To solve the problem of implementing reCAPTCHA v3 code, here are the detailed steps:

👉 Skip the hassle and get the ready to use 100% working script (Link in the comments section of the YouTube Video) (Latest test 31/05/2025)

Check more on: How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile & Cloudflare WAF – Reddit, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – Medium, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – LinkedIn Article

First, you’ll need to obtain your reCAPTCHA v3 API keys from the Google reCAPTCHA Admin Console. Visit https://www.google.com/recaptcha/admin/create, log in with your Google account, and register a new site. Make sure to select “reCAPTCHA v3” as the type. You’ll receive a Site Key and a Secret Key.

Next, integrate the client-side JavaScript into your web pages. This involves adding a script tag to your HTML. Place this line within your <head> or before the closing </body> tag on pages where you want to use reCAPTCHA:

<script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=YOUR_SITE_KEY"></script>
Replace YOUR_SITE_KEY with the actual Site Key you obtained.

After that, execute the reCAPTCHA token generation when a user action occurs e.g., form submission, button click. You can call grecaptcha.execute to get a token without user interaction. Here’s a common pattern:

grecaptcha.readyfunction {


   grecaptcha.execute'YOUR_SITE_KEY', {action: 'submit_form'}.thenfunctiontoken {
        // Add the token to your form data


       document.getElementById'g-recaptcha-response'.value = token.


       // Submit your form or make an AJAX request
    }.
}.

You’ll need a hidden input field in your form named g-recaptcha-response to store this token:

<input type="hidden" name="g-recaptcha-response" id="g-recaptcha-response">

Finally, verify the reCAPTCHA token on your server-side. When your form is submitted or AJAX request made, your server receives the g-recaptcha-response token. You must send this token, along with your Secret Key, to Google’s verification URL:
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/siteverify
This is typically a POST request.

The response from Google will include a score 0.0 to 1.0 and a success boolean.

A score closer to 1.0 indicates a human, while closer to 0.0 suggests a bot. You decide the threshold for allowing the action.

Table of Contents

Understanding reCAPTCHA v3: A Deeper Dive into Invisible Bot Protection

ReCAPTCHA v3 marks a significant evolution in bot detection, moving away from explicit challenges like “select all squares with traffic lights” and embracing an invisible approach.

Instead of interrupting the user experience, v3 operates silently in the background, continuously analyzing user behavior and assigning a “score” to each interaction.

This score, ranging from 0.0 likely a bot to 1.0 likely a human, allows website administrators to assess the risk of a user’s activity and adapt their responses accordingly, all without the user ever seeing a CAPTCHA challenge.

This seamless integration enhances user experience while providing robust protection against automated threats like spam, credential stuffing, and scraped content.

It’s a smart move for anyone looking to fortify their digital presence without annoying their legitimate users.

The Philosophy Behind Invisible Protection

The core idea behind reCAPTCHA v3 is to leverage a vast array of behavioral and environmental signals to distinguish between human and automated interactions.

Unlike its predecessors, which relied on explicit user challenges, v3 performs a risk assessment based on subtle cues.

Think of it as a highly sophisticated digital lie detector that observes how a user interacts with a page.

This includes analyzing mouse movements, keystrokes, browsing patterns, IP addresses, and even device fingerprints.

The system’s algorithms, refined over billions of interactions across the web, are trained to spot patterns indicative of malicious bots versus legitimate human behavior. Chrome cloudflare

This approach is rooted in the understanding that bots, no matter how sophisticated, often exhibit subtle differences in their interaction patterns compared to real users.

For instance, a bot might navigate a page too quickly or click with unnatural precision, whereas a human’s actions are typically more varied and organic.

How reCAPTCHA v3 Differs from Previous Versions

ReCAPTCHA v3 represents a paradigm shift from v1 and v2, primarily in its user interaction model.

reCAPTCHA v1 Deprecated: This was the classic “distorted text” CAPTCHA, requiring users to decipher wavy or obscured words. While effective for its time, it was often frustrating and accessibility-challenged.
reCAPTCHA v2 “I’m not a robot” checkbox / Invisible: v2 introduced the “I’m not a robot” checkbox. For many users, clicking this checkbox was enough, with reCAPTCHA’s algorithms performing background analysis. For suspicious users, it would present visual challenges e.g., image grids. While an improvement, it still introduced friction for a subset of users. The “Invisible reCAPTCHA” variation of v2 automated the checkbox click for low-risk users, but high-risk users would still see challenges.
reCAPTCHA v3 Invisible Score-Based: The biggest difference is the complete elimination of user-facing challenges. There’s no checkbox, no image grid. Instead, it runs entirely in the background, returning a score. This score indicates the likelihood of an interaction being legitimate. This means zero friction for your users, which is a huge win for conversion rates and overall user satisfaction. According to Google’s data, reCAPTCHA v3 protects “billions of connections every month” and processes over 1 billion requests daily, with a reported 99.8% accuracy rate in distinguishing humans from bots without user interaction.

The Benefits of Adopting reCAPTCHA v3

Adopting reCAPTCHA v3 offers a compelling suite of advantages for website owners and users alike.

Seamless User Experience: This is arguably the biggest win. By removing explicit challenges, v3 ensures that legitimate users can navigate and interact with your site without interruption. This translates directly to higher conversion rates, as users aren’t abandoning forms or pages due to frustrating CAPTCHA puzzles. A study by Google found that removing friction points in user journeys can increase conversion rates by up to 10-15%.
Granular Control over Bot Mitigation: Unlike previous versions that offered a binary “human or bot” decision, v3 provides a score. This allows you to implement a dynamic defense strategy. For instance, you could:
- Allow users with a high score e.g., 0.9 and above to proceed immediately.
- For scores in the middle range e.g., 0.5-0.8, you might introduce secondary verification steps like email confirmation, a simple puzzle, or multi-factor authentication MFA.
- Users with a very low score e.g., below 0.3 could be blocked, redirected, or served a more challenging CAPTCHA like reCAPTCHA v2, if you still want to offer that option for extreme cases. This nuanced approach means you’re not blocking legitimate users based on a single strict threshold.
Enhanced Security Without Annoyance: You get robust bot protection without the user ever feeling like they’re being “tested.” This is crucial for maintaining trust and satisfaction, especially on critical interaction points like login pages, registration forms, or e-commerce checkouts. Data from Akamai’s State of the Internet / Security report indicates that credential stuffing attacks increased by over 20% year-over-year, emphasizing the need for robust, invisible protection.

Implementing reCAPTCHA v3: A Step-by-Step Practical Guide

Implementing reCAPTCHA v3 is a straightforward process, but it requires careful attention to both client-side and server-side integration.

Skipping either part will compromise the security and functionality of your bot protection.

Client-Side Integration: The JavaScript Powerhouse

The client-side integration is where you load the reCAPTCHA JavaScript library and generate the token that will be sent to your server for verification.

Loading the reCAPTCHA API Script: This is the first and most critical step. You need to include the reCAPTCHA API script on every page where you intend to use v3. It’s recommended to place this script in the <head> section of your HTML or just before the closing </body> tag.
```
<script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=YOUR_SITE_KEY"></script>
```
Key Point: Replace YOUR_SITE_KEY with the Site Key you obtained from the Google reCAPTCHA Admin Console. This render parameter is crucial for v3, as it tells the reCAPTCHA service which site it’s associated with and initiates the background analysis. The script will automatically load the necessary components and start observing user behavior.

Executing reCAPTCHA and Obtaining a Token: Unlike v2, where a user might click a checkbox, v3 requires you to explicitly execute the reCAPTCHA to get a token. This is typically done when a user performs a significant action, such as submitting a form, logging in, or clicking a button. Recaptcha v3 download

grecaptcha.readyfunction {
    // Execute reCAPTCHA for a specific action


   grecaptcha.execute'YOUR_SITE_KEY', {action: 'submit_contact_form'}
        .thenfunctiontoken {


           // Add the token to a hidden input field in your form


           document.getElementById'g-recaptcha-response'.value = token.


           // Now, you can submit your form or make an AJAX request


           // For example: document.getElementById'contactForm'.submit.
        }.
Explanation:
*   `grecaptcha.readyfunction { ... }.`: This ensures the reCAPTCHA API is fully loaded and ready before you try to use it.
*   `grecaptcha.execute'YOUR_SITE_KEY', {action: 'submit_contact_form'}`: This is the core function call.
   *   `YOUR_SITE_KEY`: Your public Site Key.
   *   `action`: This is a crucial parameter for v3. It's a string that describes the action being taken e.g., 'login', 'signup', 'checkout', 'submit_comment'. Google uses this action to better understand the context of the user's interaction and provide a more accurate score. It also appears in your reCAPTCHA Admin Console, allowing you to monitor scores for different actions.
*   `.thenfunctiontoken { ... }.`: This is a Promise that resolves with the reCAPTCHA token if successful.
*   `document.getElementById'g-recaptcha-response'.value = token.`: You need a hidden input field in your HTML form with the `name="g-recaptcha-response"` and `id="g-recaptcha-response"` for easy JavaScript access to store this token. When the form is submitted, this token will be sent to your server along with other form data.

Handling User Actions and Form Submission:

The best practice is to call grecaptcha.execute right before your form is submitted or an AJAX request is made.
Example for a traditional form submission:
```
<input type="text" name="name" placeholder="Your Name">


<input type="email" name="email" placeholder="Your Email">


<textarea name="message" placeholder="Your Message"></textarea>


<input type="hidden" name="g-recaptcha-response" id="g-recaptcha-response">


<button type="submit" id="submitButton">Send Message</button>
```
Cloudflare security issues

Example for an AJAX form submission:

Document.getElementById’submitButton’.addEventListener’click’, function {
grecaptcha.readyfunction {

grecaptcha.execute’YOUR_SITE_KEY’, {action: ‘submit_contact_form’}
.thenfunctiontoken {

const formData = new FormDatadocument.getElementById’contactForm’.

formData.append’g-recaptcha-response’, token.

fetch’/api/process-form’, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
}

.thenresponse => response.json
.thendata => {

console.log’Form submission successful:’, data.

// Handle success, e.g., show a thank you message
.catcherror => {

console.error’Error submitting form:’, error.
// Handle errors
}.
This ensures that a fresh reCAPTCHA token is generated for each significant user action, providing the most up-to-date behavioral analysis to Google. Captcha 3

Server-Side Validation: The True Gatekeeper

The server-side validation is where the magic truly happens.

Without it, the client-side implementation is essentially useless for security.

This is where you send the token received from the client to Google for verification and receive a score that tells you how likely the user is a human.

Sending the Token to Google’s Verification URL:

When your server receives the g-recaptcha-response token from the submitted form or AJAX request, it must make a POST request to Google’s verification endpoint.
Verification URL: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/siteverify
Required POST Parameters:
- secret: Your reCAPTCHA Secret Key the one you must keep private and never expose on the client-side.
- response: The g-recaptcha-response token received from your client.
- remoteip optional but recommended: The IP address of the user making the request. This helps Google provide a more accurate score.
Example Node.js using node-fetch:

Const fetch = require’node-fetch’. // npm install node-fetch

// In your Express.js route handler, for example

App.post’/process-form’, async req, res => {
```
const recaptchaToken = req.body.
 const userIp = req.ip.
```

// Or req.headers if behind a proxy Captcha create

     if !recaptchaToken {


        return res.status400.json{ success: false, message: 'reCAPTCHA token missing.' }.
     }



    const SECRET_KEY = 'YOUR_SECRET_KEY'. // KEEP THIS PRIVATE!

     try {


        const response = await fetch'https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/siteverify', {
             method: 'POST',
             headers: {


                'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'
             },


            body: `secret=${SECRET_KEY}&response=${recaptchaToken}&remoteip=${userIp}`

         const data = await response.json.


        console.log'reCAPTCHA verification response:', data.

         if data.success {


            // reCAPTCHA verification successful
             // Check the score and action


            if data.score > 0.5 && data.action === 'submit_contact_form' { // Adjust threshold as needed


                // User is likely human and performed the expected action


                // Process the form data e.g., save to DB, send email


                return res.json{ success: true, message: 'Form submitted successfully!' }.
             } else {


                // Score too low or action mismatch, treat as suspicious


                console.warn`reCAPTCHA score too low or action mismatch: Score=${data.score}, Action=${data.action}`.


                return res.status403.json{ success: false, message: 'Suspicious activity detected by reCAPTCHA. Please try again.' }.
             }
         } else {
             // reCAPTCHA verification failed


            console.error'reCAPTCHA verification failed:', data.


            return res.status400.json{ success: false, message: 'reCAPTCHA verification failed. Please try again.' }.
         }
     } catch error {


        console.error'Error verifying reCAPTCHA:', error.


        return res.status500.json{ success: false, message: 'Internal server error during reCAPTCHA verification.' }.
Note: Ensure `YOUR_SECRET_KEY` is loaded securely, e.g., from environment variables, not hardcoded.

Interpreting the Verification Response:

The response from Google will be a JSON object, typically containing these key fields:
- success boolean: true if the token was valid, false otherwise. If false, check error-codes.
- score float: The score for this request 0.0 – 1.0. 1.0 is very likely a human, 0.0 is very likely a bot.
- action string: The name of the action you provided when executing reCAPTCHA on the client-side. Crucially, you should verify this matches the expected action for the current page/form. This prevents attackers from reusing tokens from low-value actions e.g., ‘homepage’ for high-value actions e.g., ‘login’.
- challenge_ts string: Timestamp of the challenge load ISO format.
- hostname string: The hostname of the site where the reCAPTCHA was solved. Verify this matches your domain.
- error-codes array of strings, optional: If success is false, this array will contain codes indicating why the verification failed e.g., invalid-input-response, timeout-or-duplicate.
Implementing Your Score Threshold Logic:

This is where you define your defense strategy.
- High Threshold e.g., score > 0.7: Allow the action to proceed immediately. Ideal for low-risk actions or if you prioritize user experience over extreme security.
- Mid-Range Threshold e.g., 0.3 < score <= 0.7: This is your grey area. For these scores, you might implement secondary verification methods. This could be:
  - A simple email verification step.
  - A reCAPTCHA v2 checkbox challenge if you keep it as a fallback.
  - A custom quiz or puzzle.
  - Delaying the response to simulate processing time, which can deter bots.
  - Adding a simple h-captcha or similar alternative if reCAPTCHA is not suitable.
- Low Threshold e.g., score <= 0.3: Block the action entirely, return an error message, or log the suspicious activity. This is for interactions highly likely to be automated.
Action Matching: Always check that data.action matches the action you expected. If a user submits a login form, and the reCAPTCHA token’s action is ‘homepage’, it’s a strong indicator of misuse or an attempt to bypass your security.

Best Practices and Strategic Considerations for reCAPTCHA v3

While reCAPTCHA v3 offers powerful invisible protection, its effectiveness hinges on thoughtful implementation and ongoing monitoring. Simply dropping the code in isn’t enough.

Choosing the Right Score Threshold

This is perhaps the most critical decision in your reCAPTCHA v3 implementation.

The score threshold dictates how strict your bot detection is and directly impacts user experience versus security. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer.

The ideal threshold depends on the sensitivity of the action being protected, your tolerance for false positives, and your specific risk profile.

Understanding the Score: Remember, a score of 1.0 indicates a very high likelihood of human interaction, while 0.0 suggests a strong bot presence. Google’s algorithms analyze numerous factors to arrive at this score.
High-Value Actions e.g., Login, Registration, Checkout, Sensitive API Calls: For these actions, you might opt for a higher threshold, such as 0.7 or 0.8. This means only users with a very strong human score are allowed to proceed immediately. For scores below this, you’d implement additional verification steps e.g., email verification, SMS OTP, or a reCAPTCHA v2 challenge if necessary. This minimizes the risk of account takeovers, fraudulent registrations, or stolen financial data.
Medium-Value Actions e.g., Contact Forms, Comment Submissions, Newsletter Sign-ups: A moderate threshold like 0.5 or 0.6 is often suitable here. This strikes a balance, preventing most spam while not overly inconveniencing legitimate users. If a score is lower, you might still allow the action but add a flag for manual review, or display a gentle “Are you human?” prompt.
Low-Value Actions e.g., Page Views, Search Queries: For actions where the risk of abuse is low, you might use a lower threshold e.g., 0.3 or primarily use the score for analytics rather than blocking. For instance, you could simply log scores for page views to identify potential scraping attempts without interrupting user flow.
Dynamic Thresholds: The most sophisticated approach is to implement dynamic thresholds. For example, if a user has a history of legitimate interactions, you might lower their threshold slightly. Conversely, if an IP address shows repeated suspicious activity, you might temporarily increase the threshold for all users from that IP.
Monitoring and Adjustment: The initial threshold should be considered a starting point. Regularly monitor your reCAPTCHA v3 analytics in the Google Admin Console. Pay close attention to the distribution of scores, the number of flagged requests, and the impact on your legitimate conversion rates. Adjust your threshold based on this data. If you’re seeing too many legitimate users being blocked, lower the threshold. If you’re still getting significant bot traffic, raise it or introduce secondary measures. Google reports that over 60% of websites using reCAPTCHA v3 successfully block bad traffic at a score of 0.5.

Integrating with Backend Logging and Analytics

The real power of reCAPTCHA v3 goes beyond just blocking bad traffic. Verify human

It’s about providing valuable insights into your website’s traffic patterns.

Comprehensive logging and analytics are crucial for understanding bot activity and fine-tuning your defense strategy.

Log Everything: For every reCAPTCHA verification request, log the following data on your server:
- The score received from Google.
- The action string.
- The success status.
- Any error-codes.
- The remoteip of the user.
- The challenge_ts and hostname.
- Crucially, also log the outcome of your internal logic e.g., “allowed,” “blocked,” “challenged,” “passed to review”.
Utilize Google reCAPTCHA Admin Console: This dashboard accessible where you registered your keys provides excellent built-in analytics:
- Score Distribution: See a histogram of scores over time. This helps you understand if your traffic is predominantly human or bot.
- Top Actions: View statistics for each action you’ve defined, helping you identify which parts of your site are targeted most by bots.
- Traffic Volume: Monitor the number of reCAPTCHA requests.
- Security Risk Overview: Google provides insights into potential threats.
Custom Analytics Dashboards: Export your logged reCAPTCHA data into your preferred analytics platform e.g., Google Analytics, custom BI tools, Elasticsearch/Kibana. This allows you to:
- Correlate reCAPTCHA scores with other metrics like conversion rates, bounce rates, and user engagement.
- Identify trends: Are bots targeting specific pages or during certain times of day?
- Segment data: Analyze bot activity by country, IP range, or user agent.
- Visualize the impact of threshold changes on legitimate traffic.
Alerting: Set up alerts based on anomalies in reCAPTCHA data. For instance, an sudden drop in average scores for a critical action or a spike in requests from a specific IP range could indicate a new bot attack.

Leveraging the `action` Parameter Effectively

The action parameter in reCAPTCHA v3 is more than just a label.

It’s a vital component for improving the accuracy of scores and gaining granular insights.

Purpose: When you execute grecaptcha.execute on the client-side, you pass an action string e.g., ‘login’, ‘signup’, ‘submit_contact’. This tells Google what specific user behavior you’re observing. Google uses this context to provide a more accurate score for that particular action.
Benefits:
- Improved Score Accuracy: Google’s algorithms can train specific models for different actions, leading to better bot detection. For example, the typical human behavior for a ‘login’ action differs from a ‘search’ action.
- Enhanced Reporting: In the reCAPTCHA Admin Console, you can view score distributions and traffic for each defined action. This allows you to pinpoint exactly which parts of your site are experiencing bot activity.
- Action Verification on Server-Side: This is a crucial security check. When you verify the token on your server, you receive the action back from Google. Always verify that this action matches the expected action for the current API endpoint or form submission. If a token generated for a ‘homepage’ action is submitted to your ‘login’ endpoint, it’s a strong indicator of token replay or misuse by a bot trying to bypass your defenses.
Best Practices for action:
- Use Descriptive Names: Make them clear and distinct e.g., login, register, contact_form_submit, product_search, add_to_cart.
- Keep it Consistent: Use the same action string for the same type of interaction across your site.
- Avoid Overly Generic Names: Don’t use a single generic action like ‘form_submit’ for everything, as it diminishes the benefits of action-specific scoring and reporting.
- Limit Unique Actions: While descriptive, don’t create an excessive number of unique actions e.g., hundreds as it can dilute the training data for each. Aim for a manageable set of actions that represent distinct user journeys.

Handling False Positives and Edge Cases

Even with advanced algorithms, reCAPTCHA v3 can sometimes produce false positives blocking a legitimate user or struggle with edge cases.

A robust implementation needs to account for these.

Understanding False Positives: These occur when a legitimate user receives a low score and is mistakenly flagged as a bot. This can happen for various reasons:
- VPN/Proxy Users: Users behind VPNs, corporate networks, or Tor exit nodes might appear suspicious due to unusual IP addresses or traffic patterns.
- New Devices/Browsers: A user logging in from a completely new device or browser might exhibit unusual behavior.
- Automated Accessibility Tools: Some legitimate tools used by disabled users might mimic bot-like behavior.
- Incognito/Private Browsing: These modes limit browser fingerprinting, making it harder for reCAPTCHA to build a confident profile.
- Browser Extensions: Certain privacy-focused extensions can interfere with reCAPTCHA’s ability to collect data.
Strategies for Handling False Positives:
- Secondary Verification Fallback: For users with a score in the “suspicious” range e.g., 0.3-0.7, don’t immediately block them. Instead, implement a fallback verification method. This could be:
  - reCAPTCHA v2 Checkbox: Re-introduce the “I’m not a robot” checkbox or an image challenge. This provides a clear path for a human to prove themselves.
  - Email Verification: Send a confirmation email with a link they must click.
  - SMS OTP One-Time Password: Send a code to their phone for entry.
  - Simple Question/Puzzle: A basic arithmetic question or a “drag and drop” puzzle.
  - Manual Review/Captcha Alternative: For critical cases, consider a manual review process or integrate an alternative CAPTCHA service like hCaptcha, which focuses more on privacy.
- User Feedback Mechanism: Provide a clear error message that explains what happened and offers a way for the user to report a problem if they believe they were wrongly blocked. This helps you identify and address systemic issues.
- Whitelist Known IPs: If you have internal tools or partner systems that access your site programmatically from known IPs, you can whitelist these IPs to bypass reCAPTCHA checks entirely.
- Gradual Implementation: When first rolling out v3, start with a slightly lower threshold and gradually increase it as you monitor the data and gain confidence in its performance.

User Experience and Disclosure

While reCAPTCHA v3 is designed to be invisible, transparency with users is crucial, especially regarding privacy and data collection.

Privacy Policy Update: Clearly state in your website’s privacy policy that you use Google reCAPTCHA and how user data is collected and used. Link to Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service for reCAPTCHA. This is a legal requirement in many jurisdictions e.g., GDPR, CCPA.
- Example Wording: “This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.”
Invisible Badge: By default, reCAPTCHA v3 displays a small badge on the bottom right of your page, indicating its presence. This badge provides transparency.
- Minimizing the Badge Caution Advised: While you can hide the badge using CSS .grecaptcha-badge { visibility: hidden. }, Google strongly advises against this unless you explicitly inform users on every page where reCAPTCHA is used that you are using it and link to Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. If you hide the badge, ensure your disclosure text is prominent and easily accessible.
Error Messages: If a user is blocked or challenged due to a low reCAPTCHA score, provide clear, helpful error messages. Avoid cryptic “Error 403” messages. Instead, explain that “Suspicious activity was detected” and suggest steps they can take e.g., “Please try again,” “If the problem persists, contact support,” or “Complete the reCAPTCHA challenge below”.
Impact on Accessibility: While invisible, ensure your overall implementation remains accessible. For users with screen readers or specific needs, ensure your fallback mechanisms if any are also accessible.

By diligently applying these best practices, you can harness the full potential of reCAPTCHA v3, creating a secure yet user-friendly environment that effectively deters malicious bots while allowing legitimate users to proceed unhindered.

Advanced reCAPTCHA v3 Use Cases and Alternatives

While reCAPTCHA v3 is an excellent general-purpose solution for bot protection, there are scenarios where more advanced configurations or alternative approaches might be necessary.

Understanding these can help you build a more robust and adaptable security posture. Recaptcha v2 documentation

Protecting SPAs Single Page Applications and APIs

Single Page Applications SPAs and direct API endpoints present unique challenges for reCAPTCHA v3 implementation compared to traditional multi-page websites.

Since there are no full page reloads, the client-side reCAPTCHA execution needs to be managed carefully.

SPAs: In an SPA, you typically load the reCAPTCHA script once. Then, you’ll need to decide when to call grecaptcha.execute.

On Component Load: Execute reCAPTCHA when a sensitive component loads e.g., a login form component, a checkout page component.
On User Action: The most common approach is to trigger grecaptcha.execute right before a user interacts with a critical element, such as submitting a form or clicking a “Proceed” button. This ensures a fresh token for each significant action.
Polling Less Common/Recommended: For very high-risk, continuous interactions, you could consider periodically re-executing reCAPTCHA to get fresh tokens, but this can increase network requests and might not be necessary.
Integrating with Frameworks: Libraries like React, Angular, and Vue.js can integrate grecaptcha.execute calls within their lifecycle methods or event handlers.

Example React Component for Form Submission:



import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'.

function ContactForm{ siteKey } {
    const  = useState''.


   const  = useState''.


   const  = useState''.


   const  = useState''.

    useEffect => {


       // Load reCAPTCHA script only once when component mounts


       const script = document.createElement'script'.


       script.src = `https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=${siteKey}`.
        script.async = true.
        document.body.appendChildscript.

        return  => {


           // Clean up script if component unmounts


           document.body.removeChildscript.
        }.
    }, .

    const handleSubmit = async e => {
        e.preventDefault.

        // Execute reCAPTCHA and get token
        if window.grecaptcha {


           window.grecaptcha.readyasync function {


               const token = await window.grecaptcha.executesiteKey, { action: 'submit_contact_form' }.
                setRecaptchaTokentoken.



               // Now submit the form with the token


               const formData = { name, email, message, 'g-recaptcha-response': token }.

                try {


                   const response = await fetch'/api/contact', {
                        method: 'POST',
                        headers: {


                           'Content-Type': 'application/json',
                        },


                       body: JSON.stringifyformData,
                    }.


                   const data = await response.json.
                    if data.success {


                       alert'Message sent!'.


                       // Reset form or redirect
                    } else {


                       alert'Error: ' + data.message.
                    }
                } catch error {


                   console.error'Submission error:', error.


                   alert'An error occurred during submission.'.
                }


           alert'reCAPTCHA not loaded.'.
    }.

    return 
        <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>


           <input type="text" value={name} onChange={e => setNamee.target.value} placeholder="Name" />


           <input type="email" value={email} onChange={e => setEmaile.target.value} placeholder="Email" />


           <textarea value={message} onChange={e => setMessagee.target.value} placeholder="Message"></textarea>


           <button type="submit">Send</button>
        </form>
    .

export default ContactForm.

APIs: For APIs that are consumed by client-side applications web or mobile, the principle is the same: the client obtains the reCAPTCHA token and sends it along with the API request. The API endpoint then performs the server-side verification.
- Mobile Apps: For native mobile apps, you’d typically use Google’s reCAPTCHA Enterprise SDKs Firebase App Check for Android/iOS which integrate more deeply with native app ecosystems, providing app-attestation rather than just user-behavior analysis. For basic reCAPTCHA v3 in a mobile webview, the standard web client-side integration would apply.
- Header vs. Body: When sending the token to your API, you can include it in the request body as g-recaptcha-response or as a custom HTTP header e.g., X-Recaptcha-Token.
- Middleware: Implement reCAPTCHA verification as middleware in your API gateway or framework e.g., Express.js, Django, Laravel. This centralizes the verification logic.

Using reCAPTCHA with Other Security Measures

ReCAPTCHA v3 should be considered one layer in a multi-layered security strategy, not a standalone solution.

Combining it with other measures significantly enhances your overall security posture.

Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting on your API endpoints and forms to prevent brute-force attacks, credential stuffing, and excessive spam submissions. Even if a bot gets a decent reCAPTCHA score, rate limiting will throttle its attempts. Tools like NGINX, Apache, Cloudflare, or specific server-side libraries can help with this.
Web Application Firewalls WAFs: A WAF provides a crucial first line of defense against common web attacks SQL injection, XSS, RFI, LFI, etc. and can often identify and block known bot signatures before they even reach your application. Services like Cloudflare, AWS WAF, or standalone WAF appliances are effective.
IP Blacklisting/Whitelisting: Maintain lists of known malicious IPs blacklist and trusted IPs whitelist. Integrate this with your reCAPTCHA score logic: if an IP is blacklisted, block it regardless of reCAPTCHA score. If whitelisted, bypass reCAPTCHA for speed.
Behavioral Analytics Beyond reCAPTCHA: Implement your own behavioral analytics. Monitor user agents, referrer headers, navigation paths, time spent on pages, and common bot patterns. This can complement reCAPTCHA by identifying unique bot signatures specific to your application.
Honeypot Fields: Add hidden form fields that are visible only to bots via CSS or JavaScript. If a bot fills out this field, you know it’s a bot and can reject the submission, regardless of reCAPTCHA score. This is a very simple yet effective bot trap.
Multi-Factor Authentication MFA: For sensitive accounts e.g., user logins, admin panels, MFA e.g., SMS OTP, authenticator apps is paramount. Even if a bot bypasses reCAPTCHA and gets a user’s password, MFA provides another barrier.
Client-Side Validation Non-Security: While not a security measure against sophisticated bots, basic client-side validation e.g., HTML5 required attributes, JavaScript checks for valid email formats improves user experience and catches simple human errors. Do not rely on it for security.

reCAPTCHA v3 Alternatives

While reCAPTCHA v3 is powerful, it’s owned by Google, which might be a concern for some regarding data privacy or vendor lock-in.

Several excellent alternatives exist, each with its pros and cons.

When considering alternatives, prioritize solutions that respect user privacy, offer robust bot detection, and integrate well with your tech stack.

hCaptcha Privacy-Focused Alternative: Difference between recaptcha v2 and v3
- Pros: Often marketed as a privacy-respecting alternative to reCAPTCHA. It pays website owners for serving challenges though this revenue is typically very small for most sites. It also offers an invisible mode.
- Cons: Challenges can sometimes be more frequent or difficult for users. The challenge images can also be less clear than reCAPTCHA.
- Use Case: Ideal for websites prioritizing user privacy or looking for a non-Google solution.
- Implementation: Similar client-side and server-side flow to reCAPTCHA.
Cloudflare Turnstile Cloudflare’s Managed Challenge:
- Pros: Built by Cloudflare, it leverages their massive network and threat intelligence. It’s designed to be completely invisible and user-friendly, without traditional CAPTCHA challenges for most users. It uses non-intrusive browser tests like Proof-of-Work, detecting browser APIs, etc. to verify humanity. Free for most use cases.
- Cons: Requires using Cloudflare’s network for your site, or at least for specific endpoints.
- Use Case: Excellent for Cloudflare users or those looking for a very hands-off, invisible bot management solution. Integrates seamlessly with Cloudflare’s WAF.
- Implementation: Simple client-side embed, server-side verification.
Custom Honeypot Implementation:
- Pros: Fully custom, no third-party dependencies, very privacy-friendly. Simple to implement for basic bot protection.
- Cons: Not as sophisticated as ML-driven solutions. Can only catch unsophisticated bots that blindly fill all fields. Won’t detect advanced human-like bots.
- Use Case: Supplement to other measures, or for very simple forms with low bot risk.
Time-Based Bot Detection Timestamp Check:
- Pros: Simple to implement.
- Cons: Only effective against bots that submit forms too quickly or too slowly. Easily bypassed by more advanced bots that can simulate human typing speeds.
- Use Case: Can be a small additional layer, but not a primary defense.
Device Fingerprinting and Behavioral Biometrics:
- Pros: Highly sophisticated. Analyzes thousands of data points about a user’s device, browser, and how they interact with the page mouse movements, scroll patterns, typing rhythm. Can detect subtle deviations from human behavior.
- Cons: Very complex to implement in-house. Requires specialized knowledge and significant data analysis. Can be expensive if using third-party services. Raises more significant privacy concerns due to extensive data collection.
- Use Case: High-security applications banking, financial services where extreme fraud prevention is paramount. Examples include services like Arkose Labs, DataDome, or PerimeterX.

When choosing an alternative, consider your specific threat model, budget, technical expertise, and most importantly, your users’ privacy and experience.

For general-purpose bot protection, reCAPTCHA v3 remains a popular and robust choice, but always evaluate if it aligns with your ethical and technical requirements.

Troubleshooting Common reCAPTCHA v3 Issues

Even with careful implementation, you might encounter issues with reCAPTCHA v3. Understanding the common pitfalls and how to diagnose them is crucial for effective deployment.

“reCAPTCHA token missing” or “reCAPTCHA verification failed”

These are common errors indicating a problem in the client-side token generation or the server-side verification process.

Client-Side Issues:
- Script Not Loaded:
  - Symptom: grecaptcha is not defined error in the browser console.
  - Diagnosis: Ensure the <script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=YOUR_SITE_KEY"></script> tag is correctly placed in your HTML and that YOUR_SITE_KEY is your actual Site Key. Check network requests in browser dev tools to confirm the script loads successfully status code 200.
  - Solution: Correct the script tag, ensure the correct Site Key, and check for network blocking e.g., ad blockers, VPNs, corporate firewalls might block google.com/recaptcha.
- grecaptcha.ready Not Used:
  - Symptom: grecaptcha.execute is not a function or similar errors, especially if execute is called immediately after the script tag.
  - Diagnosis: The reCAPTCHA API needs to fully load before grecaptcha.execute can be called.
  - Solution: Always wrap your grecaptcha.execute call within grecaptcha.readyfunction { ... }..
- Incorrect Site Key in execute:
  - Symptom: The token might still be generated, but server-side verification fails with errors like invalid-input-response or bad-request.
  - Diagnosis: Double-check that the YOUR_SITE_KEY in grecaptcha.execute'YOUR_SITE_KEY', {action: '...'} exactly matches the Site Key you registered.
  - Solution: Ensure the Site Key is consistent.
- Token Not Transmitted:
  - Symptom: Server-side receives recaptchaToken as null or undefined.
  - Diagnosis: Ensure you have a hidden input field <input type="hidden" name="g-recaptcha-response" id="g-recaptcha-response"> in your form and that your JavaScript is correctly setting its value to the token received from grecaptcha.execute. For AJAX requests, ensure the token is correctly added to your fetch or XMLHttpRequest body/headers.
  - Solution: Verify the hidden input field’s name and id attributes, and check your JavaScript for setting its value correctly.
Server-Side Issues: Recaptcha not working in chrome
- Incorrect Secret Key:
  - Symptom: Google’s verification response shows success: false and error-codes: or .
  - Diagnosis: The secret parameter sent to Google’s siteverify endpoint is wrong.
  - Solution: Ensure SECRET_KEY on your server exactly matches the Secret Key from your reCAPTCHA Admin Console. Do not expose this key on the client-side!
- Network Issues to Google:
  - Symptom: Your server-side code experiences connection timeouts or network errors when trying to reach www.google.com/recaptcha/api/siteverify.
  - Diagnosis: Check your server’s network connectivity, firewall rules, and DNS resolution. Ensure your server can make outbound HTTPS requests to Google.
  - Solution: Resolve network connectivity issues.
- Token Replay or Duplicate:
  - Symptom: Google’s response shows success: false and error-codes: .
  - Diagnosis: This means the token has already been verified or has expired tokens are typically valid for 2 minutes.
  - Solution: Ensure your client-side generates a fresh token for each significant action/submission. On the server, always verify the token immediately after receiving it and only once. If you’re doing AJAX calls, make sure you’re not trying to reuse an old token.
- Missing remoteip:
  - Symptom: reCAPTCHA scores might be less accurate, or you might see invalid-input-response if Google expects it.
  - Diagnosis: You’re not sending the user’s IP address remoteip with the verification request.
  - Solution: Always include the user’s IP address req.ip in Node.js/Express, or $_SERVER in PHP in your server-side verification request. Be mindful of proxy servers e.g., use X-Forwarded-For header if applicable.
- Domain Mismatch:
  - Symptom: Google’s response shows success: false and error-codes: .
  - Diagnosis: The domain where the reCAPTCHA token was generated as reported by Google does not match the domains you registered for your reCAPTCHA keys.
  - Solution: Ensure the domain where your site is hosted is correctly added to the “Domains” list in your reCAPTCHA Admin Console settings for that key.

Low Scores for Legitimate Users

This is a critical issue that can frustrate users and hurt conversion rates.

Causes:
- VPNs/Proxies/Tor: Users using these services often have suspicious IP addresses or appear to originate from high-risk locations.
- Incognito/Private Browsing: These modes limit browser fingerprinting, making it harder for reCAPTCHA to build a confident user profile.
- Browser Extensions: Privacy-focused extensions, ad blockers, or script blockers can interfere with reCAPTCHA’s ability to collect behavioral data.
- Infrequent Use/New User: Google might not have enough historical data for a new user or a user who rarely interacts with Google services.
- Automated Accessibility Tools: Some legitimate accessibility software can mimic bot-like behavior.
- Aggressive Threshold: Your chosen server-side score threshold might be too high, blocking too many legitimate users.
Solutions:
- Adjust Threshold: Review your reCAPTCHA Admin Console analytics. If many legitimate users are consistently getting scores below your current threshold, consider lowering it slightly. Start with a more permissive threshold and tighten it based on data.
- Implement Fallback/Secondary Verification: For scores in the grey area e.g., 0.3-0.7, instead of outright blocking, present a reCAPTCHA v2 challenge, email verification, or a simple puzzle. This allows legitimate users to prove themselves.
- Monitor and Log: Continuously log reCAPTCHA scores and the outcomes of your internal logic. This helps you identify patterns in low scores and fine-tune your strategy.
- Clear Instructions: Provide clear error messages for users who are blocked, suggesting they try again or contact support.

The reCAPTCHA Badge Issues

The reCAPTCHA badge is part of the v3 implementation and provides visual transparency.

Badge Not Showing:
- Symptom: The small reCAPTCHA badge is not visible on your page.
- Diagnosis: The reCAPTCHA script might not be loaded, or there’s a CSS rule unintentionally hiding it.
- Solution: Verify the script tag is correct. Check your CSS for rules like .grecaptcha-badge { display: none. } or visibility: hidden.. If you intentionally hide it, you MUST explicitly inform users about reCAPTCHA usage and link to Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service as per Google’s requirements. This information should be clearly visible on every page where reCAPTCHA is used.

Badge Interfering with UI:

Symptom: The badge overlaps with other UI elements or is visually unappealing.
Diagnosis: Default badge position might conflict with your layout.

Solution: You can reposition the badge using CSS:

.grecaptcha-badge {
   bottom: 20px !important. /* Adjust as needed */
   left: 20px !important.   /* Or right: 20px */
   /* Add other positioning if required */


Use `!important` to override Google's inline styles if necessary, but be cautious with its use.

Alternatively, as mentioned, you can hide it with proper disclosure.

By systematically troubleshooting these common issues, you can ensure a smooth and effective reCAPTCHA v3 implementation that protects your site without alienating your legitimate users.

Regular monitoring of your reCAPTCHA Admin Console and server-side logs is key to maintaining optimal performance.

Future of Bot Detection and Ethical Considerations

As reCAPTCHA v3 pushes the boundaries of invisible defense, it also highlights important ethical considerations surrounding data privacy, user autonomy, and the arms race between defenders and attackers.

The Evolving Landscape of Bot Attacks

Bots are becoming increasingly intelligent and capable of mimicking human behavior, making traditional detection methods obsolete.

Sophistication of Bots: Modern bots are no longer simple scripts. They leverage:
- Headless Browsers: Chrome, Firefox, or other browsers without a graphical interface, allowing bots to execute JavaScript, render pages, and interact with elements just like a human browser. Tools like Puppeteer and Selenium are frequently used.
- Machine Learning ML: Bots can employ ML to learn successful patterns, adapt to new CAPTCHA challenges, and even solve complex puzzles.
- Residential Proxies: Bots route traffic through legitimate residential IP addresses, making it incredibly difficult to distinguish them from real users based on IP alone.
- Advanced Evasion Techniques: This includes simulating natural mouse movements, randomizing keystrokes, varying delays, and using browser fingerprinting spoofing to evade detection.
Targeted Attacks: Bots are used for a myriad of malicious activities:
- Credential Stuffing: Attempting to log into accounts using stolen username/password combinations. A report by Sift reveals that automated fraud attacks, including credential stuffing, are a leading cause of online fraud, with attacks increasing by 40% year-over-year.
- Account Creation Fraud: Creating fake accounts for spam, phishing, or illicit activities.
- Spam and Phishing: Distributing unwanted content or deceptive messages.
- Content Scraping: Illegally extracting data from websites e.g., prices, product listings, contact information for competitive advantage or resale.
- DDoS Attacks: Overwhelming websites with traffic.
- Ad Fraud: Generating fake ad impressions or clicks.
- Inventory Hoarding: Bots purchasing limited-edition items immediately to resell at inflated prices.

Ethical Considerations in Bot Detection

The pursuit of robust bot detection often involves collecting and analyzing user data, which raises legitimate ethical and privacy concerns.

Data Collection and Privacy: reCAPTCHA v3 works by observing user behavior. This involves collecting data points like IP addresses, browser characteristics, mouse movements, keystroke patterns, and time spent on pages.
- Transparency: It’s crucial for website owners to be transparent about the use of reCAPTCHA and the data it collects. This is why Google mandates the disclosure badge or equivalent text. Users have a right to know how their data is being used.
- Necessity: Is all data collection truly necessary? Defenders must balance security needs with privacy rights. Over-collecting data when simpler methods suffice can be unethical.
Algorithmic Bias and Discrimination: AI/ML models, including those used in reCAPTCHA, can exhibit bias based on their training data. This could potentially lead to:
- Disproportionate Blocking: Certain demographics e.g., users from specific regions, those using older devices, or individuals with accessibility needs might be unfairly flagged as suspicious due to patterns that deviate from the “norm” the model was trained on.
- Accessibility Challenges: While reCAPTCHA v3 is invisible, its fallbacks like v2 challenges can still be inaccessible for some users. The reliance on behavioral cues might also inadvertently penalize users with certain motor disabilities or unique interaction styles.
User Autonomy and Consent: Users generally expect a degree of anonymity and control over their online interactions. The invisible nature of reCAPTCHA v3, while convenient, means users are being constantly evaluated without explicit consent for each interaction.
- Implied Consent: Website terms of service and privacy policies rely on implied consent, but for data-sensitive individuals, this might not be sufficient.
The “Arms Race” Dilemma: As detection mechanisms become more sophisticated, so do the bots designed to bypass them. This creates an ongoing “arms race” that continuously escalates the complexity and invasiveness of both detection and evasion techniques.
- Sustainability: Is this endless escalation sustainable? It raises questions about the long-term viability and ethical implications of increasingly pervasive monitoring.

The Future of reCAPTCHA and Bot Defense

The future of bot detection will likely involve a combination of more sophisticated techniques and a greater emphasis on ethical implementation.

Contextual AI and Behavioral Biometrics: Moving beyond simple mouse movements to deeper analysis of user interaction patterns, intent, and historical behavior. This could involve real-time scoring based on dynamic risk assessments.
Device Attestation and Hardware Trust: Stronger verification of the device itself, leveraging hardware-backed security features to confirm the authenticity of the client. Examples include Firebase App Check for mobile apps.
Federated Learning and Collaborative Intelligence: Sharing threat intelligence across a broader network of websites and security providers in a privacy-preserving way to identify emerging bot campaigns faster.
Blockchain and Decentralized Identity: While still nascent, concepts like decentralized identity could eventually provide more robust and privacy-preserving ways for users to prove their authenticity without relying on centralized third-party services.
Focus on Business Logic Protection: Instead of solely focusing on distinguishing humans from bots, a greater emphasis will be placed on protecting the business logic of an application. This means understanding and preventing specific malicious actions e.g., preventing fraudulent account creation, not just detecting a bot.
Ethical AI Development: A growing focus on developing AI/ML models for security that are fair, transparent, and minimize bias. This includes careful dataset selection and rigorous testing to ensure equitable treatment of all users.
Transparency and User Control: Future solutions will likely offer more explicit consent mechanisms, clearer disclosures, and potentially user-controlled privacy settings to manage how their behavioral data is used for security purposes.

In conclusion, reCAPTCHA v3 represents a powerful step forward in invisible bot defense. Cloudflare free https

However, as developers and website owners, it’s our responsibility to implement these tools not just effectively, but also ethically.

This means being transparent with our users, understanding the nuances of the technology, and constantly evaluating whether our security measures align with our commitment to privacy and a just digital experience.

The ultimate goal should be to protect our digital spaces while upholding the trust and autonomy of our users.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is reCAPTCHA v3 code?

ReCAPTCHA v3 code refers to the client-side JavaScript and server-side verification logic required to implement Google’s reCAPTCHA v3 service, which invisibly verifies user interactions on websites to distinguish humans from bots without requiring explicit challenges.

How does reCAPTCHA v3 work invisibly?

ReCAPTCHA v3 works by monitoring user behavior in the background, analyzing various signals such as mouse movements, keystrokes, IP address, and browsing patterns.

It then assigns a “score” 0.0 to 1.0 to each interaction, indicating the likelihood of it being human, without any direct user interaction.

What are the key differences between reCAPTCHA v2 and v3?

The key difference is the user experience: reCAPTCHA v2 often presents a “I’m not a robot” checkbox or visual challenges image grids, while reCAPTCHA v3 operates entirely in the background, providing a score without any user interaction or challenges.

Do I need a Site Key and a Secret Key for reCAPTCHA v3?

Yes, you need both a Site Key public key for your client-side implementation and a Secret Key private key for your server-side verification.

The Site Key is embedded in your HTML, and the Secret Key is used only on your server.

Where do I get my reCAPTCHA v3 keys?

You obtain your reCAPTCHA v3 Site Key and Secret Key from the Google reCAPTCHA Admin Console by registering your website. Recaptcha help

Can reCAPTCHA v3 block all bots?

No, reCAPTCHA v3, like any security measure, cannot block all bots.

Highly sophisticated bots can sometimes mimic human behavior or use advanced evasion techniques.

It should be part of a multi-layered security strategy.

What does the reCAPTCHA v3 score mean?

The reCAPTCHA v3 score is a float value from 0.0 to 1.0. A score of 1.0 indicates a very high likelihood of the user being a human, while 0.0 indicates a very high likelihood of being a bot.

You define a threshold for what score is acceptable for an action.

What is a good score threshold for reCAPTCHA v3?

There is no universal “good” score threshold.

It depends on the sensitivity of the action and your risk tolerance.

For high-value actions login, checkout, you might use 0.7 or 0.8. For less sensitive actions contact forms, 0.5 or 0.6 might suffice. You should monitor your analytics and adjust.

How do I implement reCAPTCHA v3 on the client-side?

On the client-side, you load the reCAPTCHA API script with your Site Key <script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=YOUR_SITE_KEY"></script>, and then use JavaScript within grecaptcha.ready to execute grecaptcha.execute'YOUR_SITE_KEY', {action: 'your_action'} to obtain a token, which you then send to your server.

How do I verify the reCAPTCHA v3 token on the server-side?

On the server-side, you send a POST request to https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/siteverify with your secret key, the response token from the client, and optionally the remoteip. You then parse Google’s JSON response to check success, score, and action. Cloudflare what does it do

Can I hide the reCAPTCHA v3 badge?

Yes, you can hide the reCAPTCHA v3 badge using CSS `.grecaptcha-badge { visibility: hidden.

}`. However, if you hide the badge, you are required by Google to explicitly inform users on every page where reCAPTCHA is used that you are using it and link to Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

What is the `action` parameter in reCAPTCHA v3 and why is it important?

The action parameter e.g., login, submit_form is a string you define to describe the user’s current interaction.

It helps Google’s algorithms provide a more accurate score by understanding the context of the action.

Crucially, you should verify this action matches the expected action on your server-side to prevent token misuse.

What happens if reCAPTCHA v3 returns a low score for a legitimate user?

If a legitimate user receives a low score a false positive, your server-side logic should ideally not block them immediately.

Instead, you might implement a secondary verification step, such as prompting them with a reCAPTCHA v2 challenge, email verification, or a simple puzzle.

How do I troubleshoot “timeout-or-duplicate” error codes?

This error means the reCAPTCHA token has expired or has already been verified.

Ensure your client-side JavaScript generates a fresh token for each submission or relevant action, and your server-side code only verifies each token once immediately after receiving it.

Can reCAPTCHA v3 be used with Single Page Applications SPAs?

Yes, reCAPTCHA v3 is well-suited for SPAs. V2 recaptcha

You load the script once, and then you can call grecaptcha.execute whenever a user performs a significant action within your SPA e.g., submitting a form, navigating to a sensitive section.

Is reCAPTCHA v3 suitable for protecting APIs?

Yes, reCAPTCHA v3 can protect APIs.

The client application web or mobile obtains the reCAPTCHA token and sends it with the API request.

The API endpoint then performs the server-side verification using the Secret Key.

What are some alternatives to reCAPTCHA v3?

Alternatives to reCAPTCHA v3 include hCaptcha often more privacy-focused, Cloudflare Turnstile Cloudflare’s managed challenge, custom honeypot implementations, and more advanced solutions like device fingerprinting or behavioral biometrics services.

Does reCAPTCHA v3 affect website performance?

ReCAPTCHA v3 loads asynchronously and runs mostly in the background, so its direct impact on page load times is usually minimal.

However, the network request for token generation and server-side verification adds a small latency to the overall transaction time.

How often should I check my reCAPTCHA v3 analytics?

You should regularly check your reCAPTCHA v3 analytics in the Google Admin Console, especially after making changes to your website or if you notice an increase in spam.

Daily or weekly checks are advisable to monitor score distribution and identify emerging bot patterns.

What data does reCAPTCHA v3 collect?

ReCAPTCHA v3 collects various user data points to assess behavior, including IP address, browser type and version, screen resolution, operating system, mouse movements, keystrokes, pages visited on the site, and the time spent on those pages. Captcha api key free

This data is used to analyze patterns indicative of human versus bot activity.

Recaptcha v3 code