Urinator.com Review

Based on looking at the website Urinator.com, it is clear that the primary purpose of the products offered is to assist individuals in passing urine tests, specifically by providing synthetic urine and devices to maintain its temperature.

The site explicitly states its intent to “protect your privacy of a genetically predisposed medical condition” through “substitution,” implying a means to bypass or manipulate drug screenings or similar tests.

This activity is widely considered unethical and often illegal, depending on the context of the test e.g., employment, probation, legal requirements. Engaging in such practices can lead to severe consequences, including job loss, legal penalties, and a breach of trust.

From an ethical perspective, especially in the context of integrity and honesty, using products designed for deception is highly discouraged.

Instead, individuals should always strive for truthfulness and transparency in all their dealings.

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Urinator.com Review Latest Discussions & Reviews:

Overall Review Summary:

• Website Focus: Primarily sells synthetic urine and urine-warming devices.
• Stated Purpose: “Protecting your privacy of a genetically predisposed medical condition” via “substitution” in urine tests.
• Ethical Concerns: Highly questionable due to its intent to facilitate deception in official tests.
• Legality: Potentially illegal depending on local laws and the context of the urine test.
• Reliability Claim: Claims 25+ years of proven results.
• Product Offerings: The Urinator original and The Urinator BT Bluetooth-enabled.
• Customer Support: Offers phone support and claims confidentiality.
• Guarantee: Provides a guarantee on its products.
• Pricing: Original at $169.95, BT version at $239.95.

The Urinator.com website presents itself as the official manufacturer of “The Urinator,” a “digitally temperature controlled one of a kind, state of the art, electronic urine-warming device.” The site emphasizes its longevity, claiming “25+ years” of success against “every test that’s thrown at it.” While the website attempts to frame its product as a privacy protection tool, the explicit mention of “fake pee kit,” “synthetic urine,” and “helping you pass urine tests” leaves little doubt about its true function.

Such products are designed to circumvent legitimate testing procedures, which is fundamentally at odds with principles of honesty and integrity.

Rather than seeking ways to deceive, focusing on personal accountability and addressing any underlying issues responsibly is always the better path.

Best Alternatives for Ethical Conduct and Well-being:

Instead of engaging with products designed for deception, which carry significant ethical and legal risks, consider these ethical and beneficial alternatives that promote personal growth, well-being, and genuine solutions:

• Educational Resources on Ethics and Integrity
  • Key Features: Books, online courses, and academic journals focusing on moral philosophy, ethical decision-making, and professional integrity.
  • Average Price: Varies widely, from free online articles to $50+ for comprehensive textbooks or courses.
  • Pros: Fosters personal growth, builds character, enhances reputation, provides tools for sound decision-making.
  • Cons: Requires time and commitment to study and apply principles.
• Meditation and Mindfulness Tools
  • Key Features: Guided meditation apps, mindfulness journals, meditation cushions, and sound machines.
  • Average Price: Free apps with basic features to $100+ premium apps, physical tools.
  • Pros: Reduces stress, improves focus, promotes self-awareness, encourages peaceful living.
  • Cons: Requires consistent practice for noticeable benefits.
• Physical Fitness Equipment
  • Key Features: Resistance bands, yoga mats, dumbbells, jump ropes, and fitness trackers.
  • Average Price: $20-$200, depending on the specific equipment.
  • Pros: Enhances physical health, boosts mood, increases energy levels, promotes discipline.
  • Cons: Requires dedication and proper form to avoid injury.
• Career Development and Skill-Building Platforms
  • Key Features: Online courses e.g., Coursera, Udemy, LinkedIn Learning, professional certifications, and workshops.
  • Average Price: Free introductory courses to $1000+ certification programs.
  • Pros: Improves job prospects, enhances professional skills, offers legitimate pathways to career advancement.
  • Cons: Can be time-consuming and require financial investment for advanced programs.
• Healthy Living and Wellness Guides
  • Key Features: Cookbooks for nutritious meals, guides on sleep hygiene, stress management techniques, and holistic health.
  • Average Price: $10-$50 for books and guides.
  • Pros: Supports overall well-being, prevents health issues, encourages sustainable lifestyle changes.
  • Cons: Requires consistent effort and commitment to adopt new habits.
• Journaling and Self-Reflection Tools
  • Key Features: Guided journals, blank notebooks, and pens designed for reflective writing.
  • Average Price: $10-$30.
  • Pros: Aids in emotional processing, clarifies thoughts, supports goal setting, promotes gratitude.
  • Cons: Requires regular commitment to see significant benefits.
• Volunteering Opportunities
  • Key Features: Local community service organizations, non-profits, and charitable initiatives. Note: This is a category for finding opportunities, not a product on Amazon.
  • Average Price: Free time commitment.
  • Pros: Fosters a sense of purpose, builds community, helps others, provides valuable experience.
  • Cons: Requires dedication and finding suitable opportunities that align with one’s schedule and values.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Unpacking Urinator.com: A Closer Look at Its Purpose

Urinator.com positions itself as a solution for individuals facing urine tests, but its true intent is to facilitate deception rather than provide a legitimate health or privacy service.

The website’s content, while couched in terms like “privacy” and “genetic profiling,” quickly reveals its core offering: synthetic urine and devices designed to warm it to body temperature for the purpose of “passing” tests.

This immediately raises significant ethical red flags.

In many professional and legal contexts, submitting a falsified sample is considered fraud, with severe repercussions ranging from immediate dismissal from employment to criminal charges.

The promotion of such products encourages dishonesty and undermines the integrity of testing systems designed for safety, fairness, and accountability. Bookphaz.com Review

The Questionable Premise of “Privacy Protection”

The claim that Urinator.com’s products are for “protecting your privacy of a genetically predisposed medical condition” attempts to justify their use. However, this justification is tenuous at best.

• Context of Testing: Most urine tests, especially in employment or legal settings, are not primarily focused on genetic profiling. They are typically screening for substances e.g., drugs, alcohol or specific medical conditions relevant to the context of the test.
• Lack of Transparency: True privacy protection involves clear policies, consent, and secure data handling, not the submission of false biological samples. Misrepresenting a sample is a form of deception, not a legitimate privacy safeguard.
• Legal Implications: Depending on the jurisdiction and the specific test, submitting a fake sample can be a criminal offense. For instance, in some U.S. states, the manufacture, sale, or use of synthetic urine with the intent to defraud a drug test is illegal. Data from the National Conference of State Legislatures NCSL indicates that as of 2023, at least 32 states have laws addressing synthetic urine, with penalties ranging from fines to jail time. This underscores the serious legal risks associated with such products.

Urinator.com’s Stated Features and Their Underlying Intent

The website highlights several “features” of its products, but each is ultimately geared towards facilitating circumvention:

• Digitally Temperature-Controlled Warming: The Urinator and Urinator BT are marketed as “digitally temperature controlled” devices that “maintain the correct testing temperature for a minimum of four hours.”
  • Purpose: This feature is crucial because urine samples are often temperature-checked at collection to ensure they are fresh and from a human body. Maintaining the correct temperature typically between 90°F and 100°F or 32°C and 38°C is a key factor in making synthetic urine appear legitimate.
• “Reusable, Reliable, and Superior”: The site boasts the product’s reusability and claims it’s “by far the most superior product on the market.”
  • Implication: This suggests a focus on repeated deception, encouraging users to rely on the product for multiple instances of test evasion.
• Urinator BT with Bluetooth and App Control: The “Next Generation” Urinator BT offers app-based temperature monitoring and remote heating control.
  • Enhancement for Deception: The Bluetooth feature provides “peace of mind” by allowing discreet temperature checks, further aiding the user in passing off synthetic urine as real. This advanced functionality shows a deliberate effort to make the deceptive act easier and less detectable.

The focus on these features clearly demonstrates that the product is not about health or genuine privacy, but about enabling individuals to falsify test results.

This aligns with a pattern of behavior that can lead to distrust and negative consequences.

The Urinator.com Deceptive Model

Urinator.com operates on a model that inherently promotes deception. Tramitareta.com Review

While they market their products as “privacy protection,” the core utility lies in helping users submit a false sample during a legitimate test.

This goes against fundamental principles of honesty and transparency, which are cornerstones of ethical conduct in any society.

When an individual takes a test, whether for employment, legal compliance, or medical reasons, there’s an implicit understanding that the results will be accurate and truthful.

Products like The Urinator directly undermine this trust.

How Urinator.com Promotes Deception

The website’s content, while carefully worded in some sections, clearly outlines its role in bypassing standard testing procedures: Rehabbingo.com Review

• “Helping you pass urine tests”: This phrase is central to their marketing, explicitly stating the product’s purpose. It implies assisting individuals in achieving a “pass” result, regardless of actual physiological conditions or substance use.
• “Synthetic urine”: The consistent mention of “fake pee kit” and “synthetic urine” throughout the site confirms that the user is not submitting their own biological sample. This is the essence of deception in a urine test scenario.
• “Substitution is the only way to be 100% sure”: The site directly compares “substitution” with “detox with some sort of toxin rid process,” asserting that substitution is “the only way to be 100% sure of not exposing your genetic information during a test.” This not only promotes using a fake sample but also dismisses other albeit potentially ineffective methods, pushing users towards active misrepresentation.
• “Protecting your privacy of a genetically predisposed medical condition”: While this might sound benign, it’s a justification for avoiding detection of anything in one’s system, not just medical conditions. In contexts where a clean test is required for employment or legal compliance, this “privacy” is a euphemism for evading accountability.
• “Against every test that’s thrown at it”: This boast, claiming over 25 years of success, suggests a product designed to bypass various testing methods, not just those for specific “medical conditions.” It implicitly promises to outsmart testing protocols.

The Ethical Fallout of Deception

Engaging in deceptive practices, even if framed as “privacy protection,” has a ripple effect that extends beyond the individual.

• Loss of Trust: Employers, legal systems, and healthcare providers rely on the integrity of test results. When tests are compromised, it erodes trust in individuals and the systems designed to ensure safety and fairness. For example, if a job requires a drug-free environment for safety reasons e.g., operating heavy machinery, a false negative due to synthetic urine could lead to accidents and endanger others.
• Legal Consequences: As previously noted, many jurisdictions have made the sale and use of synthetic urine for fraudulent purposes illegal. The penalties can be significant, including fines, imprisonment, and a permanent criminal record. Such consequences can severely impact future employment, housing, and personal freedoms. According to a 2022 report by the National Drug-Free Workplace Alliance, over 70% of U.S. employers conduct some form of drug testing, highlighting the widespread expectation of honesty in this context.
• Moral Compromise: For individuals, engaging in deception can lead to a compromised moral compass. While seemingly a “quick fix,” it can foster a habit of avoiding responsibility and seeking shortcuts, which is detrimental to long-term personal and professional growth.
• Negative Societal Impact: Widespread use of such products can lead to a less transparent and accountable society, where rules and regulations are perceived as easily circumvented, potentially leading to a breakdown in order and fairness.

Instead of resorting to such means, individuals facing tests or conditions that might lead to unfavorable results should consider upfront honesty, seeking help e.g., addiction counseling, legal advice, or pursuing legitimate pathways that uphold integrity.

Urinator.com: Pricing and Value Proposition

Urinator.com offers two primary products: The Urinator original and The Urinator BT.

The pricing reflects a specialized, technologically enhanced solution designed to circumvent testing procedures.

However, the “value” derived from these products is inherently tied to an unethical purpose, making any discussion of their worth problematic from a moral standpoint. Diagor.com Review

The Urinator Pricing Structure:

• The Urinator Original: $169.95
  • This is the basic model, described as a “digitally temperature controlled… electronic urine-warming device.”
  • It promises to maintain the correct temperature for a minimum of four hours.
• The Urinator BT Bluetooth Version: $239.95
  • This “Next Generation” model includes Bluetooth connectivity for smartphone monitoring Android only and remote control.
  • It offers “peace of mind” by allowing users to check the temperature discreetly.

The Problematic “Value Proposition”:

The “value” offered by Urinator.com is the perceived ability to “pass” urine tests through deception.

From an ethical perspective, there is no true value in facilitating dishonesty.

• Short-Term Gain, Long-Term Risk: While the product might offer a temporary solution to pass a test, the long-term risks are substantial. These include job loss, legal penalties, damage to reputation, and a compromised moral standing. The financial cost of the product $169.95-$239.95 pales in comparison to the potential legal fines that can run into thousands of dollars, or the loss of a career earning potential.
• Investment in Deception: Paying for such a product is an investment in a deceptive act. True value comes from genuine solutions, honest effort, and legitimate pathways to success. For example, investing in education or skill development offers a tangible return in career advancement and personal growth, unlike a product designed to circumvent accountability.
• Lack of Genuine Problem Solving: The product does not address any underlying issues that might lead an individual to fear a urine test e.g., substance abuse, legal issues. Instead, it provides a means to avoid confronting these problems, which can perpetuate harmful cycles. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration SAMHSA, only about 10% of people with substance use disorders receive specialized treatment, indicating a significant gap where genuine solutions are needed instead of deceptive workarounds.

Therefore, while Urinator.com charges a premium for its technology, the “value” it delivers is a dangerous illusion built on a foundation of dishonesty, leading to potentially severe negative outcomes.

Urinator.com: Why Ethical Concerns Outweigh Any Perceived Benefits

The primary function of Urinator.com’s products is to enable deception in urine tests.

This fundamental objective immediately places the website and its offerings in a morally questionable category. Sixteeninches.com Review

From an ethical standpoint, any “benefits” derived from successful deception are fleeting and ultimately overshadowed by significant risks and negative implications.

It’s crucial to understand why this type of product is universally discouraged in environments that value integrity and truthfulness.

The Core Ethical Compromise

• Undermining Honesty: The most significant ethical concern is the direct promotion of dishonesty. Whether for employment, legal, or medical purposes, urine tests rely on the assumption that the submitted sample is genuine. Using synthetic urine, warmed to body temperature to mimic a real sample, is an active act of misrepresentation. This behavior erodes trust in individuals and the systems designed to ensure safety and fairness.
• Legal Ramifications: Many U.S. states and federal regulations explicitly prohibit the use, sale, or manufacture of devices and substances intended to defraud drug tests. For instance, laws in states like Texas HB 1076 and Indiana IC 35-43-5-11 classify the sale or possession of synthetic urine with intent to defraud as a misdemeanor or even a felony. The “benefits” of passing a test are quickly negated by potential fines, imprisonment, and a criminal record, which can severely impact future employment, housing, and personal freedoms.
• Professional Integrity: In professional settings, integrity is paramount. Employees are expected to be truthful, especially regarding conditions that might affect their ability to perform job duties safely and effectively. Using a product like The Urinator demonstrates a clear lack of professional integrity and can lead to immediate termination if discovered, regardless of the test outcome. A 2021 survey by the Society for Human Resource Management SHRM found that 89% of HR professionals consider integrity a critical trait for employees, highlighting the importance of honesty in the workplace.
• Health and Safety Risks: In contexts where drug testing is for safety-sensitive positions e.g., transportation, healthcare, heavy machinery operation, a false negative due due to synthetic urine can put lives at risk. An individual under the influence could potentially cause harm to themselves or others, solely because a test was circumvented.
• Moral Degradation: Consistently choosing deception, even for seemingly minor benefits, can degrade an individual’s moral character over time. It can normalize dishonest behavior and make it harder to distinguish between right and wrong in other aspects of life.

The Illusion of “Benefits”

While the website might imply “benefits” such as “passing a test” or “protecting privacy,” these are merely the immediate outcomes of a deceptive act, not genuine advantages.

• “Passing a Test”: This is a false accomplishment. The test is not passed based on the individual’s actual condition but on the successful substitution of a fake sample. This provides no resolution to any underlying issues that might have prompted the need for a deceptive measure.
• “Privacy Protection”: As discussed, this is a mischaracterization. Legitimate privacy involves controlling personal information through lawful and transparent means, not through falsifying official documents or tests. The website’s framing of “genetic profiling” as the primary threat is a diversion from the more common reasons for urine tests, which are typically substance screening or medical compliance.

In conclusion, Urinator.com’s products offer a path of least resistance for individuals seeking to avoid accountability.

However, this path is fraught with ethical compromises, legal dangers, and a profound disservice to personal integrity. Daviswoolfe.com Review

The fleeting advantage of “passing” a test through deceit is a poor exchange for the significant and lasting negative consequences that can arise.

Urinator.com: The Inevitable Downsides of Deception

While Urinator.com markets its products as foolproof solutions for passing urine tests, the reality is that relying on deception carries a multitude of significant and often irreversible downsides.

There are no true “pros” when the core function of a product is to circumvent ethical and legal standards.

Instead, users are exposed to a range of cons that far outweigh any perceived short-term gain.

The Obvious and Hidden “Cons”:

• Legal Repercussions: This is perhaps the most critical downside. Many U.S. states and even federal regulations have laws against using or selling synthetic urine with the intent to defraud a drug test. Penalties can range from significant fines e.g., $500 to $5,000 to imprisonment e.g., 6 months to 2 years. A criminal record can severely impact future employment opportunities, housing, and even professional licensing. According to data from the National Conference of State Legislatures NCSL, over 30 states have enacted laws prohibiting or penalizing the use of adulterants or synthetic urine to defraud drug tests.
• Job Loss and Career Damage: If an employer discovers that a fake sample was submitted, immediate termination is highly probable, regardless of the test outcome. This can lead to a ruined professional reputation, making it difficult to secure future employment, especially in industries that conduct background checks and drug screenings. Even if not legally prosecuted, the loss of trust can be irreparable.
• Ethical and Moral Compromise: Using products like The Urinator promotes dishonesty and circumvents legitimate testing processes. This can lead to a personal ethical decline, making it easier to engage in other deceptive behaviors. For individuals, this can manifest as increased anxiety, guilt, and a constant fear of exposure.
• Financial Waste: The cost of The Urinator $169.95 or The Urinator BT $239.95 is a direct expenditure on a product that promotes dishonesty. This money could be invested in legitimate self-improvement, professional development, or seeking genuine solutions to whatever underlying issues led to the need for a urine test.
• Loss of Trust and Relationships: If family, friends, or colleagues discover the deceptive act, it can severely damage relationships built on trust and respect.
• No Resolution to Underlying Issues: The product offers a temporary evasion, not a solution. If the reason for the test is related to substance abuse or behavioral issues, using synthetic urine only delays confronting and addressing these problems, potentially leading to more severe consequences down the line.

In essence, while Urinator.com promises a shortcut, it delivers a pathway laden with significant legal, professional, and personal risks. Regainsoftware.com Review

The “downsides” are not mere inconveniences but potentially life-altering consequences that far outweigh any fleeting sense of relief from passing a test deceptively.

Alternatives to Deception: Embracing Integrity and Legitimate Solutions

When faced with situations that might require a urine test, especially those related to substance use or compliance, the ethical and ultimately more effective approach is to embrace integrity and seek legitimate solutions, rather than resorting to deceptive products like those offered by Urinator.com.

True success and peace of mind come from confronting challenges honestly and proactively.

Why Choose Legitimate Pathways?

• Personal Integrity: Choosing honesty over deception builds character and self-respect. It aligns an individual’s actions with their moral compass, leading to greater peace of mind and genuine confidence.
• Legal Compliance: Adhering to laws and regulations protects individuals from severe legal repercussions, including fines, imprisonment, and criminal records, which can have long-lasting negative impacts on one’s life.
• Professional Trust: In the workplace, integrity is highly valued. Employers prefer employees who are truthful and accountable. Demonstrating honesty, even in challenging situations, builds a strong professional reputation and fosters trust.
• Addressing Root Causes: Instead of merely avoiding a test, legitimate alternatives encourage individuals to address the underlying reasons for their concern. This could involve seeking treatment for substance use, managing health conditions responsibly, or transparently communicating with employers or legal authorities.
• Long-Term Well-being: Genuine solutions lead to sustainable positive outcomes. Whether it’s improved health, a stable career, or healthier relationships, integrity fosters a foundation for long-term well-being.

Ethical and Productive Alternatives:

Instead of considering synthetic urine products, individuals should explore these constructive and ethical alternatives:

1. Seeking Professional Help for Substance Use: Oliflix.com Review

   • Description: If concerns about a urine test stem from substance use, the most responsible and effective long-term solution is to seek professional addiction counseling, therapy, or rehabilitation programs. These services offer medical and psychological support to address dependency, develop coping mechanisms, and achieve sobriety.
   • Resources: Organizations like the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration SAMHSA offer a National Helpline 1-800-662-HELP and online resources to find treatment centers. Many employers also offer Employee Assistance Programs EAPs that provide confidential counseling services.
   • Pros: Addresses the root cause, leads to long-term sobriety, improves overall health, fosters personal growth, rebuilds trust.
   • Cons: Requires commitment, can be challenging, may involve significant lifestyle changes.

2. Open Communication and Transparency:

   • Description: In situations involving employment or legal tests, open and honest communication with the relevant parties employer, probation officer, legal counsel can sometimes be a viable option, especially if issues are addressed proactively.
   • Process: Discuss concerns, explain any mitigating circumstances, and inquire about alternative solutions or accommodations. While not always possible, honesty can sometimes lead to understanding or alternative pathways.
   • Pros: Preserves integrity, avoids legal consequences of deception, builds trust, can lead to constructive solutions.
   • Cons: May not always lead to the desired immediate outcome, requires courage and transparency.

3. Detoxification Natural and Medically Supervised:

   • Description: For individuals who have recently used substances and are facing a test, natural detoxification through hydration, healthy diet, and exercise can help. For more serious situations, medically supervised detox programs ensure safety and effectiveness.
   • Mechanism: The body naturally processes and eliminates substances over time. Boosting this process safely can be an option, but it requires time and is not a guaranteed quick fix.
   • Pros: Natural process, no synthetic substances, can be part of a healthy lifestyle change.
   • Cons: Not always reliable for immediate testing, requires time, some substances have long detection windows, medical supervision is essential for safety in severe cases.

4. Understanding Testing Policies and Rights:

   • Description: Educate yourself about the specific testing policies of the employer or legal entity. Understand your rights and any procedures for retesting or appeals. Legal counsel can provide valuable guidance.
   • Resources: Consult with legal aid services, employment lawyers, or human resources departments for clarity on policies.
   • Pros: Empowers individuals with knowledge, ensures fair treatment, helps navigate complex situations legitimately.
   • Cons: Requires research, may still lead to unfavorable outcomes if policies are strict.

5. Focusing on a Drug-Free Lifestyle:

   • Description: For individuals seeking employment or maintaining positions where drug tests are standard, committing to a drug-free lifestyle is the most straightforward and ethical long-term solution.
   • Benefits: Ensures readiness for any test, promotes health and well-being, eliminates the need for deceptive measures, fosters peace of mind.
   • Pros: Guarantees successful test outcomes, improves health, eliminates anxiety about testing, aligns with ethical principles.
   • Cons: Requires sustained commitment and discipline.

Ultimately, while the allure of a quick fix might be tempting, the ethical and practical costs of using products like The Urinator are far too high. Celominer.biz Review

Embracing integrity and seeking genuine solutions will always lead to more positive and sustainable outcomes.

FAQ

What is Urinator.com’s primary purpose?

Urinator.com’s primary purpose is to sell products, specifically synthetic urine and electronic urine-warming devices, designed to help individuals “pass” urine tests by substituting a fake sample for a real one.

Is using products from Urinator.com ethical?

No, using products from Urinator.com is not ethical.

Their core function is to facilitate deception in official tests, which goes against principles of honesty, integrity, and transparency.

Are products like The Urinator legal to use?

The legality of using products like The Urinator varies by jurisdiction. Many U.S. Instamosaicstudio.com Review

States have laws prohibiting the sale, manufacture, or use of synthetic urine with the intent to defraud drug tests, classifying such actions as misdemeanors or felonies.

What are the potential consequences of using synthetic urine to pass a test?

Potential consequences include job termination, legal penalties fines and imprisonment, damage to one’s professional reputation, and a compromised moral standing.

Does Urinator.com offer a guarantee?

Yes, Urinator.com states on its website that it is the manufacturer and the “only one with a guarantee” for The Urinator product.

How much does The Urinator original cost?

The Urinator original is listed on the website for $169.95.

What is the difference between The Urinator and The Urinator BT?

The Urinator BT is a “Next Generation” version of The Urinator that includes Bluetooth connectivity, allowing users to monitor the temperature on their phone Android only and turn the heating on/off remotely. It costs $239.95. Nadalinacosmetics.com Review

Does Urinator.com claim its products are reusable?

Yes, the website states that The Urinator kit is “reusable, reliable and by far the most superior product on the market!”

How long does The Urinator claim to maintain temperature?

The Urinator claims to maintain the correct testing temperature for a minimum of four hours on one set of batteries.

What kind of support does Urinator.com offer?

Urinator.com offers free, confidential telephone support to customers who buy direct from them.

What is “genetic profiling” according to Urinator.com?

Urinator.com briefly mentions “genetic profiling” as something “substitution is the only way to be 100% sure of not exposing your genetic information during a test,” implying that their products prevent the exposure of one’s genetic data.

Can synthetic urine be detected by laboratories?

Yes, despite claims of reliability, synthetic urine can often be detected by laboratories. Aqx.com Review

Modern testing protocols analyze various parameters beyond just temperature, such as specific gravity, creatinine levels, and pH, to identify artificial or adulterated samples.

What are ethical alternatives to using synthetic urine for a test?

Ethical alternatives include seeking professional help for substance use, engaging in open and transparent communication with relevant parties, pursuing natural or medically supervised detoxification, and committing to a drug-free lifestyle.

Does Urinator.com offer products other than the main device?

Yes, the website mentions “Urinator pee refills” and “Dr John’s synthetic urine” as additional products available for purchase.

How long has The Urinator product been on the market?

The Urinator product claims to have been proven “time and time again over the last 25+ years,” indicating its presence since at least 1998.

Is “Next Day Shipping” available from Urinator.com?

Yes, Urinator.com prominently advertises “NEXT DAY SHIPPING AVAILABLE!” for its products. Bazodo.com Review

What is the company behind Urinator.com?

The website indicates that the manufacturer is Innovative Research Technology, Inc., and the copyright notice for the website is also attributed to this entity.

Does the Urinator BT work with iOS Apple phones?

No, the website explicitly states that the Urinator BT’s phone monitoring feature is “Android only.”

What are some common reasons people might consider using products like Urinator.com?

People might consider using such products due to fear of failing a drug test, potential job loss, legal repercussions, or simply to avoid personal accountability for substance use.

Why is integrity important when facing tests?

Integrity is important because it fosters trust, upholds ethical standards in professional and legal contexts, avoids severe legal and career consequences, and contributes to one’s overall moral well-being and peace of mind.

Cirk-l.com Review