Continuing to use unmaintained software accumulates technical debt, making future migrations or integrations more complex and costly.

Lack of New Features and Innovation

• Stagnation: An unmaintained platform will not receive any new features, integrations with modern tools e.g., CI/CD pipelines, modern IDEs, or performance enhancements.
• Competitive Disadvantage: Teams stuck with an outdated platform will find themselves at a disadvantage compared to those leveraging modern, actively developed tools that offer superior features, efficiency, and developer experience.
• Missed Opportunities: The inability to adapt to new industry standards or integrate with emerging technologies can hinder a team’s productivity and innovation capabilities.

Community and Support Deterioration

While Phabricator had a dedicated community, its official end-of-maintenance inevitably leads to a decline in community activity and available support.

• Reduced Forum Activity: Discussion forums become less active, making it harder to find answers to problems or collaborate on custom solutions.
• Fewer Contributions: Open-source contributions, such as bug fixes or feature additions from the community, typically dwindle significantly.
• No Official Support Channel: The primary vendor, Phacility, no longer offers official support, leaving users entirely on their own for troubleshooting and maintenance.
• Difficulty Finding Expertise: As the software becomes more niche and outdated, finding developers or administrators with the necessary expertise to manage and troubleshoot it becomes increasingly challenging.

Migration Challenges from Phabricator: What Former Users Faced

The discontinuation of Phabricator prompted many organizations to migrate their data and workflows to alternative platforms.

This process, while necessary, often presented significant challenges. Minipresso.com Reviews

Data Export and Import Complexity

Extracting data from Phabricator and importing it into a new system is rarely a straightforward “one-click” operation.

• Schema Mismatches: Different tools store data tasks, code reviews, comments in different formats and schemas, necessitating complex mapping and transformation scripts.
• Attachment Handling: Files and attachments linked to tasks or code reviews need careful handling to ensure they are correctly migrated and linked in the new system.
• Historical Context: Preserving the rich historical context – who said what, when, on which line of code – is crucial but difficult to perfectly replicate in a new environment.
• API Limitations: If the new platform’s API is limited, migrating large volumes of historical data can be a tedious manual process or require custom scripting.

Workflow and Process Adaptation

Migrating from one comprehensive tool to another isn’t just about moving data.

It’s about re-evaluating and adapting established workflows.

• Feature Parity: Rarely does a new tool perfectly match the feature set of the old one. Teams might need to adjust how they conduct code reviews, manage tasks, or share documentation.
• Learning Curve: Users need to learn a new interface, new terminology, and new ways of accomplishing their tasks. This can lead to initial drops in productivity.
• Integration Gaps: If a team relied heavily on specific integrations within Phabricator, finding equivalent or better integrations in the new system requires research and configuration.
• Resistance to Change: Human inertia is a powerful force. Getting an entire team to adopt a new system requires careful planning, training, and communication to overcome resistance.

Downtime and Business Disruption

Migrations often involve some level of downtime, impacting productivity and potentially delaying projects.

• Planning for Cutover: Teams need to strategically plan the cutover date, often over weekends or during periods of low activity, to minimize disruption.
• Parallel Running: Some teams might choose to run both systems in parallel for a period, which adds complexity and overhead.
• Validation: After migration, extensive validation is required to ensure all data has been accurately transferred and that critical workflows function as expected.
• User Support: Providing immediate support to users during and after the migration is crucial for a smooth transition, requiring dedicated resources.

Top Alternatives to Phabricator: Modern Solutions for Development Teams

Given Phabricator’s end-of-life status, organizations now actively seek modern, actively maintained alternatives that offer similar or superior functionality. Popmoji.com Reviews

The market is rich with integrated platforms and specialized tools.

GitLab: A Comprehensive DevOps Platform

GitLab has emerged as one of the leading all-in-one DevOps platforms, covering the entire software development lifecycle from planning to deployment and monitoring.

• Integrated Features: GitLab offers Git repository management, CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, code review, project management, and more, all within a single interface.
• Strong CI/CD: Its robust integrated CI/CD capabilities are a major draw, allowing for automated testing, building, and deployment.
• Scalability: Available in self-hosted and SaaS cloud versions, suitable for teams of all sizes, from small startups to large enterprises.
• DevOps Focus: Designed with a strong emphasis on DevOps principles, facilitating collaboration between development and operations teams.
• Alternatives to Phabricator’s Modules:
  • Code Review: GitLab’s Merge Requests offer powerful code review features, similar to Phabricator’s Differential, with inline commenting, discussions, and approvals.
  • Issue Tracking: GitLab’s Issues provide robust task management, akin to Maniphest, with customizable labels, milestones, and boards.
  • Wiki: Built-in wikis serve the same purpose as Phriction for documentation.
  • Repository Management: Native Git repository management is central to GitLab, fulfilling Diffusion’s role.

GitHub: Code Hosting and Collaboration Hub

GitHub remains the most popular platform for Git-based version control and collaborative software development, especially within the open-source community.

• Market Dominance: Its widespread adoption means most developers are already familiar with it, reducing onboarding time.
• Ecosystem: A vast ecosystem of integrations with third-party tools for CI/CD, project management, security, and more.
• Community: An unparalleled community for open-source projects, facilitating contributions and knowledge sharing.
• Key Offerings:
  • Pull Requests: GitHub’s Pull Requests are the industry standard for code review, providing features similar to Phabricator’s Differential.
  • Issues: GitHub Issues provide robust bug tracking and task management capabilities.
  • GitHub Actions: Its integrated CI/CD platform allows for extensive automation.
  • Projects and Discussions: Tools for project management and team communication.

Atlassian Suite Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket: Best-of-Breed Tools

The Atlassian suite offers a collection of powerful, specialized tools that integrate well, providing a highly configurable environment.

• Jira: The industry standard for agile project management and issue tracking, far surpassing Maniphest in depth and flexibility.
• Bitbucket: Atlassian’s Git repository management solution, offering powerful code review Pull Requests and CI/CD capabilities Pipelines, serving as an alternative to Diffusion and aspects of Differential.
• Confluence: A leading enterprise wiki and collaboration platform, ideal for documentation and knowledge sharing, similar to Phriction but with much greater functionality.
• Deep Integration: While separate products, they are designed to integrate seamlessly, creating a powerful ecosystem.
• Target Audience: Often preferred by larger enterprises due to their extensive features, scalability, and robust support.

Azure DevOps: Microsoft’s Integrated Solution

For teams deeply invested in the Microsoft ecosystem or those looking for a comprehensive, cloud-native DevOps platform, Azure DevOps is a strong contender. Sendowl.com Reviews

• End-to-End Platform: Provides services for planning Azure Boards, version control Azure Repos, CI/CD Azure Pipelines, testing Azure Test Plans, and artifact management Azure Artifacts.
• Scalability and Cloud Integration: Tightly integrated with Azure cloud services, offering high scalability and leveraging cloud infrastructure.
• Enterprise Features: Designed for enterprise-grade development with robust security, compliance, and governance features.
• Flexibility: Supports various languages, frameworks, and deployment targets, making it suitable for diverse development environments.

Gitea/Gogs: Lightweight, Self-Hosted Git Solutions

For teams that valued Phabricator’s self-hosting capabilities and are looking for lighter-weight, open-source alternatives primarily focused on Git, Gitea and Gogs are excellent choices.

• Lightweight and Easy to Deploy: Both are much simpler to set up and maintain than a full GitLab or Azure DevOps instance.
• Self-Hosted Focus: Designed specifically for self-hosting, giving teams full control over their data and infrastructure.
• Core Git Features: Offer repository hosting, issue tracking, pull requests for code review, and wikis.
• Community Driven: Benefit from active open-source communities.
• Ideal For: Smaller teams or projects that don’t require the full breadth of features found in larger, more complex DevOps platforms.

The Long-Term Costs of Unmaintained Software: Beyond the Obvious

While the immediate concerns of security and functionality are paramount, using unmaintained software like Phabricator in the long term incurs a hidden but significant cost.

It’s a classic example of “penny wise, pound foolish.”

Opportunity Cost of Developer Time

Every minute a developer spends wrestling with an outdated system is a minute not spent on innovation or core product development.

• Troubleshooting: Developers will spend more time troubleshooting compatibility issues, workarounds for missing features, or dealing with system quirks.
• Manual Processes: Without modern integrations or automation, tasks that could be automated on a contemporary platform will require manual effort.
• Reduced Morale: Working with antiquated tools can lead to frustration and lower morale among developers, potentially impacting retention.
• Slower Iteration: The inability to rapidly implement new features or fix bugs due to tool limitations directly impacts a team’s ability to innovate and respond to market demands.

Increased Operational Overhead

Operating unmaintained software requires more effort and resources than maintaining a modern, supported system. Telnyx.com Reviews

• Custom Patching: If critical vulnerabilities are discovered, teams might be forced to develop and maintain their own custom patches, a highly specialized and risky endeavor.
• Manual Updates: Without official updates, system administrators will need to manually patch underlying OS and database components, hoping they don’t break Phabricator.
• Monitoring Complexity: Detecting and diagnosing issues becomes harder without vendor support or updated diagnostic tools.
• Higher Skill Requirements: Maintaining a bespoke, unmaintained system often requires highly specialized skills that are becoming rarer, increasing staffing costs or making it harder to find talent.

Compliance and Audit Risks

For organizations operating in regulated industries, using unmaintained software can pose significant compliance and audit risks.

• Failure to Meet Standards: Many regulatory frameworks require software systems to be actively maintained, patched for security vulnerabilities, and supported by a vendor. Unmaintained software fails on all these counts.
• Audit Findings: During audits, the use of unsupported systems can be flagged as a major non-compliance issue, leading to penalties, fines, or reputational damage.
• Data Integrity Concerns: The lack of ongoing support and potential for unpatched bugs can raise questions about data integrity and reliability, critical for financial, healthcare, or personal data.

Impact on Recruitment and Retention

Talented developers are increasingly discerning about the tools they use.

• Talent Attraction: Modern developers are often attracted to companies that invest in cutting-edge tools and provide a productive work environment. Being stuck on an obsolete platform can make it difficult to attract top talent.
• Talent Retention: Similarly, developers can become frustrated if they feel their skills are stagnating due to outdated tools or if they are constantly battling legacy systems. This can contribute to higher employee turnover.

Phabricator’s Legacy: What It Got Right

Despite its discontinuation, Phabricator leaves behind a notable legacy, and it’s worth acknowledging what the platform did exceptionally well during its active maintenance period.

Many of its innovations influenced subsequent tools and continue to shape how modern development suites are designed.

Integrated Experience

One of Phabricator’s strongest points was its commitment to an integrated experience. Instead of disparate tools bolted together, Phabricator was designed from the ground up as a single, cohesive platform. Backpack.com Reviews

• Unified UI/UX: A consistent user interface across all applications Differential, Maniphest, Diffusion, etc. meant less context switching for developers.
• Cross-Application Linking: The ability to easily link tasks to code reviews, commits, and wiki pages created a powerful, traceable workflow. This “everything is linked” philosophy significantly improved transparency and traceability.
• Single Source of Truth: Teams could find all relevant information about a project – code, tasks, discussions, documentation – in one place, reducing information silos.

Powerful Customization and Extensibility

Phabricator was highly customizable, particularly for teams with specific workflows or unique requirements.

• Configurable Workflows: Its project and task management Maniphest allowed for deep customization of task types, statuses, and field, adapting to various methodologies.
• Phabricator Query Language: A powerful, SQL-like query language allowed users to build incredibly specific queries and dashboards for tasks, reviews, and commits. This offered a level of analytical power often missing in simpler tools.
• Command-Line Tools: Its extensive set of command-line tools e.g., arc for arcanist allowed for deep integration with local development environments and automation scripts.
• Self-Hosted Control: Being self-hosted, organizations had full control over their instance, allowing for custom modifications, plugins, and integrations that might not be possible with SaaS solutions.

Focus on Developer Workflow

Phabricator was built by developers, for developers, and this was evident in its design choices.

• Arcanist arc: Its command-line client, arc, was a powerful tool that streamlined common developer tasks like creating diffs for review, landing commits, and updating tasks directly from the terminal. This focus on developer efficiency was a major differentiator.
• Pre-Commit Code Review: The emphasis on pre-commit review via Differential and arc was groundbreaking for its time, catching bugs and design flaws earlier, leading to higher code quality.
• Clear Review Process: The structured nature of Differential ensured that code reviews were thorough and consistent, providing clear paths for feedback and approval.

While the “Phabricator.com Reviews” topic largely points to its end-of-life, understanding its past strengths helps appreciate the features and design philosophies that current alternatives have adopted and improved upon.

Its legacy lies in demonstrating the power of an integrated development suite and a developer-centric approach.

The Future of Open-Source Development Tools: Lessons from Phabricator

Phabricator’s journey, from a widely adopted platform to an unmaintained project, offers significant lessons for the future of open-source development tools and for teams relying on them. Ritetag.com Reviews

The Challenge of Sustainability for Open Source

Maintaining a large, complex open-source project requires substantial resources – not just code contributions, but also dedicated staff for bug fixing, security patching, feature development, and community management.

• Funding Models: Phabricator’s primary maintainer, Phacility, ultimately decided to cease active maintenance. This highlights the ongoing challenge for many open-source projects to find sustainable funding models beyond volunteer efforts or single-company sponsorship.
• Burnout: Long-term maintenance can lead to burnout for core contributors if resources are scarce.
• Community vs. Commercial Support: While community contributions are vital, relying solely on them for critical enterprise-level software can be risky. Many successful open-source projects now have commercial entities providing professional support and development.

The Shift Towards Cloud-Native and Managed Services

The industry trend is clearly moving towards cloud-native solutions and managed services, particularly for developer tools.

• Reduced Operational Burden: Companies are increasingly opting for SaaS Software as a Service solutions like GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps to offload the burden of infrastructure management, security patching, and scaling. This contrasts with Phabricator’s self-hosted model, which required significant in-house ops expertise.
• Always-On Availability: Cloud providers offer high availability and disaster recovery, ensuring tools are always accessible.
• Automatic Updates: SaaS platforms automatically receive updates, bug fixes, and new features without any action required from the user, addressing the core issue Phabricator users now face.
• Cost Efficiency: While there’s a subscription fee, the total cost of ownership TCO for managed cloud services can often be lower than self-hosting due to reduced labor costs for maintenance, security, and infrastructure.

The Importance of a Vibrant Ecosystem and Interoperability

Modern development practices emphasize modularity and interoperability between tools, rather than a single monolithic solution.

• API-First Approach: Tools are increasingly designed with robust APIs, allowing for seamless integration with other services e.g., CI/CD, monitoring, communication platforms.
• Platform Integrations: Rather than building every feature in-house, modern platforms focus on integrating with best-of-breed specialized tools.
• Standardization: Adherence to industry standards e.g., Git as the de facto version control system, Markdown for documentation facilitates easier migration and tool switching.

Phabricator’s story serves as a cautionary tale and a blueprint for the future.

This reinforces the need for developers and organizations to critically evaluate not just the features of a tool, but also its long-term viability, community support, and maintenance strategy, especially when choosing core infrastructure for software development. Vint.com Reviews

The shift towards powerful, cloud-based, and continuously updated platforms is a direct response to these lessons.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Phabricator.com?

Based on checking the website, Phabricator.com is the historical and archival site for Phabricator, an open-source software development platform that is no longer actively maintained.

It provides information about the past features and applications of Phabricator.

Is Phabricator still actively maintained?

No, Phabricator is no longer actively maintained.

The official message on Phabricator.com states: “Effective June 1, 2021: Phabricator is no longer actively maintained.” Famebit.com Reviews

What does “end of maintenance” mean for Phabricator users?

For Phabricator users, “end of maintenance” means that the software will not receive any new updates, bug fixes, security patches, or feature enhancements from its original developers.

This can lead to security vulnerabilities, compatibility issues, and a lack of support for modern development practices.

Why was Phabricator discontinued?

Phacility, the company behind Phabricator, announced the end of active maintenance due to various factors, likely including the challenge of sustaining a large, complex open-source project without a clear commercial model or sufficient resources for ongoing development and support.

Is it safe to continue using Phabricator?

Using Phabricator in a production environment is generally not recommended due to the lack of security updates and bug fixes. Unpatched software is vulnerable to known exploits, which can lead to data breaches or system compromises.

What were the main features of Phabricator?

Phabricator was a comprehensive suite of tools, including Differential code review, Maniphest task management, Diffusion repository browsing, Audit post-commit review, and Phriction wiki, all integrated into a single platform. Boatbound.com Reviews

What are the best alternatives to Phabricator?

Top alternatives to Phabricator include comprehensive DevOps platforms like GitLab and Azure DevOps, code hosting and collaboration hubs like GitHub, and the integrated suite of specialized tools from Atlassian Jira, Bitbucket, Confluence. For lightweight self-hosting, Gitea and Gogs are options.

Does Phabricator offer cloud hosting?

Phabricator was primarily designed for self-hosting.

While some third parties might have offered hosted instances in the past, there is no official cloud hosting solution from Phacility.

Most modern alternatives offer robust cloud hosting options.

Can I still download and install Phabricator?

Yes, you can likely still find the source code for Phabricator and attempt to install it, as it is open-source. Userlike.com Reviews

However, be aware that you would be responsible for all maintenance, security, and compatibility issues yourself, with no official support.

How does GitLab compare to Phabricator?

GitLab offers a similar integrated experience to Phabricator but is actively maintained, constantly updated, and provides a much broader range of features, especially in CI/CD, security scanning, and project management. It’s a comprehensive DevOps platform.

How does GitHub compare to Phabricator?

GitHub is primarily a Git repository hosting service with strong code review Pull Requests and issue tracking.

While it covers core areas like Phabricator’s Differential and Maniphest, it’s often complemented by other tools for full DevOps, whereas Phabricator aimed for a more all-in-one approach. GitHub is actively developed and widely used.

How does Jira compare to Phabricator’s task management?

Jira is a highly sophisticated project and issue tracking tool, offering far more depth, flexibility, and integrations than Phabricator’s Maniphest. Cloudfuse.com Reviews

It supports complex workflows, agile methodologies, and extensive reporting, making it a leading choice for enterprise-level project management.

Is there a migration path from Phabricator to other tools?

Yes, migration is possible but often requires significant effort.

Data export and import, workflow adaptation, and historical context preservation can be complex.

Many organizations that used Phabricator have already migrated to platforms like GitLab or Atlassian.

What kind of teams typically used Phabricator?

Phabricator was popular among open-source projects, academic institutions, and companies that preferred a self-hosted, highly customizable, and integrated suite for their software development lifecycle. Wikipedia.com Reviews

Was Phabricator primarily for code review?

While code review Differential was a core and highly regarded feature of Phabricator, it was a comprehensive suite that also included task management, repository browsing, wikis, and more.

What is Arcanist arc in Phabricator?

Arcanist, often referred to as arc, was Phabricator’s powerful command-line client.

It allowed developers to interact with Phabricator directly from their terminal, streamlining tasks like creating and landing diffs for code review, managing tasks, and more.

Can I still get support for Phabricator?

No, official support from Phacility has ceased.

Any support would need to come from the remaining community which is likely dwindling or from individuals who have continued to maintain their own forks or specialized knowledge. Webengage.com Reviews

What are the security implications of using unmaintained software like Phabricator?

The primary security implication is exposure to unpatched vulnerabilities.

This means that if new security flaws are discovered in Phabricator itself or its underlying components, there will be no official fixes, leaving your system open to attacks.

Is Phabricator open source?

Yes, Phabricator is open-source software, meaning its source code is publicly available and can be freely used, modified, and distributed.

However, this doesn’t guarantee ongoing active maintenance.

What are the long-term risks of not migrating from Phabricator?

The long-term risks include increased security exposure, growing compatibility issues with modern systems, inability to leverage new development tools or practices, higher operational overhead, difficulty in recruiting and retaining talent, and potential compliance issues.

Migration is strongly advised for any active development team.